Could someone please point me to the URL for adding Mahout release notes?
On Monday, February 17, 2014 3:27 PM, Ellen Friedman
b.ellen.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Suneel,
Thanks for notes. I'm inquiring about status of the notes and update to the
website to announce 0.9: Ted has
Below r the release notes, not sure where they should be going on the website.
If someone could point me to a location I will go ahead and update the same.
=
The Apache Mahout PMC is pleased to announce the release of Mahout 0.9.
Mahout's goal is to build scalable
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Switched LDA implementation from using Dirtichlet to Collapsed
Variational Bayes (CVB)
This line should read:
Switched LDA implementation from using Gibb's sampling to Collapsed
Variational Bayes (CVB)
Hi Suneel,
Thanks for notes. I'm inquiring about status of the notes and update to the
website to announce 0.9: Ted has reviewed the release notes - were you
waiting for additional input or are they ready to go on the website? Are
you the one who updates the site?
I've been asked to write a
Here's a draft of the Release Notes for Mahout 0.9, Please review the same.
--
The Apache Mahout PMC is pleased to announce the release of Mahout 0.9.
Mahout's goal is to build scalable machine learning libraries focused
primarily in the areas of collaborative
Mahout 0.9 has been pushed to the mirrors and is available for download at
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/mahout/
On Friday, January 31, 2014 11:21 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.com
wrote:
The release has passed with the required votes from PMC, will be pushing 0.9 to
the
Yes, thanks Suneel!
On Feb 2, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Mahout 0.9 has been pushed to the mirrors and is available for download at
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/mahout/
On Friday, January 31, 2014 11:21 PM, Suneel Marthi
I just checked and the release has propagated to French mirrors.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Mahout 0.9 has been pushed to the mirrors and is available for download at
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/mahout/
On Friday, January 31, 2014
The release has passed with the required votes from PMC, will be pushing 0.9 to
the mirrors and updating the release notes over the next day or two.
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:16 AM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Shannon Quinn
+1, all steps passed
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Shannon Quinn squ...@gatech.edu wrote:
LGTM
On 1/29/14, 4:27 PM, peng wrote:
+1, can't see a bad side.
On Wed 29 Jan 2014 11:33:02 AM EST, Suneel
Voting for this closes tomorrow, thus far there's been only a single +1 from
PMC. I'll go ahead and release the artifacts tomorrow regardless of whether we
succeed/fail to muster the minimum 3 +1 votes.
Thanks
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:45 AM, Sergey Svinarchuk
+1
On 01/29/2014 05:25 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote:
Looks good.
+1
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
a), b), c), d) all passed here.
CosineDistance of clustered points from cluster-reuters.sh -1 kmeans were
within the range [0,1].
Date: Tue, 28 Jan
+1 from me
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:58 AM, Sebastian Schelter s...@apache.org
wrote:
+1
On 01/29/2014 05:25 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote:
Looks good.
+1
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
a), b), c), d) all passed here.
+1, can't see a bad side.
On Wed 29 Jan 2014 11:33:02 AM EST, Suneel Marthi wrote:
+1 from me
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:58 AM, Sebastian Schelter s...@apache.org
wrote:
+1
On 01/29/2014 05:25 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote:
Looks good.
+1
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Andrew
LGTM
On 1/29/14, 4:27 PM, peng wrote:
+1, can't see a bad side.
On Wed 29 Jan 2014 11:33:02 AM EST, Suneel Marthi wrote:
+1 from me
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:58 AM, Sebastian Schelter
s...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On 01/29/2014 05:25 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote:
Looks good.
+1
+1
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Shannon Quinn squ...@gatech.edu wrote:
LGTM
On 1/29/14, 4:27 PM, peng wrote:
+1, can't see a bad side.
On Wed 29 Jan 2014 11:33:02 AM EST, Suneel Marthi wrote:
+1 from me
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:58 AM, Sebastian Schelter
a), b), c), d) all passed here.
CosineDistance of clustered points from cluster-reuters.sh -1 kmeans were
within the range [0,1].
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:45:42 -0800
From: suneel_mar...@yahoo.com
Subject: Mahout 0.9 Release
To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
Fixed the
Looks good.
+1
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
a), b), c), d) all passed here.
CosineDistance of clustered points from cluster-reuters.sh -1 kmeans were
within the range [0,1].
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:45:42 -0800
From:
1.2.1, all passed.
+1 from me
Gokhan
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com
wrote:
a),b),c),d) all passed on CentOS for me
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0200
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: ssvinarc...@hortonworks.com
),d) all passed on CentOS for me
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0200
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: ssvinarc...@hortonworks.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
I did a), b), c), d) and all steps pass.
