Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.3/5/
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 32711 lines...]
prepare-release-no-sign:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.3/lucene/build/fakeRelease
[copy] Copying 401 file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662646#comment-13662646
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-4842:
Erik: ok, now looking at your test, i think it's just flaw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-4842:
---
Attachment: SOLR-4842__hoss_tests.patch
Erik: based on your followup comment, i ignored your patch and attemp
thanks
thats a great start... ah solo much to do!
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Alan Woodward wrote:
> I made a start on this, but in the end the client decided to do something
> different so it never got finished. I did get
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4902 out of it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662580#comment-13662580
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-4842:
I'm not sure my patch actually shows the problem c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-4842:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.3.1)
Description: SOLR-4717 introduced local param support for per-fie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-4842:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.3.1
> Field faceting with local params affects successive field faceting paramete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-4842:
---
Attachment: SOLR-4842.patch
Here's a patch demonstrating a failing test case that should pass,
demons
Erik Hatcher created SOLR-4842:
--
Summary: Field faceting with local params affects successive field
faceting parameters
Key: SOLR-4842
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4842
Project: Solr
Go for it, it's probably best to discourage people from trying this
out at this point...
Erick
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> For anyone who doesn't know already, core discovery is fundamentally broken
> in 4.3.0, and the problems won't be fixed in 4.3.1. The specifi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662455#comment-13662455
]
Naomi Dushay edited comment on SOLR-2649 at 5/20/13 11:41 PM:
--
: I think you're confusing the hierarchy of your database's types with the
: hierarchy in Java. In Java, a java.sql.Blob and a java.sql.Clob are 2
: different things. They do not extend a common ancestor (excpt
Exactly - regardless of what the informix docs may say about how column
types ar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662455#comment-13662455
]
Naomi Dushay commented on SOLR-2649:
Our dismax mm setting is 6<-1 6<90%.
I would like
Found it. In AddBlockUpdateTest.testSmallBlockDirect
assertEquals(2, h.getCore().getUpdateHandler().addBlock(cmd));
and in the patched code DirectUpdateHandler2.addBlock()
Tom
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
> My understanding of Lucene Block-Join indexing is that at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662402#comment-13662402
]
Naomi Dushay commented on SOLR-3385:
I believe this is the same as SOLR-2649:
// For c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-4816:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4816.patch
> Change CloudSolrServer to send updates to the correct shard
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662389#comment-13662389
]
Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-4816 at 5/20/13 10:00 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-4816:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4816.patch
After spending more time looking at everything that an upateRequest ca
My understanding of Lucene Block-Join indexing is that at some point
IndexWriter.addDocuments() or IndexWriter.updateDocuments() need to be
called to actually write a block of documents to disk.
I'm trying to understand how SOLR-3076 (Solr should support block
joins), works and haven't been abl
For anyone who doesn't know already, core discovery is fundamentally
broken in 4.3.0, and the problems won't be fixed in 4.3.1. The specific
problem that a user found isn't a problem on branch_4x, but the code is
quite a lot different.
See discussion on SOLR-4773 starting on May 6th.
I am pl
My apologies. I will revert now.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:48 PM
To: Lucene/Solr dev
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1484015 - in
/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr
It is still Python 3.2 and 2.7. Maybe some changes in FreeBSD 9.x
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:07 PM
> To: dev@luce
Uwe,
No, I didn't commit LUCENE-5007 on the 4.3 branch.
I skimmed the errors and IIRC it looked like " 2>&1" is part of a file name
that Python can't find, which makes sense. Not sure why this is only a problem
on Jenkins, though. Maybe the newer version of Python you upgraded to changed
fil
Steven, is your fix LUCENE-5007 related to that?
I am just mentioning this, because 4.3 is the release branch, so it should pass
smoke tester!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Apache
James,
I'm assuming this was a mistake? Can you revert it? Thanks.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> What happened here?:
> - We don't use 4.2 branch anymore
> - Please don't commit JAR files
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662263#comment-13662263
]
Paul Elschot commented on SOLR-4834:
>From the Lucene In Action book, 2nd edition:
{qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662253#comment-13662253
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4788:
A review of all Solr issues that mention last_inde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey resolved SOLR-4048.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
> Add a "findRecursive" method to NamedList
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662225#comment-13662225
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4048:
On 4x, two solr-core tests failed with 500 server
I made a start on this, but in the end the client decided to do something
different so it never got finished. I did get
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4902 out of it, which would allow
you to plug in custom FilterReaders to Solr via the IndexReaderFactory. I'm
still interested i
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/2842/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_21 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC
5 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.TestEmbeddedSolrServer.testGetCoreContainer
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrEx
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Rowe resolved LUCENE-5007.
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available (was: New)
Committed:
- trunk: r1484
Note, I'm rapidly catching up so I just skimmed... but is it possible
that your imports are replacing older documents with new documents
that don't happen to match? Looking at numDocs/maxDoc in the admin GUI
should tell you this, the delta between those two numbers is the
number of replaced documen
I think you're confusing the hierarchy of your database's types with the
hierarchy in Java. In Java, a java.sql.Blob and a java.sql.Clob are 2
different things. They do not extend a common ancestor (excpt
java.lang.Object). To write code that deals with both means you need to have
separate p
In march, there was so effort at looking at cleaner ways to integrate
external data:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/201303.mbox/%3cc2e7cc37-52f2-4527-a919-a071d26f9...@flax.co.uk%3E
Any updates on this?
Thanks
Ryan
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX/472/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.6.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.replicator.http.HttpReplicatorTest.testBasic
Error Message:
Connection to http://localhost:51800 refused
Stack Trac
Mark Streitman created LUCENE-5010:
--
Summary: Getting a Poterstemmer error in Solr
Key: LUCENE-5010
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5010
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662013#comment-13662013
]
Maciej Lizewski commented on SOLR-4841:
---
I am OK with that. My point was that it is i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661991#comment-13661991
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-4841:
-
protected should be enough!
> D
Maciej Lizewski created SOLR-4841:
-
Summary: DetectedLanguage constructor should be public
Key: SOLR-4841
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4841
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661883#comment-13661883
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-4048:
-
All fine now!
> Add a "findRecu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661866#comment-13661866
]
Elran Dvir commented on SOLR-2894:
--
Hi,
I want to report a problem that we found in the p
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk/266/
4 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.spatial.DistanceStrategyTest.testDistanceOrder
{strategy=recursive_quad}
Error Message:
Not equal for doc 0 expected:<2.827493667602539> but was:<180.0>
Stack Trace:
java.lang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661832#comment-13661832
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4048:
Trunk commit r1484386 to improve and clean up new
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.3/4/
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 32711 lines...]
prepare-release-no-sign:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.3/lucene/build/fakeRelease
[copy] Copying 401 file
45 matches
Mail list logo
