Dear Community
Apache Gump builds some of your projects and it is quite possible you
don't know or have by now forgotten about it.
More than half a year ago a technical problem has forced us to turn off
emails on build failures as we would have been sending out lots of false
alarms.
Before we
On 2012-07-08, Prescott Nasser wrote:
As a community, if you would please vote:
[+1] Ready for graduation
[-1] Not ready because...
+1
I know I speak for all the developers on this project, we appreciate
(and will continue to appreciate) everyone's contributions via the
mailing list and
On 2012-06-14, Christopher Currens wrote:
I've gone back and forth on whether I think we're ready for graduation or
not. I had always felt like we weren't because the project isn't as active
as I'd like it to be. However, I think I've been looking at it wrong.
We've got a good enough
On 2012-06-14, Troy Howard wrote:
The only reservation I have about graduation is losing or lessening
Stefan Bodewig's involvement. He's been really helpful. Can we keep
all of our mentors even if we graduate? :)
Thanks.
There is no rule that forces ex-mentors to unsubscribe from the
On 2012-06-15, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-06-14, Troy Howard wrote:
The only reservation I have about graduation is losing or lessening
Stefan Bodewig's involvement. He's been really helpful. Can we keep
all
Hi all,
a few days ago I saw few files without license headers and wanted to
provide a patch to fix them. I realized those files didn't have proper
line-ends and so the patch would have looked ugly (I am on Linux), I
fixed them in svn instead - don't worry, I won't start modifying code.
On 2012-06-02, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
I'm using git-svn, with auto-crlf set to true
I'm not familiar enough with git-svn. auto-crlf will cover the git side
but I don't think it sets the eol-style property in svn.
- I think this will cover it but let me know if my commits are bad...
I
On 2012-05-29, Christopher Currens wrote:
build commit all release should work. However, we have one or two issues
with our current trunk state [...]
I use the command: build simple all release which will clean, build and
generate an html report for the tests. It doesn't do stylecop rules,
Hi all,
for those not subscribed to the general list: Jukka (the current
chairman of the Incubator PMC and our shepherd this time around) raised
some questions about this quarter's report.
On 2012-04-30, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
ICLA signed and sent
and recorded by the secretary. Your name appears in this list
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
as well.
Many thanks
Stefan
On 2012-04-28, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
That mail from Stephan got lost in my inbox, so I never followed up on
that. I guess now would be a good chance to tie up all loose ends.
How do I do the ICLA?
In addition to what Troy said, you can also fill in the text form and
PGP-sign it when you
: Stefan Bodewig
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
Attachments: LUCENENET-474.patch
I'll attach a RAT generated patch shortly.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Bodewig updated LUCENENET-474:
-
Attachment: LUCENENET-474.patch
Patch that adds the missing license headers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Bodewig resolved LUCENENET-473.
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed with svn revision 1296052
Fix linefeeds
On 2012-02-29, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2012-02-28, Christopher Currens wrote:
Alright, it's done! 3.0.3 is now merged in with Trunk!
I'll see to running RAT and looking at the line-ends over the next few
days so we can get them fixed once and not run into it with the release.
I went
On 2012-02-28, Christopher Currens wrote:
Alright, it's done! 3.0.3 is now merged in with Trunk!
Great!
Let me know if anyone has any problems.
I'll see to running RAT and looking at the line-ends over the next few
days so we can get them fixed once and not run into it with the release.
On 2012-02-15, Christopher Currens wrote:
That's similar to a suggestion Stefan made in another email:
The only alternative would be [...] running a
dynamic server on a dedicated VM. The later would
be easier to negotiate for a top level project.
Though, his response seems to imply that
On 2012-02-14, Prescott Nasser wrote:
I've been trying to use the upload a tar.gz file to add docs to the
site to solve the publish takes forever problem. This actually doesn't
solve the problem at all - when uploading the tar file, it just untars
it and commits all the files for you (saving
Hi all,
If we want a blog for Lucene.Net on blogs.apache.org, the instructions
to request one are at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Resource+request+FAQs
Mainly we should have a list of ASF ids of the initial set of admins and
authors.
I had a look at how the RSS snippets are
On 2012-02-09, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Stefan, im looking into using the tarball approach to our docs. I
attempted to update the website yesterday and I ended up running out
of time waiting for the publish to happen.
