Hogbing,
I'm taking a look at the bug now but just so I understand.. When you
refer to JSF, I assume you mean the Trinidad renderkit. Is that
correct?
Scott
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Hongbing hongbing.w...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Pavitra:
It can happen in update model phase. For example,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995609#comment-12995609
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2038:
-
Also, by JSF, I'm assuming that you
and then the model's code, where exception can be thrown.
In the catch part, we want to skip reporting the exception if it is handled
by model/controller code.
Thanks,
Hongbing
On 2/16/2011 4:23 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hogbing,
I'm taking a look at the bug now but just so I
the same problem twice
and that is where the interface comes in. The model wants to tell the view
that there was a problem, but that the model will take care of reporting it,
so the view needn't bother.
-- Blake Sullivan
On 2/16/11 4:39 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
If this exception is handled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan resolved TRINIDAD-2035.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-2
Patch has been committed
testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA
site [2] for review as well.
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
PS- This is my first release
..
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good
or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not SVN folder.
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan
/15 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code.
Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of
tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to
commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number
STARETSmax.star...@oracle.com wrote:
+1
On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
: 2.0.0-beta-2
Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
Assignee: Scott O'Bryan
Priority: Blocker
The buildnumber-maven-plugin prevents the building of the Trinidad source in
Maven when the source tree is downloaded as an archive vs. taken from the svn
repository. The steps
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995023#comment-12995023
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2037:
-
As discussed in this thread[1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan resolved TRINIDAD-1863.
-
Resolution: Fixed
trinidad requeststatemap does not preserve its state between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan resolved TRINIDAD-2037.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-2
Added the discussed profile
Andy, make sure you check out using HTTPS instead of http. If the
repo is listed as http it won't let you commit. I'll see what I can
do when I get into work.
On Feb 14, 2011, at 7:27 AM, Andy Schwartz andy.g.schwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar
Cool.. I'll start the Trinidad beta 2 release when I get into the office.
On Feb 14, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Andy Schwartz andy.g.schwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott, Jan-Kees -
Thanks for the pointers! Was able to commit after switching over to
https (d'oh!):
Components: Documentation
Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
Assignee: Scott O'Bryan
Several resources in the logger bundle have inproper capitolization
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
We're waiting for you Andy.. :D what's the JIRA #?
Also, are your committer rights all set up? If so, go ahead and test
and commit. If not, then I'll do it..
On Feb 13, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Andy Schwartz andy.g.schwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I have uploaded a patch for TRINIDAD-2030. If nobody
+1
On Feb 12, 2011, at 6:11 AM, Martin Marinschek mmarinsc...@apache.org wrote:
+1,
best regards,
Martin
On 2/11/11, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Am 11.02.11 12:54, schrieb Jakob Korherr:
+1
Regards,
Jakob
2011/2/9 Mark Strubergstrub...@yahoo.de:
+1
LieGrue,
Awesome Werner, Congratulations..
On Feb 11, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I have become father of a nice little boy yesterday.
My second child.
Werner
+1, I totally agree with Bernd.. Releases have VERSION numbers. It's
snapshots that need revision and I see no harm either way.
On Feb 11, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
+1 for adding the revision number in any case.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
I agree with this, so long as the circular dependencies for compile
time are not used. I also agree with many of tue others, the MyFaces
API should be available at compile time and be BINARY compatible with
the RI, and even though the impl only need be present at runtime, I
don't think anyone
Hey everyone,
Now might be a good time for a new Trinidad 2.0 beta release. Does
anyone have any issues that need to be addressed before I start this
process? If not, I'll plan on starting the release process tomorrow.
