Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

+1 On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 19:20, Gora Mohanty wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 22:42, Kevin Risden wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >>> Geospatial

Re: Welcome Jim Ferenczi to the PMC

Congrats Jim! On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > Welcome Jim! > > On 20 Dec 2017, at 10:18, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that Jim Ferenczi has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > Welcome Jim! > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:05:17.701417] On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:26 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:36:22.387901] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Please

Re: Release 7.1

+1! On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:09 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 to get 7.1 out! >> >> Le lun. 9 oct. 2017 à 17:54, Shalin Shekhar Mangar a >> écrit : >> >>>

Re: lucene-solr:branch_6_6: LUCENE-7869: Changed MemoryIndex to sort 1d points.

Thanks for noticing this Alan! I've reverted the changes to this file and then re-added the entry to CHANGES.txt in two separate commits. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:23 PM Martijn v Groningen < martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, this is a mistake. Let me fix this. > > On T

Re: lucene-solr:branch_6_6: LUCENE-7869: Changed MemoryIndex to sort 1d points.

Yes, this is a mistake. Let me fix this. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:16 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > There’s a few unrelated edits to CHANGES.txt here which I think might be a > mistake? > > > On 8 Jun 2017, at 11:23, m...@apache.org wrote: > > > > Repository: lucene-solr > > Updated

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC5

+1 SUCCESS! [1:22:57.327825] On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:39 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:05:04.157336] > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 5 for Lucene/Solr

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [0:48:26.225331] On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:43 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0The artifacts can be > downloaded >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Thanks, I've pushed the change to the 6.6 branch. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:42 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure Martijn, please go ahead. Thanks. > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Martijn v Groningen < > martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com&

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Hi Ishan, I like to backport LUCENE-7810 to the 6.6 branch. Is that okay with you? Martijn On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:02 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Adrien! +1 for the LUCENE-7847 merge. > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Adrien Grand

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:16:42.421075] On 24 March 2017 at 17:11, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > Lucene changes, docs and javadocs look good. The smoke tester passed for > me (I’ve lost the timing, sorry, was like 28 minutes). > > Solr’s HTML changes, docs and javadocs have moved online

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.1.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:40:22.702419] On 14 June 2016 at 02:39, Steve Rowe wrote: > I’ve committed fixes for all three problems. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Jun 13, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > > > Smoke tester was happy: SUCCESS!

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.1.0

+1 On 2 June 2016 at 14:52, Joel Bernstein wrote: > +1 > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> - >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >>

Re: Welcome Karl Wright as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome! On 5 April 2016 at 01:35, Karl Wright wrote: > Thanks to all for the warm welcome!! I am honored to be a part of this > team. > > Karl > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Koji Sekiguchi < > koji.sekigu...@rondhuit.com> wrote: > >> Welcome Karl! >> >> Koji >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 Thanks for doing this Nick! SUCCESS! [0:40:21.687836] On 1 April 2016 at 22:44, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Move trunk to Java 8

+1 On 12 September 2014 17:48, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ryan Ernst r...@iernst.net wrote: It has been 6 months since Java 8 was released. It has proven to be both stable (no issues like with the initial release of java 7) and faster.

Re: [VOTE] 4.9.0

+1 all test pass. Lets close the vote. Op 23 jun. 2014 09:19 schreef Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com: +1 SUCCESS! [0:43:52.973702] On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Artifacts here: http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_solr_4_9_0_r1604085/

Re: 4.9

+1 On 13 June 2014 14:06, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Joel Bernstein Search Engineer at Heliosearch On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: +1 Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr release 4.8.1

+1 SUCCESS! [2:12:07.466713] On 17 May 2014 06:05, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [2:30:42.364774] On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have created a release candidate at

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [2:38:57.708807] On 26 March 2014 13:11, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.comwrote: +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:13.965589] On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote for the first Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.7.1. Download it

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [1:52:31.345809] Only spotted a small docs typo in the Lucene CHANGES.txt, the second issue under Changes in Runtime Behavior should be LUCENE-5399 instead of LUCENE-4399. On 21 February 2014 02:50, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [1:05:52.694842] - Mark

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

Simon, I'll fix the typo in CHANGES.txt and also move the issue under optimisations as Robert suggested. On 21 February 2014 14:24, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: SUCCESS! [2:00:24.392734] One thing we should fix in the future: The MANIFEST.MF of almost all JAR files contains the