I wish you good luck on the next attempt 8-)
Likely deleting all those HTMLs
Hi Sean,
I just now realized the responses you received
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/201201.mbox/%3CCAFZAm_XwoDKkTK9AuJ=zeegvtqufdmebwbz89pd6lbbjguc...@mail.gmail.com%3E
On 2012-02-01, Troy Howard wrote:
- Repeatable, documented process: We need a better more defined,
public and repeatable process for creating and building releases.
+1
Preferrably one the doesn't require binaries checked in into svn ;-)
No reason this needs to be done before graduation.
-
On 2012-02-01, Simone Chiaretta wrote:
As other said, while the user base is pretty big, the dev community is
relatively small and still relying on just a few people.
Can you recommend an approach that would draw in more developers? Is
there anything the current team should be doing or stop
[I started to write a really long response and then figured I should
split it to keep this thread focussed.]
On 2012-02-02, Simone Chiaretta wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-02-01, Simone Chiaretta wrote:
As other said, while the user
#generated-docs which may provide a
solution (the upload a tarball rather than use svn approach).]
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
What would you suggest?
Having a blog on the site, and have posts on what's going on, plans for the
future, to start
On 2012-01-31, Prescott Nasser wrote:
I didn't see a notice,
me neither
but something on general caught my eye.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule says: yes.
Thank you for reminding us.
Personally I'd like to see Lucene.NET graduate over the next three
months so it would be
On 2012-01-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
I've created a wiki page with the checklist:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Release+Checklist+and+steps+once+a+release+is+approved.
Thanks, I've added the points from my list.
I've also called a vote in general for 2.9.4g.
On 2012-01-20, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Sounds like these should be incorporated into a wiki page for the project
True. Any preference about which page?
Stefan
On 2012-01-18, Michael Herndon wrote:
Not be a miser, but I'm abstaining till we get a checklist for releases
going.
You know I don't perform any checks beyond what is required by ASF rules
and policies, I don't even verify the DLLs in the binary release are
.NET asemblies at all.
I know
On 2012-01-13, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Alright, take 2. I've applied Stefan's patch and retagged the
branch. I kept RC1 as it mostly stayed the
same. http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4g-incubating-RC1/
On 2012-01-02, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2011-12-30, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Hey All, The artifacts are ready to roll, they can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4g-incubating-RC1/
Signatures and checksums are good. NOTICE, LICENSE and ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
match my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Bodewig updated LUCENENET-460:
-
Attachment: 2.9.4g.headers.patch
Missing License Headers in 2.9.4g branch
On 2011-12-30, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Hey All, The artifacts are ready to roll, they can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4g-incubating-RC1/
Unfortunately I probably won't be able to review them for another 24
hours.
Is
On 2011-12-22, michael herndon wrote:
I'm not familiar enough with the licenses or procedures for incorporating
another project outside the ASF to speak on that. Others might have input
on that.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
If you decide you want to incorporate any
On 2011-12-01, Prescott Nasser wrote:
The december board report has been updated:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2011
Thanks!
Please review and adjust as needed,
I've renamed your Goals for graduation section to Long term goals as
I don't see any reason why you'd need to complete
On 2011-12-01, Prescott Nasser wrote:
I'm happy to announce that we've released Lucene.Net 2.9.4.
Congratulations all.
It may be a good idea to flesh this out a bit with details of what has
changed and sending an announcement to announce@apache as well (you must
use your @apache.org address in
On 2011-12-01, Simone Chiaretta wrote:
Currently there is a bit of confusion in the list of packages:
- There is Lucene with project id luceneby Apache SF relased on jan
11 frozen on version 2.9.2.2 http://nuget.org/List/Packages/Lucene
- There is Lucene.Net - (strong named 2.0/4.0)
On 2011-11-29, Prescott Nasser wrote:
1. Move the artifacts to the distribution place (not sure where or how yet)
/www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/lucene.net/
make sure all files and directories are owned by the group incubator and
group writable. If you create new directories, set the
Reporter: Stefan Bodewig
Priority: Critical
Fix For: Lucene.Net 3.x, Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
I'm sorry I lead you into this but it seems the NOTICE files are to be kept to
the bare minimum, see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/20.mbox
On 2011-11-22, Prescott Nasser wrote:
My goal is to release 2.9.4 this month - it looks like we have no -1s
from our dev list so in the next day or so I will put that to the
general incubator list.
Please remember to mention you need two more IPMC member votes.
With the 4.0 release we
On 2011-11-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
My goal is to release 2.9.4 this month - it looks like we have no -1s
from our dev list so in the next day or so I will put that to the
general incubator list.
