Just catching up after a couple of weeks away here; phew there is lots
going on!
Re splitting the projects, there has been some project reorganization
(we created a new TLP in Apache), but no real change yet. I think the
idea is to get the software separated, and then people will follow
their
Hi All,
When do these projects separate into their own TLP's? What is the timeline?
Or is there documentation on the process of splitting an existing project
into two separate projects?
Best,
Marcus
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 1:51 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> It is now Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 8:46 AM
It is now Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 8:46 AM GMT.
A re-spin of the vote closing/ summary.
48 votes have been posted: 37 from PMC members, 8 from committers and
3 from user community.
>From this total 8 people voted -1 and 40 people voted +1. Vote
distribution among PMC members (binding votes):
+1 (binding)
> On 18 May 2020, at 10:46, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> I am closing this vote, thank you for participating.
>
> 46 votes have been posted: 35 from PMC members, 8 from committers and
> 3 from user community.
>
> From this total 8 people voted -1 and 38 people voted +1. Vote
>
Sure, I'd considered timezones before responding. The archive permalink for
the original message shows a date of "Tue, 12 May 2020 07:36:57 GMT".
Permalink:
> The vote began on May 12th and the initial message said it will "be active
> for a week to give everyone a chance to read
> and cast a vote".
I thought I'd sent it on Monday, which would make a week today. Time
zones will also kick in because I live in Europe... I can wait a day
more - not a
+1 (committer)
Regards,
Alex.
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 03:37, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene
Dawid,
The vote began on May 12th and the initial message said it will "be active
for a week to give everyone a chance to read
and cast a vote".
The vote should remain open until at least May 19th.
- Dennis
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 4:55 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Correction - Jim is a PMC member
Correction - Jim is a PMC member (apologies, Jim; you may want to
update [1]). This means the results are updated to:
Vote distribution among PMC members (binding votes):
[+1]: 32
[-1]: 4
D.
[1] https://lucene.apache.org/whoweare.html
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:46 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
I am closing this vote, thank you for participating.
46 votes have been posted: 35 from PMC members, 8 from committers and
3 from user community.
>From this total 8 people voted -1 and 38 people voted +1. Vote
distribution among PMC members (binding votes):
[+1]: 31
[-1]: 4
The vote has
For the reasons I included in my message on the discussion thread (
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202005.mbox/%3CCAPsCRSWds%3Dctvf837BFRXqyPxGLJ-5a%2B3hCa6HwrA8FFR5MQkA%40mail.gmail.com%3E)
I'm voting in favor of this. I hope the actual execution of it will follow
the path
+1 (binding)
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:07 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development
+1 (binding) for Solr to become TLP (and for separating the two projects from
each other)
Regards,
Doron
--
Sent from:
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-Java-Developer-f564358.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
Otis
--
http://sematext.com
> On May 15, 2020, at 15:13, kwatters wrote:
>
> -1
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-Java-Developer-f564358.html
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
-1
--
Sent from:
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-Java-Developer-f564358.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
+1
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 19:20, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 22:42, Kevin Risden wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Kevin Risden
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
>>> Geospatial
+1
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 22:42, Kevin Risden wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Kevin Risden
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch
>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer
>>
+1 (binding)
Kevin Risden
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch
> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer
> nkn...@apache.org
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM Namgyu Kim wrote:
>
+1 (binding)
Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch
Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer
nkn...@apache.org
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM Namgyu Kim wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili <
> tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
+1
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Tommaso
>
> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>
>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>> calling for a vote on the proposal to
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr
++1
Regards,
Lucky Sharma
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 8:01 PM, Mark Harwood wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2020/05/12 07:36:57, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> > Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
> >
> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr
+1
On 2020/05/12 07:36:57, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>
(having not read all replies, just the message I added binding... later
replies indicate that i should have said
-1 (committer)
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:53 AM Gus Heck wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:53 AM Joel Bernstein wrote:
>
>> -1 (binding)
>>
>>
>> Joel Bernstein
>>
-1 (binding)
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:53 AM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:39 AM Tomoko Uchida <
> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Personally, I am not particularly interested in "promoting"
-1 (binding)
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:39 AM Tomoko Uchida
wrote:
> Personally, I am not particularly interested in "promoting" Solr to TLP
> though, agree with the idea Lucene and Solr should have separate code base,
> CI infra, contribution
Personally, I am not particularly interested in "promoting" Solr to TLP
though, agree with the idea Lucene and Solr should have separate code base,
CI infra, contribution procedure, release cycles, etc.
If this proposal is the best way to do so, +1 (non binding).
Tomoko
2020年5月13日(水) 16:21
> I wanted to clarify that only PMC members cast binding votes and not
> committers.
I thought it's up to the decision of the one who sends the vote thread
but I stand corrected, thank you Anshum.