+1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll
Using CentOS 6.5 and hadoop 1.2.1, all passed.
+1 from me
Gokhan
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
a),b),c),d) all passed on CentOS for me
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0200
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: ssvinarc
@outlook.com wrote:
a),b),c),d) all passed on CentOS for me
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0200
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: ssvinarc...@hortonworks.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
I did a), b), c), d) and all steps pass.
+1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Grant
6.5 and hadoop 1.2.1, all passed.
+1 from me
Gokhan
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com
wrote:
a),b),c),d) all passed on CentOS for me
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0200
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: ssvinarc...@hortonworks.com
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
a),b),c),d) all passed on CentOS for me
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0200
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: ssvinarc...@hortonworks.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
I did a), b), c), d) and all steps
13:43:06 +0200
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: ssvinarc...@hortonworks.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
I did a), b), c), d) and all steps pass.
+1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
+1 from me.
On Jan
6.5 and hadoop 1.2.1, all passed.
+1 from me
Gokhan
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com
wrote:
a),b),c),d) all passed on CentOS for me
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0200
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From
+1 from me.
On Jan 22, 2014, at 5:55 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Fixed the issues that were reported this week and restored FP mining into the
codebase.
Here's the URL for the final release in staging:-
I did a), b), c), d) and all steps pass.
+1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
+1 from me.
On Jan 22, 2014, at 5:55 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Fixed the issues that were reported this week and restored FP mining
into the
a),b),c),d) all passed on CentOS for me
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0200
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: ssvinarc...@hortonworks.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
I did a), b), c), d) and all steps pass.
+1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing
Fixed the issues that were reported this week and restored FP mining into the
codebase.
Here's the URL for the final release in staging:-
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1003/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.9/
The artifacts have been signed with the
I did a) b) c) and d) without noting any problem so far. +1 from me.
--sebastian
On 01/22/2014 11:55 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
Fixed the issues that were reported this week and restored FP mining into the
codebase.
Here's the URL for the final release in staging:-
Same here. I did a), b), c) and d) too and all tests pass. Here's my +1, if my
vote counts.
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 7:11 PM, Sebastian Schelter s...@apache.org
wrote:
I did a) b) c) and d) without noting any problem so far. +1 from me.
--sebastian
On 01/22/2014 11:55 PM, Suneel
Likewise, a) through d) work on an Amazon AMI and Ubuntu 12.04.
+1
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Same here. I did a), b), c) and d) too and all tests pass. Here's my +1,
if my vote counts.
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 7:11 PM, Sebastian
Thanks Andrew M., see that some of the example scripts need to be fixed as they
still refer to the deprecated algorithms.
See that the Streaming KMeans has failed for you as well.
I'll be rolling back the release today to fix these issues.
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 1:22 AM, Andrew
Sure thing; continuing to smoke test the other examples tonight
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Thanks Andrew M., see that some of the example scripts need to be fixed as
they still refer to the deprecated algorithms.
See that the Streaming KMeans
of the ASF emails?
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:48:06 -0800
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Sure thing; continuing to smoke test the other examples tonight
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar
.
Is there somewhere else that we can get a subset of the ASF emails?
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:48:06 -0800
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Sure thing; continuing to smoke test the other examples tonight
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014
is down.
Is there somewhere else that we can get a subset of the ASF emails?
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:48:06 -0800
Subject: Re: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
From: andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Sure thing; continuing to smoke test the other examples tonight
Hmmm... that's an issue. Since both Dirichlet and Meanshift clustering have
been removed from 0.9, cluster-syntheticcontrol.sh options 4,5 are not gonna
work and should have been removed for 0.9.
To PMC,
- rollback the release, fix this issue (and other patches that were submitted
in the
This is an issue (trivial one though) that needs to be fixed for 0.9 Release,
will be rerolling the release today (in the next few hrs) and putting out a new
release candidate in staging.
Thanks for reporting this Andrew P.
On Monday, January 20, 2014 12:34 AM, Andrew Palumbo
Trying out the build today
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
This is an issue (trivial one though) that needs to be fixed for 0.9
Release, will be rerolling the release today (in the next few hrs) and
putting out a new release candidate in staging.
Builds on Ubuntu 12.04 from tarball and zip, and on AWS's default 64-bit
Linux AMI from tarball.
All tests pass.
*Output of examples:*
*asf-email-examples.sh, run on mahout.apache.org
http://mahout.apache.org:*
*recommendations:*
[ec2-user@ip-10-73-146-199 bin]$ hadoop fs -cat
Thanks Grant.