Re: Welcome Benson Margulies as Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Benson! On 28 January 2014 16:19, Wolfgang Hoschek whosc...@cloudera.com wrote: Welcome on board! Wolfgang. On Jan 26, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: Good to have you aboard! Erick On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Welcome Areek Zillur as Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Areek! On 23 January 2014 01:39, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: Welcome, Areek! koji -- http://soleami.com/blog/mahout-and-machine-learning- training-course-is-here.html (14/01/22 4:26), Robert Muir wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Areek Zillur has accepted to

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.6.0 Take 3

+1 a happy smoker: SUCCESS! [1:35:43.581808] On 19 November 2013 18:35, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote: +1 smoke tester happy. Shai On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: +1 -- Adrien

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.6.0

+1! The smoker test succeeded. On 14 November 2013 15:09, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.comwrote: +1 SUCCESS! [2:50:09.253204] () however we have the usual ***WARNING***: javadocs want to fail! for Solr (which IMHO we should fix) Regards, Tommaso 2013/11/14 Shai

Re: Welcome Ryan Ernst as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Ryan! On 14 October 2013 20:13, Ryan Ernst r...@iernst.net wrote: Thanks Adrian. I grew up in Bakersfield, CA (colloquially known as the armpit of California). I escaped and went to Cal Poly for my bachelors in computer science, and after a very brief stint working on HPUX, I

Re: Welcome Joel Bernstein

Welcome Joel! On 3 October 2013 15:45, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 10/2/2013 11:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: The Lucene PMC is happy to welcome Joel Bernstein as a committer on the Lucene and Solr project. Joel has been working on a number of issues on the project and we

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC5

+1 smoke tester is happy. On 30 September 2013 14:37, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.comwrote: +1, smoke tester is happy. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote to release the

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC2

+1 smoker is also happy on my end On 25 September 2013 08:55, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: Here is a new release candidate that fixes some JavaBin codec backward compatibility issues (SOLR-5261, SOLR-4221). Please vote to release the following artifacts:

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0

+1 Smoke tester passes On 19 September 2013 11:47, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Smoke tester passes; changes, docs and javadocs look good. Steve On Sep 18, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Please test and vote to release the following Lucene

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 3179 - Still Failing!

Thanks for fixing this test bug! On 22 August 2013 16:11, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: I committed a fix: slowwrapper bug On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote: Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/3179/

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 3179 - Still Failing!

oops :) I see that now after checking the commit! On 23 August 2013 14:56, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: the bug was not in the test, the test found a bug in slow wrapper itself! :) On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Martijn v Groningen martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks

Re: Welcome Cassandra Targett as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome! On 1 August 2013 09:06, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: Welome Cassandra! -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b96) - Build # 6593 - Failure!

I'll fix. On 16 July 2013 21:05, Policeman Jenkins Server jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote: Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/6593/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b96 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED:

Re: svn commit: r1503837 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/queries/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queries/TermFilterTest.java

Just did this... On 16 July 2013 21:19, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Hi Martijn, Maybe remove the System.out? Uwe m...@apache.org schrieb: Author: mvg Date: Tue Jul 16 19:15:24 2013 New Revision: 1503837 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1503837 Log: LUCENE-5088: Fixed test

Re: svn commit: r1503837 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/queries/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queries/TermFilterTest.java

This should fix this, b/c value2 (one extra character) will always be different than value1. The test initially failed b/c value1 and value2 were equal. On 16 July 2013 21:37, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Does this really fix this or just make it less likely to happen...? On Tue, Jul

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.4

+1 Smoker ran successful On 16 July 2013 17:36, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Smoke tester is happy on mac. On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote to release Lucene and Solr 4.4, built off revision 1503555 of

Re: svn commit: r1503837 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/queries/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queries/TermFi lterTest.java

True, I misunderstood Robert and_TestUtil#randomRealisticUnicodeString(random). I will change the test. Thanks for pointing this out to me. On 16 July 2013 23:12, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote: : This should fix this, b/c value2 (one extra character) will always be :

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.3-Java6 - Build # 104 - Still Failing

I'll look into this one. On 25 June 2013 01:40, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.orgwrote: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.3-Java6/104/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestBlockJoinSorting.testNestedSorting Error Message:

Re: [VOTE] Lucene Solr 4.3.1 RC1

+1 Smoker ran successful as well. On 12 June 2013 21:24, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote: +1 I upgraded Elasticsearch and all tests pass. Smoketester is happy too simon On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.comwrote: +1 -Yonik

Re: Welcome Han Jiang as a new Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Han! On 8 June 2013 17:50, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 6/8/2013 4:01 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Han Jiang has accepted to join our ranks as a committer. Welcome to the project, Han! - Shawn

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b89) - Build # 5736 - Still Failing!

