RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.59 Released

Hi Eric, Just an FYI: The https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html file is missing. https://httpd.apache.org/security/ Thanks, Steve Bush From: covener Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 6:54 AM To: annou...@httpd.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.59

Re: libapreq subproject roll call

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 09:51, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 2:11 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > > > I count myself as a release vote of last resort only, but i don't > > think we should be committing to future fixes/releases if nearly > > everyone is in this category. > > +1, since

RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

/../include" /I "../../server" /I "../database" /I "../ssl" /I "../../srclib/apr/include" /I "../../srclib/apr-util/include" /D "_DEBUG" /D "WIN32" /D "_WINDOWS" /Fo"$(INTDIR)\\" /Fd"$(INTDIR)\

RE: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56

%20 (path or query string) or + (query string) does eliminate the problem for our mappings. From: Eric Covener Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 8:31 PM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56 On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 11: 02 PM BUSH Steve wrote: Corr

RE: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56

but it might be worth updating the mod_rewrite documentation on this? From: BUSH Steve Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 7:45 PM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56 I just completed upgrading to 2. 4. 56 from 2. 4. 55 and now we are ha

RE: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56

I just completed upgrading to 2.4.56 from 2.4.55 and now we are having problems with existing mod_rewrite directives that use parameter substitution: An example of a mod_rewrite declaration we have is: RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} GET [NC] RewriteRule ^/zoology/animals/reset/(\d+)$

RE: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56

Please remember to send the release announcement to annou...@httpd.apache.org From: Eric Covener Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 3:51 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56 I am going to call this one early and proceed with the release. 9

Re: [RESULT: PASS] Re: [VOTE] Release libapreq2-2.17

On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 09:58, Joe Orton wrote: > > Thanks for testing. The release is approved: > > PMC votes: +1 from ylavic, jfclere, jorton > > I will promote the release and announce it. > Thanks for this release. I didn't get round to uploading it to CPAN yet, but a bug report has come in

Announcing new releases on annou...@httpd.apache.org

ounced in October, 2021 However, each of 2.4.51, 2.4.52, and 2.4.54 were not announced. Can I please ask for the person or people who are responsible for the releases to make sure that they also announce the releases on the announce@ mailing list. Thank you in advance, Steve Bush This email a

[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.43 RC1

As a preliminary to making a new mod_perl release, I am updating Apache-Test. Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.43 release candidate. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.43-rc1.tar.gz MD5 = 44d976ae19d5ab2879e43a26a360366b SHA1 =

Re: [RESULT: PASS] Re: [VOTE] Release libapreq2-2.16

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 14:37, Steve Hay wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 14:33, Joe Orton wrote: >> >> Thanks for testing again, the vote has passed: >> >> PMC votes: +1 from rpluem, ylavic, jorton >> Community: +1 stevehay >> >> I'll

Re: [RESULT: PASS] Re: [VOTE] Release libapreq2-2.16

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 14:33, Joe Orton wrote: > Thanks for testing again, the vote has passed: > > PMC votes: +1 from rpluem, ylavic, jorton > Community: +1 stevehay > > I'll promote the release & send the announcement mail. > Thanks for this, and sorry for the hassle in wanting another

Re: [VOTE] Release libapreq2-2.16

On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 16:07, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:05:16PM +, Joe Orton wrote: > > Hi, I've prepared a candidate release tarball for libapreq2 v2.15 here: > > You can see I'm still an amateur at this - should read ^^ v2.16 > Many thanks for rolling out this

Re: [RESULT: PASS] Re: [VOTE] Release libapreq2-2.15

On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 10:20, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 03:57:25PM +, Steve Hay wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 16:43, Joe Orton wrote: > > > > > > Thanks all for testing, the vote has passed: > > > > > > PMC votes +1: ylav

