Thank you Chai.
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, 6:35 pm Chaitanya Bapat, wrote:
> Hello MXNet community,
>
> *If your PRs aren't targeted towards v1.* branches [v1.x for e.g.] then
> ignore.*
>
> For a few weeks, we've witnessed timeouts for CI unix-gpu pipelines
> specifically on PRs targeted towards v1.x
actively engaging in PR
reviews, dev@ list discussions and helping the project and fellow
contributors.
Sam, thank you for all your contributions and looking forward to more
support!
Welcome, Sam!
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
I agree with marking numpy operators being marked as experimental and going
with v1.7 given numpy is still in progress and mainly targeted beginning
v2.0. And, v1.7 has several significant features such as accelerator APIs.
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, 7:51 pm Chen, Ciyong, wrote:
> Hi Chai,
>
> We've f
This is so very helpful Yang. Thank you so much for contributing this :-)
On Wed, 20 May 2020, 10:36 pm Lin Yuan, wrote:
> Awesome work! Thanks a lot for making this desirable feature happen.
>
> Lin
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:45 AM Yang Shi wrote:
>
> > Hi MXNet Community,
> >
> > Global se
Thanks Yang. Being able to search content is very important for the
documentation site.
I played around it on my laptop. Looks exciting and so helpful. For
example, I tried to search a tutorial for how to deploy on mobile and
result directly took me to a tutorial.
As Marco pointed out, search is
Thank you Aaron and Foivos for bringing this up.
Any other concerns in the MXNet website that we need to tackle?
Best,
Sandeep
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020, 11:17 am Aaron Markham,
wrote:
> I created a ticked with Apache Infra. Searching Jira reveals that there has
> been an experimental CDN in China f
Thanks a lot Joe for your contributions. Thank you Marco, Chai and Leo for
helping this.
Especially given that you had seen around 57% build failing in sanity
check, this should be very helpful to provide faster feedback for PR
authors on sanity issues plus save a lot of unnecessary builds.
Best,
## Description
This issue is being created to gather:
1. All the new feature requests/suggestions for MXNet website improvements and
changes.
2. Current we have 40 open issues tagged "Website" -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AWebsite
, if there
Thanks for bringing this here to MXNet community Yuan and thank you and
other contributors to bring MXNet operator in K8s.
It would be very helpful if you can help us to by giving some details about
current users of mxnet-operator in K8s or any users experimenting with it.
This info about userbase
+1 Thanks for bringing this up.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17968#issuecomment-608971830
a] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya
> >[image:
> >> https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> >> <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
> > *+1 (973) 953-6299*
> >
> > [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
> > https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat] <
> https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
> > https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya
> >[image:
> > https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
> >
>
>
> --
> *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
> *+1 (973) 953-6299*
>
> [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
> ]
> <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
> https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
> https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> >> > > > > > > upon
> > > >> > > > > > > >> request for a PR) to require a manual step, but the
> PR
> > > >> > > validation
> > > >> > > > > > > pipelines
> > > &
Thank you for taking care of it Zi.
Best,
Sandeep
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, 6:52 pm Chaitanya Bapat, wrote:
> Thanks Zi!
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 15:48, Patrick Mu wrote:
>
> > Dear Community,
> >
> > We have restarted the CI master, with a more powerful instance with
> larger
> > network and IO
formation==
> > > > >> > You have been invited to an online meeting, powered by Amazon
> > Chime.
