[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13140992#comment-13140992
]
Werner Punz commented on MYFACES-3361:
--
Hi Keith, thanks for reporting it, I will f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz reopened MYFACES-3361:
--
reopening issue because the honkong chinese messages are missing in the final
build
Position of Popup and DatePicker should automatically fixed
---
Key: TOBAGO-1046
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-1046
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Bug
+1 for the idea
but -1 for the name. I expect trouble with the Apache Incubator.
What is the difference between Apache Incubator and Apache MyFaces Incubator?
If there is a difference we should consider a different name.
I would prefer labs, sandbox or what ever.
Regards
Bernd Bohmann
On Tue, N
hi bernd,
the name might be difficult. e.g. there is also an area called apache
labs [1] and we have sandbox modules without such rules.
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://labs.apache.org
2011/11/1 Bernd Bohmann :
> +1 for the idea
> but -1 for the name. I expect trouble with the Apache Incubator.
>
The description of apache labs is:
Apache Labs is a place for innovation where committers of the
foundation can experiment with new ideas.
This modified description of Apache Myfaces Incubator/labs/sandbox
would perfectly fit for MyFaces:
Apache MyFaces Labs is a place for innovation where commi
+1 for the idea!
I agree with Bernd about the name. For me, "incubator" is also associated
with rules and legal stuff. We should encourage people to contribute,
instead of scaring them away. "Sandbox" or "labs" sounds encouraging and
accessible. But perhaps we should discuss/vote the name in anoth
hi bernd,
the description of the apache incubator is:
"
The Incubator project is the entry path into The Apache Software
Foundation (ASF) for projects and codebases wishing to become part of
the Foundation's efforts. All code donations from external
organisations and existing external projects wi
hi bart,
as mentioned [1] by mark it's also about ip clearance [2].
regards,
gerhard
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/201110.mbox/%3c1319274310.93350.yahoomail...@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com%3E
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
http://www.irian.at
Hi,
I think it's time for the next release. There are a lot of bug fixed
now, and the last release is some weeks ago.
What do you think?
Regards
Udo
Before releasing 2.1.4 I would like to get the code cleanup done. I think this
is about 2 weeks work now
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Udo Schnurpfeil
> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 11:03 AM
> Subject: MyFaces 2.0.10 and 2.1.4 relea
+1
Regards,
Jakob
2011/11/1 Gerhard Petracek :
> Hi,
>
> in order to check if there is a community for a new sub-project (esp.
> GSoC projects for MyFaces), we discussed [1] the introduction of an
> internal incubator.
> We would release such projects early and e.g. after a quarter we
> decide if
Ok,
if there is no real difference between Apache Incubator and Apache
MyFaces Incubator,
I have to change my vote to
-1
especially a have a problem with:
All code donations from external organisations and
existing external projects wishing to join MyFaces enter through the
MyFaces-Incubator.
hi bernd,
i just changed the text of the incubator as you did with the text of
labs to show that it fits better because the primary goal is the
"community check" (+ we can never ignore ip clearance).
we just don't need the overhead of the incubator and the incubation
phase is very short.
we are st
Bernd has a good point.
Actually the underlying problem is that we (ASF) introduced Apache-Extras but
the code over there has no implicit IP grant. This can also even be GPLed
code...
Whereas otoh for contributing to a MyFaces sandbox project you need to be an
ASF committer already.
Usually g
@mark: +1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/11/1 Mark Struberg :
> Before releasing 2.1.4 I would like to get the code cleanup done. I think
> this is about 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Udo Schnurpfeil resolved TOBAGO-1046.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5.0-beta-2
> Position of Popup and DatePic
Hi
Really we already did almost all issues planned for the next release,
but there is still some issues to do in the next days. I was thinking
on send a vote for release myfaces master pom soon, then
myfaces-builder-plugin and finally a release of myfaces core, so that
will take around 2 weeks. Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg resolved EXTCDI-225.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0.2
upgraded to myfaces-parent-11-SNAPSHOT.
Just need
add ConfigurableDataSource
--
Key: EXTCDI-236
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-236
Project: MyFaces CODI
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: JEE-JPA1-Module
Affects Versions: 1.0.1
Incomplete serialization implementation in
AccessibilityProfile$SerializableAccessibilityProfile
Key: TRINIDAD-2155
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDA
Add @JSFFaceletFunction annotation
--
Key: MYFACES-3381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3381
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: JSR-314
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-3381.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Add @JSFFaceletFunction annotation
> --
23 matches
Mail list logo