017
# AVX_to_SSE_instances/100instructions: 0.1687
# SSE_to_AVX_instances/100instructions: 0.1687
Bhavin Thaker.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 7:00 AM Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think we should explicitly define march to be x86-64 (which is the
> default in Linux) and documented here:
> h
to reproduce the
crash and then use Valgrind to get to the culprit portion of the code
quickly.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 6:49 AM Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It's very difficult to reproduce, non-deterministic. We were also running
> without signal handl
Have you tried running with valgrind to get some clues on the root-cause?
Bhavin Thaker.
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 8:55 PM Da Zheng <zhengda1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It might also be possible that this isn't an MKLDNN bug.
> I just saw a similar memory error without MKLDNN bui
Done.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:27 AM Chris Olivier
wrote:
> Can someone please give write me access to the MXNet wiki?
>
Multi-part upload with finalization seems like a good approach for this
problem.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:45 AM Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rahul,
> IMO It is not Ok to write to a local file before streaming, you have to
> consider securi
ote that this is also efficient because local memory
or disk I/O (assuming SSD or high-grade rotating hard disk) will be faster
than multiple S3 put calls over long-distance network.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:34 PM Rahul Huilgol <rahulhuil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Chris,
&g
.
In short, your proposal #3 is good and ideal but seems less practical based
on my observations so far.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:58 AM Marco de Abreu <
marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sheng,
>
> very good suggestions! How long do we plan to suppo
+1 to having committers act as role models for descriptive PR title and
descriptions.
I am sorry to say this explicitly because I found a few committers to have
no descriptions in their PRs with PR titles that seemed vague to me as a
contributor of Apache MXNet.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Sun, Jan 14
documented here (prepared after the MXNet 1.0 Release):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Retrospective+for+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.0.0
Any comments or suggestion on the above Release retrospective are most
welcome.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:03 PM
instead of doing it
during the upcoming release.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Marco de Abreu <
marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello Sheng,
>
> thanks a lot for leading this task!
>
> +1 for both points. Additionally, I'd propose to add the req
Ok, Marco. Do all the permitted datasets reside in S3 or is this a todo
item?
Bhavin Thaker.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:28 AM Marco de Abreu <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> It would make sense, but the license does not permit redistribution of the
> GroupLens-Movie dataset
Does it make sense to cache the datasets into a (reliable) S3 bucket so the
tests to run reliably?
Does the dataset licensing allow downloading the dataset?
Bhavin Thaker.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:52 AM kellen sunderland <
kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey all, since this ser
Would it make sense to have a developer best practices section on the
Apache wiki where such guidance can be documented for future reference?
Bhavin Thaker.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:56 AM Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have been thinking about
to the open-source Apache MXNet.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 12:30 PM Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to that. I think we don't have to run CUDA 8 on every PR.
>
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Marco de Abreu <
> marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com>
that the MXNet
CI run tests only with latest CUDA9 version and NOT CUDA8.
I am eager to hear alternate viewpoints/corrections from folks other than
Kellen and me.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 8:24 AM kellen sunderland <
kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the though
/incubator-mxnet/issues/8805
Bhavin Thaker.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 3:30 AM kellen sunderland <
kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all, I'd like to propose that we nail down exactly which versions of
> CUDA we're supporting. We can then ensure that we've got good test
> cov
.
Thanks,
Bhavin Thaker.
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Hen <bay...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks Bhavin. Let's definitely get that as an active conversation.
>
> In general I'm okay with the report. I'm having login pains with the wiki
> (yay for non-ldap service), but chatted with S
questions in the one question above, I am
looking for more ideas or thoughts.
Cheers,
Bhavin Thaker.
on various MXNet talks at
conferences, universities, etc. If anybody has suggestions on how to
increase the contributions to MXNet, please share your ideas.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:15 PM Hen <bay...@apache.org> wrote:
> Few items that flagged for me in the report:
&g
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Development+Process
Wishing all of you a very happy new year 2018!