> > > > >> > *Chime meeting ID*: *9272158344*
> > > > >> > Join via Chime clients (manually): Select 'Meetings > Join a
> > > Meeting',
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > enter 9272158344
> > > > >> > Join via Chime clients (auto-call): If you invite auto-call as
> > > > attendee,
> > > > >> > Chime will call you when the meeting starts, select 'Answer'
> > > > >> > *Join via browser screen share*: https://chime.aws/9272158344
> > > > >> > *Join via phone* (US): +1-929-432-4463,,,9272158344#
> > > > >> > *Join via phone (US toll-free)*: +1-855-552-4463,,,9272158344#
> > > > >> > International dial-in: https://chime.aws/dialinnumbers/
> > > > >> > In-room video system: Ext: 62000, Meeting PIN: 9272158344#
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
> > > > >> > *+1 (973) 953-6299*
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > > > >> > <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
> > > > >> https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
> > > > >> > ]
> > > > >> > <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
> > > > >> > https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <
> https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya
> > > > >> >[image:
> > > > >> > https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > > > >> > <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
> > > *+1 (973) 953-6299*
> > >
> > > [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > > <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
> > https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
> > > ]
> > > <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
> > > https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya
> > >[image:
> > > https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
i.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Notes
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2) Link to release candidate:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://github.com/ap
Awesome :-) Well deserved :-)
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 6:31 PM kellen sunderland
wrote:
> Congrats Lai. Well deserved.
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 6:18 PM Jake Lee wrote:
>
> > Congratulations! Lai
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 6:13 PM Sheng Zha wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Please join me i
Thank you Tao and Shufan.
Sidebar missing bug in API documentation is inconvenience for the user. It
would great if we can fix it with 1.5.1
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, 10:14 AM Lai Wei wrote:
> Hi Tao,
>
> Thank you so much for driving it. Currently nightly test on tutorials are
> failing and it nee
; 23:59:59.
> > >
> > > 1) Link to release notes:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.0+Release+Notes
> > >
> > >
> > > 2) Link to release candidate:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.5.0.rc2
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 3) Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.5.0.rc2/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > >
> > > +1 = approve
> > > +0 = no opinion
> > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > --
> > > Best Regards
> > >
> > > Lai
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
Thank you Zhaoqi for all your contributions to MXNet community.
This feature of capturing detailed information for a custom operator in
MXNet profiler output will be very helpful for lot of MXNet users who has
custom operators and want to know more about the bottlenecks.
Best,
Sandeep
On Wed, Ju
I ran operator benchmarks for GPU with CUDA10.1 comparing MXNet 1.4.1 and
1.5.0 RC2
Results -
https://gist.github.com/sandeep-krishnamurthy/e0a2be893c8c4d484390c9c8813bdf50#file-mxnet_opperf_gpu-md
GPU operator benchmark Summary:
1. Most ops are mostly stable across MXNet 1.4.1 and 1.5.0.RC2. No
Hello Ciyong/Pedro,
Ran operator benchmarks on 1.4.1 and 1.5.0.rc2. (Not complete, doesn’t
cover all MXNet operators, not presented in best possible way, still WIP)
https://gist.github.com/sandeep-krishnamurthy/e0a2be893c8c4d484390c9c8813bdf50
Following operators looks slower in 1.5 compared to
> > > > > > should also join in this pledge on python3statement.org [2]
> > > because it
> > > > > > > would help clean up our project and it would be difficult to
> > > continue
> > > > > > > supporting Python2 anyway when some of our dependencies are
> > > dropping
> > > > > > > support.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As a concrete step, we should decide on a date to remove all
> > > usages of
> > > > > > > Python2 from our CI and consider that officially dropping
> > support.
> > > > > > > Following that, we can expect PRs will end up breaking support
> > for
> > > > > > Python2.
> > > > > > > I suggest just using the same date that Python is dropping
> > support
> > > of
> > > > > > > January 1. We may also need to update some examples or scripts
> > that
> > > > > were
> > > > > > > written only for python2 that are around the project. Any
> > thoughts?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Zach
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] - https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0373/
> > > > > > > [2] - https://python3statement.org/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
gt; Happy to discuss further.
>
> -Naveen
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 1:57 PM sandeep krishnamurthy <
> sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Community,
> >
> > I am currently working on building a utility/library to help us easily do
ent in this github repository
<https://github.com/sandeep-krishnamurthy/dl-operator-benchmark>. Proposal
is to get this library under incubator-mxnet/benchmark/
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/master/benchmark>. Please
do review and provide your feedback and suggestions.
usable out of the box.
