[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910483#action_12910483
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
bq. Is this near-comittable?
I think we
Hi,
Starting a new thread for this question, as it's a little separate
from the 3.x cache warming thread:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/fdc19610bdf6e179/tuning_solr_caches_with_high_commit_rates_nrt#adf9ee007ce18ba6
The new fcs/per-segment faceting that's in the 4.x trunk looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910513#action_12910513
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649:
Looks great!
Should we make it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910516#action_12910516
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2648:
-
Since this API is new in 4.0 I wonder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910527#action_12910527
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2324:
I just posted some details about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910535#action_12910535
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2324:
-
bq. BTW, randomly, LUCENE-2186 has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910539#action_12910539
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2649:
-
bq. Should we make it optional, whether
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910554#action_12910554
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. Should we make it optional, whether the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910568#action_12910568
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2649:
-
bp. Perhaps FieldCache.Parser was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910576#action_12910576
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. I guess we need to be able to manually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910589#action_12910589
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2649:
-
bq. Also, if I have to list out all the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910591#action_12910591
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2649:
One thing I've wanted to do for a long time, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910568#action_12910568
]
Simon Willnauer edited comment on LUCENE-2649 at 9/17/10 9:59 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910598#action_12910598
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. Whatever you call it (using Factory is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910599#action_12910599
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. open up FieldCache to allow the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910618#action_12910618
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
This is a band-aid, but we could consider
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2647:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2647.patch
New patch, w/ the names we iterated to above...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910626#action_12910626
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2648:
Looks good Simon!
Maybe instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910625#action_12910625
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2649:
bq. Are there any advantages to using payloads
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910628#action_12910628
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
Uwe: For DocTerms the approach is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2648:
Attachment: LUCENE-2648.patch
changed ReaderIterator#docId() to ReaderIterator#ord()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910633#action_12910633
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2648:
-
bq. ? Ie, the index is not always a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910636#action_12910636
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2647:
-
bq. New patch, w/ the names we iterated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910635#action_12910635
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. public void setCacheValidBitsForFields(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910640#action_12910640
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
oh right -- thats true. Is a global flag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated LUCENE-2649:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch
I added a static flag to CachedArray:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910653#action_12910653
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
FYI, I like the idea of revisiting the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910654#action_12910654
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
I am against the configuration option to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910660#action_12910660
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2649:
-
bq. I was suggesting handling it the same way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910663#action_12910663
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
I'm all for dropping the static flag and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910668#action_12910668
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-2649:
-
So: Please don't add any static
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910677#action_12910677
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649:
I know it's only 3% (for ints...
improve windows defaults in FSDirectory
---
Key: LUCENE-2650
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2650
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Store
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2650:
Attachment: LUCENE-2650.patch
Here's the patch:
* sets the defaults as described in the issue
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910695#action_12910695
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2650:
-
by the way, all lucene/solr tests pass on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910699#action_12910699
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. Let's try to find some baby-step (even if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910699#action_12910699
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-2649 at 9/17/10 2:01 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910700#action_12910700
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
Are people generally ok with the idea of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910707#action_12910707
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
I am against that option! No static
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910707#action_12910707
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2649 at 9/17/10 2:11 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910711#action_12910711
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
I like the idea of optionally caching the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910717#action_12910717
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
If ya care - don't pass a null parser!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910728#action_12910728
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
bq. If ya care - don't pass a null parser!
Search Grouping: Group by query (like facet.query)
--
Key: SOLR-2123
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2123
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Yonik Seeley
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910736#action_12910736
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. What if I care, but somethign else (that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910746#action_12910746
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. How would that work?
We could start off
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910760#action_12910760
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2650:
--
bq. I think we should just consider doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910777#action_12910777
]
John Beck commented on SOLR-1316:
-
If you wish to use the comment text you have typed (shown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910777#action_12910777
]
John Beck edited comment on SOLR-1316 at 9/17/10 4:41 PM:
--
If you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2650:
Attachment: LUCENE-2650.patch
same patch, only i added the same safety (ensuring clones null
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910780#action_12910780
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2648:
-
I will commit tomorrow if nobody
Add support for MMapDirectory's unmap in Apache Harmony
---
Key: LUCENE-2651
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2651
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2651:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2651.patch
First totally untested patch. This refactors the unmap hack to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910805#action_12910805
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
Supporting different parsers is not an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2651:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2651.patch
Generics Policeman violated himself. Fixed patch.
Add support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910818#action_12910818
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2651:
-
Hi, will test this soon.
Can we apply the 4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2650:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2651.patch
I completed the patch, I missed the extra check in clone().
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2651:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2651.patch
I completed the patch, I missed the extra check in clone().
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2650:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2651.patch)
improve windows defaults in FSDirectory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2650:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: I completed the patch, I missed the extra check in clone().)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2651:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2651.patch)
Add support for MMapDirectory's unmap in Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2651:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2651.patch
Some minor improvements to the patch. Passes on windows with
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-3.x/118/changes
Changes:
[mikemccand] fix incorrect ramUSED message to IW infoStream
--
[...truncated 18329 lines...]
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTimeLimitingCollector
[junit]
Someone mentioned the 3.x section of trunk's CHANGES.txt file on IRC a
while back, and i forgot to follow up on mail about what/why that was
there -- i had never noticed it before.
: Instead of maintaining two places to edit, why don't we just have trunk
: track only those things that are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910882#action_12910882
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-2563:
--
added a redirect in r998383.
I made this redirect
My unscientific, off the cuff, sociological impression is that once we
moved forward with
the multi-branch development plan and created the 3x branch, a lot of
people who use to be the big proponents of regular releases got really
about the freedom involved in working on the trunk, and lost
SEVERE exceptions are being logged for expected PingRequestHandler
SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE exceptions
-
Key: SOLR-2124
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910890#action_12910890
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2124:
At first glance, this seems like a fundemental problem with
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/17/10 9:45 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
When we vote on a release, tha's what we
are voting on: source. We may also distribute precompiled binary jars
via the download mirrors, or via maven, but that's not what
+1 on the ant-only policy. I've recently been futzing with Mahout and I
had not been faced with the scrofulous horror of Maven. Please keep it
out of the main source tree of solr. You can do whatever you want with
the internal Apache build process.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
My unscientific, off
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1291/changes
Changes:
[mikemccand] fix incorrect ramUSED message to IW infoStream
--
[...truncated 14621 lines...]
common.init:
build-lucene:
init:
compile-test:
[echo] Building swing...
Helau!
(means +1)
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Lance Norskog [mailto:goks...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:19 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: discussion
72 matches
Mail list logo