Re: [RESULT: PASS] Re: [VOTE] Release libapreq2-2.15

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 16:43, Joe Orton wrote: > > Thanks all for testing, the vote has passed: > > PMC votes +1: ylavic, rpluem, covener > Community +1: stevehay > > (Steve, looks like we need to get you on the httpd PMC!) > > and no -1 votes. > > I'll promote th

Re: [VOTE] Release libapreq2-2.15

On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 16:39, Joe Orton wrote: > > Hi, I've prepared a candidate release tarball for libapreq2 v2.15 here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/libapreq/ > > This release is mainly to address a security issue in libapreq2 which > has been outstanding for over a year,

Re: Trouble building 2.4.41 on Windows with CMake

: > However, it fixed it by ignoring most of the troubles... I have my IP > unblocked, > so I'm able to get some further fixes in, I added the iterator, confirmed > the > newest fixes and have committed to trunk and 2.4.x. Steve, please retest > and > report back? > > There is no s

Re: Trouble building 2.4.41 on Windows with CMake

Thanks to you both - that was indeed the trouble, and the fix has sorted it out for me. On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 08:16, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > Added to trunk in r1866119. > Merged to 2.4.x in r1866121. > > Thanks for this, Bill! > > > Am 29.08.2019 um 19:05 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > > >

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.42 RC1

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 14:10, Steve Hay wrote: > > Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.42 > release candidate. > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.42-rc1.tar.gz > > MD5 = 2dd753a50d94ee1705

[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.42 RC1

apache_test_config.pm for recent perls in which '.' is no longer in @INC by default. [Steve Hay]

Re: Breakage in httpd 2.4.39/windows/cmake?

On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 21:41, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Because of some trouble on another project, I wanted to recheck > the current nghttp2 build between our mutual dependencies and > httpd... and something isn't looking so healthy in the CMake > build of the last release. (But I did answer

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.41 RC1

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 22:07, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > > Tested on Fedora 30 with Apache/2.4.39, looking good to me > > That's my +1 > Thanks to all for testing. With the +1 from Adam Prime (sent privately) that's enough :-)

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.41 RC1

On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 08:45, Steve Hay wrote: > > Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.41 > release candidate. > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.41-rc1.tar.gz > +1 from me using the following setups: VC++ 2013 32-bit, P

[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.41 RC1

Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.41 release candidate. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.41-rc1.tar.gz MD5 = 7933d3a6a762f087bf7883a1ac2086eb SHA1 = 17aa9a8669023aa2f485aa83f8f389969b8e5f0c Major changes in this release are as follows: Set

Re: Absorb win32-apxs into httpd distro?

On 14 December 2016 at 08:13, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Randy wrote http://www.apache.org/dist/perl/win32-bin/ - but I'm wondering > who else here at httpd is interested in helping maintain and get this code > into our own distribution? I've shipped this for a decade for my

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2-2.14 RC

On 5 December 2016 at 16:14, Issac Goldstand wrote: > Builds and passes all tests on linux x64 with: > > Perl/5.18 Apache/2.2.31 mod_perl/2.10 > Perl/5.24 Apache/2.4.23 mod_perl/2.10 > > I'm +1 on release All successful on Win32 (x64) / VC10 with: perl-5.25

Re: apreq release

[Resending from an address that's actually subscribed to the lists...] The current mod_perl release (2.0.10) is taken from trunk. (The httpd24 branch was only for development work leading towards the previous release (2.0.9), and is now obsolete.) On 17 November 2016 at 09:03, Issac Goldstand

Re: apreq release

[Resending from an address that's actually subscribed to the lists...] The current mod_perl release (2.0.10) is taken from trunk. (The httpd24 branch was only for development work leading towards the previous release (2.0.9), and is now obsolete.) On 17 November 2016 at 09:03, Issac Goldstand

Re: apreq release

On 15 November 2016 at 09:26, Issac Goldstand wrote: > Hi all, > > Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with > Apache 2.4 and requested a change. Given that we haven't released an > updated apreq in nearly 6 years, I'm inclined to make/test the

