+1
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Manfred Geilermanfred.gei...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
thanks leonardo
--Manfred
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 04:24, Leonardo Uribelu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and
make the necessary changes. Just
+1
thanks leonardo
--Manfred
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 04:24, Leonardo Uribelu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and
make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous
emails the suggested layout is this:
/trunk
Hi
Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and
make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous
emails the suggested layout is this:
/trunk - 2.0
/branches/1.1.x
/branches/1.2.x
If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that
that would be great ! Thx Leo!
-Matthias
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Leonardo Uribelu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and
make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous
emails the suggested layout is
sure!
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps
for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is
possible to delay this change after the release.
regards
Leonardo
+1
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
sure!
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary
steps
for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would
so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ?
-Matthias
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann
bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
Hello,
+1
I would prefer
/trunk - 2.0
/branches/myfaces-1.1.x
/branches/myfaces-1.2.x
because we are not using cvs
+1 sounds good to me
2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org:
so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ?
-Matthias
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann
bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
Hello,
+1
I would prefer
/trunk - 2.0
+1 for sure
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 sounds good to me
2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org:
so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become
trunk ?
-Matthias
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd
+1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps
for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is
possible to delay this change after the release.
regards
Leonardo Uribe
2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com
+1 for sure
On Wed, May
Ah. Good point!
Sent from my iPod.
On 22.05.2009, at 21:10, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
wrote:
Hello,
+1
I would prefer
/trunk - 2.0
/branches/myfaces-1.1.x
/branches/myfaces-1.2.x
because we are not using cvs anymore
and the path already contains
actually, I agree with Bernd.
For the following layout:
/trunk - 2.0
/branches/myfaces_1_1_x
/branches/myfaces_1_2_x
Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk:
-most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec)
-most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk)
So, I am +1 on
Hello,
+1
I would prefer
/trunk - 2.0
/branches/myfaces-1.1.x
/branches/myfaces-1.2.x
because we are not using cvs anymore
and the path already contains
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/
maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name.
Regards
Bernd
On Fri, May 22, 2009
from Bernd, on a different thread:
Hello,
I would suggest following layout
1.1.x branch/1.1.x
1.2.x branch/1.2.x
2.0.x trunk
because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are
only in bugfix state.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
Hi,
...
Ok, I filed this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053
maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ...
(since we already work on 2.0.x)
what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk
And the following efforts
15 matches
Mail list logo