Re: [DISCUSS] Apache MXNet: Path to graduation

As a physicist I would like to point out that "Gluon" means: An elementary particle that acts as the exchange particle for the strong force between quarks [1]. As a general scientific term it can barely be seen as a candidate for trademark registration. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon On

[INVITATION] Berlin MXNet Recurring User Group Meeting

Dear MXNet Community, This is a friendly reminder that the Berlin MXNet Recurring User Group Meeting will be held today at 6pm-7pm (CEST) / 9am-10am (PST). More info here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28Incubating%29+User+Groups+recurring+meetings

Re: [VOTE] Remove conflicting OpenMP from CMake builds

t; > > committer. A vote on dev@ won't help you circumvent a veto. > > > > > > > > > > > > -sz > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2019/06/14 23:59:33, Pedro Larroy < > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> > > > > wrot

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

rote: > > > > I reopened it for you. > > > > On Wed, May 22, 2019, 05:25 Anton Chernov wrote: > > > > > I don't have necessary rights to reopen this PR. > > > > > > пн, 20 мая 2019 г. в 08:00, Pedro Larroy >: > > > > > &

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

Great! Thank you, Aaron. I have rebased it. ср, 22 мая 2019 г. в 15:49, Aaron Markham : > I reopened it for you. > > On Wed, May 22, 2019, 05:25 Anton Chernov wrote: > > > I don't have necessary rights to reopen this PR. > > > > пн, 20 мая 2019 г. в 08:00, Ped

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

e.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Benchmarking+MXNet+with+different+OpenMP+implementations > > There are multiple issues that will be fixed by solving this problem. > > > Pedro > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:54 AM Anton Chernov wrote: > > > > I would like to pr

[INVITATION] 7th of May 2019 / Berlin MXNet Recurring User Group Meeting

Dear MXNet community, I would like to invite you to the regular Apache MXNet (Incubating) User Group meeting on the 19th of March 2019 [1]. As usually, the meeting will have remote VC, powered by Amazon Chime [2]. It will be held from 6pm-7pm (CEST) / 9am-10am (PST). Join the meeting:

Re: The Learning Robot

et it out on the > https://twitter.com/ApacheMXNet account? > > - Carin > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:37 AM Anton Chernov wrote: > > > Dear MXNet Community, > > > > > > Read the development story of a robotics demo powered by deep learning > with > > Apache M

The Learning Robot

Dear MXNet Community, Read the development story of a robotics demo powered by deep learning with Apache MXNet on an embedded platform. The Learning Robot Humans and machines, hand in hand. https://medium.com/apache-mxnet/the-learning-robot-1c2deab8f375 Best Anton

Re: Call for Ideas and Approaches to Community Building

, Aaron Markham : > Anton, can you share the design and specs and code for the robot arm demo? > I wish that was being shown at GTC now. It would be great to let people > borrow it for West coast events. Maybe I can get one built here in Palo > Alto. > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, 05:54 An

Re: CI unstable

) https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14525 I would appreciate a review and merge on those. Best Anton пт, 22 мар. 2019 г. в 20:57, Anton Chernov : > Yes, you can see the changes in this PR: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14504 > > Unfortunately,

Re: CI unstable

> fix this issue. Say > > http://data.dmlc.ml/models/imagenet/inception-bn/Inception-BN-0126.params > -> > http://data.mxnet.io/models/imagenet/inception-bn/Inception-BN-0126.params > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:57 AM Anton Chernov > wrote: > > > Dear MX

CI unstable

Dear MXNet Community, Since a few days we are experiencing problems with CI PR verification builds. For some reason unix-cpu builds get aborted. Potentially there is a problem with gitlab.com from where dependencies are downloaded for static MXNet builds. We are working hard on finding and

Re: Call for Ideas and Approaches to Community Building

I don't know whether that is enough, but here are a few efforts we make to promote MXNet: * The robotic arms demo at the embedded world We promoted MXNet as the framework to go on embedded devices with our robotic arms demo. We've got a lot of attention from different people including professors

