setPropertyActionListener cannot be nested within facelets tag
--
Key: MYFACES-2539
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2539
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf resolved TRINIDAD-1676.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.14-core
ha: provide facility
Hi,
Blake committed an interesting patch to Trinidad:
http://bit.ly/dtghOs
I see that MyFaces can actually return NULL on getId(), however the
MyFaces implementation
goes ahead and creates the ID if getClientId(facesCtx) is called AND!
the getId() returns null.
So, why not directly ensuring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kang Kyung Tae updated TRINIDAD-1711:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
JSParser20TokenManager issues a error in Korean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kang Kyung Tae updated TRINIDAD-1711:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
JSParser20TokenManager issues a error in Korean
Facelets server state saving does not work
--
Key: MYFACES-2540
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2540
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JSR-314
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Koci updated MYFACES-2540:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Facelets server state saving does not work
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2540
Leonardo Uribe píše v Po 08. 02. 2010 v 21:35 -0500:
Hi
It should work. If something does not, just create an issue and I'll
take a look at it. I think in this case there are some differences
between client side and server side state saving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831427#action_12831427
]
Christian Haupt commented on TRINIDAD-1569:
---
Bug is available at versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831436#action_12831436
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on TRINIDAD-1569:
--
ok, will take a look.
My
Support for actionlistener method without ActionEvent parameter
---
Key: MYFACES-2541
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2541
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Koci updated MYFACES-2541:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Support for actionlistener method without ActionEvent
Hi,
can you please point me to a description how to set code formatting
which conforms check style rules? Or better - is there a public settings
for eclipse formatter (it is a file named org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
from .settings directory)?
Thanks,
Martin Kočí
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831448#action_12831448
]
Mathias Walter commented on TRINIDAD-1569:
--
The used JSF Runtime is Mojarra
Hi Martin,
see http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyFaces_Developer_Notes for details.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/2/9 Martin Koci martin.k...@aura.cz
Hi,
can you please point me to a description how to set code formatting
which conforms check style rules? Or better - is there a public settings
for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakob Korherr resolved MYFACES-2534.
Resolution: Fixed
ComponentSupport.addFacet adds a panel when there is only one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831454#action_12831454
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2534:
OK good
ComponentSupport.addFacet adds
Hi,
So the difference between getId() and getClientId() is that the last one
generates the Id if necessary, am I right?
From my point of view getId() is the getter for the id property which can be
set with setId(). However, there is no method setClientId(). So I think the
sence is that getId()
Don't throw exception if no SelectItems found
--
Key: MYFACES-2542
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2542
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: New Feature
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakob Korherr resolved MYFACES-2525.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-2
1.2.9-SNAPSHOT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831476#action_12831476
]
Jarek Gawor commented on MYFACES-2525:
--
Thanks!
Split javax.faces package in OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831477#action_12831477
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2542:
Thanks for pointing that out and for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831479#action_12831479
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2542:
I almost forgot: I really like the idea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakob Korherr updated MYFACES-2542:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-2
Assignee: Jakob Korherr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831493#action_12831493
]
Martin Koci commented on MYFACES-2542:
--
First the changed class is duplicated in
Thanks,
that's very useful. Question regarding logging: WIKI page says that
commons-logging is used. Is it still valid statement?
Jakob Korherr píše v Út 09. 02. 2010 v 14:36 +0100:
Hi Martin,
see http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyFaces_Developer_Notes for
details.
Regards,
Jakob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831501#action_12831501
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2542:
That's all really no problem. You learn
You're welcome!
We are now using java util logging on 2.0.x branch, please see MYFACES-2378
for details.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/2/9 Martin Koci martin.k...@aura.cz
Thanks,
that's very useful. Question regarding logging: WIKI page says that
commons-logging is used. Is it still valid statement?
Client behaviors are not decoded by UIXComponentBase
Key: TRINIDAD-1715
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1715
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831524#action_12831524
]
Curtiss Howard commented on MYFACES-2458:
-
Latest fixes:
* execute=multiple ids
Facelets Taglib jars are not recognized
---
Key: MYFACES-2543
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2543
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JSR-314
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831534#action_12831534
]
Ganesh Jung commented on MYFACES-2539:
--
probably caused by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831532#action_12831532
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2543:
Your facelets taglib has to have the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831538#action_12831538
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-2543:
-
which is IMO not nice;
As
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831539#action_12831539
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2543:
I don't know if this is OK with the
Deplyoing very simple JARs, like:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12435313/MyFaces_Test.jar
should work, out of the box. Doesn't the spec explicitly talk about this
for backward compatibility?
Sure, when you extend the old Facelets classes, you have to have it deployed
as well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Min Lu updated TRINIDAD-1613:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Add support for rowKey change
-
On my opinion you have to differentiate between 1.x taglibs and 2.0 taglibs
in some way, because MyFaces cannot know if this taglib will or won't run.
