this vote passed with 100 % +1
regards,
gerhard
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
usually it is helpful to do the following on results.
A simple RE: in the thread, so folks that are interested can see what
100% means.
-how many votes?
-who actually submitted a vote
Or, a new email with all voters and their vote...
-M
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Gerhard Petracek
[EMAIL
Hi Gerhard,
Gerhard Petracek schrieb:
this vote passed with 100 % +1
The rule for any vote is that it requires at least 3 +1s from PMC
members in order to pass. Note that votes from committers and users are
an important *influence*. But in the end it is the PMC which has been
appointed by the
ok - i oriented at a result post of scott.
and because there was no -1 i didn't include details.
thank you for the information - i'll do that.
regards,
gerhard
2008/6/6 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
usually it is helpful to do the following on results.
A simple RE: in the thread,
Hi Hazem,
the question is if the exporterActionListener component currently
depends on tomahawk.
if this is not the case i'm against moving it into tomahawk.
A future tomahawk specific version could extend the commons version of
this component.
There is no problem if tomahwk depends on commons
Hi, Gerhard
Do you mean setting alignments of column's header and data independently?
As for the table itself, there's one issue with setting alignment for column
group header.
It's addressed in the patch for TRINIDAD-1058.
Alexey
Gerhard Petracek wrote:
hello,
i received the following
thank you for the information.
i know that - it was just because it was a definite pos. vote (inclusive
more than 3 pmc votes) - i kept it short.
- if really required, i'll do that.
regards,
gerhard
2008/6/6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Gerhard,
Gerhard Petracek schrieb:
this
Hi Leonardo,
the commons project is not only for validators and converterts,
but for all kind of renderkit independent jsf (tools/utils/...).
the missing of a suitable commons submodule could not be a reason.
imho a commons-tools could be a possible module for the
exporterActionListener
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
Hazem Saleh schrieb:
Hi Team,
After completing the
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hazem,
the question is if the exporterActionListener component currently
depends on tomahawk.
if this is not the case i'm against moving it into tomahawk.
+1
A future tomahawk specific version could extend the
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Leonardo,
the commons project is not only for validators and converterts,
but for all kind of renderkit independent jsf (tools/utils/...).
yup. I don't know why we always have to clarify that...
To me this is clear ;-)
thank you for voting!
all votes were +1 (chronological order):
binding votes (pmc):
- Manfred Geiler
- Volker Weber
- Matthias Wessendorf
- Bruno Aranda
- Grant Smith
- Scott O'Bryan
- Bernd Bohmann
non-binding:
- Hazem Saleh
- Leonardo Uribe
- Werner Punz
- Gerhard Petracek
regards,
gerhard
t:stylesheet renders link to an empty page on tomcat-5.5.24 and above
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-1266
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1266
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Dear MyFaces community,
please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Matt Cooper.
Matt is working on the Apache MyFaces and Trinidad stuff.
Therefore last week there was a vote to invite him to the MyFaces
Project Management Committee (PMC) and fortunately he did accept.
Matt,
Please subscribe to
werner is also a pmc member - this information is missing at the team-list.
so i repeat it:
thank you for voting!
all votes were +1 (chronological order):
binding votes (pmc):
- Manfred Geiler
- Volker Weber
- Werner Punz
- Matthias Wessendorf
- Bruno Aranda
- Grant Smith
- Scott O'Bryan
-
details are at [1]
regards,
gerhard
[1]
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Result-%28was-Re%3A--VOTE--myfaces-extensions-as-a-new-myfaces-sub-project%29-p17687491.html
2008/6/6 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
thank you for the information.
i know that - it was just because it was a definite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602971#action_12602971
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on TRINIDAD-:
--
I had a conflict, applying
+1
2008/6/6 Zubin Wadia [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
Hazem Saleh
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still totally agree with Leonardo, Iam not seeing that Tomahawk should
depend on myfaces-commons to use the exporterListener component.
lol
there would be no dependency...
in an ideal world such a listener is totally
I still totally agree with Leonardo, Iam not seeing that Tomahawk should
depend on myfaces-commons to use the exporterListener component.
Iam still (+1).
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The actual layout of myfaces-commons is this:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomasz Bech updated TOMAHAWK-1034:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Warning page contains secure and nonsecure items on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603003#action_12603003
]
tomasz.bech edited comment on TOMAHAWK-1034 at 6/6/08 4:32 AM:
As I said before, This listener will be aware of other Tomahawk components
(The current functionality will be extended).
BTW, I don't think that I said some thing so funny!
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Hazem Saleh
Hi Team,
I will suspend this vote for now.
I will start now implementing some of my future work of this component so
that no confusion can be occur.
I will be back to this thread after showing you a concrete example.
Thanks all very much.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL
One question: we have here some positive votes. Is this votes enough?
regards
Leonardo Uribe
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 (both points)
2008/6/4 Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL
In my opinion yes, so if no objections I'll commit the proposed code, but on
the point:
1. Apply myfaces-builder-plugin on myfaces core 1.2 (necessary for build
correct myfaces-metadata.xml for tomahawk 1.2)
I'll not apply fully the plugin, just for component class generation and
build metadata,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hazem,
there is no reason why tomahawk should not depends on common-*.
If you have a well working UIData content to exel/pdf exporter why
don't give non tomahawk users the ability to use it.
that were exactly my
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One question: we have here some positive votes. Is this votes enough?
did you count?
I noticed a negative as well...
regards
Leonardo Uribe
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
This isn't a vote to do a release, or start a new project, so I think
simple consensus is enough, ie that this vote passes.
