spellChecker.ClearIndex();
Addwords(r, "field1"); // < Unutulmus!!
PS: Lucene.NET ile ilgili sorulariniz icin Mailing Listleri
kullanabilirsiniz. Lutfen direkt eMail atmayiniz.
Iyi calismalar.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.a
+1. No pending commits.
A copy of the current trunk somewhere else(tag, branches etc.) would be good
too.
DIGY.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> Looks like we have a 'lazy consensus', in that, no one has raised any
> significant objections, a few min
After this directory layout changes; what about replacing ArrayLists,
Hashtables etc, with appropriate Generics? This would bring us very close
to lucene 3.0.3 (and not hard to do with the help of VS).
DIGY
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> Sounds good. I'll ma
We already have a release for .NET 2.0 (Lucene.Net 2.9.2). So, jumping to
4.0 shouldn't be a problem for Lucene,Net community.
DIGY
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> Sounds good to me. I have done this previously in a local branch and
> noticed massive
n weird effects at runtime not at
compile time).
DIGY
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Van Den Berghe, Vincent (JIRA) <
j...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&
Yes the real 2.9.4 is in the trunk. 2.9.4g is currently neither 2.9.4 nor
3.0.3.
But having an intermediate tag/release could also be good before removing
deprecated methods.
DIGY
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Scott Lombard wrote:
> Digy,
>
> Should your 2.9.4g be renamed to 3.0
he "ASF may
> use this" checkbox has been checked - is this correct?
>
absolutely.
>
> For the project specific tasks I'd ask all of you to fill in whatever
> you feel like adding. All Lucene.NET committers should be able to
> modify the status page.
>
> Stefan
>
DIGY
How about indexing the new document(s) in memory using RAMDirectory then
calling indexWriter.AddIndexesNoOptimize for NRT & master index?
DIGY
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Robert Stewart wrote:
> Is it possible to add a document to more than one index at the same time,
> such tha
No. It's Rune's work.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E
<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E>
DIGY
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:16 PM, G
those fixes to current trunk?
DIGY
ce.
> If it is good for the project, is possible to put this as improvement in
java version?
You should ask this to Lucene.Java community.
> About sharing patch file, put it in other place is a good approach?
No, It would be better to open a JIRA issue.
DIGY
-Original Message-
Hi All,
2.9.2 tag is created.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 3:23 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.Net 2.9.3
+1 for the tag
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Digy
This is an unresolved old topic.
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org/msg00872.html
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:a...@getopt.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 12:32 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: .Net, Lucene and IKVM
Hi all
Hi Thomas,
Can you give a little more info?
Which Lucene.Net version do you use?
Which analyzer do you use while indexing?
Which analyzer do you use while searching?
Can you provide us with a sample text?
Or better, can you send a *small* code to regenerate your case?
DIGY
-Original
No. You have to initialize it with an IndexWriter.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Wertheim [mailto:dan...@wertheim.se]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 7:59 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: Problems with IndexSearcher
-- Forwarded message --
From
No. To make a search, you have to have an index
and Indexes are created with IndexWriter.
(creating an empty index with IndexReader(or IndexSearcher) would be weird)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Wertheim [mailto:dan...@wertheim.se]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 10:03 PM
To: lucene
It is expected behavior. Please see
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_2/api/all/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexReader.html#terms%28org.apache.lucene.index.Term%29
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Vincent DARON [mailto:vda...@ask.be]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 6:10 PM
To: lucene-net-dev
ector.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: steven.h...@pattersoncompanies.com
[mailto:steven.h...@pattersoncompanies.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 7:10 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Arithmetic Overflow
I'm not sure how to report this or if this is
Is -for ex- MaxInt/2 a valid value? You can get easily an OOM exception( and
the worst case would be getting sporadic OOM when search fequency increases).
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 9:43 PM
To: lucene-net
Sorry, for now, only 4.0.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:06 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.NET 2.9.4g -- only usable with .NET 4.0 ?
Digy,
Am I correct that
I just want to keep the 2.9.4g & trunk in par.
The only divergence for now is LUCENENET-172 which will be applied to 2.9.4
eventually.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:08 PM
To: lucene
I must also say that I am not interested in the name of the version.
As you have said, It should be something that differentiates it from java
versions.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:32 AM
To: lucene-net
Sorry no binary. As far as I know it requires an official release
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 1:45 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-412) Replacing
Not just this version, Lucene.Net 2.9.4 also can read (in theory) the index
created in 3.0.3. But I haven't tested it myself.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Bauer [mailto:a...@familie-bauer.info]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 8:37 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Su
> Digy, if you have a second to comment on anything user should be aware for
the SimpleFacetedSearch, I'm going to add documentation about it on the wiki
pulling from your commits and comments so far.
Too early for documentation. Many things may change.
DIGY
-Original Message--
Lucene.Net 2.9.2 should be able to read the index created with 1.9 without
any problem.