Not sure if I can vote given my role as the BuildMeister/ReleaseMeister for
0.9.
Here's my +1 FWIW.
a) Attached is the draft of the Release notes for 0.9, would definitely
appreciate feedback on that.
b) The vote is open until Monday, Jan 20, 2014 11:59PM EST and passes if a
-1
The cluster reuters example results in zero clusters when choosing
streaming k-means. The other steps, unpacking and building do work.
I see this stacktrace:
INFO: Number of Centroids: 0
Jan 19, 2014 3:51:08 PM org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job run
WARNING: job_local797072544_0001
Frank,
Were u running this with MAHOUT_LOCAL=true?
On Sunday, January 19, 2014 10:29 AM, Frank Scholten fr...@frankscholten.nl
wrote:
-1
The cluster reuters example results in zero clusters when choosing streaming
k-means. The other steps, unpacking and building do work.
I see this
Exported MAHOUT_LOCAL=true and still get the same results.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Frank,
Were u running this with MAHOUT_LOCAL=true?
On Sunday, January 19, 2014 10:29 AM, Frank Scholten
fr...@frankscholten.nl wrote:
-1
The
Its presently setup to run in MR mode (the way its been coded in
cluster-reuters.sh). So setting MAHOUT_LOCAL=true is gonna fail for this.
I am able to see this fail locally when MAHOUT_LOCAL=true.
On Sunday, January 19, 2014 11:17 AM, Frank Scholten fr...@frankscholten.nl
wrote:
OK, running in MR mode now.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Its presently setup to run in MR mode (the way its been coded in
cluster-reuters.sh). So setting MAHOUT_LOCAL=true is gonna fail for this.
I am able to see this fail locally when
When I run in MR mode I get the same problem.
See http://pastebin.com/TXJ5mQmt
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Frank Scholten fr...@frankscholten.nlwrote:
OK, running in MR mode now.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Its presently setup to run
It works when both MAHOUT_LOCAL=true and '-xm sequential' option are set.
Guess will have to cut a release again with '-xm sequential' option set.
On Sunday, January 19, 2014 11:31 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Its presently setup to run in MR mode (the way its been
The reason u r seeing the error is because there are were no sequence files in
HDFS in MR mode to begin with = hence no term vectors generated = and hence
no vectors to cluster.
MR mode:
1. Set HADOOP_HOME
2. unset MAHOUT_LOCAL
3. clean up ur local /tmp/mahout-work-x directory
I'll try to test out soon
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov dlie...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try to test out soon
Stevo, could u test streaming kmeans?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 19, 2014, at 8:10 PM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov dlie...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try to test out soon
I ran through the tests with on a CentOS VM AMD64 2 cores 4 GB RAM. Had a bit
of trouble getting the Hadoop natives to compile and therefore may have run
into some problems because of the hadoop setup. Ran into some problems in the
example scripts. Particularly with
andrew.psal...@webtrends.com, i...@eprice.gr i...@eprice.gr
Cc: u...@mahout.apache.org u...@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout 0.9 Release - Call for Volunteers
This is not a maven issue.
Andrew, r u on Mac OS 10.8? If so u would be seeing these errors.
These errors being spewed by Carrot
Ran the tests, verified sigs, tried out a few of the examples.
+1 (binding)
On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:41 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Third time's a Charm!!!
Here's the new URL for Mahout 0.9 Release:
...@webtrends.commailto:andrew.psal...@webtrends.com,
i...@eprice.grmailto:i...@eprice.gr i...@eprice.grmailto:i...@eprice.gr
Cc: u...@mahout.apache.orgmailto:u...@mahout.apache.org
u...@mahout.apache.orgmailto:u...@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout 0.9 Release - Call for Volunteers
...@mahout.apache.orgmailto:u...@mahout.apache.org
u...@mahout.apache.orgmailto:u...@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout 0.9 Release - Call for Volunteers
This is not a maven issue.
Andrew, r u on Mac OS 10.8? If so u would be seeing these errors.
These errors being spewed by Carrot
...@mahout.apache.orgmailto:u...@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout 0.9 Release - Call for Volunteers
This is not a maven issue.
Andrew, r u on Mac OS 10.8? If so u would be seeing these errors.
These errors being spewed by Carrot RandomizedRunner and per the
conversation in Mahout-1345 this happens on Mac OS X
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Sotiris Salloumis i...@eprice.gr wrote:
c) Run through the unit tests: mvn clean test [ Passed: 370 milliseconds]
?!
Was that seconds? Or really milliseconds?