Please remember to mention you need two more IPMC member votes.
I just sent that vote email
On 2011-11-20, Prescott Nasser wrote:
I've updated the files - same location
Thanks a lot!
Hashes and sigs are good. All required legal files are in place. src
zip still matches the tag (so I didn't have to re-run RAT)
+1
Stefan
On 2011-11-18, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Third time is the charm:
I'm afraid it is not.
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
Sigs and hashes are good. Source zip and tag match except for the
build/lib/doc dirs that are only inside the tag and which I agree is a
Hi all,
Lucene.NET would have been due for its quarterly board report this
month. Unfortunately the automatic reminder email was off and I (along
with all others it seems) forgot to check the list of podlings that were
supposed to report.
I think it would be best to provide a report in December
On 2011-11-02, Prescott Nasser wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC2/
As usual, no technical opinion at all, I leave that to others.
Sigs and hashes look good. NOTICE and LICENSE are fine.
RAT is almost happy, we should add license headers to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Bodewig updated LUCENENET-453:
-
Attachment: LUCENENET-453.inconsistent-eol.patch
patch that fixes inconsistent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Bodewig updated LUCENENET-453:
-
Attachment: LUCENENET-453.list-of-files-with-missing-svn_eol-style.txt
list of files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141952#comment-13141952
]
Stefan Bodewig commented on LUCENENET-451:
--
This lead to RAT-100 (which is now
On 2011-11-02, Prescott Nasser wrote:
I briefly touched on this in a prior email, but we have a our docs
located
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/site/docs/, they
need to be moved under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141932#comment-13141932
]
Stefan Bodewig commented on LUCENENET-451:
--
I've used RAT's trunk to add
On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Artifacts are located here:
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC1/
Is there a tag in svn that is supposed to correspond to them? My guess
is http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC1/.
But then I find
On 2011-10-31, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
The only other test I'd perform was running RAT which I'll do shortly
and post the results here.
The binary look good, but
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/lucene.net/src.rat.txt
Way too many files without license headers. I can and will provide a
patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Bodewig updated LUCENENET-451:
-
Attachment: LUCENENET-451.trunk.patch
Patch against trunk that adds licenses to most
On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Stefan - doc folder was left out intentionally for this reason.
OK. I wonder whether it should be moved out of trunk.
Also the Lib folder, I left out, I thought it was additional dll's
that weren't part of Lucene that others might need. I can put that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Bodewig updated LUCENENET-451:
-
Attachment: (was: LUCENENET-451.trunk.patch)
Missing License Headers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13140066#comment-13140066
]
Stefan Bodewig commented on LUCENENET-451:
--
I will re-create the patch
Hi Prescott,
thank you for pushing things forward.
On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Done - i've uploaded the new files to the same place. I actually found
an issue with the bin.zip file, so it was good that I merged that bug
fix in.
I'm pretty sure you know that, but if you decide to
On 2011-10-03, Prescott Nasser wrote:
I think we're ready, i just dont know the procedures to call a vote.
Don't know the exact details for Lucene.Net but the general approach is
likely always the same.
* Make sure your PGP key is inside the KEYS file people will use to
check the artifacts
Michael,
On 2011-09-23, mhern...@apache.org wrote:
Added: incubator/lucene.net/trunk/build/scripts/All/Lucene.Net.nuspec
?xml version=1.0?
package xmlns=http://schemas.microsoft.com/packaging/2010/07/nuspec.xsd;
metadata
idLucene.Net.Core/id
version$version$/version
This - and
On 2011-09-23, Michael Herndon wrote:
Other than talking on the private list, is there any infrastructure to
sharing api keys, passwords for committers of a project? I've tried
looking at docs on people.apache.org, infra, and other others place but no
dice so far. The issue with the private
On 2011-09-22, Danijel Kecman wrote:
i would like to contribute.
welcome Danijel.
The best way to start contributing is by looking at the issues in JIRA
pick one and start providing patches there - as well as engaging in
discussion on this list.
Cheers
Stefan
On 2011-09-18, Michael Herndon wrote:
The rest needs to be done by jenkins admins and/or myself.
OK.
Hopefully we'll have builds rolling by the end of this month =)
Sounds great.
And I plan to leverage your work for log4net once you are done. 8-)
Stefan
On 2011-09-17, Michael Herndon wrote:
Who is our current PMC?
The Incubator PMC.
Stefan
On 2011-09-18, Michael Herndon wrote:
So would requesting getting an account be requested on lucene-net-private@
incubator.apache.org ?