Can you try to search with luke
(http://www.getopt.org/luke/luke-0.9.9/lukeall-0.9.9.jar ) and iterate over
the results?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart [mailto:robert_stew...@epam.com
One more point, some write operations using Lucene.Net 2.9.2 (add, delete,
optimize etc.) upgrades automatically your index to 2.9.2.
But if your index is somehow corrupted(eg, due to some bug in 1.9) this may
result in data loss.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart
Sorry no idea. Maybe optimizing the index with 2.9.2 can help to detect the
problem.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart [mailto:robert_stew...@epam.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:40 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] index version compatibility (1.9 to 2.9.2)?
I tried
Have you tried to use Lucene.Net as is, before working on optimizing your
code? There are a lot of speed improvements in it since 1.9.
There is also a Faceted Search project in contrib.
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Simple+Faceted+Search
)
DIGY
-Original Message
And yes for 1 & 2.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart [mailto:robert_stew...@epam.com]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:36 PM
To:
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Faceting
I took a brief look at the documentation for faceting in contrib. I did not
look at code yet. Do you think it
ility.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Th
Hi Scott,
Please avoid crossposting(as I do now). Since when I reply to your eMail, it
goes to one of the lists and thread is splitted into two.
It may be good for announcements but not for discussions.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent
> I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on "user" vs.
"contributor".
I am sorry for this misunderstanding.
What I tried to say with "contributor"(not "committer") was the "people that
works on Lucene.Net source code", not the o
tedProjectId=12310290&reportKey=com.sourcelabs.jira.plugin.r
eport.contributions%3Acontributionreport&Next=Next
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Ayende Rahien [mailto:aye...@ayende.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 8:16 PM
To: Rory Plaire; lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: R
Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
against all projects using Lucene.Net
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucen
+1 for an official release.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Hey All,
How do people feel about
I created a working portuguese stemmer (
http://people.apache.org/~digy/PortugueseStemmerNew.cs ) from
http://snowball.tartarus.org/archives/snowball-discuss/0943.html
http://snowball.tartarus.org/archives/snowball-discuss/att-0943/01-SnowballC
Sharp.zip
Since it has a BSD license (http
Sorry, but I feel the same as Neal.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 6:08 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
No interest in
Even all contribs could be a single project/assembly. That way, users could
reference all contribs with a single assembly.
I see no harm in putting a few KB pressure on RAM :)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7
I think, there was a sync problem between our eMails :(
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jordan [mailto:robe...@gmx.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:22 AM
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
On 22.09.2011 00:16, Robert Jordan wrote:
>
vel. So, It is (I
think) ready for another release.(I use it in all my projects since long).
PS: Hearing the "pain" of porting codes that greatly differ from Java made
me just smile( sorry for that:( ). Be ready for responses that get beyond
the criticism between "With all
Troy,
I am not againt it if you can continue to understand and port so easyly.
No one here -I think- wants a java-tastes code.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:42 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject
t any problem. For short, 2.9.4g is a superset of
2.9.4 in bugfix level)
As a result, creating a new branch for .Net friendly Lucene.Net or
continuing on this branch is just a matter of taste.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursda
I forgot to mention, 2.9.4g implements IDisposable for many of the classes
that has a "Close()" method
which can be thought as .Net friendly API.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 5:05 PM
To:
Hi Neal,
> The "brand recognition" ..
I Agree
> If the project were moved elsewhere, I do not think it would survive.
Probably you are right but I am not going to take any step (personally) for
acceptance to the incubator.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From:
You can try "UnaccentedWordAnalyzer" in /contrib/Contrib.Net/
(you have to download the contrib code from svn).
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: asmcad [mailto:asm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 11:24 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: need
UnaccentedWordAnalyzer doesn't make use of stemming.
If you really need it;
a) SnowballAnalyzer is not good in turkish stemming.
b) It is better to write a custom analyzer using Zemberek or its .NET
version NZemberek.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: asmcad [mailto:asm...@gmai
Test"
But the query "Test&&Test" will also be parsed as "test test" by
StandardAnalyzer. Since there are 2 sucessive "test"s in the index, there
must be a hit.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Fr
Wouldn't something like that be enough?
string hash =
Convert.ToBase64String(System.Text.Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(dirName));
since MD5 is only used to lower the risk of collision
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/cTKYIAO6UX4CnyDgeEV8
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Simon Will
bytes) documents. It was
surprisingly as fast as Lucene.Net. That may mean that we should fix
something in the code.
Reflection is another nice thing in IKVM. You can even load and execute Java
classes J
DIGY
Although TIKA is a very good project, I've never needed it in windows
environment. Using Ifilter interface solves most(if not all) of the problems
related with converting a document to text.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Janua
Here is a port of lucene.java's arabic analyzer (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-392 )
You can safely remove nunit dependency and test cases from the project.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Ben Foster [mailto:b...@planetcloud.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ScoresAsPercentages
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Wen Gao [mailto:samuel.gao...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 8:55 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: how can I get the similarity in fuzzy query
Hi,
I am using FuzzyQuery
After I got the admin rights, I added all commiters as administrators(except
Sergey, since I couldn't find his JIRA username).