: MAHOUT 0.9 Release - New URL
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Sotiris Salloumis i...@eprice.gr
mailto:i...@eprice.gr wrote:
c) Run through the unit tests: mvn clean test [ Passed: 370 milliseconds]
?!
Was that seconds? Or really milliseconds?
It would be .tar.gz file and you would find it under mahout/distribution.
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:45 PM, Chameera Wijebandara
chameerawijeband...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok let's see after fixed the URL
Thank you Tharindu for your cooperation. :)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:55 AM,
Thanks Suneel.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
It would be .tar.gz file and you would find it under mahout/distribution.
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:45 PM, Chameera Wijebandara
chameerawijeband...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok let's see after
The link -
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1000/ still
returns a 404.
Is the latest release candidate made available for 0.9?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Chameera Wijebandara
chameerawijeband...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Suneel.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at
Sorry, sent little too early :). Got email from Suneel.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:16 PM, spa...@gmail.com wrote:
The link -
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1000/ still
returns a 404.
Is the latest release candidate made available for 0.9?
On Thu, Jan
Please hold off on this, screwed up the future development version#. Have to
redo this again.
Sorry about that.
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 8:47 AM, spa...@gmail.com spa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry, sent little too early :). Got email from Suneel.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:16 PM,
Hi Suneel,
Still it getting 404 error.
Thanks,
Chameera
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Here's the new URL for Mahout 0.9 Release:
Hi Suneel,
Below first round of tests,
Environment: SMP Debian 3.2.51-1 x86_64
Machine: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz stepping 05 12GB
RAM
OpenJDK: javac 1.6.0_27
a) Verify that u can unpack the release (tar or zip) [ Passed: tar -zxvf ]
b) Verify u r able to compile the
a), b), and c) all pass for me. Don't have the setup yet at work to go
through d), will wait for others to verify.
On 1/16/14, 9:41 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
Third time's a Charm!!!
Here's the new URL for Mahout 0.9 Release:
I tested mahout 0.9 on Ubuntu 12.04 64bit, java version 1.6.0_27
a) Verify that u can unpack the release (tar or zip) - passed
b) Verify u r able to compile the distro - passed
c) Run through the unit tests: mvn clean test -passed
d) Run the example scripts under $MAHOUT_HOME/examples/bin.
Got the same error.
Regards,
Yexi
2014/1/16 Chameera Wijebandara chameerawijeband...@gmail.com
Hi Suneel,
Still it getting 404 error.
Thanks,
Chameera
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Here's the new URL for Mahout 0.9 Release:
shortener for easy copy/paste http://goo.gl/gX6xGz
Regards
Sotiris
-Original Message-
From: Yexi Jiang [mailto:yexiji...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 5:59 PM
To: mahout
Cc: Suneel Marthi; u...@mahout.apache.org; priv...@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout 0.9 Release - Call
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 5:59 PM
To: mahout
Cc: Suneel Marthi; u...@mahout.apache.org; priv...@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout 0.9 Release - Call for Volunteers
Got the same error.
Regards,
Yexi
2014/1/16 Chameera Wijebandara chameerawijeband...@gmail.com
Hi Suneel
OS X 10.9.1, java version 1.6.0_65.
On 1/16/14, 10:41 AM, Sergey Svinarchuk wrote:
I tested mahout 0.9 on Ubuntu 12.04 64bit, java version 1.6.0_27
a) Verify that u can unpack the release (tar or zip) - passed
b) Verify u r able to compile the distro - passed
c) Run through the unit tests:
Hi Tharindu,
Still I could not able to download the artifacts. Could you please hep me
to test the Release
Thanks
Chameera
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Thanks Tharindu.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:30 PM, Tharindu Rusira
I am getting a 404 Item not found exception for this link. Complete stack
trace is -
404 - ItemNotFoundException
Repository with ID=pathPrefixOrId: 'orgapachemahout-1000' not found
org.sonatype.nexus.proxy.ItemNotFoundException: Repository with
ID=pathPrefixOrId: 'orgapachemahout-1000' not found
The Release has been rolled back to include a few last minute fixes, will be
sending out a new Release link in a day.
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 1:33 PM, spa...@gmail.com spa...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am getting a 404 Item not found exception for this link. Complete stack
trace is -
404 -
OK. By the way - Is it alright to paste the stack trace in email window? Or
I should have used some better way to report my issue?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
The Release has been rolled back to include a few last minute fixes, will
be sending
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Chameera Wijebandara
chameerawijeband...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tharindu,
Chameera, sorry for the late reply. I'm having issues with my personal
computer these days :)
Still I could not able to download the artifacts. Could you please hep me
to test the
Tharindu,
There is no .tar file in the given link (befor give the 404 error).