[INVITATION] 19th of March 2019 / Berlin MXNet Recurring User Group Meeting

Dear MXNet community, I would like to invite you to the regular Apache MXNet (Incubating) User Group meeting on the 19th of March 2019 [1]. As usually, the meeting will have remote VC, powered by Amazon Chime [2]. Join the meeting: https://chime.aws/4899512091 Meeting ID: 4899 51 2091 Best

Re: [RFC] Integrating the new MXNet website

The link is not working: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpageaction?pageId=103089084 Page Not Found We can't find that page. This could be because: The page doesn't exist. The page exists, but you don't have view permission for that space. I have checked that I'm

Re: direction for documentation across various APIs that share common doc source

Hi Aaron, Here is an idea: The main documentation is the one in .cc files. In theory the language bindings should just override some stuff from it, like examples. If I understand correctly there is a sphinx script that generates the documentation. If run it first for core src folder and then from

Embedded World 2019 Robotics Demo

Dear MXNet Community, If you happens to be at the Embedded World exhibition in Nürnberg drop by our booth at the Qt stand in hall 4 to see a MXNet robotics demo. Looking forward to see you! Best Anton

Re: Benchmarking MXNet with different compilers and different OpenMP implementations (results)

or they use what the system expects? > > Cheers, > Aaron > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 04:37 Anton Chernov wrote: > > > Dear MXNet community, > > > > Due to multiple problems related to OpenMP and stale proposed change [1] > we > > have been working on gathe

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

t/blob/8a63bdecf2d9f12d34fe5874957ae4c867eb5f5b/CMakeLists.txt#L408-L410 [2] https://github.com/intel/mkl-dnn/releases вт, 12 февр. 2019 г. в 11:22, Anton Chernov : > Recent benchmarking results have been published here [1]. Experiments > compare different OpenMP implementations as well

Benchmarking MXNet with different compilers and different OpenMP implementations (results)

Dear MXNet community, Due to multiple problems related to OpenMP and stale proposed change [1] we have been working on gathering performance data on the impact of using different OpenMP implementations with MXNet (great thanks to Stanislav Tsukrov for the hard work). The results can be found here

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

]. Best Anton [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2wclBg [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/14087#issuecomment-461734041 вс, 9 дек. 2018 г. в 16:28, Anton Chernov : > Hi Chris, > > Following up on the issue, are all things resolved in the discussion? > > I

Re: Taxonomy on our cwiki

A quick tip about links to the wiki pages, note the difference in links: * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Process (1) * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/BINjB (2) If sharing was done via the 'Share' menu the link (2) would persist after any structual movements.

[INVITATION] 8 January 2019 / Apache MXNet (Incubating) User Group meeting

Dear MXNet community, I would like to invite you to the regular Apache MXNet (Incubating) User Group meeting on the 8th of January 2019 [1]. As usually, the meeting will have remote VC, powered by Amazon Chime. Join the meeting: https://chime.aws/4899512091 Meeting ID: 4899 51 2091 Best Anton

Re: [DISCUSS] About the PR merging policy

There was no policy setup before for this as far as I know. Personally, I don't see any value in introducing another blocker for enough slow process of PR merges. The best value / burden ratio one gets from lightweight 'another pair of eyes' approach. Anton ср, 12 дек. 2018 г. в 01:24, Tianqi

GitHub CI status update not stable

are working on resolving the issue and will update you once it will get resolved. Best regards, Anton Chernov

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

Hi Chris, Following up on the issue, are all things resolved in the discussion? If yes, I kindly ask you to reopen this PR and remove ‘requesting changes’ status: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12160 Thank you. Best Anton вт, 27 нояб. 2018 г. в 17:15, Anton Chernov

Re: using conan to manage Apache Incubator MXNet project dependencies

le or workflow in this case. > > ср, 28 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:24, Anton Chernov : > > > Great, thank you for your answers. > > > > Is it possible to have an offline build somehow? For example, if all > > dependencies would be stored locally. Probably, that would require som

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1

Dear all, The Apache MXNet (incubating) community is happy to announce Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1! Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for both efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and imperative programming to maximize efficiency and