Regards,
Bhavin Thaker.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:36 AM, kellen sunderland <
kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sheng’s comments are correct. GitHub will save review
Hi Marco,
Thanks for your work on the CI.
Is it possible/ok to share the docs via googledocs link until you get write
permissions for the apache wiki page?
Bhavin Thaker.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Marco de Abreu <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
> Hello MXNet
T use GPU
context on a CPU-only instance.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> verified building from source and tested on macOS Sierra
>
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 10:32 AM Chris Olivier &
.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6364314/why-is-a-pthread-mutex-considered-slower-than-a-futex
Bhavin Thaker.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:00 PM kellen sunderland <
kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think Haitao is right given some stacks we've recently looked at. e.g
Do we have performance/profiling measurement evidence to prove/disprove the
claims of the impact of mutex bottleneck in MXNet?
Bhavin Thaker.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:03 AM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu>
wrote:
> If they are not bottleneck. Then resorting to standard library
+1 for better [1] PR Titles. As suggested by Madan and use by Spark, the
current PR template seems to be ignored by folks and so we may want to
simplify it to:
Q1. What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Q2. How was this patch tested?
+1 to either [2] Jira OR [3] PR labels.
Bhavin
+1 for [1] Jenkins (A setup separated from Apache Jenkins) - with various
plugins.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Madan Jampani <madan.jamp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for (1)
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com>
I agree about your point on correctness -- do you know of any known
correctness issues with Ninja?
These build times seem to be NOT with GPU builds and distributed kvstore
enabled -- could you please confirm? nvcc builds take a significant time.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:45 AM
-build.org/manual.html
Thanks,
Bhavin Thaker.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to update the MXNet build instructions.
>
> In particular I was thinking that it would be a good idea to update
> the i
, what is the expected SLA for a response from them? When users deploy
MXNet in production environments, they will expect some form of SLA for
support and a patch release.
Regards,
Bhavin Thaker.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 T
failures for PRs.
There are other places (nightly) to do extensive tests.
PR-unit-tests are sanity tests and must be quick, reliable and consistent
for every PR.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:51 AM Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> That's not true. random() an
+1 to disable old slack, but keep old messages viewable.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:23 AM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> As we have now migrated the majority of people from apache-mxnet.slack.com
> to the-asf.slack.com I would like to suggest
MXNet (Incubating).
Regards,
Bhavin Thaker.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:56 AM Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Some of the unit tests are extremely costly in terms of memory and compute.
>
> As an example in the gluon tests we a
Hi John,
I went through the mentioned section and scanned the entire page. It is
very helpful. Thanks!
Regards,
Bhavin Thaker.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:32 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> Bhavin,
>
> You may want to review http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-
to learn from the mistakes of other Apache
projects and also contribute to that guidelines list.
Later, we can propose our guidelines page to contribute back to the *main
Apache guidelines page for incubating projects*.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Sebastian <ss
Hi Seb: please use a different email thread for new topics of discussion.
Hi Jun: I think Seb may be referring to Volta V100 support in MXNet and NOT
P4/P40 inference accelerators.
Corrections/clarifications welcome.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:22 PM Jun Wu <wujun@gmail.
+1
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:45 PM Naveen Swamy wrote:
> + 1
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Vikram Madan
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Lupesko, Hagay
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I think
-review and only
after sufficient amount of sanity build-tests have passed.
Let the machines work harder for humans and not the other way around.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:20 PM Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The majority of these iterations is to trigge
one feature
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Bhavin Thaker <bhavintha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 : Chris has an important question.
> >
> > How do we ensure that a feature/task for a particular Apache project is
> not
> > worked on by multiple
is working on
what.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM Joern Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A good way to coordinate is to use the dev list and/or state on the
> issues that you are interested in it and are working on it.
>
> We use Jira for years at Apac
that high bar. This is difficult to
quantify but is a quality that is expected to be demonstrated in various
conversations of the person being nominated to be the committer.
Bhavin Thaker.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Sebastian <s...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Another thing might be that hav
40 matches
Mail list logo