7;d keep autoRefresh=true in all the scenarios, where
Karaf is used as "application server" and switch it to autoRefresh=false in
µservices / custom distro / single start mode. And looking forward Karaf 5
and new feature mechanism, I'd rather turn autoRefresh off in Karaf 5..
Too late for Christmas wishes, but I'd like to wish you all happy New Year
- the year without face masks, the year of Linux on Desktop™, Karaf 5, Pax
Web 8 and Half Life 3 ;)
Let us all forget about 2020 asap!
kind regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 24 gru 2020 o 19:01 Geaaru napisał(a):
&g
Hello
I'm progressing well with simplification/stabilization of WAB support in
Pax Web 8.
Here's a draft schema of how it works now with Pax Web 7
1) Bundles with Web-ContextPath manifest header are "tracked" as "web apps"
2) web.xml parsing (if such descriptor is available) is performed in the
Hello
Great idea! I'd be glad to join in reasonable hours ;)
And +1 for quick summary of the "state of OSGi".
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 16 gru 2020 o 00:43 Bernd Eckenfels
napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> Yes this sounds interesting, would like to listen in.
>
> BTW
+1 (binding)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 15 gru 2020 o 14:39 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> +1 (binding)
>
> Gently reminder about this vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 14 déc. 2020 à 06:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit
> :
> >
> &g
r-war, so the lifecycle is
simplified and matches what I did in pax-web-extender-whiteboard.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 15 gru 2020 o 14:40 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> As you have probably seen, Apache Karaf Decanter 2.6.0 is in vote.
>
> Now, I’m focus on Ka
+1
Thanks!
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 2 gru 2020 o 18:51 Francois Papon
napisał(a):
> +1
>
> Thanks JB!
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 02/12/2020 à 06:18, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit :
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I prepare
Thanks JBO - this looks cool and gives nice summary!
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 9 lis 2020 o 17:03 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> I did a quick blog post about what’s new in Apache Karaf 4.3.0:
>
> http://blog.nanthrax.net/?p=1038 <http://blog.nanthrax.ne
l, I like the features I just don't know how
the future looks like. So I'm happy to help with low level issues - whether
these are bundle wirings or thread deadlocks. I trust you guys about where
you'll lead Karaf ;)
kind regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 9 lis 2020 o 08:40 Jean-Ba
e runtime, tooling, …), but I would love to have feedback
> from the community to drive the roadmap.
>
> Thanks Greg ! You made my day ;)
>
:)
I'll definitely think outside of OSGi box after I finish my current
assignment (work).
regards
Grzegorz
> Regards
> JB
>
> &g
think about OSGi ;)
If I was asked to help shaping Karaf 5, I'd still think OSGi-first...
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 4 nov. 2020 à 06:27, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit
> :
> >
> >>
> >> don’t think OSGi focus
> >>
> >
to be influenced or influence for now ;)
>
> So, I would love your overall thinking in term of approach, features,
> vision, and again generally speaking (don’t think OSGi focus, or one
> particular use case, more global).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 4 nov. 2020 à 06:09
Hello
Great news! Is this branch already available in Karaf's git repo?
regards and stay safe!
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 4 lis 2020 o 05:59 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> François and I started to think about Karaf 5 and give an even modern
> flavor to
Hello, answers inline.
wt., 27 paź 2020 o 12:00 Robert Varga napisał(a):
> On 27/10/2020 11:27, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> >> On 26/10/2020 17:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >> What is the story with servlet-api, though? pax-w
ot;servlet-api compatibility bundle"
that adds package exports for javax.servlet.* to provide 3.1.x version.
For now I think Pax Web 7.3.x needs both versions of servlet API...
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
- war support (based on finished Whiteboard and HttpService support)
- tests for preprocessors
- review war: and webbundle: schemes in pax-url
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 27 paź 2020 o 04:24 Mark Derricutt napisał(a):
> Wooohoo! Mega-congrats to everyone involved on this.
>
> Now to
+1
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 7 paź 2020 o 14:42 Jamie G. napisał(a):
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:37 AM Francois Papon
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > François
> > fpa...@apache.