Thanks
Scott O'Bryan
Sorry about not adding the tag to this.. ;)
On 02/10/2011 11:10 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey everyone,
Now might be a good time for a new Trinidad 2.0 beta release. Does
anyone have any issues that need to be addressed before I start this
process? If not, I'll plan on starting the release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12993277#comment-12993277
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-3039:
Ahhh yes. Mike, you're one hundred
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992513#comment-12992513
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-3039:
One other idea might be to move
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992286#comment-12992286
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-3039:
I think I disagree with this bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-2019:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
ClassCastException on StampState$TableState when
+1
On Jan 17, 2011, at 2:01 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1 (since I've seen NOTICE.txt got already fixed in SVN and will be here in
the next release)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 1/17/11, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf
I agree. Legacy projects can:
1 keep referencing the old master pom
Or
2 set an older JDK level when they upgrade. There are far more
projects right now which require JDK 5+
On Jan 14, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
we could also go the other way around in the
Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a
JIRA which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can
include it. I'm not sure how feasible this is, given that the TCK needs
to run against a native portal environment, but I certainly wouldn't be
+1 Good work Mike
On 01/13/2011 11:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and
a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
+1
On 01/12/2011 03:01 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
+1
Leonardo
Leonardo and Matthias,
Can Nexus host distributables only? There should be no repository
entries associated with this project. It's run from maven directly so
this distributable should simply be a zip of the svn source tree
(without the svn directories).
Scott
On 01/12/2011 03:00 PM,
No I haven't. But it looks like Jetty is not looking in the TLD files
for the context listeners.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 15, 2010, at 6:59 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
Has one used jetty-8.0.0.M1 so far, with MyFaces 2.0.2 ?
Looks like I (currently) have to add this:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12910774#action_12910774
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1910:
-
Yeah, at most this is a stop gap
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge Master
version 4.
This version of the bridge master uses version 9 of the myfaces plugin
to allow artifacts to be published to repository.apache.org as per the
Apache instructions [1].
The bridge master artifacts have been staged
MyFaces
2010/8/25 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Also, I added:
-Leo
-Werner
-Gerhard
-Matthias
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
done
-M
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey Matthias, can
Hey Matthias, can you add me to this? I'd be willing to try the
bridge stuff. Continuum has proven fairly unreliable for us.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 25, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks Bernd!
Right now the following committers have been added:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-1888:
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-1886:
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Fix Version/s: 1.2.14-core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900349#action_12900349
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1888:
-
Also needs to be in 1.2.x..
Need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900360#action_12900360
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1888:
-
At the request of the submitter, I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900359#action_12900359
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1886:
-
At the request of the submitter, I'm
+1
On 07/22/2010 04:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
+1
On 7/20/2010 2:09 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-beta.
This is the
Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Portlet
Environment: JSF 2.0, Portlet
Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
Assignee: Scott O'Bryan
The Trinidad configurator framework stores some persisted state in an object
called the RequestStateMap
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 20, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
/JK
2010/7/20 Martin Marinschek mmarinsc...@apache.org
+1,
best regards,
Martin
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR-301 v.
1.0.0 and am now beginning the formal vote. As stated in a previous
email, the TCK for JSF Portlet Bridge related projects will be written
and distributed through the Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge project and
made
%20JavaServer%20Faces%201.2%20TCK%20User%27s%20Guide.html
FYI ... the released TCK will also be built and run from the structure within
this tag (as referenced by the User Manual).
-Mike-
On 6/30/2010 1:17 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR
questions or objections? Hoping that there won't be, Scott is working on
generating this new artifact and once done we will repost the vote.
-Mike-
On 6/30/2010 8:54 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey Mike,
I think if we update the wiki to the instructions in the svn repo for
now, that should
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR-301 v.
1.0.0 and am now beginning the formal vote. As stated in a previous
email, the TCK for JSF Portlet Bridge related projects will be written
and distributed through the Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge project and
made
- Original Message
From: Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Sent: Wed, June 30, 2010 9:34:01 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR-301 v. 1.0
Yeah Mike, I don't know what I was smoking. Generally people
run
(properly).
But please do double check my work.
Unless I hear otherwise I intend to close the vote Tuesday and
publish/not publish based on the vote.
-Mike-
On 6/25/2010 9:15 AM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
+1
2010/6/23 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
mailto:darkar...@gmail.com
)
If you are testing with Mojarra uncomment these out to get the
additional test apps built
My question is: Do we need to implement something on MyFaces to make this
work? or it is a Mojarra specific feature?
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/6/23 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
Yes
this
work? or it is a Mojarra specific feature?