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

On 24 August 2016 at 18:02, Steve Hay <steve...@apache.org> wrote: > Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.40 > release candidate. > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.40-rc1.tar.gz > +1 on Win8/VC10 with default configura

[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

) in META.yml. [Steve Hay, CPAN RT#111359] Fix broken POD. [Steve Hay] Switch argument order in "openssl gendsa". [rjung] Add (limited) checks for *_SAN_*_n and *_DN_Email variables. [kbrand] Update key sizes and message digest to what is common in 2015. [kbrand]

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://www.naans-curries.com/except.php?93> Steve Wan Cheung

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.39 RC1

On 8 April 2015 at 18:04, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: On 8 April 2015 at 14:24, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.39 release candidate. http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/Apache-Test-1.39-rc1.tar.gz

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.39 RC1

On 8 April 2015 at 14:24, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.39 release candidate. http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/Apache-Test-1.39-rc1.tar.gz Success on Windows with VC++ 2010 using perl-5.20.2 with/without LWP

[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.39 RC1

() implementation available by using the Apache::Test::need_fork() function. [Steve Hay] CPAN RT#87620: Add -D APACHE2_4 to identify httpd-2.4. [Michael Schout]

Re: Was there any concrete decision on apreq?

nothing. Most mod_perl users (I think) install apreq via Apache2::Request. That can continue to be maintained on CPAN, as is, linking against httpd instead of mod_apreq Or do you forsee a problem here? On 2/24/2015 9:56 AM, Steve Hay wrote: What would this mean for mod_perl users? I, and I

Re: Was there any concrete decision on apreq?

What would this mean for mod_perl users? I, and I assume many others(?), still use the perl glue part of libapreq in mod_perl software. I only just spotted this thread, and just wondered how such mod_perl users will be affected, if at all. On 24 February 2015 at 03:24, Joseph Schaefer

RE: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads

) return ProxyWebsocketAsyncDelay timeout has wrong format; return NULL; } The same issue looks like it applies to the ProxyWebsocketIdleTimeout setting as well. - Steve From: Edward Lu [mailto:chaos...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 11:38 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re

RE: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads

I removed the apr_pollset_remove() call on line 1978 of event.c. So far it is working fine for me. Thanks Edward. - Steve Edward Lu wrote: Seems like the solution is just to remove the extra apr_pollset_remove(); all sockets are removed from the pollset when one of them is signalled

RE: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads

, 9, {EPOLLIN, {u32=2843796944, u64=2843796944}}) = 0 [pid 15451] gettimeofday({1406038173, 745832}, NULL) = 0 [pid 15451] futex(0x891ec88, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 38, NULL unfinished ... - Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Zweep Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 11:56 AM To: 'dev

RE: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads

by the second. When I then send a message from the second client I see a flood of messages from the server that had been queued. - Steve -Original Message- From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 8:16 AM To: Apache HTTP Server Development List

RE: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads

. The same results were observed. - Steve -Original Message- From: Eric Covener [cove...@gmail.com] Sent: July 17, 2014 9:15 PM To: Apache HTTP Server Development List Subject: Re: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads I am having

RE: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads

to this before Monday though. - Steve -Original Message- From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:51 PM To: httpd Subject: Re: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads Hi Steve, can you still reproduce with the latest APR 1.5.x, notably containing

Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads

into what is going on here would be helpful. I noticed that there have been a number of recent changes both to the event mpm and mod_proxy_wstunnel. Perhaps there are still some known issues with this code? Thanks - Steve --- Steve Zweep | Senior Software Engineer WatchGuard

RE: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads

Thanks Eric. BTW, the test setup I have is fairly simple. The websocket server just echoes received messages from any client to all connected clients. I just connect 2 clients and send a message to the server from one. A tcpdump shows the correct packets are sent by the server. - Steve