Committed a fix for this. Hopefully it doesn't fail any more. On 23 May 2013 23:14, Policeman Jenkins Server jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote: Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/5736/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b89 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.3 RC4

+1 Smoke tester passed. On 30 April 2013 20:38, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Adrien. I re-ran the smoke tester and it passed this time. +1 to release RC4. Steve On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Steve, On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:57

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 5334 - Failure!

Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: martijn.is.h...@gmail.com [mailto:martijn.is.h...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Martijn v Groningen Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 8:34 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 5334 - Failure!

I looked into a previous failure of this test and committed a fix for that. I think that fix caused this failure. In the fix I use of the NoMergePolicy and this seems to break the assert in the RandomIndexWriter#doRandomForceMerge() method. On 28 April 2013 19:17, Michael McCandless

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk - Build # 246 - Still Failing

I'm looking into this failure. On 26 April 2013 12:01, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.orgwrote: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk/246/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestBlockJoinSorting.testNestedSorting Error

Re: [VOTE] Lucene Solr 4.3.0 RC3

+1, smoker is happy On 24 April 2013 10:03, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: +1, smoke tests pass. Tommaso 2013/4/23 Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com Here is a new RC candidate... http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC3-rev1470846/

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1

+1 The smoker tester ran successful! On 19 April 2013 08:18, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/ Thanks everybody for the hard work! Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! Integration into ES is successful!

Re: Welcome Shalin Shekhar Mangar to the PMC

Congrats Shalin! On 6 April 2013 00:54, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 4/4/2013 12:24 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Shalin Shekhar Mangar has accepted the PMC's invitation to join. Congratulations, Shalin!

Re: Welcome Adrien Grand to the PMC

Welcome Adrien :) On 29 March 2013 08:49, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote: Seems like you have those release voting rights now after all :) Congratulations. Dawid -- Met vriendelijke groet, Martijn van Groningen

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.2.1 RC2

+1 The smokeReleaseTest again ran successfully. On 27 March 2013 16:09, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: Is that a +1 ? :) That's a good question. I didn't want to +1 in order to make the counting easier since

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.2.1

+1 The smokeTestRelease script ran successful On 26 March 2013 08:53, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote: Upgrade ES to 4.2.1 - all tests pass +1 thanks mark for rolling this release! simon On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1

+1! The smoke test ran successful. On 17 January 2013 17:38, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, Christian, I should have pointed to the JIRA issue for the apache- prefix removal: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4287 - Steve On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Steve Rowe

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

+1 Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. On 21 December 2012 01:07, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On OS X 10.8.2, the smoke tester passes for me, except for the same javadoc errors Mike reported, under Oracle Java 1.7.0_10. (I commented out the Java7

Re: Welcome Sami Siren to the PMC

Welcome Sami! On 13 December 2012 17:17, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote: welcome! On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks guys for the warm welcome. It's great to be back ;) -- Sami Siren On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Adrien Grand

Re: Welcome Alan Woodward as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Alan! On 17 October 2012 10:04, Alan Woodward alan.woodw...@romseysoftware.co.uk wrote: Thanks Robert. I'm a developer based in Cambridge, UK, and have been working on search engines for 10 years or so. Up until a couple of years ago I was mainly using closed-source

Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)

+1 On 10 October 2012 05:23, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote: +1 -Yonik http://lucidworks.com On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found

Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)

+1 smoke tester is also happy on my machine. Martijn On 27 September 2012 21:16, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: +1, smoke tester is happy on my [Linux] env. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com

Re: VOTE: release 4.0

+1, Smoker tester also ran successfully on my machine (Ubuntu 12.04.1) Martijn On 24 September 2012 14:48, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: +1, smoke tester is happy on Ubuntu 12.04. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Robert

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6 - Build # 608 - Failure

Committed a fix for this. On 9 September 2012 21:31, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: This failure reproduces ... I'm not sure what's up ... ant test -Dtestcase=GroupFacetCollectorTest -Dtests.method=testRandom -Dtests.seed=115039C6A89AE1D1 -Dtests.multiplier=3

Re: VOTE: 4.0-BETA

+1 SmokeTestRelease.py ran successfully. On 7 August 2012 05:32, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Artifacts here: http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.0bRC0-rev1370099/ The list of changes since 4.0-ALPHA is pretty large: lots of important bugs were fixed. This

Re: ToParentBlockJoinQuery vs filtered search

not really sure that it's needed for anyone. Could you please provide feedback for the latest patch, and/or move it forth or back? Regards by Martijn v Groningen-2 on Feb 06, 2012; 7:57pm URL: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ToParentBlockJoinQuery-vs-filtered-search-tp3717911p3719987