Re: using conan to manage Apache Incubator MXNet project dependencies

t; > other build tools might be added in a similar manner. > > вт, 27 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:54, Anton Chernov : > > > I think I asked this already, but want to confirm in regards to the > > following discussion: > > > > MXNet CMake build - rais

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

/12160 If there are no other objections I kindly ask Chris Olivier to remove his 'requesting changes' veto on it to unblock the CMake overhaul work. Thank you. Best Anton чт, 22 нояб. 2018 г. в 17:11, Anton Chernov : > > Thank you for you answer, Chris. > > > The whole “mixin

Re: using conan to manage Apache Incubator MXNet project dependencies

I think I asked this already, but want to confirm in regards to the following discussion: MXNet CMake build - raise minimal required version https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/09772f9447ebff72cdfea5512ae70e295db8a21ba0ddb39359cd0a77@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E Would it be possible to define

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

iable > you can set in the mxnet omp tuning code that will print overhead and > execution times for the current omp library. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 7:12 AM Anton Chernov wrote: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > Thank you for your answer. I

Re: [Discussion] MXNet CMake build - raise minimal required version

use MXNet > can not be build without it [2]. ? > > you mean it is always built or it is turned on (ie recording and saving > profiling information)? I am not aware of it being turned on by default. > > > profiler has no overhead when built in but not turned on. > > >

Re: [Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

Hi Chris, Thank you for your answer. If you have noticed the initial email comes from me, Anton Chernov (@lebeg on Github) and thus the proposal is not from any 'Ci' team that you've mentioned, but from me personally. You are writing: > someone is doing something unhealthy when they f

[Discussion] Remove bundled llvm OpenMP

Dear MXNet community, I would like to drive attention to an important issue that is present in the MXNet CMake build: usage of bundled llvm OpenMP library. I have opened a PR to remove it: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12160 The issue was closed, but I am strong in my oppinion

[Discussion] MXNet CMake build - raise minimal required version

Dear MXNet community, I propose to raise the minimal required cmake version that is needed to build MXNet to 3.10 which was tagged on March 16 2018 [1]. The effort of repairing cmake scripts in general is targeting to deprecate make and maintain only 1 build system. *Need* The build system is

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1.rc0

, Hagay Lupesko : > Great - congrats! > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:51 AM Anton Chernov wrote: > > > Dear MXNet community, > > > > I'm happy to announce the results of the vote. > > > > This vote passes with 8 +1 votes (4 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes.

[RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1.rc0

Dear MXNet community, I'm happy to announce the results of the vote. This vote passes with 8 +1 votes (4 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes * Carin / binding * Indhu / binding * Sandeep / binding * Jim / binding * Kellen * Steffen * Roshani * Aaron 0 votes * No votes -1 votes * No votes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1.rc0

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:43 PM Steffen Rochel > > wrote: > > > >> +1 build on MacOS Sierra following instructions on > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Developer+Setup+on+Mac > >> and run one training test. > >> >

Re: Should PR-860 (Use modernized range loops where possible) be reverted?

Hi Carin, The discussion [1] was about whether to enable automatic checks on using old behaviour in new PR's. Kellens PR [2] was about modernizing the actual code itself and was not up for voting, thus could not receive any technical veto votes. Per the discussion (as I have understood it), we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1.rc0

gt; +1 build on MacOS Sierra following instructions on > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Developer+Setup+on+Mac > >> and run one training test. > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:34 PM Carin Meier > wro

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0 release

I'd like to remind everyone that 'code freeze' would mean cutting a v1.4.x release branch and all following fixes would need to be backported. Development on master can be continued as usual. Best Anton ср, 14 нояб. 2018 г. в 6:04, Steffen Rochel : > Dear MXNet community, > the agreed plan was

[VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1.rc0

Dear MXNet community, This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1. Voting will start now, on Monday the 12th of November 2018 and close on 14:00 Thursday the 15th of November 2018, Pacific Time (PT). Link to release notes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/eZGzBQ

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

б, 10 нояб. 2018 г. в 11:59, Anton Chernov : > Due to various problems we had to postpone the tagging and vote for the > release till Monday, the 12th of November 2018. > > Following change has been updated and waiting to be merged: > > Disable flaky test test_operator.test_d