Dawid
-
To unsubscribe,
+1
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:37 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
+1 (binding)
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:18 PM Koji Sekiguchi
wrote:
> +1
>
> Koji
>
> On 2020/05/12 16:36, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> > Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
> >
> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a
+1
Koji
On 2020/05/12 16:36, Dawid Weiss wrote:
Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
independent
I agree this is a procedural vote. Here's my +1 for the proposal.
Shai
On Tue, May 12, 2020, 23:07 Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> I agree this is not a code change category vote. It’s a majority vote. -1s
> are not vetos.
>
> Simon
>
> On 12. May 2020, at 21:17, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
>
> I would
I agree this is not a code change category vote. It’s a majority vote. -1s are
not vetos.
Simon
> On 12. May 2020, at 21:17, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
>
> I would argue against that — this is more of a project level decision with no
> changes to the core code base per se — more of restructuring
Dawid,
Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
I wanted to clarify that only PMC members cast binding votes and not
committers.
Also,
I am about to re-read the rules here but I think this is a procedural vote.
Also, considering almost all procedural changes would impact the code in
some way, I don't think anything would pass if we were to put stuff in the
"code modification" category as getting a single veto would stop all
This is a procedural vote. Code is not affected. The future of each
project diverges from the same git commit.
Dawid
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:08 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
wrote:
>
> This is in the code modification category, since code will be modified as
> result of this proposal.
>
> On Wed,
I would argue against that — this is more of a project level decision with
no changes to the core code base per se — more of restructuring of it. Sort
of how a sub project becomes a TLP.
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 00:38, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is in the code
This is in the code modification category, since code will be modified as
result of this proposal.
On Wed, 13 May, 2020, 12:27 am Shawn Heisey, wrote:
> On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> > calling for a vote on the
On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
independent entities.
+1 (pmc)
We should clarify
-1 (committer)
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:14 PM Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> : make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> : committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> :
: Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
: make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
: committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
: worked out during the process if the decision passes.
:
: Please indicate one of
-1 (binding)
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:37 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr
+1
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:20 AM Ryan Ernst wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:37 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>>
>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>
>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a
+1 (binding)
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:37 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr
+1
> On May 12, 2020, at 3:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> worked out during the process
+1 (binding)
Andi..
> On May 12, 2020, at 00:37, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr
+1 (binding)
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:21 PM Ignacio Vera wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:38 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -1 (binding)
>>
>>
+1 (binding)
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:38 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe
wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
>
-1 (binding)
+1 (binding)
~ David
+1 (binding)
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 8:41 AM Steve Rowe wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Steve
>
> > On May 12, 2020, at 3:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> >
> > Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
> >
> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> > calling for a vote on the proposal to
+1
--
Steve
> On May 12, 2020, at 3:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr
+1, this is long overdue.
It will indeed be quite a bit of work to separate everything, but I think
the long term benefits to both projects will be massive, making that
one-time cost very much worth it.
Thanks for raising this Dawid!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, May
+1
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:37 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
+1 (binding)
Le mar. 12 mai 2020 à 14:00, Simon Willnauer a
écrit :
> +1 binding
>
> Sent from a mobile device
>
> > On 12. May 2020, at 13:33, Jason Gerlowski
> wrote:
> >
> > -1 (binding)
> >
> >> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:31 AM Alan Woodward
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Alan
+1 binding
Sent from a mobile device
> On 12. May 2020, at 13:33, Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
> -1 (binding)
>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:31 AM Alan Woodward wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Alan Woodward
>>
On 12 May 2020, at 12:06, Jan Høydahl wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>>
-1 (binding)
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:31 AM Alan Woodward wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Alan Woodward
>
> > On 12 May 2020, at 12:06, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Jan Høydahl
> >
> >> 12. mai 2020 kl. 09:36 skrev Dawid Weiss :
> >>
> >> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
> >>
>
+1 (binding)
Alan Woodward
> On 12 May 2020, at 12:06, Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Jan Høydahl
>
>> 12. mai 2020 kl. 09:36 skrev Dawid Weiss :
>>
>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>
>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>> calling for a vote
+1 (binding)
Jan Høydahl
> 12. mai 2020 kl. 09:36 skrev Dawid Weiss :
>
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr
0 9:37 AM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)
>
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>
Oh, here is my +1 (binding).
Dawid
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:36 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate
Thanks for suggesting this and bringing this forward to a vote, Dawid.
I'm in favor of the proposal; +1 (binding)
Best,
Christian
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:37 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>
+1 from me (binding)
Karl
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:54 AM Atri Sharma wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> Regards,
>
> Atri
>
> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 13:07, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>
>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>> calling for
+1 (binding).
Regards,
Atri
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 13:07, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and
Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
independent entities.
To quickly recap the reasons and
65 matches
Mail list logo