>
> Could you elaborate why you think this is the case?
>
> -sz
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:11 AM sandeep krishnamurthy <
> sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello MXNet community,
> >
> > I have put up a design propos
logic.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103090063
Thanks to our fellow community members (Zhi, Naveen, Pinar and Jake) for
their initial feedback. I request the community to review and provide
feedback on the proposal.
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
r and look forward to
> > future growth of the MXNet Clojure package and community.
> >
> > - Carin
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+hellonico+
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> failures.
> For details see
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/51e9ab05edae2089c74a253000a92d5aa5c6406f54e5bd0a0b3c3879@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>
> The MXNet community will discuss next steps.
>
> Regards,
> Steffen
>
>
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
Welcome Lin :-)
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019, 3:28 PM Yuan Tang Welcome Lin!
>
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 6:27 PM Tianqi Chen
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Community:
> >
> > Please join me to welcome Lin Yuan(@apeforest) as a new committer of
> > Apache(incubating) MXNet!
> >
> > He has contributed to various impro
ilestones and more details are captured in this document.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+end+to+end+models
Please do provide your feedback via comments in the document or on this
e-mail. All contributions are welcome. I will be creating JIRA stories and
issues for initial
+1
Build from source on Mac and Ubuntu 16.04.
1. Run GAN, DCGAN using Gluon on 1 GPU in Ubuntu and CPU Mac.
2. Convert a model to fp16, save and load in Gluon, perform inference.
Best,
Sandeep
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 7:01 PM Indhu +1.
>
> Builds fine from source. Tested few CNN examples using Py
all,
> > > > > > The upgraded label bot has been pushed into production. Current
> > > > > > functionality includes
> > > > > > add, delete, and update.
> > > > > > (i.e. @mxnet-label-bot add ['label']
> > > > > > @mxnet-label-bot remove ['label']
> > > > > > @mxnet-label-bot update ['label'])
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Users should feel free to leave suggestions and any potential
> > issues.
> > > > The
> > > > > > forum to this best would be here:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13163
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > -Harsh Patel
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
dio>
>
> I would highly appreciate your taking time to review and provide feedback,
> comments/suggestions on this.
> Looking forward to your support.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Gaurav Gireesh
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
to what we have for tutorials to catch any such
> > > regressions. The test could check only basic functionalities/working of
> > the
> > > examples. It can run small examples completely whereas it can run long
> > > training examples for only few epochs.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts from the community? Any other suggestions for fixing the
> > same?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ankit Khedia
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
+1
This will be very useful for increasing our committer pool that has
expertise in various components and not necessarily across and complete
in-depth expertise. This will have mainly 3 major positive impact on the
project:
1. Will greatly help in managing PRs and issues with fast turn around.
The
gt;> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:01
> > AM
> > > > > kellen
> > > > > > > > > > > sunderland
> > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > It would be ideal if we
> > could
> > > > > cover
> > > > > > > OSX
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jenkins,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > >
referring to the number of commenters
> on
> > > the
> > > > issue [1].
> > > >
> > > > You said that this is for "high performance use cases", which
> > contradicts
> > > > with Hagay's assement that this is "ba
ttps://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11849
> > > The fix was done by Sandeep:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12412 and is ready to
> be
> > > cherry picked into the release branch.
> > >
> > > This seems like a release blocker
0:
> >> > *https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.3.0.rc
> >> > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.3.0.rc0>0*
> >> >
> >> > View this page, click on "Build from Source", and use the source code
> >> > obtained from 1.3.0.rc0 tag:
> >> > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
> >> >
> >> > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> >> >
> >> > +1 = approve
> >> > +0 = no opinion
> >> > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Roshani
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> release
> > > > >> > >> (lots
> > > > >> > >> >>>> of
> > > > >> &g
>
> > > > >
> > > > > I therefore would like to propose that we discontinue the support
> of
> > > > MXNet
> > > > > on Windows 7 in the next release.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Specifically, this means the following required actions:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) state the discontinuation of Windows 7 support in the release
> note
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) update the MXNet webpage if Windows version is mentioned.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3) update the open Github issues related to Windows 7
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please share your thoughts about this proposal and/or suggest if
> > there
> > > is
> > > > > any other missing action item from the above.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Lin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
gt; > When searching developer guide by keyword, only one of them can be
> > > returned
> > > > on either site.