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/6/23 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
Yes there is.. Although the JSR has not been kicked off yet, we do have
a 'very' preliminary stab as JSF 2.0 bridge that runs Trinidad 2.0. Bright
now it exists as a private
Yeah, I think I might know what this issue is... Thanks for finding
it. It looks like some versions of JSF only exist in the Maven 1
repositories. Let me see if I can take a quick stab at a patch and
I'll have Mike regenerate the artifacts.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 23, 2010, at 1:32 AM,
,
strub
--- On Wed, 6/23/10, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 12:26 PM
Yeah, I think I might know what
this is still in line with what people want. When we talked
about the TCK earlier, there were many questions as to why this TCK
could not exist completely in the open source community and, in the end,
that's exactly what we did.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12873044#action_12873044
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-143:
-
Can we fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797706#action_12797706
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-2468:
Jakob,
I recently moved some
/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=893759
David, thanks for the patch
-Matthias
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Scott O'Bryan
darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yah guys, thanks for clearing that up. Your right that I
didn't
take
a look at the patch and mis understood your proposal. +1
configuration from the patch is a lot
clearer.
+1 on a patch
On Dec 22, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
I think I agree with Matthias that this may be problematic. If you
compile
something against Servlet 3.0 classes, you very well may run into
some
runtime issues if you then try
Encoding needs to be done for portals in all cases..
We talked about adding this optimization to Trinidad a while ago.
It's as simple as making a configurator that, when running as a
servlet) overrides the encodeResourceUrl to return the base URL
without doing any encoding. The reason we didn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12794497#action_12794497
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1233:
-
Actually, that's all it does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12794536#action_12794536
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1233:
-
Possibly, but that would be up
I think I agree with Matthias that this may be problematic. If you
compile something against Servlet 3.0 classes, you very well may run
into some runtime issues if you then try to use those binaries in a
Servlet 2.5 type environment. You generally *WILL NOT* run into
problems if you do the
If Blake is right and the property only exists in impl, I'm not sure why
it would have to be deprecated even as nobody should be using it.. ;)
EL allows us to be a bit sloppy, unfortunately, but it has long been the
paradigm that stuff in the impl is use-at-your-own-risk.
+1 to Blake and
Ganesh, Simon, Matthias.. I think I've got this patch mostly done (at
least enough to commit and not hose anyone), but I've not been involved
in much of the core development for JSF 2.0. Can you guys review the
patches I uploaded for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2467 and
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
In both MyFaces and the R.I., the JSP ViewDeclarationLanguage extracts and
casts the request and response to their native HttpServlet equivalents. This
does not work in a portlet environment because the objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated MYFACES-2467:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Move ViewDeclarationLanguage base classes and JSP
As for the VDL, simply put the current JSP VDL casts to some servlet
objects
(at least in the R.I.) to do some things. ;) yodaClassCastExceptions
do
not an effective bridge make../yoda
Not to surprised if myfaces does that too. Filing bugs is welcome.
Note that Apache MyFaces 2.0
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's going to be JSF 2.0/Portal 2.0. I'm not sure if the JCP is going
to
look at a Portal 1.0 Spec for JSF 2.0. The leanings on the current
Hey Guys,
I'm working on a preliminary version of the portlet-bridge for
JSF2.0.. Looking at the current R.I. implementations, it appears as if
I'm going to have to come up with my own implementations for the
ViewDeclairationLanguage's for the bridge. Although the R.I. is laid
out so that
thought it would suffice to brige the portal lifecyle
phases and forward the requests to the faces servlet?
Best regards,
Ganesh
Scott O'Bryan schrieb:
Hey Guys,
I'm working on a preliminary version of the portlet-bridge for
JSF2.0.. Looking at the current R.I. implementations, it appears
Hey Andrew, so would executing this during web application startup
(like during a filter or FacesServlet.Init) be early enough?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 15, 2009, at 8:44 PM, Andrew Robinson andrew.rw.robin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On my quest to write the support of the JSF 2 client
definitely be too late as this happens on application server startup,
not on the first request.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Scott O'Bryan scott.obr...@oracle.com wrote:
Hey Andrew, so would executing this during web application startup (like
during a filter or FacesServlet.Init) be early
Hey all,
I am pleased to announce that the vote to release the MyFaces Portlet
Bridge Master POM v3 has passed with 4 +1 votes and no +0 or -1 votes
[1]. Thanks to everyone who participated.
