On 18 Mar 07, at 12:23 AM 18 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 18/03/2007, at 11:29 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Wouldn't documents like:
src/site/apt/guides/getting-started/index.apt
have the ${pom.name} expressions (which are meant to be
expressions) populated with the value?
Wouldn't break
On 18/03/2007, at 11:29 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Wouldn't documents like:
src/site/apt/guides/getting-started/index.apt
have the ${pom.name} expressions (which are meant to be
expressions) populated with the value?
Wouldn't break them, they would render just interpolate the value.
So, ye
I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-3
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency-plug
in-2.0-alpha-3/
Staged at:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository
Changes:
This release adds 2 new goals:
dependency:analyze -> this executes the mav
Ok, just wrapped my head around this.
1) surefire 2.3 uses p-u 1.1, with a customised commandline that
fixes a bug (Which has also been fixed in more recent p-utils)
2) maven 2.0.5 uses p-u 1.1, so it all plays well
3) 2.0.6/2.1 switch to a new p-u, which will break the above
4) in 513934, Joh
On 17 Mar 07, at 9:57 PM 17 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Just an update on what's happening with Surefire...
- 2.3 was released a little while back, which corrects a number of
issues with testng and other surefire problems
- however, it did identify some regressions and other issues, whi
Hi,
Just an update on what's happening with Surefire...
- 2.3 was released a little while back, which corrects a number of
issues with testng and other surefire problems
- however, it did identify some regressions and other issues, which
are scheduled for 2.3.1
- a branch has been created -
+1
Andy
On 17 Mar 2007, at 22:33, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
As part of the massive overhaul that was MNG-1577 I wanted to also
to ask for commit privs for Ralph. Much of my recent work has been
with Patrick on getting MNG-1577 into the codebase, but Ralph also
did a great deal of work an
+1
Andy
On 17 Mar 2007, at 22:35, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
On 3/17/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to release the alpha 1 version of this shared component. The
analyzer scans through your class files and produces a list of
dependencies declared but not used, dependencies us
On 17 Mar 07, at 7:06 PM 17 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 18/03/2007, at 9:56 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 17 Mar 07, at 6:37 PM 17 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
What about anything with a .vm extension?
download.apt.vm gets processed as vm first, then apt. We can do
that in Doxia with z
Thanks all!
On 3/17/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great, well I'll get Patrick to send in his CLA then.
Jason.
On 17 Mar 07, at 3:14 AM 17 Mar 07, Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
> +1
>
> Fabrice.
>
> On 3/16/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Patrick has,
On 18/03/2007, at 9:56 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 17 Mar 07, at 6:37 PM 17 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
What about anything with a .vm extension?
download.apt.vm gets processed as vm first, then apt. We can do
that in Doxia with zero-configuration.
I really don't want it on by default,
On 17 Mar 07, at 6:37 PM 17 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
What about anything with a .vm extension?
download.apt.vm gets processed as vm first, then apt. We can do
that in Doxia with zero-configuration.
I really don't want it on by default, because it'll break existing
documents
It won't
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 6:34 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Commit privs for Ralph Goers
Hi,
As part of the massive overhaul that was MNG-1577 I wanted to also to
ask for commit privs for Ralph. M
Yes, actually. Kenney fixed the tests so we can probably shove this
out the door. It's still on my list, just been working on 2.0.6.
Jason.
On 17 Mar 07, at 6:35 PM 17 Mar 07, Niall Pemberton wrote:
Any progress on this?
Niall
On 3/2/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/2/0
+1
On 18/03/2007, at 9:33 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
As part of the massive overhaul that was MNG-1577 I wanted to also
to ask for commit privs for Ralph. Much of my recent work has been
with Patrick on getting MNG-1577 into the codebase, but Ralph also
did a great deal of work and whe
What about anything with a .vm extension?
download.apt.vm gets processed as vm first, then apt. We can do that
in Doxia with zero-configuration.
I really don't want it on by default, because it'll break existing
documents, and I can see situations where we might want to facilitate
differe
Any progress on this?
Niall
On 3/2/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/2/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2 Mar 07, at 7:28 AM 2 Mar 07, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > ping :-)
> >
>
> I just released a snapshot, do you think you could give it a whirl
> quickly?
On 3/17/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to release the alpha 1 version of this shared component. The
analyzer scans through your class files and produces a list of
dependencies declared but not used, dependencies used but not declared,
and dependencies actually used. Maven-d
Hi,
As part of the massive overhaul that was MNG-1577 I wanted to also to
ask for commit privs for Ralph. Much of my recent work has been with
Patrick on getting MNG-1577 into the codebase, but Ralph also did a
great deal of work and when looking at the last patch I committed to
the docum
On 17 Mar 07, at 12:08 PM 17 Mar 07, Eric Redmond wrote:
Could this velocity pre-processor just be a plugin that gets run in
the
pre-site phase - unrelated to doxia?
It could and that's what the velocity people seem to be doing on
their site, but I would really like to not have to config
Going through my builds, I'm finding a surprising number of mismatches.
Looks like I've got some significant cleanup to do. Here's some sample
output:
[INFO] [dependency:analyze]
[INFO] Found Resolved Dependency / DependencyManagement mismatches:
[INFO] Dependency: oracle:adf-faces-api:jar
[INFO]
+1, thanks for including it :)
Mark
On 17/03/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, thank you to Mark Hobson for contributing this very useful
component.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 11:04 AM
To: Maven Develope
Could this velocity pre-processor just be a plugin that gets run in the
pre-site phase - unrelated to doxia?