RE: Question about async mod_proxy_wstunnel and threads

I checked out was quite recent, and I did confirm I had all the latest fixes in place. I'll send logs and annotations once I've collected them. Thanks Eric. - Steve From: Eric Covener [cove...@gmail.com] Sent: July 17, 2014 9:15 PM To: Apache HTTP Server

Re: error in Apache::TestSSLCA, cannot build libapreq

I don't know about the event MPM one, I'm afraid - that isn't used on Windows. On 24 June 2014 08:53, Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net wrote: Awesome! Are the other anomalies that Mark reported yesterday also Apache::Test-land? Issac On 24/06/2014 10:48, Steve Hay wrote: I just

Building 2.4.7 on Windows

I'm trying to build 2.4.7 on Windows with VC++ 2010 but have run into a problem building mod_proxy_fcgi.so. I'm following the same process as I previously used with success for 2.4.6: build pcre, apr and apr-util (the latter two from the -deps archive), then httpd itself (using Jeff Trawick's

Re: Building 2.4.7 on Windows

On 17 February 2014 14:48, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 17, 2014 9:18 AM, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: I'm trying to build 2.4.7 on Windows with VC++ 2010 but have run into a problem building mod_proxy_fcgi.so. I'm following the same process as I previously

Re: Choosing a stronger password hash algorithm

end users. Make it easy to build a FIPS compliant httpd without patches and help put consultants like me out of business :-) -Steve M. -- Steve Marquess OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc. 1829 Mount Ephraim Road Adamstown, MD 21710 USA +1 877 673 6775 s/b +1 301 874 2571 direct marqu

Re: Choosing a stronger password hash algorithm

: when you don't do all your cryptography via a specific crypto library (OpenSSL, NSS, etc.) then FIPS 140-2 compliance goes from trivial (for 2.4) to messy. Not generally a problem outside of the U.S., but it very much matters anywhere in the U.S. government market. -Steve M. -- Steve Marquess

modules registry

Hi, I've recently taken over maintenance of an apache module and want to update it's entry in the registry. I have a feeling the user signup is not working properly, and the 'forgot password' link definitely isn't. steve

RE: VS2010 release builds of Apache/mod_perl crash on Vista/2008/Win7

Steve Hay wrote on 2011-02-07: Steve Hay wrote on 2011-02-07: Steve Hay wrote on 2011-02-04: William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-02-04: On 2/4/2011 3:49 PM, Steve Hay wrote: It looks like the original environ[] was allocated by msvcr100.dll using something other than a function matching

RE: VS2010 release builds of Apache/mod_perl crash on Vista/2008/Win7

William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-02-08: On 2/8/2011 8:29 AM, Steve Hay wrote: +int len = (int)strlen(newarr[arg]) + 1; +*env = (char*)_malloc_dbg(len * sizeof(char), _CRT_BLOCK, __FILE__, __LINE__); +strcpy_s(*env, len, newarr[arg]); That's just sick ... It's

RE: VS2010 release builds of Apache/mod_perl crash on Vista/2008/Win7

Steve Hay wrote on 2011-02-04: William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-02-04: On 2/4/2011 3:49 PM, Steve Hay wrote: It looks like the original environ[] was allocated by msvcr100.dll using something other than a function matching the HeapFree() function where the crash finally happens. The CRT code

RE: VS2010 release builds of Apache/mod_perl crash on Vista/2008/Win7

Steve Hay wrote on 2011-02-07: Steve Hay wrote on 2011-02-04: William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-02-04: On 2/4/2011 3:49 PM, Steve Hay wrote: It looks like the original environ[] was allocated by msvcr100.dll using something other than a function matching the HeapFree() function where

VS2010 release builds of Apache/mod_perl crash on Vista/2008/Win7

++ test.exe!__tmainCRTStartup() Line 555 + 0x17 bytes C Can anyone shed any light on what the problem is? In particular, can it be fixed (or at least worked around) in the Apache code, or is this a problem with msvcr100.dll? Steve test.cpp Description: test.cpp

