Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
On 14 Jun 07, at 2:32 PM 14 Jun 07, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
I have some statistic of downloads for Apache JAMES Server (email
server).
We distribute both binary and source distributions:
[...]
Do you actually deploy with Maven? I imagine you have the standard set
-Message d'origine-
De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2007 07:10
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : Re: What's the deal with the shade plugin?
On 15/06/2007, at 3:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 14 Jun 07, at 9:33 PM 14 Jun 07, Brett
+1
Vincent
2007/6/13, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The release notes are here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
projectId=10500styleName=Htmlversion=13138
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.7/
Staging repository:
On 15/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: brianf
Date: Thu Jun 14 18:50:14 2007
New Revision: 547483
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=547483
Log:
MDEP-59: updated dependencies to get the new unarchiver for rar. Had to move
around the tests to avoid new heap
Please use the user list for this kind of questions.
Try clearing your cache, that often has a miraculous effect in maven
1.0.2. Otherwise, provide more information.
Cheers,
-Lukas
bala reddy wrote:
I'm getting the below error when i do a maven dist:build-bin; please help.
Thanks
-B
Hi,
I'd like to ask that issues reported by PMC members and core developers
get less strict reviews.
When I find an issue that's rather complex I usually describe
how to reproduce it, but I lack the time to write sample projects, at
least when reporting. When i get around to it I reproduce the
On 13/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Tue Jun 12 20:26:16 2007
New Revision: 546719
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=546719
Log:
o using the new groupId for the IT artifacts
Modified:
Yup, I did the same change locally to test something.
Normally we don't want to depend on plexus snapshots since it imposes a
restriction
on the ability to release.
I think we should add the repo in the pom where we need a plexus snapshot, and
remove it
as soon as the dependency is released.
Mark Hobson wrote:
Hi,
I need an ArtifactFilter that supports wildcards and have patched
IncludesArtifactFilter accordingly, but then saw MNG-2621. I
implemented wildcards slightly stricter than allowing arbitrary
regular expressions - from the Javadoc:
The artifact pattern syntax is of
On 15/06/07, Kenney Westerhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's safest to assume no regexps at all, so your solution looks fine.
Jason, you said in MNG-2621 it could wreak havoc - how so? I think it's safer
to not
allow * for partial matches too, but we have no choice in the version
tag,
Mark,
Can you subscribe to the commit list with your apache address? so I won't have
to moderate mails.
Thanks.
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: markh
Date: Fri Jun 15 04:34:44 2007
New Revision: 547635
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=547635
Log:
Added ignores
On 15/06/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Can you subscribe to the commit list with your apache address? so I won't have
to moderate mails.
Thanks.
Ah sure, sorry, didn't realise that was happening. I'm not sure it's
working though since I sent a test email to [EMAIL
On 15/06/07, Andrew Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I the only one getting a test failure on IT0002 with the 2.0.7
bundle?
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Expected file was not found: /
Users/aje/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/its/maven-core-it-support/
On 15/06/07, Mark Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/06/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Can you subscribe to the commit list with your apache address? so I won't
have to moderate mails.
Thanks.
Ah sure, sorry, didn't realise that was happening. I'm not sure it's
On 15/06/07, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, we should add it temporarily. I normally wouldn't use a snapshot but the
new archiver has a feature needed by mdep and they asked me to test it before
they do a release. It should be very short term.
Okay, cool.
Mark
Ok, the last one I tested was Wed night. In that case +1.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 8:53 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7
On 15 Jun 07, at 5:36 AM 15 Jun 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 4:58 AM 15 Jun 07, Andrew Williams wrote:
Am I the only one getting a test failure on IT0002 with the 2.0.7
bundle?
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Expected file was not found: /
Users/aje/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/its/maven-core-it-support/
On 15 Jun 07, at 5:36 AM 15 Jun 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Where are we on the 2.0.7 vote? It seems like there are some issues
requiring a new RC such as licenses and notices, but I've lost track.
The original RC was technically ok on my builds.
I've updated them all, the licenses are fixed.
Where are we on the 2.0.7 vote? It seems like there are some issues
requiring a new RC such as licenses and notices, but I've lost track.
The original RC was technically ok on my builds.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 8:01 AM
Yes, we should add it temporarily. I normally wouldn't use a snapshot but the
new archiver has a feature needed by mdep and they asked me to test it before
they do a release. It should be very short term.
-Original Message-
From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
Am I the only one getting a test failure on IT0002 with the 2.0.7
bundle?
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Expected file was not found: /
Users/aje/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/its/maven-core-it-support/
1.0/maven-core-it-support-1.0.jar
(yes, I did install the
On 15 Jun 07, at 4:24 AM 15 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 13/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Tue Jun 12 20:26:16 2007
New Revision: 546719
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=546719
Log:
o using the new groupId for the IT artifacts
Modified:
Hmm, I think it is installing them, but under the wrong groupId.
