lördagen den 11 augusti 2007 skrev Jim Jagielski:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through August 14, 2007...
+/-1 (x == +1)
[ ]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Oden Eriksson
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. August 2007 13:56
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release
candidate tarballs for review
But for some reason and only under our build system HTTP::DAV
is not found
torsdagen den 16 augusti 2007 skrev Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Oden Eriksson
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. August 2007 13:56
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release
candidate tarballs for review
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 07:49:54PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through August 14, 2007...
+/-1 (x ==
Hi,
That is what I am finding with thi set of prereleases.
One exaple http://www.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl
And another
http://ns2.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl
it seems to me that you have not setup syswatch properly since the red and
green pictures for the bars are missing; this does
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 03:02:31AM +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
That is what I am finding with thi set of prereleases.
One exaple http://www.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl
And another
http://ns2.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl
it seems to me that you have not setup syswatch properly
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 03:02:31AM +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
That is what I am finding with thi set of prereleases.
One exaple http://www.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl
And another
http://ns2.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl
it seems to me that you have not setup syswatch properly
Hi Doc,
I may need some pointers on this.
well, that's simple:
IIRC the syswatch script uses a very small picture to create the read and green
bars; I dont see these bars, but instead my browser displays a place holder,
and that suggests me that you have not setup the path or the rights for
Hi,
Further I do find in my logs:
[Tue Aug 14 18:25:26 2007] [error] [client
1800:0:a8b4:d608:84a5:5748:6875:408]
client denied by server configuration: /var/www/docs/vispan/queue.gif,
referer:
http://www.nk.ca/vispan/
[Tue Aug 14 18:25:26 2007] [error] [client
The tarballs and related files for 2.0.60 have been
removed from testing...
Depending on the speed in which APR 0.9.15, we may
go ahead with a fully combined 1.3/2.0/2.2 release
(as originally planned) or release 1.3/2.2 earlier
than 2.0...
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:02:53 -0400
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depending on the speed in which APR 0.9.15, we may
go ahead with a fully combined 1.3/2.0/2.2 release
(as originally planned)
Rushed schedules lead to more bugs ...
or release 1.3/2.2 earlier
than 2.0...
Hello,
view from a small commercial vendor:
[ ]httpd-2.2.5
dropped into custom buildsystem for proprietary solution; passed
integrety check, compilation, regression tests, application testing plus
manual inspection without so much as a burp.
Best regards,
Andreas
--
flatline IT
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Montag, 13. August 2007 14:54
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release
candidate tarballs for review
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:02:53 -0400
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Aug 13, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Montag, 13. August 2007 14:54
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release
candidate tarballs for review
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:02:53
On Aug 10, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
Good PGP signatures on all. Good MD5 hashes on all, although you
seem to have used md5 for 1.3 and md5sum for the others, resulting
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Aug 10, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
Good PGP signatures on all. Good MD5 hashes on all, although you
seem to have
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Also, all the way through 1.3.37 the 1.3 drop has been available in
.tar.gz and .tar.Z compressed format, never in .tar.bz2.
By design and on purpose, I dropped .Z in favor of bz2...
I wanted similar distros available.
When this came up last time, we decided to retain
On Aug 13, 2007, at 1:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Also, all the way through 1.3.37 the 1.3 drop has been available in
.tar.gz and .tar.Z compressed format, never in .tar.bz2.
By design and on purpose, I dropped .Z in favor of bz2...
I wanted similar distros
On Aug 10, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[ ]httpd-2.2.5
2.2.5 Prefork is now running on issues.apache.org, running Ubuntu
Dapper, and holding up nicely:
http://issues.apache.org/server-status
Not that we expected otherwise. (:
S.
--
Sander Temme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP
On 08/11/2007 01:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through August 14, 2007...
+/-1 (x == +1)
[ ]
On 08/11/2007 01:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through August 14, 2007...
+/-1 (x == +1)
[ ]
On Aug 12, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
-1 from me on 2.0.60 as the test framework revealed regressions
compared to 2.0.59:
What platform? Trying to recreate this...
These regression are caused by an apr problem. 2.0.59 is shipped
with apr 0.9.12 whereas
2.0.60 is
On 08/12/2007 05:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 12, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
-1 from me on 2.0.60 as the test framework revealed regressions
compared to 2.0.59:
What platform? Trying to recreate this...
Sorry for omitting:
SuSE Linux 32 Bit:
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
On 11 Aug 2007, at 00:49, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[ ]httpd-2.0.60
Not tested (moot in view of Ruediger's -1)
[ ]httpd-2.2.5
+1 Linux and MacOS. Fails two Perl tests on Mac (security/CVE-2004-0959
and apache/pr18757), but that appears to be down to my perl
installation.
--
All fine for httpd-2.2.5 (VS2005 through the command line), except for this:
T:\httpd-2.2.5\httpd-2.2.5\srclib\apr\include\apr_want.h(52): Could not find
the
file strings.h.
T:\httpd-2.2.5\httpd-2.2.5\srclib\apr\include\apr_want.h(85): Could not find
the
file sys/uio.h.
+1 for the 2.2.5 tarball: good signature, test suite passes on
Linux/x86_64, looks sane from manual inspection.
joe
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 11 August, 2007 01:49
Subject: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release candidate tarballs for
review
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist
]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 11 August, 2007 01:49
Subject: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release candidate tarballs for
review
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected
Gustavo Lopes wrote:
All fine for httpd-2.2.5 (VS2005 through the command line), except for
this:
T:\httpd-2.2.5\httpd-2.2.5\srclib\apr\include\apr_want.h(52): Could not
find the
file strings.h.
T:\httpd-2.2.5\httpd-2.2.5\srclib\apr\include\apr_want.h(85): Could not
find the
file
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through August 14, 2007...
+/-1 (x == +1)
[ ]apache_1.3.28
[ ]httpd-2.0.60
[ ]
On Aug 10, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[ ]apache_1.3.28
Obviously, that should have been
[ ] apache_1.3.38
:)
Hi Jim,
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
I found a very small build problem which is caused by my own fault (I tested
wrong before);
what happens is that we changed recently the distribution directory to
/apache22, but
32 matches
Mail list logo