Creating the account requires PMC chairman karma, which I happen to
posess. I've just added you to the hudson-jobadmin group.
I don't see any place that
On 2011-09-07, Prescott Nasser wrote:
I have heard people use http://www.bitwidgets.com/ to success. I have
not used it myself though.
This looks useful at first glance. Unless anything else is mentioned
I'm going to apply for a free license for Open Source projects and share
my experience
Hi,
this is not about Lucene.NET even though it might be useful here as
well.
Over in log4net land we are trying to get our act together and finally
do a new release.
Given that many years have passed and the people active now haven't been
around all the time we are looking for a tool that
On 2011-09-07, Michael Herndon wrote:
Stefan Bodewig might still be away
He is back ;-)
and I think we need his vote on the release when the time
comes. (correct me, because I could be uber wrong).
For the release you need three +1s by Incubator PMC members. After
voting here a second vote
On 2011-08-10, Michael Herndon wrote:
Updated: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011: anyone looking into
this thread feel free to tweak.
Thanks a lot, looks good to me but I have a few questions to ask - which
may or may not get answered inside the report.
* Lucene.Net 2.9.4 2.9.4g
On 2011-08-10, Michael Herndon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-08-10, Michael Herndon wrote:
Updated: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011: anyone looking
into
this thread feel free to tweak.
Thanks a lot, looks good to me
Hi all,
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html contains quite a
few blanks that I think we could easily fill. I intend to either add
some N/A or real dates where I can during the coming week.
On the IP issues part (copyright and distribution rights) I trust the
Lucene PMC has been
The Apache Software Foundation (ASF)'s Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) is
now accepting applications for ApacheCon North America 2011, 7-11 November
in Vancouver BC, Canada.
The TAC is seeking individuals from the Apache community at-large --users,
developers, educators, students, Committers,
Hi all,
a quick heads up, since I can't find any content so far. Your board
report input is needed by Wednesday in
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2011
Thanks
Stefan
On 2011-03-25, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Stefan, how do you read their licensing:
http://www.db4o.com/about/company/legalpolicies/docl.aspx
By your reading is it possible to include this in our repo to keep
everything together? or would this have to be outside the ASF?
The usual IANAL
On 2011-03-25, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2011-03-24, Scott Lombard wrote:
It seemed to me that it may be possible that the ASF could come to an
agreement with Versant and under a db4o Opensource Compatibility
License (dOCL) allow a Sharpen variant in our repository.
I haven't followed
On 2011-03-14, Scott Lombard wrote:
I wanted to get a final agreement on how we want to handle commits to the
repository. There have been discussions in a couple of different threads
about this topic. I know patches, branches and just go for it has been
discussed and different people have
On 2011-03-08, Prescott Nasser wrote:
thanks for the nudge - I've updated this section
Thank you
Stefan
On 2011-03-07, Michael Herndon wrote:
Do you think we should pursue asking to clear with fundraising and as
a whole and go back to NDepend? There seems to be mention of donation
of VMWare and other things at the end of the page.
This may be a good idea, yes. I'll take care of it.
NCover
On 2011-03-01, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
this is one of the pain^H^H^H^Hjoys you've taken on yourself by entering
the incubator 8-)
Lucene.NET will be on a monthly schedule the first three month and then
change to a quarterly schedule for as long as you need to graduate.
On 2011-03-01, no-re
On 2011-03-07, Michael Herndon wrote:
Does the following violate any of the rules put forth by apache or
give anyone pause?
If you could put our Powered by NDepend logo on your OSS project
website we'd be happy to sponsor Apache Lucene.Net.
Yes it does.
You can't sponsor individual
On 2011-03-07, Troy Howard wrote:
We just finished a new official release, and I will be announcing it
either today or tomorrow (I was waiting for the mirror sites to get
updated before announcing it). It's located here:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/lucene.net/
But the download page
On 2011-03-04, Michael Herndon wrote:
Anything that should be on the mailing list, in the cms, on a wiki
page, on twitter, or in a jira should be persuaded to find the right
medium to do so.
That's fine, but as Digy already said IRC (or any synchronous medium
like a phone call, face to face
Hi all,
this is one of the pain^H^H^H^Hjoys you've taken on yourself by entering
the incubator 8-)
Lucene.NET will be on a monthly schedule the first three month and then
change to a quarterly schedule for as long as you need to graduate.