7;m finally ready (but need to do some other work for a while) to tackle
pax-web-extender-war. It (as it does in Pax Web 7) build upon existing
registerXXX() methods of WebContainer, but with new batch support.
thanks for patience and best regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 7 paź 2020 o 10:35 Jean-
I'd stick to explicit approach for now and leave "implicit" one for later ;)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 28 wrz 2020 o 11:08 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Just to be clear: today I’m using an "explicit" approach, where the config
> conta
Just my random observation,
because I can't dig this problem further for now ;)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 28 wrz 2020 o 10:51 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> In order to easily use Karaf in docker container, I created the following
> PR:
>
> htt
t API 4
is ... Jetty 10 which at the same time requires JDK 11.
I wrote about Pax Web 7.3.x as being a "technical preview" here:
https://groups.google.com/g/ops4j/c/6nF78NKs2qA/m/oRUxNtSyAQAJ
I hope this clears the confusion and decreases my guilt ;)
kind regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pt., 4 wrz 2
ntainer but it would be http
> whiteboard compatible and still support JSF, JSP, etc..
>
No need to change anything what's already in master-improvements branch. I
added some filterchains to handle security and preprocessors, so everything
is ready, but nothing has to be adjusted for
+1
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 2 wrz 2020 o 08:23 Francois Papon
napisał(a):
> +1
>
> Thanks JB!
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 02/09/2020 à 06:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit :
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I prepare
se
customizers (most importantly - dynamic "ServletContext.addServlet()"
according to Whiteboard specification should throw
UnsupportedOperationException - so bye bye JSFs).
I already have an idea how to "fix" this, but this will again delay Pax Web
8 a bit.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
Thanks - that's strange...
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 25 sie 2020 o 09:41 Francois Papon
napisał(a):
> Hi Grzegorz,
>
> Your Apache login seems to be disabled:
>
> https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=ggrzybek
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@a
Hello
I've just received a github notification with "You have been removed from
the @The Apache Software Foundation organization" information.
Do you know what may be the reason? Did you get such notification too?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wrapped with
Whiteboard filters and will integrate with what I've already refactored.
So please give me a little more time! I don't want to sacrifice great work
others already did (Achim, Mark, Guillaume, JBO, Stephan, Harald and others
from https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/
uot;no" means it is not and will not be implemented. Empty cell means the
implementation is still in progress.
[image: image.png]
best regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
Hello
And I've JUST sent an email about Pax Web 8 state ;)... I'll forward to
karaf-dev as well.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 20 sie 2020 o 15:23 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> As we are getting close to Pax Web 8.0, I think it’s the good timing to
>
+1 (binding)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 17 sie 2020 o 16:12 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 17 août 2020 à 09:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit
> :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache Karaf
e
discussion already moved to something different ;)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 28 lip 2020 o 18:33 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> Yeah, leader/follower (similar to Kafka wording) sounds good.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 28 juil. 2020 à 18:09, Matt Pavlovich
uot;main"
branch" seem in line with "main()" function. "trunk" is SVN thing and
"default" reminds me of the "index.html" vs "default.asp" debate hundreds
of years ago...
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
---
[1]:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/github-
But please don't use "trunk" - these days should be long gone ;)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 27 lip 2020 o 16:19 Serge Huber napisał(a):
> wow I didn't think of the git branch name !
>
> But default seems to make more sense than main to me.
>
> Regards,
&g
a8e] Initial commit
$ git branch -vv
* master f402a8e Initial commit
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 27 lip 2020 o 15:21 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> It sounds good, main is fine.
>
> I will do the rename and update documentation/website.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> >
/features/karaf-features-processing-1.0.0.xsd#L37-L39
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 27 lip 2020 o 08:45 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use the next major release to do the change (4.3.0), as
> it’s not really backward compatible.