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

the MACOS tests timed out as well for the branch. The proposed change contains thus only the build: [MXNET-908] Enable minimal OSX Travis build (v1.3.x) https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13179 Best Anton пт, 9 нояб. 2018 г. в 13:11, Anton Chernov : > I created the following

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

In case the tests for MACOS will time out as well we can disable them and keep at least the build stage as in: Disable travis tests https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13137 Best Anton пт, 9 нояб. 2018 г. в 11:17, Anton Chernov : > > Hi Naveen, > > I believe that

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

.3.1 branch since > travis CI is timing out and creates blockers, it also did not exist for > v1.3.0. > > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:04 AM Anton Chernov wrote: > > > A PR to fix the tests: > > > > Remove test for non existing index copy operator (v1.3.x) > &

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

/job/v1.3.x/ I will look into the failures, but any help as usual is very appreciated. The nightly tests are fine: http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/job/NightlyTests/job/v1.3.x/ Best Anton ср, 7 нояб. 2018 г. в 17:19, Anton Chernov : > Yes, you are right about the versions wording, tha

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

A PR to fix the tests: Remove test for non existing index copy operator (v1.3.x) https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13180 Best Anton чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 10:05, Anton Chernov : > An addition has been made to include MacOS tests for the v1.3.x branch: > > [MXNET-90

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

/incubator-mxnet/pull/12462 [MXNET-908] Enable python tests in Travis https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12550 [MXNET-968] Fix MacOS python tests https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12590 Best Anton чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 9:38, Anton Chernov : > Thank you everyone for y

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

her violation happens it could be > ground for declining a release during votes. > > -sz > > > On Nov 7, 2018, at 2:25 AM, Anton Chernov wrote: > > > > [MXNET-1179] Enforce deterministic algorithms in convolution layers >

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

/incubator-mxnet/pull/13154 fix broken links (v1.3.x) https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13155 Best Anton ср, 7 нояб. 2018 г. в 10:49, Anton Chernov : > Hi Sheng, > > thanks for you suggestions. Personally, I would not rush with new major > release as this breaks the pace

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

> >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Naveen and Anton, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for pointing that out. You are right that these are not > critical > >>>> fixes. Putting them in 1.4.0 is more appropriate. PRs are closed. > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Speedup non-code PR in CI

Hi Lin, thanks for your suggestion. I think it makes total sense. The triggering logic of the verification build is in the Jenkinsfile [1]. We would be happy if you could drive this and introduce a PR that implements this check. Best Anton [1]

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

ton вт, 6 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:06, Anton Chernov : > Hi Haibin, > > I have a few comments regarding the proposed performance improvement > changes. > > CUDNN support for LSTM with projection & clipping > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13056 > > There i

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

5:55, Anton Chernov : > Hi Patric, > > This change was listed in the 'PR candidates suggested for consideration > for v1.3.1 patch release' section [1]. > > You are right, I also think that this is not a critical hotfix change that > should be included into the 1.3.1 pa

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

//cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release > ), > these features will go into 1.4 rather than patch release of 1.3.1. > > Feel free to correct me :) > > Thanks, > > --Patric > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ant

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

of time, I'm afraid. Best regards, Anton пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 19:45, Anton Chernov : > > As part of: > > Implement mkldnn convolution fusion and quantization > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12530 > > I propose to add the examples and documentation PR as well: >

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 19:02, Anton Chernov : > Dear MXNet community, > > I will be the release manager for the upcoming 1.3.1 patch release. Naveen > will be co-managing the release and providing help from the committers side. > > The following dates have been set: > > C

[Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Dear MXNet community, I will be the release manager for the upcoming 1.3.1 patch release. Naveen will be co-managing the release and providing help from the committers side. The following dates have been set: Code Freeze: 31st October 2018 Release published: 13th November 2018 Release notes

Re: [Discuss] Feature detection at runtime / test skipping depending on features

Great idea. I could see following checks being added: * Is OpenMP enabled? * Is CUDA enabled? (though already available as 0 for GPU count) * Is NCCL enabled? * CuDNN? * What BLAS / LAPACK math library is used? * F16 support enabled? * KVStore enabled? * TensorRT? It would help to structure the