> > > >
> > > > It will be more convenient for developers if all the developer guide
> > > > resides on cwiki and all user guide (non-developer) on the mxnet.io
> > > > website. We can add a link on mxnet.io to refer all developers to
> > cwiki
> > > > for
> > > > guidance.
> > > >
> > > > Any comment is appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Lin
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
e found in
> the Confluence design doc
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/SVRG+Optimization+in+MXNet+Python+Module
> >
> .
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions! Thank you very much for your
> time and considerations!
>
> Cheers,
> Stephanie Yuan
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
your contributions.
Best,
Sandeep
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:02 PM sandeep krishnamurthy <
sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Sheng - Thanks for the feedback. I agree PR template provides that info.
> But, one major draw back is ability to filter, group and take actions
> (review, merge,
essary in pr-awaiting-testing
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:44 PM, sandeep krishnamurthy <
> sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > << Sorry sent too early>>
> > Hello Community,
> >
> > Recently, we are observing a growing number of PR open
/github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/labels/pr-ready-to-merge>
Review and CI is complete. Ready to Merge
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:35 PM sandeep krishnamurthy <
sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> Recently, we are observing a growing number of PR open {pending
Hello Community,
Recently, we are observing a growing number of PR open {pending for review,
pending for updates, ready to merge but waiting and more}.
To shed some light on numbers:
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
Hello Ivan and MXNet community,
Here is the repo with all resources we used in the SF MXNet Meetup -
https://github.com/TalkAI/facial-emotion-recognition-gluon
Best,
Sandeep
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:43 AM sandeep krishnamurthy <
sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will share t
g and pointing it to a custom
> > > page.
> > >
> > > I'd like to know how we go about requesting that kind of change on the
> > > Apache infra.
> > >
> > > Also, so that we know if people are getting 404s on certain pages, or
> if
> > > pages are breaking and throwing 500 errors, we could look at the server
> > > logs for the domain. A cron job that pushes them to s3 would work if we
> > > can't get direct access.
> > >
> > > How do we get regular access to or a feed of these logs that are
> residing
> > > on the web server?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Aaron
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
; >
> > > As this would be something that serves the mxnet project, my advise
> would
> > > be to make sure it ends up in a location that is controlled by the
> Apache
> > > mxnet PMC, in a location that is mirrored back to ASF resources.
> > >
> > > Isabel
> > >
> > > --
> > > Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
Thanks Vandana for picking up this issue. I think this is important to be
fixed and enabled in CI. Please let us know effort required to fix these
issues and we all can jump in and help you.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018, 7:27 PM Vandana Kannan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On enabling the option "undefined-varia
n images: from idea to production".
> > > > The details are here:
> > > > https://www.meetup.com/deep-learning-with-mxnet/events/252916863/ -
> > note
> > > > that there is limited capacity, so if you are interested please RSVP.
> > > >
> > > > The community is welcomed to join us, will be a great opportunity to
> > > mingle
> > > > and get to know one another in person.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Hagay
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
ct+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
> > > >*
> > > >
> > >
> > > Target feature freeze date is July 23rd. A release candidate will be
> cut
> > > around Monday, August 6th and voting will commence from then until
> > > Thursday, August 9th. If you have any additional features in progress
> and
> > > would like to include it in this release, please make sure to comment
> so
> > I
> > > can update the release notes.