>
> Regards
> JB
&
p2*:
[badServlet][null][null][x461][/c3/yikes][461]"));
assertThat(httpGET(port, "/c4/yikes?result=461&msg=x461"), endsWith("/*ep5*:
[badServlet][null][null][x461][/c4/yikes][461]"));
regards
Grzegorz
pt., 24 lip 2020 o 07:45 Francois Papon
napisał(a):
> Thank yo
of
total context model rewrite)
- JSF integration tests will be a breeze then
- 8.0.0.GA
Sorry for a really huge delay, but I never expected this refactoring to be
so deep.
kind regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pt., 24 lip 2020 o 07:16 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> As you saw, K
believe we could have the same for Felix.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 16 lip 2020 o 07:06 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> I guess you saw that Cellar 4.2.0 release is on vote.
>
> As discussed some days ago, I will now move forward on the first
> Winegrowe
+1 (binding)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 16 lip 2020 o 07:03 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Gently reminder for the PMC to vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 15 juil. 2020 à 07:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a
> écrit :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
>
b (and free time ;) for this, but I'm
100% sure, that we're almost there - at least I don't expect bigger issues
(which wasn't true when I started the refactoring)
kind regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 7 lip 2020 o 16:11 Achim Nierbeck
napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> as being r
27;t support right now.
>
Global interception mechanism are supposed to be supported by
"preprocessors" from Whiteboard R7 (per context), for Pax Web I've
implemented a mechanism that allows this - see:
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/paxweb/pages/354025473/HTTP+Context+processing
r
en we have working R7 implementation (or
rather R6 implementation in the first place), it'd be a matter of ~2 weeks
to implement R8 on top of working R7.
So, thanks for patience, sorry for delay and please help if you like ;)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 7 lip 2020 o 11:27 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napis
+1 (binding)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
niedz., 7 cze 2020 o 16:27 Francois Papon
napisał(a):
> +1 (binding)
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 05/06/2020 à 14:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit :
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apach
+1
Great about mentioning Virtual Karaf meeting :)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 2 cze 2020 o 10:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> I prepared the board report for this month:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Board+Reports <
> htt
:)
I was thinking about karaf-quarkus extension. But I'm not experienced
enough (with Quarkus) to provide any solution (for now).
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 6 maj 2020 o 10:45 Romain Manni-Bucau
napisał(a):
> s/quarkus/karaf/ ;)
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <
Hello
BTW. Wiring/resolving reqs/caps at build time is perfect use-case for
Quarkus ;)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 6 maj 2020 o 10:39 Christian Schneider
napisał(a):
> I agree that for microservices the resolver should be run at build time and
> use static for the runtime.
>
r not) a feature is in
/.
ad4) +1
ad5) +2
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 4 maj 2020 o 07:30 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> I’m working on several improvements this week where I would need your
> review and thoughts.
>
> 1. JAXB remove
> We have a JAXB dep
et) be available), you may have resolution problem.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 29 kwi 2020 o 12:41 braus napisał(a):
> Hello everyone,
>
> So I'm not sure if I found a bug or I did something wrong.
>
> Issue description:
> I try to install a bundle which has a refere
+1
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 29 kwi 2020 o 07:52 Christian Schneider
napisał(a):
> +1
>
> Christian
>
> Am Fr., 24. Apr. 2020 um 08:45 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> j...@nanthrax.net>:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As discussed previous
id=3"));
assertTrue(get(port, "/c2/s").endsWith("my.id=4"));
assertTrue(get(port, "/c3/s").endsWith("my.id=4"));
assertTrue(get(port, "/c4/s").endsWith("my.id=6"));
Yes - this directly stems from R7 Whiteboard specification. Single servlet
r
Hello
The below (starting with is your ENTIRE log4j2.xml?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 6 kwi 2020 o 16:10 afthabvp napisał(a):
> - etc/org.ops4j.pax.logging.cfg
>
> only contain
> "org.ops4j.pax.logging.log4j2.config.file=${karaf.etc}/log4j2.xml"
>
> -
Hello
Did you specify "org.ops4j.pax.logging.log4j2.config.file" option in
etc/org.ops4j.pax.logging.cfg? May I see your configuration files:
- etc/org.ops4j.pax.logging.cfg
- log4j2.xml
?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 6 kwi 2020 o 13:09 afthabvp napisał(a):
> Hi Team,
>
&g
+1
regards and stay healthy!