RE: VS2010 release builds of Apache/mod_perl crash on Vista/2008/Win7

William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-02-04: On 2/4/2011 4:51 AM, Steve Hay wrote: The crash comes here (which is exactly where the Apache/mod_perl setup was crashing): msvcr100.dll!free(void * pBlock) Line 51 C msvcr100.dll!__crtsetenv(char * * poption, const int primary

RE: VS2010 release builds of Apache/mod_perl crash on Vista/2008/Win7

William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-02-04: On 2/4/2011 3:49 PM, Steve Hay wrote: Yes, Apache, Perl and mod_perl were all brand-new builds done one immediately after another on the same machine, using the same VS2010 installation for them all. I presume by Apache you mean httpd as well

Re: mod_ssl OCSP tuning (Re: TR of 2.3.10)

for out-of-band responder keys. As it is I've had to hack in a fix to ignore the expired self-signed cert. -Steve M. -- Steve Marquess OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc. 1829 Mount Ephraim Road Adamstown, MD 21710 USA +1 877-673-6775 marqu...@opensslfoundation.com

Re: RFC: drop support for OpenSSL 1.0 in trunk/2.3?

but nothing solid yet, but I'm confident it will happen eventually. In the meantime, dropping support for 0.9.8 will force many government sector Apache users elsewhere. -Steve M. -- Steve Marquess OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc. 1829 Mount Ephraim Road Adamstown, MD 21710 USA +1 877-673

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2

Joe Schaefer wrote: Please test and vote on http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz.asc These should have the .deps directories removed, but otherwise the source is unchanged. Fred, try running make install before

RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?

Joe Schaefer wrote: - Original Message From: Steve Hay steve...@planit.com To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com; apreq-...@httpd.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 4:03:40 AM Subject: RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12? Joe Schaefer wrote: I cut a tarball from trunk

RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?

Joe Schaefer wrote: - Original Message From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com To: Steve Hay steve...@planit.com; apreq-...@httpd.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 6:46:33 AM Subject: Re: Volunteer for RMing 2.12? - Original Message From: Steve Hay To: Joe

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Randy Kobes wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Steve Hay wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet? I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet: http://marc.info

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet? I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet: http://marc.info/?l=apreq-devm=123244555902865w=2

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Issac Goldstand wrote: Please give the tarball at http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq2-2.11.tar.gz a try and report comments/problems/etc. to the apreq-dev list at apreq-...@httpd.apache.org. I have a build error using VC++ 2005 on Win32 with perl-5.10.0, apache-2.2.10,

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq 1.34-RC4

I didn't vote because AFAIK I don't actually have a vote. I have commit access, but I'm not a PMC member and therefore have no vote. Is that correct? -Original Message- From: Issac Goldstand [mailto:mar...@beamartyr.net] Sent: 07 January 2009 13:24 Cc: APREQ List Subject: Re: [RELEASE

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.10 RC1

Bojan Smojver wrote: It has been over two years since the latest apreq2 release, so it is time to get some new code out the door. Numerous bugs were fixed (see the full list in the CHANGES file) since the last official release (2.08), so please give us feedback on this release candidate.

Re: CRL verification in mod_ssl

is the one that is referenced the most. -Steve M. -- Steve Marquess Veridical Systems, Inc. 1829 Mount Ephraim Road Adamstown, MD 21710 301-524-9915 cell 301-831-8447 land/fax [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [community] 2.3.0 alpha on October 1?

(Speaking of pet peeves -- why does Apache handle so many things besides HTTP, and yet I have to get other servers to handle certain kinds of HTTP requests because Apache doesn't handle it well?) 100K concurrent requests, kept open.

Re: [community] 2.3.0 alpha on October 1?