> > >
> > > Feel free to add any other comments/suggestions.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roshani
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
t/blob/master/
> > scala-package/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/mxnet/IO.scala#L312-L315
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/
> > scala-package/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/mxnet/IO.scala#L358-L363
> >
> > Issue links:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11775
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10753
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11571
> >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
Hello Community,
As a MXNet contributor, I had issues and took me some time on getting
hands-on with MXNet codebase, being able to code, test, DEBUG python/CPP
combination. I have documented the steps for MXNet development setup using
VSCode on Mac. Document starts from installing all required
t
> > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc1>*
> > > >
> > > > View this page, click on "Build from Source", and use the source code
> > > > obtained from 1.2.1.rc1 tag:
> > > > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
> > > >
> > > > (Note: The README.md points to the 1.2.1 tag and does not work at the
> > > > moment.)
> > > >
> > > > Please remember to test first before voting accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > +1 = approve
> > > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Roshani
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
Dear Mentors and MXNet community,
Please do let me know if any changes / updates required on the podling
report - https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2018
Thank you Sebastian for your time to look into the podling report and
sign-off.
Best,
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:41
e to release a more
> > stable version RNN API this or next week in MKL-DNN 0.15.
> >
> > We will have CPP unit test support on these operators and I am planning
> to
> > write python unit tests to compare a RNN network's results from the
> MKLDNN
> > backend with that of the GPU to test accuracy. Is there any additional
> coverage
> > that you think we should cover in the next two weeks?
> >
> > Alex
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
community members who helped me to compile this
report.
Best,
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
6.04.4 LTS
> > > > > > > > Release:16.04
> > > > > > > > Codename: xenial
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My build script:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #!/bin/bash
> > > > > > > > set -e
> > > > > > > > set -x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > renice -n 19 -p $$
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > mkdir -p build && cd build
> > > > > > > > cmake -DUSE_CPP_PACKAGE=ON -DUSE_CUDA=OFF -DUSE_OPENMP=OFF
> > > > > > > -DUSE_OPENCV=ON
> > > > > > > > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -GNinja ..
> > > > > > > > ninja -v
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > cd ..
> > > > > > > > if [ ! -d mxnet_py3 ]; then
> > > > > > > > virtualenv -p `which python3` mxnet_py3
> > > > > > > > fi
> > > > > > > > source mxnet_py3/bin/activate
> > > > > > > > cd python
> > > > > > > > pip install -e .
> > > > > > > > cd ..
> > > > > > > > pip install opencv-python
> > > > > > > > pip install ipython
> > > > > > > > pip install matplotlib
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:33 PM Indhu <
> indhubhara...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> +1
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018, 6:52 PM Anirudh <
> anirudh2...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating)
> > version
> > > > > 1.2.1.
> > > > > > > >> Voting
> > > > > > > >> > will start now and close Thursday June 21st 7:00 PM PDT.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Link to release candidate 1.2.1.rc0:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc0
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > View this page for installation instructions:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > (Note: The README.md points to the 1.2.1 tag and does not
> > work
> > > > at
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> > moment).
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Please remember to test first before voting accordingly.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > +1 = approve
> > > > > > > >> > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > > > >> > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Anirudh
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
I would appreciate any feedback and testing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the original issue:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8971
> > > > >
> > > > > Architecture & Design:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Clojure
> > > > >
> > > > > and the github repo for rapid testing and issue fixing before of
> > > opening
> > > > an
> > > > > official PR https://github.com/gigasquid/clojure-mxnet
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm also active in the slack channel so feel free to ping me there.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Carin Meier
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋
> > > > Software School Fudan University
> > > > +86-138-1881-7745
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
Thanks Aaron. I like Wireframe2. One addition I can think of is to show in
a category Blogs/CaseStudy all new blogs published in Apache MXNet medium
handle and other trusted sources.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 3:19 PM Thomas DELTEIL
wrote:
> Nice work, I like wireframe 2 the best, it gives structure
Awesome!
On Tue, May 29, 2018, 6:03 PM Aaron Markham
wrote:
> Just wanted to bring everyone's attention to the label: Good First Issue.