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 2 kwi 2020 o 14:19 Jamie G. napisał(a):
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:07 PM Francois Papon
> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds good.
> >
> > +1 to keep the release going.
> >
associated wtih "OSGi Context Model" point to, say, /c1
"Servlet Context" is available at, say, /c1/s. But when service
registration properties for the associated ServletContextHelper (1:1 with
"OSGi Context Model") change, servlet has to "switch" from
+1
regards
Grzegorz
czw., 27 lut 2020 o 10:04 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> I think it has been already mentioned in previous report, but you are
> right, let me double check this.
> Thanks.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 27 févr. 2020 à 10:03, Francois Papon
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So
ed OK with
configuration
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.properties.PropertiesConfiguration@23945890.
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-api [log4j2] INFO : Log4J2 configured
using configuration from passed properties
so we can see entire log4j2 initialization - very helpful.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybe
Thanks Robert
At least I was able to see `Multi-Release` jars/bundles in action. In Pax
Logging 2.0.x I did this to make Log4j2 work under JDK8 and JDK9+
<https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/blob/logging-2.0.2/pax-logging-api/osgi.bnd#L103>
.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon.,
b <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 à 09:01, Grzegorz
ed standards" can be handled at lowest possible level... I
admire what spec bundles do, but it still (IMO) look like a workaround of
some fundamental problem related to adjusting JDK itself to OSGi...
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
===
[1]: https://jdk.java.net/15/
pon., 27 sty 2020 o 08:38 Jean-B
Hello
Great! I can then take it and use in integration tests for Pax Web 8.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 27 sty 2020 o 06:17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> Just a quick update: I just merged R7 branch to master.
>
> I will cut 4.3.0.RC1 today, and move forw
JavaEE 8).
So the theme for Pax Web 8 should be:
- Servlet API 4
- OSGi CMPN R7 (HTTP Service, Whiteboard Service)
- Undertow 2
- Tomcat 9
- Jetty 10 (already released as Alpha)
- javax.* → jakarta.* Maven coordinates
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pt., 24 sty 2020 o 06:44 Romain Manni-B
+1 (binding)
I checked assemblies/apache-karaf/target/bundle-report.xml in source tree
and it looks good and consistent.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 20 sty 2020 o 06:45 Romain Manni-Bucau
napisał(a):
> +1 (non binding) - for some asf itests and "simple" apps (no multip
+1 (binding)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 13 sty 2020 o 09:46 Achim Nierbeck
napisał(a):
> +1 (binding)
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> Am Mo., 13. Jan. 2020 um 09:45 Uhr schrieb Roedl Lukas <
> lukas.ro...@ait.ac.at>:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> &g
+1 (binding)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 7 sty 2020 o 07:19 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/01/2020 16:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I submit Apache Karaf (runtime) 3.0.10 to your vote.
Happy new year to everyone!
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 1 sty 2020 o 07:23 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> Hi everyone,
>
> on behalf of the Karaf team, I wish you a happy new year !
>
> For sure, 2020 will be a Karaf year with lot of new features and ideas
> coming. F
+1
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pt., 13 gru 2019 o 13:27 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> here's the board report I prepared for this month:
>
> ## Description:
> Apache Karaf provides a modern and polymorphic applications runtime,
> multi-purpose (micro
+1
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 26 lis 2019 o 08:21 Francois Papon
napisał(a):
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks!
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 25/11/2019 à 17:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I sub
Hello
IMO, alias would be better. But how about child containers?
(instance:create)?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 20 lis 2019 o 07:50 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm working on adding JMXMP connector on Karaf JMX layer (in addition of
> the RMI connecto
s Proxy.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
> The interceptor support is a small standalone module that should have its
> own lifecycle.
> Putting it in the main karaf tree would mean it is released for every karaf
> version.