Does the comment below not apply fully mean that annotations will be
added to the code, and the make-config task will be run to generate
the myfaces-metadata.xml file, but
I have no problem to give non Tomahawk users the ability to use the
exporter, but I would like to use the nice Tomahawk features so that the
component can be more useful and prettier (Please wait till I show you a
near demo about the exporter and you will get my point).
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at
+1 for myfaces-extensions-seven
2008/6/6 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hello,
there are no new name suggestions concerning 'seven' [1].
so i suggest to start the vote.
the new meaning of the acronym:
*s*imple *e*nhanced *v*alidation with *e*xtensible *n*ature
seven will be part
+1 for myfaces-extensions-seven, IMO it rocks.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 for myfaces-extensions-seven
2008/6/6 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hello,
there are no new name suggestions concerning 'seven' [1].
so i suggest to start the
+1
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
2008/6/6 Zubin Wadia [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't a vote to do a release, or start a new project, so I think
simple consensus is enough, ie that this vote passes.
Does the comment below not apply fully mean that annotations will be
added to the code, and
I am staring a new project that will use JSF. MyFaces has quite a
collection of JSF components and it is challenging, if not discouraging,
to determine which component, or components, to use for a specific
project. Yes, each component contains a description of what does, but I
have yet to
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am staring a new project that will use JSF. MyFaces has quite a
collection of JSF components and it is challenging, if not discouraging, to
determine which component, or components, to use for a specific project.
Congratulations Matt!
On 6/6/08, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear MyFaces community,
please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Matt Cooper.
Matt is working on the Apache MyFaces and Trinidad stuff.
Therefore last week there was a vote to invite him to the MyFaces
Project
Hi
I'll start to upgrade component from sandbox to tomahawk.
The first item on my list of todos is move this converters and validators
(first check and solve possible issues on JIRA)
s:convertBoolean
s:convertDateTime
s:convertNumber
s:validateCompareTo
s:validateCSV
s:validateISBN
Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
I'll start to upgrade component from sandbox to tomahawk.
The first item on my list of todos is move this converters and validators
(first check and solve possible issues on JIRA)
s:convertBoolean
s:convertDateTime
s:convertNumber
s:validateCompareTo
s:validateCSV
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
I'll start to upgrade component from sandbox to tomahawk.
The first item on my list of todos is move this converters and validators
(first check and solve possible issues on JIRA)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603057#action_12603057
]
Veena K. Pandit commented on TRINIDAD-1092:
---
I did not close this issue,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603077#action_12603077
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-:
---
I already applied the patch
Isn't Tomahawk already a commons set of components? It works with
other render kits, besides some incompatibilities do to the filter
design. I am wondering if we are attempting to put too much into
commons.
My take would be if this is a component that does any rendering it
fits well in Tomahawk,
+1 for myfaces-extensions-validator
+0 for myfaces-extensions-seven
-0.5 for myfaces-extensions-jack
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for myfaces-extensions-seven, IMO it rocks.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Gerhard Petracek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for myfaces-extensions-validator
-1 for myfaces-extensions-seven
-1 for myfaces-extensions-jack
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for myfaces-extensions-validator
+0 for myfaces-extensions-seven
-0.5 for myfaces-extensions-jack
On Fri, Jun
+1
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Zubin Wadia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
2008/6/6 Zubin Wadia [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
On
Congrats...
Andrew Robinson wrote:
Congratulations Matt!
On 6/6/08, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear MyFaces community,
please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Matt Cooper.
Matt is working on the Apache MyFaces and Trinidad stuff.
Therefore last week there was a vote
+1 myfaces-extension-validator
+0 myfaces-extension-seven
-1 myfaces-extension-jack
Grant Smith schrieb:
+1 for myfaces-extensions-validator
-1 for myfaces-extensions-seven
-1 for myfaces-extensions-jack
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
I'd recommend not migrating t:validateEqual across to myfaces-commons.
t:validateEquals is a special case of t:validateCompareTo, and, if I
recall correctly, the code in validateEquals is not as flexible as the
code in validateCompareTo. There's no point in maintaining the
inferior limited
+1 for myfaces-extensions-validator
-1 for myfaces-extensions-seven
-1 for myfaces-extensions-jack
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for myfaces-extensions-validator
-1 for myfaces-extensions-seven
-1 for myfaces-extensions-jack
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at
not sure why I didn't notice that...
-M
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Andrew Robinson (JIRA)
dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603077#action_12603077
exporterActionListener new feature
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-1267
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1267
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
Updating exporterActionListener documentation
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-1268
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1268
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions:
Promoting CAPTCHA to Tomahawk 1.1.7
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-1269
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1269
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
removing the dojo Ajax dependency from the PPRPanelGroup component
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-1270
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1270
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Documenting the PPRPanelGroup component
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-1271
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1271
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
GMap component
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-1272
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1272
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Hazem Saleh
Assignee: Hazem Saleh
A component
Documenting the media component
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-1273
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1273
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Hazem Saleh
Assignee:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603284#action_12603284
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on TOMAHAWK-1167:
--
I have checked the problem and
Hi
This vote has 2 parts:
1. Apply myfaces-builder-plugin on myfaces core 1.2 (necessary for build
correct myfaces-metadata.xml for tomahawk 1.2)
2. Add two modules called core12 and sandbox/core12 on tomahawk, that
contains 1.2 specific code for tomahawk.
on part 1 we have 4 +1
Simon Kitching
60 matches
Mail list logo