Re: svn commit: r1363272 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/LuceneTestCase.java

Thanks for also taking a look at the test failures! On 20 July 2012 19:14, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Martinj: thanks for looking into this! I think have a better fix for these: the problem is actually in the AssertingAtomicReaders that AssertingDirectoryReader wraps its

Re: svn commit: r1363272 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/LuceneTestCase.java

That is wanted! We want to test SlowMultiReaderWrapper and verify that it really behaves like a full conformant AtomicReader. Because of that we sometimes war with it. The fix Robert did is fine and is identical to the one we did in the past. As this is no real Lucene usage pattern, not

Re: Move ValueSourceFilter to query module?

+1 Good idea. I think that there also should be other implementations for the different primitive types. Maybe the inclusive or exclusive filtering can be a boolean option? Martijn On 23 July 2012 19:37, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote: In the spatial utils package I've got a

Re: FieldCache goes insane in JoinUtils

I tried to reproduce the failure on my local machine, but the test didn't fail: ant test -Dtestcase=TestJoinUtil -Dtests.method=testSingleValueRandomJoin -Dtests.seed=4613CDE1DF5391F -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dtests.nightly=true -Dtests.slow=true

Re: Welcome Greg Bowyer

Welcome! On 21 June 2012 13:09, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Greg! --  Sami Siren On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Greg Bowyer has been added as a Lucene/Solr committer. Greg: It's a tradition

Re: Grouping - Boosting large groups

Hi Corwin, This not yet possible out of the box. However I think it is possible: 1) Create a Lucene collector that counts for all groups the number of document that match. This collector will basically compute a map with the group value as key and a count as value 2) Run this collector as an

Re: Grouping - Boosting large groups

I assumed using the queries module, which isn't in 3.x. After a look at the 3.x codebase this doesn't seem to be a problem. Since all the classes you need are in: o.a.l.search.function package inside core Lucene. You can use the CustomScoreQuery ValueSourceQuery instead of the BoostedQuery.

Re: Welcome Adrien Grand as a new Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome! On 7 June 2012 22:16, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote: Welcome Adrien! ~ David On Jun 7, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Adrien Grand has joined our ranks as a committer. He has been contributing various patches to Lucene/Solr,

Re: remove via

+1 to remove the via. If someone has done work other then reviewing and committing then he could add himself as one of the author (Order is important; contributor first then committer. Depending on the work done). Maybe the contributors that have contributed in a release can also be highlighted

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)

+1. I ran the smokeTestRelease script successfully and everything looks fine to me. Martijn On 7 April 2012 12:31, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (tested on 2 different machines, Mac OSX 10.6/10.7) Tommaso 2012/4/6 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com Artifacts here:

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6

Hi, A few days ago Cody Young discovered a bug in Solr's distributed grouping (SOLR-3316). This bug also occurs in the 3x code. I attached a bug fix in the issue. I think it is an important bug fix. Can I commit the fix to branch3x or is it already too late? Martijn On 6 April 2012 13:35,

Re: svn commit: r1304320 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java

I don't know. I wasn't aware that iff has a meaning. I'll change it back if it is: if and only if. Martijn On 23 March 2012 13:57, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Is this a typo or intended to be iff (if and only if)? On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:50 AM, m...@apache.org wrote: Author: mvg

Re: svn commit: r1304320 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java

On 23 March 2012 14:06, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: I agree, and if its really important for some reason to document something as if and only if, I think we should write it out completely and avoid specialized abbreviations. +1 I Completely agree. Martijn

Re: svn commit: r1304320 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java

should open an issue to fix this confusion? On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Martijn v Groningen martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 March 2012 14:06, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: I agree, and if its really important for some reason to document something as if and only if, I

Re: svn commit: r1304320 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java

Early days of electronic text and a math professor I had had a colleague who submitted a math textbook. Someone decided that iff was a typo and did a mass substitution of if. As my prof said Going through a math text and putting back all the iff's that were supposed to be in the proofs was

Re: 3.6 branching

I propose for 3.6 that we don't create a release branch but just use our branch_3x as the release branch. We can 'svn mv' it to 'lucene_solr_3_6' when the release is ready. Normally we would branch and open up branch_3x as 3.7 for changes, but from previous discussions we intend to release

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3265) TestSolrEntityProcessorEndToEnd fails if you have a running Solr instance

:-) If I run the tests on my personal macbook it also takes a very very very long time to complete. This macbook is 5 years old... Luckily I do have another faster machine. On 22 March 2012 15:00, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: No, I have an OS X about 3 years old. Sometimes

Re: Java 1.6 EOL

Maybe some time after the 4.x branch is created, the trunk can move to Java 7? 3.x branch supports Java 5, 4.x and current trunk support Java 6. Seems natural to me that the future 5.x and future trunk would support Java 7... Martijn On 16 March 2012 15:50, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 12754 - Failure

I committed a fix for this. Martijn On 15 March 2012 12:11, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.orgwrote: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12754/ All tests passed Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 15069 lines...]

