thomaswoeckinger edited a comment on issue #855: SOLR-13739: Improve
performance on huge schema updates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/855#issuecomment-529448374
> Overall looks good. Do "ant precommit" and "ant test" pass?
Yes they pass.
> I presume you did
thomaswoeckinger commented on a change in pull request #855: SOLR-13739:
Improve performance on huge schema updates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/855#discussion_r322213237
##
File path: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/rest/RestManager.java
##
@@ -76,7
thomaswoeckinger commented on issue #855: SOLR-13739: Improve performance on
huge schema updates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/855#issuecomment-529448374
> Overall looks good. Do "ant precommit" and "ant test" pass?
> I presume you did manual inspection to see this has
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #855: SOLR-13739: Improve
performance on huge schema updates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/855#discussion_r322209342
##
File path: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/rest/RestManager.java
##
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
iverase merged pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update Tessellator logic to
label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771
This is an automated message from the
thomaswoeckinger commented on issue #855: SOLR-13739: Improve performance on
huge schema updates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/855#issuecomment-529367883
@gerlowskija or @dsmiley: if anyone of you has time to review this very easy
fix, that would be great
chatman commented on issue #863: SOLR-13677: reverting the last commit
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/863#issuecomment-529239167
LGTM!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
noblepaul opened a new pull request #863: SOLR-13677: reverting the last commit
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/863
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
msokolov opened a new pull request #862: LUCENE-8971: Enable constructing
JapaneseTokenizer with custom dictio…
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/862
…nary
# Description
Extends the API of JapaneseTokenizer so it can accept a dictionary other
than the built-in
janhoy opened a new pull request #861: SOLR-10665 POC for a PF4J based plugin
system
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/861
Creating PR for this old issue
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
dsmiley commented on issue #828: LUCENE-8753: UniformSplitPostingsFormat
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/828#issuecomment-528935783
Merged:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/b963b7c3dbecda86c2917ad341caee63b93815ac
dsmiley closed pull request #828: LUCENE-8753: UniformSplitPostingsFormat
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/828
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
nknize commented on issue #771: LUCENE-8620: Update Tessellator logic to label
if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#issuecomment-528893586
Awesome. LGTM! Thanks!
cpoerschke commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step if
group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#issuecomment-528868837
> ... Will also annotate specific observations (and spoiler alert) one
unexpected test failure
cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r321742912
##
File path:
cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r321740457
##
File path:
cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r321734947
##
File path:
cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r321732406
##
File path:
cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r321730287
##
File path:
cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r321726345
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321719110
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321719788
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321718297
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321718707
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321718778
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321718513
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321719001
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321718163
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321721428
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321718423
##
File path:
nknize commented on a change in pull request #771: LUCENE-8620: Update
Tessellator logic to label if triangle edges belongs to the original polygon
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/771#discussion_r321722381
##
File path:
cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r321724239
##
File path:
cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r321722336
##
File path: solr/solr-ref-guide/src/result-grouping.adoc
##
cpoerschke commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step if
group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#issuecomment-528843185
Thanks @diegoceccarelli for the pushes and the documentation additions too!
> ... precommit
janhoy commented on issue #860: SOLR-13734 JWTAuthPlugin to support multiple
issuers
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/860#issuecomment-528818950
Reviewers: This PR includes changes from #852 and therefore looks bigger
than it is. A diff between the two can be seen here:
janhoy opened a new pull request #860: SOLR-13734 JWTAuthPlugin to support
multiple issuers
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/860
# Description
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13734
# Checklist
Please review the following and check all that
iverase commented on issue #857: LUCENE-8968: Improve performance of WITHIN and
DISJOINT queries for Shape queries
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/857#issuecomment-528770584
I have run the performance benchmark defined
noblepaul opened a new pull request #859: SOLR-13731: javabin must support a
1:1 mapping of the JSON update format
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/859
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
jpountz commented on issue #858: Harden Up TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/858#issuecomment-528489114
Thanks @atris.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
jpountz merged pull request #858: Harden Up TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/858
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
atris commented on issue #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error Handling For Illegal
Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#issuecomment-528487667
> TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector
Thanks for taking a look. The test failure is not really a code issue but a
test
atris opened a new pull request #858: Harden Up TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/858
TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector.testInvalidArguments should check for
exceptions and corresponding messages, post LUCENE-8905
jpountz commented on issue #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error Handling For Illegal
Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#issuecomment-528440603
I'm seeing test failures such as
```
17:50:42[junit4] Suite:
iverase commented on issue #857: LUCENE-8968: Improve performance of WITHIN and
DISJOINT queries for Shape queries
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/857#issuecomment-528425823
Thanks @jpountz , I agree we should not be keeping a state in the visitor. I
updated the PR going
jpountz merged pull request #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error Handling For
Illegal Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #857: LUCENE-8968: Improve
performance of WITHIN and DISJOINT queries for Shape queries
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/857#discussion_r321278855
##
File path:
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #857: LUCENE-8968: Improve
performance of WITHIN and DISJOINT queries for Shape queries
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/857#discussion_r321276057
##
File path:
iverase opened a new pull request #857: LUCENE-8968: Improve performance of
WITHIN and DISJOINT queries for Shape queries
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/857
We are currently walking the tree twice for INTERSECTS and WITHIN queries in
ShapeQuery when we can do it in just
atris commented on issue #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error Handling For Illegal
Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#issuecomment-528333650
@jpountz Updated the PR. Ran the test suite, came in clean. Also, beasted
`TestGrouping` 20 times, ran clean.