If you can ensure that your 1.x-taglib runs with facelets 2.0 you simply
have to add version=2.0 to your taglib and it will function properly.
Hi
I agree with Jakob.
Just a small comment, doing some black box tests between myfaces and ri I
notice long time ago that ri cannot read faces-config.xml without have
version 2.0 in that file. It seems they fix that but a side effect is what
we are seeing right now (facelets taglibs 1.1.x
maybe I am conservative, but I doubt that it is a bug, to allow old
facelets-based tag JARs.
You are saying it is, right ?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I agree with Jakob.
Just a small comment, doing some black box tests between myfaces and ri I
... on the other hand, the EG says, that JSF2.0 RT can be used to
deploy a JSF1.2 based application.
Since Facelets was just some random proprietary framework, ignoring
the old Facelets DTD is I
think correct;
Still it is IMO a bit lame.
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Matthias
Can it be made into a configuration option?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
... on the other hand, the EG says, that JSF2.0 RT can be used to
deploy a JSF1.2 based application.
Since Facelets was just some random proprietary framework, ignoring
the
It is a bug to allow old facelets taglibs which are not marked with
version=2.0 with the built-in facelets implementation.
2010/2/9 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
maybe I am conservative, but I doubt that it is a bug, to allow old
facelets-based tag JARs.
You are saying it is, right ?
Never mind. I see in the jira issue that it's possible to drop in the
old facelets implementation. That seems like the right approach to
me.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
Can it be made into a configuration option?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:25
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a bug to allow old facelets taglibs which are not marked with
version=2.0 with the built-in facelets implementation.
do you mind filing one against them :-)
I wonder what they have to say for that...
-Matthias
...and, of course, when you extend old Facelets classes, this is NOT
supported.
However the JSF spec has provided a backdoor:
== javax.faces.DISABLE_FACELET_JSF_VIEWHANDLER
for that you need to ship old Facelets.
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
Never mind. I see in the jira issue that it's possible to drop in the
old facelets implementation. That seems like the right approach to
me.
I see both ways; I think I don't like the fact that the RI has this bug :)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831602#action_12831602
]
Jeanne Waldman commented on TRINIDAD-1637:
--
I'm reverting this checkin and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeanne Waldman resolved TRINIDAD-1714.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.14-core
Mark the skin as dirty if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Catalin Kormos resolved TRINIDAD-1708.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.14-core
I committed a fix for the
Add line numbering to source code tabs in Trinidad component showcase demo app
--
Key: TRINIDAD-1716
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1716
Project: MyFaces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Catalin Kormos resolved TRINIDAD-1716.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.14-core
Add line numbering to source
Components showcase demo app - improve tr:train component's demo
--
Key: TRINIDAD-1717
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1717
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Catalin Kormos resolved TRINIDAD-1717.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.14-core
Components showcase demo app
we could make a special log entry instead of just ignoring old facelets
libraries.
...and you do not have to set the config parameter if the
com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler is installed in the faces-config.
MyFaces does this automatically!
2010/2/9 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Koci updated MYFACES-2544:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
UIViewRoot skips uncorrectly encodeBegin
UIViewRoot skips uncorrectly encodeBegin
Key: MYFACES-2544
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2544
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JSR-314
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan resolved TRINIDAD-1368.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.13-core
Fixed in revision 908215 on
input/select components are not rendered well with the new Casablanca skin
--
Key: TRINIDAD-1718
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1718
Project: MyFaces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831674#action_12831674
]
Mathias Walter commented on TRINIDAD-1708:
--
Thanks for fixing it. I've created
Hello, as some may remember I had to pull the vote of ext-scripting
Alpha 1 due to a missing parent pom in the projects main pom.
Nevertheless I have done all the changes and used the opportunity for
some pre alpha code cleanup.
I would like to restart the vote, to get the Alpha finally out.
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/2/9 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
Hello, as some may remember I had to pull the vote of ext-scripting Alpha 1
due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831738#action_12831738
]
Mathias Walter commented on TRINIDAD-1107:
--
Would that work for tr:treeTable
Many Facelets taglibs don't use Facelets tag handlers,
but simply wrap some xhtml templates. Nothing will stop
these libraries to work with MyFaces if we allow old
version taglibs.
If we insist on refusing them people will simply switch
to Mojarra to get their application to run. The argument
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831881#action_12831881
]
Ganesh Jung commented on MYFACES-2521:
--
Most old facelets taglibs only that wrap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831881#action_12831881
]
Ganesh Jung edited comment on MYFACES-2521 at 2/10/10 5:49 AM:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
Many Facelets taglibs don't use Facelets tag handlers,
but simply wrap some xhtml templates. Nothing will stop these libraries to
work with MyFaces if we allow old version taglibs.
If we insist on refusing them people will simply
67 matches
Mail list logo