Re: Reproducing test failures on CI

tup Scheduled for 23rd October in London, where Pedro Larroy > > will talk about Deep Learning using MXNet! > > > > > > > https://www.meetup.com/Deep-Learning-with-Apache-MXNet-London/events/255280739/ > > > > > > -Naveen > > > > On Mon, O

Re: Creating branch for Java_API

We could create a special job for testing it, maybe with a tweaked Jenkinsfile so you could run only the tests you are interested in. What do you think? Best Anton пт, 12 окт. 2018 г. в 20:24, Naveen Swamy : > Hi All, > > Just wanted to inform there that I am going to create a branch on GitHub

Re: [DISCUSS] Use modernized C++11 range loops uniformly throughout the project

om/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Res-for-range сб, 29 сент. 2018 г. в 16:13, Anton Chernov : > +1 > > Maybe it's not necessary to enforce usage of range-based for, but I would > highly encourage to to it due to already named advantages. If code would be >

Re: [DISCUSS] Use modernized C++11 range loops uniformly throughout the project

+1 Maybe it's not necessary to enforce usage of range-based for, but I would highly encourage to to it due to already named advantages. If code would be introduced using the old-style there could be a comment suggesting the new way. But why do the manual work and not leave that to the automated

Re: Reformulating to a more efficient design of Mxnet-label-Bot

t;Marco de Abreu" > wrote: > > You mean like a replacement for the codeowners feature? > > Anton Chernov schrieb am Fr., 28. Sep. 2018, > 01:39: > > > As a feature request: Could we include detection and proposal of > reviewers > > to the

Re: Reformulating to a more efficient design of Mxnet-label-Bot

As a feature request: Could we include detection and proposal of reviewers to the bot as well? Anton чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 15:27, Harsh Patel : > Hey, > I'm Harsh Patel, and I am looking to contribute to MXNet. I wanted to get > some feedback to improvements that could be made with the current

Re: Remove MKLML as dependency

MKLML is super easy to install since it's distributed with the MKL-DNN package on GitHub [1] and this for all desktop platforms (Linux, Windows and MacOS). Currently, I don't see a way how MKL could be automatically installed on a Windows CI host for example. It also has the advantage of being

Re: Nightly Builds Not Working for Cu90MKL?

https://pypi.org/project/mxnet-cu90mkl/#history > > No builds show up since 8/22. From what I can tell, other variants (eg; > mxnet-mkl) are up to date. > > On August 31, 2018 at 2:24:30 PM, Anton Chernov (mecher...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > Hi Alfredo! > > Could you pro

Re: Nightly Builds Not Working for Cu90MKL?

Hi Alfredo! Could you provide more info on this? Where do you get the information? Best Anton пт, 31 авг. 2018 г. в 22:49, Alfredo Luque : > Just curious why the latest build is 2018-08-22 while the other variants > are up to date. > > Thanks, > > — > Alfredo Luque > Software Engineer >

Apache MXNet (Incubating) Recurring User Group Meeting Notes: 28th August 2018

Dear Apache MXNet (Incubating) community, Please find some meeting notes from the user group meeting on 28th August 2018. # MXNet contribution Per joined the group to see and discuss how he can contribute to MXNet. He already had a PR opened [1] and was looking for the next steps. As a

Re: MXNet Berlin Office Hours

" a very confusing concept. > > Does that mean "Apache MXNet committers who happen to live in Berlin?" > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Anton Chernov > wrote: > > > Dear MXNet community, > > > > As part of our customer support the MXNet Berlin

Re: MXNet developer setup on Mac with VSCode for develop, test and debug

I hope that the instructions will be for cmake soon. After merging this PR [1] there should be not too much problems with the build (considering it's without CUDA). Best Anton [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11148 чт, 19 июл. 2018 г. в 18:59, Pedro Larroy : > Have you guys