>
> Christian
>
> Am Mo., 11. Nov. 2019 um 20:38 Uh
+1 :)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 6 lis 2019 o 08:31 Romain Manni-Bucau
napisał(a):
> +1 (obviously too ;))
>
> Le mer. 6 nov. 2019 à 08:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
> écrit :
>
> > Here's my +1 (binding) obviously ;)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
>
st mapped in your
process' virtual memory as set of pages that JVM can already use.
And it's not only making native JVM images.
This is *directly* opposite to what Karaf (and OSGi in general) is for.
But maybe +Guillaume Nodet can tell more about it ;)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 10
/org.apache.aries.spifly.dynamic.bundle/1.2,
while Karaf uses 1.2.2
- pax-jdbc 1.4.0 uses geronimo-connector/3.1.1 while Karaf uses
geronimo-connector/3.1.4
- pax-cdi 1.1.1 uses xbean-bundleutils 4.12, while pax-web 7.2.11 uses 4.14
but these are minor differences.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 24 wrz
Hello
Did you use official distro? What I'd do is debugging, but unfortunately i
don't have much time this week. Do you have some logs from first run?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pt., 23 sie 2019 o 17:38 musician napisał(a):
> I just checked the state.json under
[
"feature:feature/[4.2.6,4.2.6]",
"feature:deployer/[4.2.6,4.2.6]",
...
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 21 sie 2019 o 15:25 musician napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> It is possible to configure karaf in way to execute the features specified
> in the featuresBoot in or
+1!
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 31 lip 2019 o 13:15 Freeman Fang napisał(a):
> Hi JB,
>
> FYI, CXF 3.3 is the first version to support JDK11.
>
> So I think we should upgrade to use CXF 3.3.x in Karaf, what do you think?
>
> Best Regards
> －
> Freeman
Great article - thanks!
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 25 cze 2019 o 21:47 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> Just to let you know I just finished a new blog post about Karaf running
> with Kubernetes (following the previous blog post about Karaf with Docke
Good idea!
I however don't have that much experience with all these new (new?? it's
already legacy probably) docker/k8s/openshift technologies - still on
TOLEARN list...
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 11 cze 2019 o 15:37 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> as
Thank you JB!
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 10 cze 2019 o 23:36 Erwin Hogeweg
napisał(a):
> Wonderful JB,
>
> As always, kudos to the Karaf team for the commitment and all the hard
> work.
>
> Erwin
>
> El jun. 10, 2019, a la(s) 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> escri
+1
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
sob., 8 cze 2019 o 18:52 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> it's "as karaf", so basically, it uses your .m2/repository by default
> and then goes into the repository in etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg.
>
> So, you have to use
JB - how far are we with R7 in pax-web?
I mean on my todo-list there's still fixing R6 whiteboard support in
pax-web (PAXWEB-1123, PAXWEB-1124)... I didn't do anything yet for R7.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pt., 7 cze 2019 o 08:09 Francois Papon
napisał(a):
> Thanks JB!
>
> re
+1
Thanks!
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 6 cze 2019 o 10:59 Andrea Cosentino
napisał(a):
> Great, +1.
>
> --
> Andrea Cosentino
> --
> Apache Camel PMC Chair
> Apache Karaf Committer
> Apache Servicemix PMC Member
> Email: anco
ant to be too fast here. But I see no problems
using it in Karaf 4.2.7.
Karaf 4.3.0 should use pax-logging 2.0.0 (R7)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 4 cze 2019 o 14:47 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> You are right, that's why I did pax-logging-1.10.x branch to avoid too
&g
thing I think is sensible here is to stop exporting
anything from pax-logging-log4j2... Extensions should be done via fragments
or pax-logging-api's org.ops4j.pax.logging.spi interfaces (like
PaxAppender).
WDYT?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
===
[1]: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/ops4j/yjqOzvrKRkc/t5BXmfyoBgAJ
hare PR ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 22/05/2019 13:53, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> > Let's try different approaches before deciding ;)
> >
> > I'm starting to give pax-logging-log4j2 the same shape as with
> > pax-logging-service and pax-logging-log
ional import on the extend package ?