Thanks,
Chameera
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Tharindu Rusira
tharindurus...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Chameera Wijebandara
chameerawijeband...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tharindu,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Chameera Wijebandara
chameerawijeband...@gmail.com wrote:
Tharindu,
There is no .tar file in the given link (befor give the 404 error).
Well, what about a .zip file? As I can remember, it was a .zip file.
Thanks,
Chameera
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at
Ok let's see after fixed the URL
Thank you Tharindu for your cooperation. :)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Tharindu Rusira
tharindurus...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Chameera Wijebandara
chameerawijeband...@gmail.com wrote:
Tharindu,
There is no .tar file in
Calling for volunteers to test this Release.
On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:39 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Pushed the Mahout 0.9 Release candidate.
See https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1000/
This is a call for Vote.
I want to volunteer to test this release. What is the procedure/steps to
get started and what pre-reqs I need to have?
Cheers
.S
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Calling for volunteers to test this Release.
On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:39 PM,
Here's the link to Release artifacts for Mahout 0.9:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1000/
For those volunteering to test this, some of the stuff to look out for:
a) Verify u can unpack the Release tar.
b) Verify u are able to compile the distribution.
c) Run
Hi,
How can I download the Release tar.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Tharindu Rusira
tharindurus...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Suneel,
I tested
the
installation process with unit tests and everything went well. (Ubuntu
12.10 32bit, Java 1.7.0_40).
Please note that I did not clean my local
Thanks Tharindu.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:30 PM, Tharindu Rusira
tharindurus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Suneel,
I tested
the
installation process with unit tests and everything went well. (Ubuntu
12.10 32bit, Java 1.7.0_40).
Please note that I did not clean my local maven repository
Hi,
one thing I forgot: you once mentioned running into issues with the new kmeans
- are those fixed or tracked in jira? In case of the latter we should include a
known issues/ call for helping hands section.
Isabel
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hi All,
Please see below the first draft of Release notes for Mahout 0.9. Please
feel free to add/edit sections as u see fit.
(This is a draft only).
Regards,
Suneel
-
The
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Sebastian Schelter
ssc.o...@googlemail.com wrote:
- Mahout Math
Lanczos in favour of SSVD
IIRC, we agreed to not remove Lanczos, although it was initially
deprecated. We should undeprecate it.
Some folks like Lanczos in Mahout (for reasons not
Suneel ran into some issues this weekend; I'm going to try it out and see if I
can repro.
On Dec 23, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm isa...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
one thing I forgot: you once mentioned running into issues with the new
kmeans - are those fixed or tracked in jira? In
Hi,
the draft looks good overall, I have some minor comments inline:
On 22.12.2013 03:28, Suneel Marthi wrote:
Hi All,
Please see below the first draft of Release notes for Mahout 0.9. Please feel
free to add/edit sections as u see fit.
(This is a draft only).
Regards,
Suneel
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Sebastian Schelter
ssc.o...@googlemail.com wrote:
- From Clustering:
Dirichlet - replaced by Collapsible Variational Bayes (CVB)
I think we switched our LDA implementation to use CVB and removed
Dirichlet clustering, those are two different things,
+1 for 1.0.
This is more challenging than expected (the old hadoop 0.23 profile
support is misleading)
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 19, 2013, at 19:48, Andrew Musselman andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
+1
I am looking at M-1329 (Support for Hadoop 2.x) as we speak. This change
requires quite some testing and I prefer to push this to 1.0. I am thinking
of creating a unit test that starts miniclusters for each versions and runs
a job in them.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Suneel Marthi
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Frank Scholten fr...@frankscholten.nl wrote:
I am looking at M-1329 (Support for Hadoop 2.x) as we speak. This change
requires quite some testing and I prefer to push this to 1.0. I am thinking
of creating a unit test that starts
+1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel_mar...@yahoo.comwrote:
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Frank Scholten fr...@frankscholten.nl
wrote:
I am looking at M-1329 (Support for Hadoop 2.x) as we speak. This change
requires quite some testing and
Update on pending JIRAs:-
M-1319 - Patch available, looking for someone to review and test the same
before I commit this to trunk.
M-1288 - Solr Recommender - Pat, can this be pushed to 1.0?
M-1265 - Multilayer Perceptron - Patch has gone through several reviews, will
be committing this to
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 23:16:36 +0200
Gokhan Capan gkhn...@gmail.com wrote:
M-1354 (Support for Hadoop 2.x) - Patch available.
Gokhan, any updates on this.
Nope, still couldn't make it work.
Should we push that for 1.0 then (if this is shortly before completion
and there's too much in 1.0
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