On 2011-03-01, no-re...@apache.org wrote:
The board
On 2011-02-28, Michael Herndon wrote:
So the CI choices for Apache are the following:
- Buildbot http://ci.apache.org/#buildbot
- Continuum http://ci.apache.org/#continuum
- Gump http://ci.apache.org/#gump
- Hudson http://ci.apache.org/#hudson
I could talk hours about Gump
On 2011-02-28, Troy Howard wrote:
One quick concern I have, is how much of the things listed are already
available on the Apache hudson server?
builds@apache is the place to ask.
A lot of this is .NET specific, so unlikely that it will already be
available.
well, the DotCMIS build seems to
On 2011-02-23, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Not only cosmetic:
* The NOTICE file contains a bad copyright year and doesn't talk about
Lucene.NET at all. Make that Lucene.NET rather than Lucene and
2006-2011.
* LICENSE talks about src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/UnicodeUtil.java
and src
On 2011-02-25, Troy Howard wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Unless anybody yells I'll put some time aside today to create a patch
that fixes the issues in trunk and should hopefully be easy to merge to
the 2.9.2 tag/branch and will attach
Hi,
I've updated the RAT reports at
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/Lucene.NET/
Binary looks good to me as I know the .xml files are generated, the
source archive still contains a file licensed under the 1.1 version
(TestSnowball.cs) and the .nunit, .config, .ndoc and build.xml files
could
On 2011-02-25, Troy Howard wrote:
I updated the .src zip and associated checksums/signatures at:
I have verified the bin zip is still the same that I checked. All
signatures and hashes are fine, RAT is reasonably happy with the src zip
(I've updated
On 2011-02-23, Troy Howard wrote:
That makes sense. We've been serving up the distributions from
~/lucene.net/site/download in our svn repo through the website.
Ah, understood. This is not the way you should do it - in fact you
should never have done. Releases are supposed to take advantage
On 2011-02-23, Troy Howard wrote:
Whenever we get our CI server setup, we should probably have a build
task which checks for licensing in code files and inserts it if it's
not there.
Buildbot http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html can be set up to create
RAT reports, even for projects that use
On 2011-02-23, Troy Howard wrote:
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC1 is
available and ready for your testing and voting.
Great.
I could successfully verify your PGP signature.
Release candidate artifacts:
On 2011-02-23, Michael Herndon wrote:
Also, I'm already leaning towards hudson since we're limited to CI choices
supported by apache.
This is likely to become Jenkins rather than Hudson soon.
Stefan
On 2011-02-22, Troy Howard wrote:
I found that we have an extant KEYS.TXT at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/site/download/KEYS.txt
Would it be acceptable to simply add to that file, or is this file in
the wrong location?
The location doesn't really matter but you
On 2011-02-21, Troy Howard wrote:
If we keep the key private, how do we then manage it? Is there a place
to store these kinds of resources, where only the committers have
access?
If this is the route you wanted to go it would be easy to set up an svn
area that only committers had read access
On 2011-02-21, Troy Howard wrote:
As a general question about process around accepting software
contributions, one thing I'm a little confused about: How does
accepting this contribution differ from a normal contribution?
Not much.
By that I mean, suppose a developer contributed a
On 2011-02-21, Ayende Rahien wrote:
There are many situations where you _have_ to have a strong key, or
example, gac deployments. In those cases, anything in the chain also
have to have strong key.
Yes, I knew that. Sorry if I sounded stupid. In most cases I try to
avoid the GAC and my
On 2011-02-20, Robert Jordan wrote:
On 20.02.2011 07:49, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
If you talk about strong naming assemblies then I don't have any
experience how a well designed scheme of sharing the key between several
developers might work. As the maintainer of XMLUnit I'd be interested
On 2011-02-19, Digy wrote:
I think there is a misunderstanding about the release. In Apache way, a
release is a *signed* binary release(compiled version).
Uhm no.
Apache releases are OpenPGP signed bundles of source code (zip or tar.gz
doesn't matter).
Any binary distribution you create is
On 2011-02-19, Troy Howard wrote:
Disclaimer: Troy's Personal Opinions (tm) which may be controversial,
will be found below
Regarding the idea of 'feature branches', I guess I should make it
clear that I personally don't agree with this workflow in SVN.
This is completely appropriate for
On 2011-02-18, Troy Howard wrote:
Pending resolution of the legal issues around ingesting the code into
Lucene.Net,
All it takes is:
* attach the code to a JIRA ticket.
* have software grants signed by all contributors to the original code
base.
* write a single page for the Incubator
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