+1: Scott O'Bryan, Matthias Wessendorf, Cagatay Civici, Gerhard Petracek
I will work on getting
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge Master POM 3 and am now
beginning the formal vote. This master pom fixes an obsolete reference
to the repositories at java.net and updates some library versions which
are required to support the MyFaces Portlet Bride Testsuite.
You can
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
+1
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge Master POM 3 and
am now
beginning the formal vote
I'm not sure number 2 would work, you should try it out. I know that
when I tried to do this for Trinidad, it complained that I was not
implementing the right version of the interfaces, even though the
methods were there. If this is the case then perhaps you should use a
Proxy Object. We
I don't know why you couldn't just pass the proxy, and just throw
IllegalOperationExceptions for unrecognized methods. But this one may
be a bit cleaner. Don't know.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Bernhard Huemer
bernhard.hue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
regarding the
see if I can find the followup email I sent out..
Scott
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
OK everyone. I'm going to restart this vote.
what happened to this vote ?
was it re-done ?
I've updated
Why is this being done again?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 18, 2009, at 10:32 PM, Blake Sullivan
blake.sulli...@oracle.com wrote:
+1
-- Blake Sullivan
On Oct 18, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Maybe we should also rename the old XhtmlConstants class ?
Would make sense, as
Feature
Affects Versions: 1.2.12-core
Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
Assignee: Scott O'Bryan
Priority: Minor
The ExternalContextUtils has a way to get the requested sessionId, but not a
way to get the real sessionId. getting the real sessionId is a bit more
+1
michael freedman wrote:
+1
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-alpha-2 and am
now beginning the formal vote. The Jetty Pluto plugin is not yet
updated for the latest Pluto release so the jetty:run target will not
function in the demo
The vote for the release of Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-alpha-2 has passed. [1]
+1: Matthias Wessendorf, Mike Freedman, Scott O'Bryan
+0: none
-1: none
Thanks to everyone who voted.
Scott O'Bryan
[1]
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-of-Portlet-Bridge-2.0.0-alpha-2-td24958954.html
Hey everyone.. Looks like Continuum is down. Can someone look into
restarting it? ;)
Thanks,
Scott
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-alpha-2 and am now
beginning the formal vote. The Jetty Pluto plugin is not yet updated for the
latest Pluto release so the jetty:run target will not function in the demo
projects. The demo should deploy into a stand-alone pluto 2.0
, and info
+1 203-404-4848 x3
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0 Beta 2 and am
now beginning the formal vote.
You can find the signed release candidate
Hi,
I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0 Beta 2 and am now
beginning the formal vote.
You can find the signed release candidate at [1]
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that
: 1.2.12-core
Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
Assignee: Scott O'Bryan
We need to add support for a Portlet 2.0 container and Bridge in Trinidad.
Currently there are a number of issues which should be addressed with this
ticket:
* PPR should be enabled for Portlet 2.0 containers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708144#action_12708144
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1471:
-
Here is what this project entails
Thomas, the latest Trinidad 1.0.x branch is still avaialble. It's been
tagged. Although it's still supported it's no longer under active
development. If you need access to the trunk, it's in the svn branches
and code can be modified/updated in that branch.
I don't think we're opposed to
Hey everyone,
I completed a migration to Trinidad to allow it to work with either
Portlet 1.0 or Portlet 2.0. Portlet 2.0 containers will support AJAX.
So here is my problem. In order to support extra functionality of
Portlet 2.0, I need to compile against a Portlet 2.0 container. Most of
Yes I agree Matthias. Anyone else have a contrary opinion?
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
I completed a migration to Trinidad to allow it to work with either Portlet
1.0 or Portlet 2.0. Portlet 2.0
Affects Versions: 1.2.11-core
Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
Assignee: Scott O'Bryan
By default the ResourceServlet caches all content. While this is generally
correct, it is not always correct for custom ResourceServlet Extensions.
--
This message is automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12688997#action_12688997
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1258:
-
This patch caused a regression. When
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan reopened TRINIDAD-1258:
-
Caused a regression in functionality
GenericEntry allows invalid locale parameter - XSS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683078#action_12683078
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1428:
-
I did make some changes to this code
501 - 600 of 1260 matches
Mail list logo
