Hi All,
I would like to start a thread to discuss about the graduation for Apache
MXNet. From my time working in the community, I saw a great improvement in most
of the area that we do to make MXNet a better place. We keep tracking on all of
the issues user raised and reviewing PRs. We follow t
Hi Qing,
as a user and ASF member observing this project:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 01:44, Qing Lan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to start a thread to discuss about the graduation for Apache
> MXNet. From my time working in the community, I saw a great improvement in
> most of the area that we
: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache MXNet: Path to graduation
Hi Qing,
as a user and ASF member observing this project:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 01:44, Qing Lan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to start a thread to discuss about the graduation for Apache
> MXNet. From my time working in the commun
ge the committers who is less active to be involved into
> MXNet contribution.
>
> Thanks,
> Qing
>
>
> From: Lieven Govaerts
> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2019 5:59
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache MXNe
>> Qing
>>
>>
>> From: Lieven Govaerts
>> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2019 5:59
>> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache MXNet: Path to graduation
>
et
> >> I can tell from the issues/PRs/rfcs they submitted and indeed and indeed
> >> we should encourage the committers who is less active to be involved
> into
> >> MXNet contribution.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Qing
> >>
> >> _
contributors/committers not from Amazon to start working on them.
>> >>
>> >> 4. Committers from different firm/institution should have real work
>> >> on MXNet
>> >> I can tell from the issues/PRs/rfcs they submitted and indeed and indeed
>> >
ses were done by the Amazon side.
> >> >> Currently, we are moving on to rotate this responsibility with
> >> >> contributors/committers not from Amazon to start working on them.
> >> >>
> >> >> 4. Committers from different firm/institution
Anton Chernov writes:
> As a physicist I would like to point out that "Gluon" means: An elementary
> particle that acts as the exchange particle for the strong force between
> quarks [1].
> As a general scientific term it can barely be seen as a candidate for
> trademark registration.
This doesn'
different firm/institution should have real
> work
> > >> on MXNet
> > >> I can tell from the issues/PRs/rfcs they submitted and indeed and
> indeed
> > >> we should encourage the committers who is less active to be involved
> > into
> > >> MXN
n
> >> >> In the history, most of the releases were done by the Amazon side.
> >> >> Currently, we are moving on to rotate this responsibility with
> >> >> contributors/committers not from Amazon to start working on them.
> >> >>
> >> >
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 3:01 AM Leonard Lausen wrote:
> Anton Chernov writes:
> > As a physicist I would like to point out that "Gluon" means: An
> elementary
> > particle that acts as the exchange particle for the strong force between
> > quarks [1].
> > As a general scientific term it can bare
Hen writes:
> Are you saying that trademarks for MXNet has been registered by other
> companies?
Yes, though not for the purpose of machine learning frameworks.
So I suppose there is no concern?
These are the active / pending registrations:
- Minimax GmbH & Co. KG trademarked MXNet it in German
13 matches
Mail list logo