Eric
On 3/17/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 17 Mar 07, at 2:23 AM 17 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
> You've lost me, sorry. What type of page are you trying to create?
Do the octals need to be prefixed with 0? Does that change anything?
Eric
On 3/14/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... or is this problem still unfixed?
I still see that some folks `mvn deploy` and end up with files which
are not g+w, even though they have in settings.xml for each
I'll be there as well... looking forward to the hack-a-thing.
Eric
On 3/13/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is
speaking. Anyone want to get together there?
I'm currently working on the content of the training I'm doin
+1
On 17 Mar 07, at 11:03 AM 17 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
I'd like to release the alpha 1 version of this shared component. The
analyzer scans through your class files and produces a list of
dependencies declared but not used, dependencies used but not
declared,
and dependencies actually us
Jason van Zyl wrote:
The depMan declarations now channels all transitive dependency to what
the user specifies, but what we still need in the future when ranges
become common place is the conflict resolution mechanism as we've
always thought it would work. Because the overwhelming majority
See Below
Brett Porter wrote:
I'm generally in favour now, but there are a couple of things I'd
still like to explore first, please bear with me.
Having had the chance to review the new behaviour, I can't see any
problems with applying it to current builds - I would expect it
extremely rare
BTW, thank you to Mark Hobson for contributing this very useful
component.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 11:04 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [Vote] Release maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-1 shared
component
I'd
+1
Stéphane
On 3/17/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to release the alpha 1 version of this shared component. The
analyzer scans through your class files and produces a list of
dependencies declared but not used, dependencies used but not declared,
and dependencies actually
I'd like to release the alpha 1 version of this shared component. The
analyzer scans through your class files and produces a list of
dependencies declared but not used, dependencies used but not declared,
and dependencies actually used. Maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3 will
provide a mojo to exp
On 17 Mar 07, at 6:29 AM 17 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Ok, coming back to this - these providers are still excluded from
being built. Can we put them back into the main list of modules and
put all the integration tests into a profile?
Provided stuff does not fail because I don't have Cle
Great, well I'll get Patrick to send in his CLA then.
Jason.
On 17 Mar 07, at 3:14 AM 17 Mar 07, Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
+1
Fabrice.
On 3/16/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Patrick has, for at least a couple months, been working on MNG-1577,
has written extensive tests,
On 17 Mar 07, at 2:23 AM 17 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
You've lost me, sorry. What type of page are you trying to create?
Any page, Velocity will be used to render any of the pages. It would
just work anywhere in the site.
I can see how this makes it possible to make lightweight reports
On 17 Mar 07, at 8:34 AM 17 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
I'm generally in favour now, but there are a couple of things I'd
still like to explore first, please bear with me.
Having had the chance to review the new behaviour, I can't see any
problems with applying it to current builds - I wou
I'm generally in favour now, but there are a couple of things I'd
still like to explore first, please bear with me.
Having had the chance to review the new behaviour, I can't see any
problems with applying it to current builds - I would expect it
extremely rare to see a managed dependency i
On 17/03/2007, at 1:37 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
No matter how bad the existing behaviour, it is consistent once in
place.
It's not consistent at all. It is totally erratic behavior,
completely defective and counter intuitive. All people are forced
to do is is continually override depende
Eric Redmond wrote:
+1 for patching 2.0.6
I have yet to hear a single convincing argument for maintaining
broken behavior. Who cares if people depend on it being broken? Don't
upgrade. It's a defect, not a feature change. Pushing this to a major
version is way overkill.
+1
Jorg
Hi,
well, this is indeed a problem..
I don't understand the second option: if you stop relocating
(not done by maven, but by the pom deployers, right?) when a version exists,
that means you can never relocate. It's no use to
relocate unreleased poms since they won't be present in the repository
This doc looks good to me.
On 17/03/2007, at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I will also help because we need a spec that people can read to
understand what exactly happens. There is a fundamental level of
confusion as to how snapshots work, how versions work where, and
Ok, coming back to this - these providers are still excluded from
being built. Can we put them back into the main list of modules and
put all the integration tests into a profile?
- Brett
On 16/01/2007, at 7:06 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
agreed.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
So... why
Ah, sorry - don't mind me. Looking at the wrong version. I see you've
already done this.
On 17/03/2007, at 9:13 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Jason,
I had this old message flagged to ask about...
On 16/01/2007, at 8:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 13:10:57 20
Hi Jason,
I had this old message flagged to ask about...
On 16/01/2007, at 8:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 13:10:57 2007
New Revision: 496493
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496493
Log: (empty)
Modified:
maven/components/trunk/maven-cli/s
Hi,
I would like to start a discussion on how relocations in the central
repo should be handled.
I recently noticed more and more artifacts partially relocated in the
repo in case of a new upload. With *partially* relocated I means the
case of a new version of an existing artifact uploaded with a
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I will also help because we need a spec that people can read to
understand what exactly happens. There is a fundamental level of
confusion as to how snapshots work, how versions work where, and how
you accurately control what versions get pulled in. Ralph, I would
certai
45 matches
Mail list logo