jpountz commented on issue #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error Handling For Illegal
Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#issuecomment-528328729
Hmm I got confused indeed, we shouldn't check that start is less than
howMany since howMany is not the rank of the last
atris commented on issue #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error Handling For Illegal
Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#issuecomment-528310009
@jpountz Thinking more about this, should we be asserting if howMany is
greater than start? Would that still be true for
jpountz commented on issue #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error Handling For Illegal
Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#issuecomment-528264657
Could you confirm all tests pass now, including the grouping ones that
failed previously?
atris commented on a change in pull request #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error
Handling For Illegal Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#discussion_r321140473
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TopDocsCollector.java
##
@@
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error
Handling For Illegal Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#discussion_r321139006
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TopDocsCollector.java
##
@@
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error
Handling For Illegal Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#discussion_r321139330
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TopDocsCollector.java
##
@@
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error
Handling For Illegal Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#discussion_r321138932
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TopDocsCollector.java
##
@@
atris commented on issue #823: LUCENE-8939: Introduce Shared Count Early
Termination In Parallel Search
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/823#issuecomment-528262274
Thank you for merging and reviewing, @jpountz !
and thank you @jimczi and @mikemccand for reviewing!
atris commented on issue #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error Handling For Illegal
Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#issuecomment-528260449
@jpountz Updated, please see
This is an automated message
jpountz merged pull request #823: LUCENE-8939: Introduce Shared Count Early
Termination In Parallel Search
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/823
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
atris commented on issue #854: Shared PQ Based Early Termination for Concurrent
Search
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/854#issuecomment-528247486
> I thought that the follow up for LUCENE-8939 would be to allow the sharing
of the minimum score (could be extended to a
atris commented on issue #816: LUCENE-8942: Tighten Up LRUQueryCache's Methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/816#issuecomment-528242381
Thank you for merging!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
jpountz merged pull request #816: LUCENE-8942: Tighten Up LRUQueryCache's
Methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/816
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
jpountz commented on issue #816: LUCENE-8942: Tighten Up LRUQueryCache's Methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/816#issuecomment-528239928
This looks great.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
atris commented on issue #816: LUCENE-8942: Tighten Up LRUQueryCache's Methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/816#issuecomment-528239294
@jpountz Updated, please let me know if it looks fine
This is an
atris commented on issue #823: LUCENE-8939: Introduce Shared Count Early
Termination In Parallel Search
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/823#issuecomment-528237811
Thanks for approving, @mikemccand !
@jpountz , @jimczi Does this look ok to merge now?
atris commented on issue #816: LUCENE-8942: Tighten Up LRUQueryCache's Methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/816#issuecomment-528235852
Yeah, I will move it in this PR itself -- sorry, this one fell off my radar.
jpountz commented on issue #816: LUCENE-8942: Tighten Up LRUQueryCache's Methods
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/816#issuecomment-528225965
To avoid any confusion, I was expecting you would move the CHANGES entry on
this PR rather than after the merge.
jpountz merged pull request #775: LUCENE-8910: upgrade to icu 62.1 must be
completed
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/775
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error
Handling For Illegal Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#discussion_r321097309
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TopDocsCollector.java
##
@@
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error
Handling For Illegal Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#discussion_r321097236
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TopDocsCollector.java
##
@@
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #769: LUCENE-8905: Better Error
Handling For Illegal Arguments
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/769#discussion_r321098166
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TopDocsCollector.java
##
@@
gus-asf commented on a change in pull request #838: SOLR-13705 Double-checked
locking bug is fixed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/838#discussion_r321052124
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/SecurityConfHandler.java
##
@@
gus-asf commented on a change in pull request #838: SOLR-13705 Double-checked
locking bug is fixed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/838#discussion_r321052124
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/SecurityConfHandler.java
##
@@
gus-asf commented on a change in pull request #838: SOLR-13705 Double-checked
locking bug is fixed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/838#discussion_r321050856
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/SecurityConfHandler.java
##
@@
gus-asf commented on a change in pull request #838: SOLR-13705 Double-checked
locking bug is fixed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/838#discussion_r321050532
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/SecurityConfHandler.java
##
@@
gus-asf commented on a change in pull request #838: SOLR-13705 Double-checked
locking bug is fixed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/838#discussion_r321050532
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/SecurityConfHandler.java
##
@@
gus-asf commented on a change in pull request #838: SOLR-13705 Double-checked
locking bug is fixed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/838#discussion_r321050511
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/SecurityConfHandler.java
##
@@
yonik commented on issue #850: SOLR-13727: Bug fix for V2Request handling in
HttpSolrClient
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/850#issuecomment-528167851
Committed manually to master & 8x. Thanks Megan!