>
> When you're going through new issues and labelling, keep this one in mind,
> so there are opportunities for new members to the project. I think a lot of
> p
ishing the Scala package from 1.2.0 release. What
> do
> > > you recommend should be the configuration for the Scala Packages ?
> > >
> > > I am thinking of the below
> > > For CPU build with
> > > OPENBLAS
> > > LAPACK
> > >
> > > For GPU build with
> > > OPENBLAS
> > > CUDA 9.0
> > > NCCL
> > >
> > > Let me know if you concerns or recommendations.
> > >
> > > Thanks, Naveen
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> > > >> Regarding to the following knowing issues listed below RC3:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> * CMake build ignores the USE_MKLDNN flag and doesn't build
> with
> > > > >> MKLDNN support even with -DUSE_MKLDNN=1. To workaround the issue
> > > please
> > > > >> see: #10801<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/
> 10801
> > >.
> > > > >> I think this problem has already been fixed in #10629<
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10629> and we can
> > use
> > > > >> CMake to build MXNet with MKLDNN support on WIN32 platform now.
> > > > >> Xinyu
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rahul Huilgol
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> installation
> > page
> > along with some suggestions. I'd appreciate your feedback here or on
> > the
> > wiki.
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Installation+page+UX
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Aaron
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
Hello MXNet community,
Keras users can now use the high-performance MXNet deep learning engine for
the distributed training of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and
recurrent neural networks (RNNs). With an update of a few lines of code,
Keras developers can increase training speed by using MXN
tters auth token to run the script.
>
> Please let me know if you have any other ideas to do this.
>
> Thanks,
> Roshani
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> >>> workshop
> >>> > during that conference, but only for internal amazon users.
> >>> >
> >>> > Best,
> >>> > Mu
> >>> >
> >>> > > On Feb 28, 2018, at 3:02 PM, Pedro Larroy <
> >>> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Hi folks
> >>> > >
> >>> > > It would be nice to organize an MXNet community meet up in Seattle
> >>> > > around the 26th of April, since some of us will be around due to an
> >>> ML
> >>> > > conference happening in those dates.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > For example going for some drinks / dinner.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Would anyone from the list be interested in joining?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Pedro.
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
gt; backend
> > > framework as Keras's submodule(Keras depends on MXNet) rather than
> > > opposite.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Yao
> > >
> > > 2018-03-23 11:44 GMT-07:00 Xingjian SHI :
> > >
> > >
Hello MXNet Community,
Along with Lai, Karan and other MXNet contributors, I am working on adding
MXNet backend for Keras. Currently supporting around ~70% of Keras APIs
across CNNs and RNNs.
https://github.com/deep-learning-tools/keras/tree/keras2_mxnet_backend
We wanted to gather the community
another
> admin (i.e. Nan Zhu) know in order to add you as a
> contributor/committer/etc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Chris
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
rning-tools/keras/issues
Best
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:28 PM, sandeep krishnamurthy <
sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
>
> I am working on adding Apache MXNet backend for Keras2. Jiajie Chen, MXNet
> contributor, was actively involved and has contr
ubmodules.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:32 PM, Chris Olivier
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > All other relases have the submodule sources included
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:00 PM, sandeep krishnamurthy &l
e candidate 1.1.0.rc0:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.1.0.rc0
> > > > >
> > > > > View this page and scroll down to “Build from Source” with source
> > code
> > > > > obtained from the 1.1.0.rc0 tag:
> > > > > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
> > > > >
> > > > > (Note: The README.md points to the 1.1.0 tag and does not work at
> the
> > > > > moment.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > > > +1 = approve
> > > > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Haibin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
use to avoid running into a second wave of
> > warnings about things discussed here already.
> >
> > Isabel
> >
> > --
> > Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
- Keras Tracking Issue - https://github.com/keras-team/keras/issues/8697
Best Regards,
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
poc)
Regards,
Sandeep
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 7:43 PM, sandeep krishnamurthy <
sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) for suggestion around framing CODEOWNERS functionality as the
> watchlist.