> Fragment is also an option to extend the classloader of core.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 22/05/2019 13:31, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> > Wouldn't DynamicImport-Package on core introduce some hard-to-find
> > deadlocks? (bund
some extra packages in extend should work.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 22/05/2019 13:01, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> > +1 for splitting log4j2.
> >
> > This pax-logging-log4j2-extend would be a fragment?
> >
> > regards
> > Grzegorz Grzybek
> >
>
+1 for splitting log4j2.
This pax-logging-log4j2-extend would be a fragment?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 22 maj 2019 o 12:09 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> My plan is basically to split into parts.
>
> pax-logging-log4j2-core with the minimal packages/imports to work in
> Ka
ginal pax-logging-log4j2. This
way, "basic" pax-logging-log4j2 would be much less affected by refreshes
related to jackson or commons-*.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
===
[1]:
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/TOOLS/pages/412549134/OSGi+Report+Maven+Plugin
>
> - Eric L
>
&g
e time (integration tests
will show).
But even if, changing pax-logging from 1.10 to 2.0 between Karaf 4.2.5 and
4.2.6 is not that natural...
Versioning is hard...
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> - Eric L
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:47 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> &g
le.name}
log4j2.appender.mdc.routes.sift.type = Route
...
# _logger_ with routing _appender_ attached
log4j2.logger.camel.name = org.apache.camel
log4j2.logger.camel.level = DEBUG
log4j2.logger.camel.additivity = false
log4j2.logger.camel.appenderRef.SiftAppender.ref = SiftAppender
regards
Grzegorz Grzyb
Hello
I'm generally +1, but here are the questions:
- will Karaf itself reference particular version of jclouds (features +
cli)?
- will Karaf team be releasing jclouds-features|cli? Together with Karaf?
Together with jclouds itself?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 17 kwi 2019 o 20:45
+1
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 17 kwi 2019 o 20:44 Serge Huber napisał(a):
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> cheers,
>Serge
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:30 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I submit Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.5 to yo
Hello
I just spotted one issue I decided to report with _blocker_ priority:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6238.
I *must* fix it.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 15 kwi 2019 o 09:46 Eric Lilja napisał(a):
> Great news, JB!
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:23 AM Franc
Hello
+1
Nothing from me - but soon I hope to finish this override&blacklist
mechanism documentation ;)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 15 kwi 2019 o 06:21 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a):
> Hi guys,
>
> I fixed the latest issues for 4.2.5 during the weekend. I'm work
Hello
JNDI is not a (big) problem - you have to ensure that all (aries-)jndi
bundles and JDBC driver bundles should start before pax-logging-log4j2.
Also data source should be ready.
The proper solution should be (IMO) to implement lazily initialized
log4j2's ConnectionSource.
regards
Grz
to work on this.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 9 kwi 2019 o 12:41 leonardchicco
napisał(a):
> Hi all,
>I have a boring problem when I start karaf using custom logging appender
> Follow the section of my "org.ops4j.pax.logging.cfg"
>
> ==
Hello
Yes Luca - I mentioned this. standard features should have "compile" scope
(or no , which amounts to the same), to ensure eventadmin is
resolved at startup stage and gets into etc/startup.properties.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 1 kwi 2019 o 18:33 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ot;
-> "Wired to org.apache.felix.configadmin/1.9.14 which is being refreshed"
So, to prevent refreshing pax-url-aether, you have to ensure that
"eventadmin" feature is installed at "startup" stage.
To do this:
- change scope for org.apache.karaf.features:standard:4.
Hello
pax-url-aether is the bundle that provides mvn: URL handler. "Unknown
protocol: mvn" means (99%) that you used activemq feature at boot stage
without adding pax-url-aether bundle at startup stage. Can you share your
karaf-maven-plugin configuration?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
so
Hello
Hmm, maybe JDK11 is an issue? Does it work with JDK8?
ALSO it could be because appenders may have to be declared before they
added to loggers? :) Just a blind guess.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 28 mar 2019 o 11:38 Jayamani napisał(a):
> Hi Grzegorz,
> As suggested i have
201 - 300 of 450 matches
Mail list logo