This is
yonik closed pull request #850: SOLR-13727: Bug fix for V2Request handling in
HttpSolrClient
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/850
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
gus-asf commented on a change in pull request #838: SOLR-13705 Double-checked
locking bug is fixed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/838#discussion_r321050422
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/SecurityConfHandler.java
##
@@
yonik commented on a change in pull request #850: SOLR-13727: Bug fix for
V2Request handling in HttpSolrClient
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/850#discussion_r321048686
##
File path:
solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/HttpSolrClient.java
gus-asf commented on a change in pull request #856: LUCENE-8965
SometimesConcurrentMergeScheduler
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/856#discussion_r321035131
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SometimesConcurrentMergeScheduler.java
##
gus-asf commented on a change in pull request #856: LUCENE-8965
SometimesConcurrentMergeScheduler
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/856#discussion_r321034932
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SometimesConcurrentMergeScheduler.java
##
rmuir commented on issue #775: LUCENE-8910: upgrade to icu 62.1 must be
completed
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/775#issuecomment-528146605
looks good to me.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
mikemccand commented on a change in pull request #823: LUCENE-8939: Introduce
Shared Count Early Termination In Parallel Search
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/823#discussion_r320956707
##
File path:
mikemccand commented on a change in pull request #823: LUCENE-8939: Introduce
Shared Count Early Termination In Parallel Search
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/823#discussion_r320956589
##
File path:
dsmiley opened a new pull request #856: LUCENE-8965
SometimesConcurrentMergeScheduler
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/856
The initial version here is copied with simple modifications from one I
wrote at Salesforce. I do not propose we actually commit this version, it's
jimczi commented on issue #854: Shared PQ Based Early Termination for
Concurrent Search
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/854#issuecomment-528035227
I thought that the follow up for LUCENE-8939 would be to allow the sharing
of the minimum score (could be extended to a
dsmiley commented on issue #828: LUCENE-8753: UniformSplitPostingsFormat
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/828#issuecomment-527974721
Thanks; looks good Bruno.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
bruno-roustant closed pull request #676: LUCENE-8753: SharedTerms UniformSplit
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/676
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
bruno-roustant commented on issue #676: LUCENE-8753: SharedTerms UniformSplit
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/676#issuecomment-527962140
Moved to #828 so I am closing this.
This is an automated message from
bruno-roustant commented on issue #828: LUCENE-8753: UniformSplitPostingsFormat
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/828#issuecomment-527941283
I added a new commit to integrate SharedTerms (same as PR#676 now obsolete).
It also fixes the lack of BlockEncoder for the FST.
dsmiley commented on issue #838: SOLR-13705 Double-checked locking bug is fixed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/838#issuecomment-527874693
+1 to the code you have here.
This is an automated message from the
bruno-roustant commented on a change in pull request #797: LUCENE-8921:
IndexSearcher.termStatistics requires docFreq totalTermFreq instead of
TermStates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/797#discussion_r320722038
##
File path:
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #797: LUCENE-8921:
IndexSearcher.termStatistics requires docFreq totalTermFreq instead of
TermStates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/797#discussion_r320717177
##
File path:
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #797: LUCENE-8921:
IndexSearcher.termStatistics requires docFreq totalTermFreq instead of
TermStates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/797#discussion_r320713838
##
File path:
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #797: LUCENE-8921:
IndexSearcher.termStatistics requires docFreq totalTermFreq instead of
TermStates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/797#discussion_r320713047
##
File path:
thomaswoeckinger opened a new pull request #855: SOLR-13739: Improve
performance on huge schema updates
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/855
Affects schemas containing ResourceLoaderAware components, increases
creation of a new collection with a huge schema by a factor 60
atris commented on issue #854: Shared PQ Based Early Termination for Concurrent
Search
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/854#issuecomment-527823824
cc @jpountz.
This PR builds on top of #831
This is an
atris opened a new pull request #854: Shared PQ Based Early Termination for
Concurrent Search
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/854
NOCOMMIT.
This is a WIP PR which implements a shared PQ based early termination. Each
collector collects independently into a thread
201 - 300 of 3240 matches
Mail list logo