> I also feel that we should enable and find/request more than 1 person per
&
; > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Steffen
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 8:39 PM Mu Li <
> muli@gmail.com
> > >
> > &g
ng a blog post about how to contribute to MXNet, can be as simple
> > > > as how to use CLion to contribute to the project and send a patch...
> > > >
> > > > Just my thoughts.
> > > >
> > > > Pedro.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Chris Olivier >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > I suggest more transparency in the development process and
> > requirement
> > > > > definitions and grooming.
> > > > >
> > > > > Backlog wish-list on public wiki, which link to public JIRA epics
> or
> > > > > stories, where people outside of Amazon can edit/comment on the
> items
> > > or
> > > > > add items themselves.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Bhavin Thaker <
> > bhavintha...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Team,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Do you have any suggestions on how to increase community
> involvement
> > > and
> > > > >> contributions including code additions/changes,
> > > bug-fixes/enhancements,
> > > > >> documentation updates, tutorials, increased adoption, answering
> > > > questions
> > > > >> on Stackoverflow/discuss.mxnet.io, etc.?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> While I have asked multiple questions in the one question above, I
> > am
> > > > >> looking for more ideas or thoughts.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > >> Bhavin Thaker.
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
ot
> > > [6] Other - Please Name
> > >
> > > Please feel free to add a comment to support your choice.
> > > This vote will be open from now until the end of the day on Monday
> > > 11/13/2017
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Meghna Baijal
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
t; > a
> > > > set
> > > > >> > of quick tests as part of the PR process, and then a more
> detailed
> > > > >> > regression test suite periodically (say every 4 hours). This
> fits
> > > > nicely
> > > &
Hello All,
A new Apache MXNet (incubating) blog post is published covering the
highlights of 0.12 release.
https://blogs.apache.org/mxnet/entry/apache-mxnet-0-12-release
Thanks!
Apache MXNet (incubating) Team
Hello All,
A new Apache MXNet (incubating) blog post is published covering the
highlights of 0.12 release.
https://blogs.apache.org/mxnet/entry/apache-mxnet-0-12-release
Thanks!
Apache MXNet (incubating) Team
rence to the imagenet training script seems to be
> a bit out of context.
>
> In the following paragraph there is a typo: "allowing developerto" should
> be "allowing developers to".
>
> Best,
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> On 01.11.2017 01:27, sandeep krishnamu
> Can you sign in at blogs.apache.org using your Apache LDAP credentials
> > please?
> >
> > That will add you to the pool of users, and then one of the mentors can
> > add you to the blog :)
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017
> > >> Created a page in cwiki for a draft of blog post for MXNet v0.12
> > >> release.
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> > Draft+of+blog+post+for+MXNet+v0.12+release
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> *Sukwon Kim, *>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Sukwon Kim, *
> > >
> > > Senior Product Manager-Technical,
> > > Amazon Web Services (AWS) EC2
> >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
. I propose we disable 'required status check' for the
> master
> > > > branch so that we can development is not impacted. We can work on
> fixing
> > > > the CI situation in parallel.
> > > >
> > > > Committer,
> > > > Please vote if you are okay with disabling 'required status check'
> for
> > > > master.
> > > >
> > > > Once we have enough votes, I'll request a mentor to file a ticket
> with
> > > > infra.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Indu
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
t; +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Tianqi
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:39 PM Mu Li
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > &g
t; >is not with the same community, it requires Infra and
> >>>> community to
> >>>> > > > dive
> >>>> > > > >deep together on all action items.
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> >
gt; > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I have a new idea for a logo that I'd like to propose.
> > >>
> > >> The rabbit (I call him Max) is blazingly fast, like MXNet, but
> also
> > >> friendly and approachable, like the Gluon interface.
> > >>
> > >> Do you all like it?
> > >>
> > >> Seb
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
: Option 1 - Set up separate Jenkins CI build system.
Thanks,
Sandeep
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
d growing
> > the community, can everyone who is working on MXNet please share what
> > you're working on?
> >
> > I'm working on
> > -Redesigning the website
> > <https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/versions/master/index.html>.