Our latest builds, on some fairly modest hardware, are actually about twice as fast as numbers I posted last time async-vs-threads came up. Apache can very easily fill multiple gigE interfaces on modest hardware. We can sustain about 45k requests/sec on our build on a dual dual-core system

mod_ssl and OCSP stapling

OSSI has been working with the OpenSSL team (Dr. Steve Henson) to support OCSP stapling (RFC 3546, section 3.6 Certificate Status Request) for the Mozilla foundation. To date OCSP stapling has been implemented in the OpenSSL dev branch and will appear in the upcoming 0.9.8g release. We're now

RE: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?

Perl 5.9.5 contains numerous changes to support building with MSVC80. These changes will be in 5.8.9 when that gets released, but 5.10 is looking distinctly likely to be released before it (and, of course, will also contain the changes). Steve From: Jorge

RE: Building with Visual Studio 2005

I think it is fixed in svn. The changes would be in the *.dsp files, not Makefile.win, and e.g. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/httpd.dsp does indeed have manifest stuff in it. So fingers crossed for 2.2.5... Thanks, Steve From: Jorge

Building with Visual Studio 2005

Does anyone have a set of makefiles for building apache httpd 2.2.4 with Visual Studio 2005 on Win32? I just tried running nmake /f Makefile.win INSTDIR=C:\apache2.2 installr out of the box and I find that it all builds OK but the binaries didn't get the manifest files embedded in them, so when

Windows Vista support?

Has any development been done for supporting Windows Vista yet, or is it planned by anyone soon? The reason I ask is that the server doesn't seem to run as a service on Windows Vista. I logged this as a bug and asked about it on the user mailing too recently, but had no reply to either, so

Re: Windows Vista support?

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Steve Hay wrote: Has any development been done for supporting Windows Vista yet, or is it planned by anyone soon? Hi Steve. Do you mean are we accepting patches to solve problems on Vista? Sure. Do you mean is there a person assigned to resolve such issues

Re: AW: Windows Vista support?

2.2 compatibility with vista and add your observations there. Steve - I'll give you another out that might be useful. Because at this point it seems to be less-than-bugs, more-than-gotchas to running vista (many people are, successfully) - let's start a tracking page at http://wiki.apache.org

Re: AW: Windows Vista support?

off and I installed it as I usually do by compiling the source and running httpd.exe -k install. I've had someone report that opening and admin console (cmd.exe with admin rights) works aswel. But you allready tried the later. On 5/2/07, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've already overcome

Re: AW: Windows Vista support?

. Note the errors or messages above, and press the ESC key to exit. 19... Steve Hay wrote: I've already overcome the difficulties of *installing* apache, much as you describe below, and I also found that if you create a batch file to run the MSI and then run that batch file as an administrator

Re: AW: Windows Vista support?

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Steve Hay wrote: I've already overcome the difficulties of *installing* apache, much as you describe below, and I also found that if you create a batch file to run the MSI and then run that batch file as an administrator (using the runas command) then things work

Re: AW: AW: Windows Vista support?

Mario Brandt wrote: Hello, Using Apache 1.x I had it running in a command prompt (i.e. just typing apache.exe), but the service wouldn't start. I never tried 1.x. For myself I think it is out of date. Using Apache 2.2.4, I can't start it either way so far. Do you actually have the server

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq 1.34-RC2

Issac Goldstand wrote: The apreq developers are planning a maintenance release of libapreq1. This version primarily addresses an issue noted with FireFox 2.0 truncating file uploads in SSL mode. Please give the tarball at http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq-1.34-RC2.tar.gz a try and

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq 1.34-RC1

Issac Goldstand wrote: Please give the tarball at http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq-1.34-RC1.tar.gz a try and report comments/problems/etc. to the apreq-dev list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] All tests OK on WinXP (VC6) with perl-5.8.8, apache-1.3.34 and mod_perl-1.29. --

Re: apreqXXXXXX temp files remain after processing uploads greater than 256kb. Further large upload fails