Andy
On 15 Jun 2007, at 13:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Fri Jun 15 05:54:11 2007
New Revision: 547666
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=547666
Log:
o little script to install all the support
On 15/06/2007, at 9:27 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
When I find an issue that's rather complex I usually describe
how to reproduce it, but I lack the time to write sample projects, at
least when reporting. When i get around to it I reproduce the issue
and fix
it in svn - I normally don't
Emmanuel,
You need to reply to the allow-tc address once to get Mark onto the
allow list, then it won't matter which address he is subscribed under.
- Brett
On 15/06/2007, at 9:41 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Mark,
Can you subscribe to the commit list with your apache address? so I
On 15 Jun 07, at 5:59 AM 15 Jun 07, Andrew Williams wrote:
Hmm, I think it is installing them, but under the wrong groupId.
No, the old ones are deployed in the remote repository. The invoker
plugin is broken.
Andy
On 15 Jun 2007, at 13:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Can we restart the vote once this is sorted out? I have no idea which
svn rev we are voting on any more, or who checked and voted for which.
- Brett
On 15/06/2007, at 10:56 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Ok, the last one I tested was Wed night. In that case +1.
-Original Message-
From:
On 15 Jun 07, at 4:38 AM 15 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Mark Hobson wrote:
Hi,
I need an ArtifactFilter that supports wildcards and have patched
IncludesArtifactFilter accordingly, but then saw MNG-2621. I
implemented wildcards slightly stricter than allowing arbitrary
regular
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:09 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Can we restart the vote once this is sorted out? I have no idea
which svn rev we are voting on any more, or who checked and voted
for which.
It is sorted out, I was planning on releasing it today. What's the
problem?
- Brett
Thanks, that script does sort it for me :)
Andy
On 15 Jun 2007, at 13:55, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 4:58 AM 15 Jun 07, Andrew Williams wrote:
Am I the only one getting a test failure on IT0002 with the 2.0.7
bundle?
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Expected file was not
Apologies, you are quite right.
Andy
On 15 Jun 2007, at 14:08, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 5:59 AM 15 Jun 07, Andrew Williams wrote:
Hmm, I think it is installing them, but under the wrong groupId.
No, the old ones are deployed in the remote repository. The invoker
plugin is
On 15 Jun 07, at 4:30 AM 15 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Yup, I did the same change locally to test something.
Normally we don't want to depend on plexus snapshots since it
imposes a restriction
on the ability to release.
I think we should add the repo in the pom where we need a plexus
On 15 Jun 07, at 4:27 AM 15 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask that issues reported by PMC members and core
developers
get less strict reviews.
Well, you would most likely assign them to a version/component and
possibly assign them to yourself so they wouldn't end up
On 15/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you install the artifacts you'll be fine. The invoker plugin broke
which is why they are not installed. You can't simply run the ITs,
you must install the plugins and artifacts that are used as part of
the ITs.
As I go through and find them
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:29 AM 15 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 15/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That one small typo will render a system useless. What's the usecase
for not having to select individual artifacts to filter?
The filters are looking like something that will
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:33 AM 15 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 15/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you install the artifacts you'll be fine. The invoker plugin broke
which is why they are not installed. You can't simply run the ITs,
you must install the plugins and artifacts that
oh yes, my bad.
Thx brett.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Emmanuel,
You need to reply to the allow-tc address once to get Mark onto the
allow list, then it won't matter which address he is subscribed under.
- Brett
On 15/06/2007, at 9:41 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Mark,
Can you
Hello,
I've just been trying to get my head around the interaction the JavaDoc
plugin when set to aggregate and multi-module builds...
This would have saved me tons of time(svn diff on trunk version of file):
Index: org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java
On 15/06/2007, at 11:27 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:09 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Can we restart the vote once this is sorted out? I have no idea
which svn rev we are voting on any more,
We're voting on the tag used to build the releases.
Which has been changed
On 15/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you have two different things here. The first visualizing the
tree removing certain aspects and this implies the resolution is
complete and you're looking at a reduction. The second is actually
changing how the resolution happened in
On 15/06/2007, at 11:23 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 4:30 AM 15 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Yup, I did the same change locally to test something.
Normally we don't want to depend on plexus snapshots since it
imposes a restriction
on the ability to release.
I think we
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:09 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Can we restart the vote once this is sorted out? I have no idea
which svn rev we are voting on any more,
We're voting on the tag used to build the releases.
or who checked and voted for which.
I haven't changed the location of what
Hi Jason,
On 15/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That one small typo will render a system useless. What's the usecase
for not having to select individual artifacts to filter?
The filters are looking like something that will be used to exclude
dependencies and things of that nature
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:42 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 15/06/2007, at 11:23 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 4:30 AM 15 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Yup, I did the same change locally to test something.