> > -Setting up a forum for user support.
> >
> > Seb Kiureghian
> >
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
This will be very useful forum for Q&A from the community. It mainly helps
in one stop shop for all queries and answers.
Discus is very well integrated with Pytorch and helping community. I found
it very helpful and responsive.
+1
Thanks
sandeep
On Sep 15, 2017 5:33 PM, "Bhavin Thaker" wrote:
re than one party, because they isn't know the other was
> working on it already? Or coordinate forces (so to speak) on a large
> feature or initiative?
>
> -Chris
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
unknown yet.
These issues will be fixed soon.
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
ps://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-mxnet/job/master/260/
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
s/coreml/README.md <
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/
> > > tools/coreml/README.md>
> > > 2. Keras 1.2.2 Support: https://github.com/dmlc/keras/
> wiki/Installation
> > <
> > > https://github.com/dmlc/keras/wiki/Ins
thout
> needing
> >>> any
> >>> >> >>> > other dependencies (or only dependencies which can't be
> avoided).
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > The JNI layer could easily be shared between the Java and
> Scala
> >>> API.
> >>> >> >>> > As far as I understand is the JNI layer in the Scala API
> anyway
> >>> >> >>> > private and a change to it wouldn't require that the public
> part
> >>> of
> >>> >> >>> > the Scala API is changed.
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > What do you think?
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > Jörn
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Java+
> >>> >> API+Internals
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:39 PM, YiZhi Liu <
> javeli...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >> Hi Joern,
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >> I suggest to build Java API as a wrapper of Scala API, re-use
> >>> most
> >>> >> of
> >>> >> >>> >> the procedures. Referring to the Java API in Apache Spark.
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >> 2017-08-16 18:21 GMT+08:00 Joern Kottmann >:
> >>> >> >>> >>> Hello all,
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> I would like to propose the addition of a Java API to MXNet.
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> There has been some previous work done for the Scala API,
> and it
> >>> >> makes
> >>> >> >>> >>> sense to at least share the JNI layer between the two.
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> The Java API probably should be aligned with the Python API
> >>> (and
> >>> >> >>> >>> others which exist already) with a few changes to give it a
> >>> native
> >>> >> >>> >>> Java feel.
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> As far as I understand there are multiple people interested
> to
> >>> >> work on
> >>> >> >>> >>> this and it would be good to maybe come up with a written
> >>> proposal
> >>> >> on
> >>> >> >>> >>> how things should be.
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> My motivation is to get a Java API which can be used by
> Apache
> >>> >> OpenNLP
> >>> >> >>> >>> to solve various NLP tasks using Deep Learning based
> approaches
> >>> >> and I
> >>> >> >>> >>> am also interested to work on MXNet.
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> Jörn
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >> --
> >>> >> >>> >> Yizhi Liu
> >>> >> >>> >> DMLC member
> >>> >> >>> >> Technical Manager
> >>> >> >>> >> Qihoo 360 Inc, Shanghai, China
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> --
> >>> >> >>> Yizhi Liu
> >>> >> >>> DMLC member
> >>> >> >>> Technical Manager
> >>> >> >>> Qihoo 360 Inc, Shanghai, China
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> Yizhi Liu
> >>> >> DMLC member
> >>> >> Technical Manager
> >>> >> Qihoo 360 Inc, Shanghai, China
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Yizhi Liu
> >>> DMLC member
> >>> Technical Manager
> >>> Qihoo 360 Inc, Shanghai, China
> >>>
>
>
>
> --
> Yizhi Liu
> DMLC member
> Technical Manager
> Qihoo 360 Inc, Shanghai, China
>
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
Keras 1.2.2 Support: https://github.com/dmlc/keras/wiki/Installation <
> https://github.com/dmlc/keras/wiki/Installation>
>
>
>
> Please make sure you TEST before you vote accordingly:
>
> +1 = approve
>
> +0 = no opinion
>
> -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
--
Sandeep Krishnamurthy
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