Randy Kobes wrote: On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Steve Hay wrote: I tried your patch with the current svn version (revision 518242), but I'm still seeing intermittent failures (usually in tests 15, 16 and/or 20) either when I run nmake test from the top-level, or when I run: perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib

Re: apreqXXXXXX temp files remain after processing uploads greater than 256kb. Further large upload fails

Randy Kobes wrote: On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Joe Schaefer wrote: Randy, do you know why we use the APR_FILE_NOCLEANUP flag? Maybe we should just remove that and see if it fixes the problem Vinay is seeing. Hi Steve, and all, If you remember from http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t

Re: What do you think about Lighttpd?

Ah, OK so I shouldn't panic until a browser ships with pipelining enabled by default. HTTP pipelining would be nice, as in limited tests, it had a nice performance increase on sites with lots of little images/css/etc. On 3/1/07, Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- steve [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: What do you think about Lighttpd?

On 2/27/07, Arnold Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nick already told you, that Apache allows you to choose. So simply use the fast-cgi/mpm-event combo, if you like that best. And if you want to evangelize the combo, nobody is stopping you. I use this and it works fine. However: 1. The event

Re: What do you think about Lighttpd?

I use it too, and have meddled with it enough at a source level to feel comfortable running it. It has obvious, documented, problems (don't use it with mod_ssl), I didn't make it clear earlier -- I do use the event mpm. Successfully. What *is* the problem with mod_ssl anyway??? I have used the

Re: FastCGI

, steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is Apache considering including a FastCGI module? Apache includes a CGI module, but not FastCGI. And the FastCGI module that is available does not compile with Apache 2.2 (yes, I know the ways around that). One of the advantages of Lighttpd is that it has built

Re: FastCGI

Seriously, that would be great, now all you need is someone to actually work on it... Well, I looked doing it just so I could track down some odd behavior that occurs under FastCGI on rare occasions. The current code would need a few changes to the source: 1. Compile on Apache 2.2 [easy] 2.

Re: How to retrieve the posted variables using the apache module...

You should take a look at ap_setup_client_block, ap_should_client_block and ap_get_client_block. Here is a small code snippet that should get you started... static int BUFSIZE = 65536; if ( ap_setup_client_block(r, REQUEST_CHUNKED_DECHUNK) == OK ) { if (

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: Apache-Test-1.29-RC3

Philip M. Gollucci wrote: A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.29-rc3 is now available. http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.29-rc3.tar.gz All tests OK on Win32 using perl-5.8.8, apache-1.3.34 and mod_perl-1.29. -- Radan

Re: Rusty perl question

Patrick Galbraith wrote: Hi all, I used to know the trick, I think, but can't remember. I want to code my application to be smart about whether it's on a system that can use mod_perl2/apreq, or if I have to use CGI. I 've code my app to use CGI successfully, but would like to keep the code

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.09-RC2

All OK on Win32 using apache-2.2.2, perl-5.8.8 and mod_perl-2.0.3-RC2 -- Radan Computational Ltd. The information contained in this message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have

Re: Reading POST request without destroying it?

/mod_php is invoked. I've included the code I'm using below, if there is anything immediately visible I'd appreciate pointers .. Steve -- http://www.steve.org.uk/ tatic const char * mod_ifier_parse_read_post_payload(request_rec *r, const char **rbuf) { apr_bucket_brigade *bb; int

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: libapreq2 2.09-RC1

Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Please download, test, and report back on the following candidate tarball: http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09-rc1.tar.gz All tests OK on Win32 (on a single run, at least--I'm not sure if the previous problems with upload.t have gone away or

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC4

Randy Kobes wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote: Randy Kobes wrote: Also, just to verify that it is the stray temp files left over that are causing the problem, does it help if you change the APR_EXCL flag in the call to apr_file_mktemp on about line 832 of library/util.c

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC4

Randy Kobes wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote: Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level nmake test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's not just running the test multiple

  1   2   >