Ok, if there is no real difference between Apache Incubator and Apache MyFaces Incubator, I have to change my vote to
-1 especially a have a problem with: All code donations from external organisations and existing external projects wishing to join MyFaces enter through the MyFaces-Incubator. This is the Apache Incubator role. Regards Bernd On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi bart, > > as mentioned [1] by mark it's also about ip clearance [2]. > > regards, > gerhard > > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/201110.mbox/%3c1319274310.93350.yahoomail...@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com%3E > [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > 2011/11/1 Bart Kummel <b...@kummelweb.nl> >> >> +1 for the idea! >> I agree with Bernd about the name. For me, "incubator" is also associated >> with rules and legal stuff. We should encourage people to contribute, >> instead of scaring them away. "Sandbox" or "labs" sounds encouraging and >> accessible. But perhaps we should discuss/vote the name in another thread >> and first focus on the idea... >> Best regards, >> Bart Kummel >> >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 01:36, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> in order to check if there is a community for a new sub-project (esp. >>> GSoC projects for MyFaces), we discussed [1] the introduction of an >>> internal incubator. >>> We would release such projects early and e.g. after a quarter we >>> decide if we keep and promote a project (as a sub-project or a module >>> of an existing sub-project) or if we drop it. >>> >>> Please vote: >>> >>> [+1] I like the idea >>> [0] I'm not convinced but I'm ok with it >>> [-1] I don't agree >>> >>> Regards, >>> Gerhard >>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/d7oogfabvliwn7fg >> >