Remove Caffe functionality

Dear community, Currently MXNet has a Caffe framework integration (translator and converter) [1]. There were some issues discovered with it, for example some tests were failing [2]. Since we decided to remove the flaky tests and proceed to making them stable I propose completely removing this

MXNet Berlin Office Hours

://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/new) at least a few days before so that the team member who will help with the issue gets a chance to prepare. Main point of contact through email: mxnet-edge-oncall-primary[at]amazon.com Best regards Anton Chernov [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence

Re: CI is experiencing issues at the moment

The issue has been resolved. We have retriggered the failed builds and there is no need for any actions on your side. We will continue to monitor the builds for any further failures. Apologies for any inconvenience. Best regards, Anton чт, 12 июл. 2018 г. в 11:31, Anton Chernov : > Dear MX

CI is experiencing issues at the moment

Dear MXNet community, We are currently experiencing some issues with the CI system [1] (the disk space run full on the master). We will update you shortly when the issue was resolved. Best regards, Anton Chernov [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11654

CI is experiencing issues at the moment

Dear MXNet community, We are currently experiencing some issues with the CI system [1] (the disk space run full on the master). We will update you shortly when the issue was resolved. Best regards, Anton Chernov [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11654

Re: Feature branches for ARM and Android

Thank you Thomas for your suggestion, we already did exactly that and now even have a CI verification for PR's to this branches in a public fork. The main problem mentioned by Pedro already is that the changes we are doing are already big and they are not going to be smaller over time. The merge

Re: Make scalapkg fails if USE_BLAS is set to openblas/mkl/apple

The problem still persists with make build, so no correlation with the build system. 2018-06-06 15:49 GMT+02:00 Naveen Swamy : > I am using make to build > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Anton Chernov wrote: > > > Yes, we have checked that as well, but did not help

Re: Make scalapkg fails if USE_BLAS is set to openblas/mkl/apple

the library. Are you using cmake or make for builds? 2018-06-06 14:47 GMT+02:00 Naveen Swamy : > By the way it turned out the problem was when we used USE_SIGNAL_HANDLER > along with a combination of flags, try removing signal handler and see if > it works > > > On Jun 6, 2018, at 12:28

Re: Make scalapkg fails if USE_BLAS is set to openblas/mkl/apple

Unfortunately, I think this is the same behaviour that we're observing on Raspberry Pi's. Currently we are bisecting the release to find the breaking commit to have an idea what exactly is broken. What I can say for now that this failure is not deterministic (on RPi's) and the library import to

Re: Make cmake default

Here [1] you can find a work in progress PR regarding BLAS libraries handling with cmake in MXNet. -- Anton [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11148 2018-06-04 11:43 GMT+02:00 Anton Chernov : > +1 > > > > Cmake build scripts have currently some limitations (CU

Re: Make cmake default

+1 Cmake build scripts have currently some limitations (CUDA, lapack, F16 etc) especially for cross compilations. I am currently working on those [1]. lapack and BLAS cmake module coming soon. Once this is done all ci builds can be ported to use cmake builds. Regarding amalgamation: It

Re: MXNet C++ package improvements

The document has been synced to JIRA <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=75976112>. 2018-03-15 17:51 GMT+01:00 Anton Chernov <mecher...@gmail.com>: > I've improved the document based on recent comments, please have another > look. What has b

Re: MXNet C++ package improvements

example * Added thread safety requirements Thanks @chris and @naveen for your reviewing efforts! 2018-03-14 21:44 GMT+01:00 Anton Chernov <mecher...@gmail.com>: > Sure, here we go: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Xi0aU9Nks7- > GcsJIfcXoEpgPeYnSiEtBpJlhZvMaIb8/edit?usp=sharing &

MXNet C++ package improvements

Dear MxNet Community, please find here the design document for the proposed MXNet C++ package improvements for review and consideration. Feedback is welcome and highly appreciated. Thank you! BR Anton

Wiki Access

Hi! Can somebody please give write me write access to the MXNet wiki? In particular this section: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Design+Proposals Thanks! Anton

Join MXNet Development Discussion

Hi! I would like to join the MXNet Development Discussion on slack. Could you grant me access? Thanks! Kind regards, Anton Chernov