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 8:20 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: S
(for v2.9.3, 2.9.4 & 2.9.5) we have to update
another repository also.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: pnas...@apache.org [mailto:pnas...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:11 PM
To: lucene-net-comm...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net
See the patch for "Lucene.Net.Util" at
http://people.apache.org/~digy/Lucene.Net.Util.patch
I haven't looked at test cases or run unit tests. But It is that easy to
port fixes for 4 files under "Lucene.Net.Util"
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Lom
) is written to that
index.
I think, we have problems in using a common terminology.
DIGY
PS: It would be better if you use "user" mailing list to ask questions. This
mailing lists is intented to be for development purposes.
-Original Message-
From: Wen Gao [mailto:samue
Hi Scott,
What is the meaning of this assignment? Is it like "Don't touch this issue I am
working on it"?
Or can I work on it? But as I said before, I would prefer to work on diffs
instead of issues.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard (JIRA) [mailto:j...@ap
I don't think that I understand your problem.
Is it something like
IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(path, analyzer, *false*,
IndexWriter.DEFAULT_MAX_FIELD_LENGTH);
..
writer.AddDocument(doc);
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Wen Gao [mailto:samue
I don't know what others think, but I find it more trackable to see the
issues and related patches in one place(JIRA)
(especially, while trying to understand what was done for a specific issue;
after many months)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apach
OK, you are right. I didn't know this tab. I must have missed this feature
with the new version of JIRA(even I don't recall surely whether it was
available in previous version or not :) ).
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com]
Se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859054#action_12859054
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-357:
Hi Frank,
WeakHashtable is the one of the inno
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859477#action_12859477
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-357:
bq. or a diff. implementation of the method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859517#action_12859517
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-357:
Robert,
The only overriden method is GetHashCode.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859967#action_12859967
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-357:
Thanks Robert.
I committed the patch.
DIGY
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-359:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-359.patch
Hi Ben,
Can you test the attached patch?
If it's OK, I will commit.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863890#action_12863890
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-183:
Below is the mail from *Bernie Solomon*
{code}
Ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12864451#action_12864451
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-357:
Another experience on topic "Lucene.Net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-357:
---
Attachment: Constants.patch
I am thinking of a different patch. With this patch("Constants.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-358.
Assignee: Digy
Resolution: Fixed
Patch committed.
DIGY
> CloseableThreadLocal memory leak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868359#action_12868359
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-366:
Hi Ben,
I get errors while trying to apply your p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868771#action_12868771
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-366:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your work, but there are names
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009390#comment-13009390
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-405:
No. I just forgot to commit :)
DIGY
> Port:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009422#comment-13009422
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-399:
There are only a few minor remaining issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-409:
---
Attachment: DateField.patch
Hi Neal,
Can you try the patch?
DIGY
> Invalid Base exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-409:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-409.patch
> Invalid Base exception in DateField.StringToT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13021102#comment-13021102
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-409:
Hi Neal,
I'll commit the final patch which a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-412:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-412.patch
Patch for "Document.fields"(all unit tests pass)
If it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13025204#comment-13025204
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-412:
Hi All,
I prepared a primitive test case whe
: Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 2.9.4g , .Net 4.0
Reporter: Digy
Priority: Minor
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
On behalf of Richard Wilde:
Exceptions in Medium Trust(.NET 4.0)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-413:
---
Attachment: MediumTrust.2.9.4g.patch
MediumTrust.2.9.4.patch
> Medium trust secur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-413:
---
Attachment: MediumTrust.2.9.4.patch
constants.cs fix added into patch
> Medium trust security is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033235#comment-13033235
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-412:
Some samples to show the diffs of 2.9.4 & 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035795#comment-13035795
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-412:
Hi All,
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is almost ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035817#comment-13035817
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-414:
Fixed in 2.9.4g
DIGY
> The defini
Contrib/Faceted Search
--
Key: LUCENENET-415
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Reporter: Digy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs
SimpleFacetedSearch.cs
Just a draft.
Needs your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037061#comment-13037061
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
Here is the documentation of the code:)
{
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038063#comment-13038063
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your comments & test code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038228#comment-13038228
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
But BitSet+Caching is still faster than BooleanQ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
SimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
I take one step further
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
SimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
Some comments.
> Cont
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
cleaner test case
> Contrib/Faceted Sea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039259#comment-13039259
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
With the increasing number of attached files, i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039272#comment-13039272
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
Hi Ben,
Do you think we still need IndexSear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039289#comment-13039289
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
I'll wait a few days before closing t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-416.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Fixed in 2.9.4 & 2.9.4g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041634#comment-13041634
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-421:
Could you try 2.9.4 in
https://svn.apache.org/r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042963#comment-13042963
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
According to my last tests, SFS searches cost onl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-415.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Digy
Committed to trunk & 2.9.4g branch
> Contrib/Faceted
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