Normally we don't want to depend on plexus snapshots since it
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:52 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 15/06/2007, at 11:27 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:09 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Can we restart the vote once this is sorted out? I have no idea
which svn rev we are voting on any more,
We're voting on the
This vote is cancelled and will be re-instated on Monday. I will re-
stage as fast as I can so that anyone who wants to check can. But
doing a vote over the weekend has traditionally not yielded a decent
enough set of people trying things so we'll shoot for next Wednesday.
Schedule updated
Folks,
I have a weird problem with this release. In a multi-project setup is one of my
submodules failing, because the surefire plugin is missing classes in the class
path when install is invoked from above. install works fine from the sub
project level though. Now the really weirtd part: I
Yup, I'm certainly not going to complain about a 5 day vote to cover
the weekend.
Cheers,
Brett
On 16/06/2007, at 12:05 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:52 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 15/06/2007, at 11:27 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:09 AM 15 Jun
On 13/06/07, Mark Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I've been working on dependency tree diagnostic tools and as a
consequence have made substantial changes to maven-dependency-tree. A
brief synopsis of changes are:
- support for node states: included, omitted for conflict, etc.
-
On 15 Jun 07, at 7:22 AM 15 Jun 07, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Folks,
I have a weird problem with this release. In a multi-project setup
is one of my submodules failing, because the surefire plugin is
missing classes in the class path when install is invoked from
above. install works fine
I just noticed that the dav deploy is still broken (as in 2.0.6 I
think) not a new problem, just checking folk were aware.
Andy
On 15 Jun 2007, at 14:17, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:09 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Can we restart the vote once this is sorted out? I have no
Quick note - I've added a 'shared components' version for assigning
the stuff that isn't in core's versioning scheme (we need to ship
them out of the project later on - have added that to my notes).
I'm assigning components where they are missing so that it might be
easier to identify
On 15/06/2007, at 11:27 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 6:09 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Can we restart the vote once this is sorted out? I have no idea
which svn rev we are voting on any more,
We're voting on the tag used to build the releases.
Which has been changed
I agree on the lacking documentation, when I saw this thread I did a google
search on shade maven plugin and was unable to find out what the plugin
does. Though to be fair I spent no more than 2 minutes searching.
On 6/15/07, Cabasson Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Message
On 15 Jun 07, at 8:04 AM 15 Jun 07, Evan Worley wrote:
I agree on the lacking documentation, when I saw this thread I did
a google
search on shade maven plugin and was unable to find out what the
plugin
does. Though to be fair I spent no more than 2 minutes searching.
Lots of plugins
Jason van Zyl wrote on Friday, June 15, 2007 4:28 PM:
On 15 Jun 07, at 7:22 AM 15 Jun 07, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Folks,
I have a weird problem with this release. In a multi-project setup
is one of my submodules failing, because the surefire plugin is
missing classes in the class path when
On 15 Jun 07, at 9:06 AM 15 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Everything has a component now, and I did a whole bunch of versions
while I was at it.
The components really need to be adjusted (review/approve the
taxonomy and migrate towards that), since I found I had a hard time
picking the
Everything has a component now, and I did a whole bunch of versions
while I was at it.
The components really need to be adjusted (review/approve the
taxonomy and migrate towards that), since I found I had a hard time
picking the right one, especially in relation to the project builder,
On 6/14/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a Documentation version so that
technical issues wouldn't be polluted by documentation issues.
Documentation is neither a version nor pollution. :)
Given the general 'the docs
On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Jun 07, at 8:04 AM 15 Jun 07, Evan Worley wrote:
I agree on the lacking documentation, when I saw this thread I did
a google
search on shade maven plugin and was unable to find out what the
plugin
does. Though to be fair I spent no
No problems here.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: maven-dependency-tree changes for 1.1
On 13/06/07, Mark Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I've been working on
Go for it. If you change some public APIs, try if possible to deprecate them
(in the case of some users used them)
Arnaud
On 15/06/07, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problems here.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007
Mark,
There are already a bunch of filters defined within dependency for a lot
of this. None of them work for you or is it that you need to access them
from the shared component?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 9:46 AM
To: Maven
Hi
I am attaching artifacts to the main (jar) artifact in my plugin for
maven. All works fine for versioned plugins,
but for SNAPSHOTS I see the following behavior:
1. mvn install
installs the SNAPSHOT correctly in my local repository (correctly).
2. mvn deploy
-retrieves the latest build
I agree with that. Normally if I intend to fix it later, I just assign it to
myself right away.
-Original Message-
From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 7:27 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: JIRA Smackdown
Hi,
I'd like to ask that issues
On 15 Jun 07, at 9:58 AM 15 Jun 07, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 6/14/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a Documentation version so that
technical issues wouldn't be polluted by documentation issues.
Documentation is neither a
66 matches
Mail list logo