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 12658 - Failure

I committed a fix for this. Martijn On 8 March 2012 11:11, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.orgwrote: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12658/ All tests passed Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 4672 lines...] [junit] [junit]

Re: TestStressNRT failures.

I also don't get any failures. I ran the test on a linux box (latest checkout) and with -Dtests.iter=1000 Martijn On 8 March 2012 13:45, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: Not a linux box, but -Dtests.iter=1000 and no failures on my Macbook Pro. FWIW Erick On Wed, Mar 7, 2012

Re: Plans to add functions to results of groups

I haven't seen an issue describing this. Something like this was available in the SOLR-236 patches, but never got committed. I started to create a second pass collector that counts the distinct values of a particular field for the top N groups in LUCENE-3444. I think there might be a need for a

Re: pending backports for 3.6

+1! On 6 March 2012 07:35, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote: I think we should then release 3.6, freeze 3.x for maintenance, and create branch_4x to work towards a 4.0 beta (this is March 2012). +1. On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Can we

Re: ideas for alphas/betas?

Seems like a good idea to me. Martijn On 6 March 2012 07:42, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote: I agree. Maybe we should also tag issues as 4.0-alpha, 4.0-beta in JIRA? For 4.0-alpha we'll tag all the issues that are expected to change the index format, and 4.0-beta all the issues that

Re: Welcome Stefan Matheis

Welcome Stefan! Martijn On 29 February 2012 22:14, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Stefan! -- Sami Siren - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: FieldCache future?

Grouping etc could work solely on a docvalues api and maybe they have a special ctor to take a SortedBytes impl (and fieldcache implements the docvalues api or some other backwards mechanism). This would remove the redundant implementations (both fieldcache and DV implementations) in stuff

Re: Welcome Sami Siren as committer

Welcome Sami! Martijn On 19 February 2012 19:24, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote: Congratulations Sami! Dawid On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome ! Shai On Feb 19, 2012 6:44 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Welcome Christian Moen as committer

Welcome Christian! Martijn On 14 February 2012 23:01, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Welcome Christian! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Christian Moen has

Re: Welcome Jan Høydahl to the PMC

Congrats Jan! Op 13 feb. 2012 15:53 schreef Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com het volgende: Welcome Jan ! Shai On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm pleased to announce that Jan has accepted the PMC's invitation to join. Congratulations Jan! --

Re: Welcome James Dyer

Welcome! On 10 February 2012 14:18, Chris Male gento...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Welcome James! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Grant Ingersoll

Re: Welcome Martijn van Groningen to the Lucene PMC

Thanks guys! I'm really delighted. @Erick Sure! There is lots of open source work to do. Martijn On 8 February 2012 08:44, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote: Congratulations Martijn. On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats Martijn! Shai

Re: Welcome Dawid Weiss to the Lucene/Solr PMC

Congratulations Dawid! On 8 February 2012 08:44, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote: Thank you guys, I'm truly honored. Dawid On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: I'm please to announce that Dawid has accepted the PMC's invitation to join.

Re: [JENKINS] Solr-3.x - Build # 592 - Failure

Oops my fault. Javadoc error. On 7 February 2012 23:04, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-3.x/592/ No tests ran. Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 19887 lines...]

Re: [JENKINS] Solr-3.x - Build # 592 - Failure

Committed a fix. On 7 February 2012 23:06, Martijn v Groningen martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com wrote: Oops my fault. Javadoc error. On 7 February 2012 23:04, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-3.x/592/ No tests ran. Build Log

Re: ToParentBlockJoinQuery vs filtered search

Hi Mikhail, There is already an issue open for supporting block join in Solr: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3076 Maybe you can attach your work in that issue and we can iterate from there. Martijn On 6 February 2012 14:54, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: On

Re: Welcome David Smiley

Welcome! On 5 February 2012 16:01, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote: Welcome David! Dawid On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Welcome! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail:

Re: Welcome Tommaso Teofili as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome! On 27 January 2012 05:49, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome ! Shai On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Welcome Tommaso! -- Met vriendelijke groet, Martijn van Groningen

  1   2   >