Hi,I want to introduce the idea that I've come up with when I was working on the integration of the client side validation support for myFaces. Martin and I agreed this is the optimal solution for the problem for now.
The aim is to minimize the effort of the myfaces user and do not break anything
Hi,It's ready, I've finished my work on the client side validation for myfaces and added a sample to the sandbox-examples.Thanks to Martin and Ernst, it is deployed to Irian.For now I've used required, compareTo and isbn validation.
The link to the example page is under the Input Handling -
for the 1.2 issues are not taken into account.Any thoughts?Regards,Cagatay Civici
ByrneI seem to remember one of them pointed at that jar but that was a *long* time ago.
Dennis Byrne-Original Message-From: Cagatay Civici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 06:41 PM
To: dev@myfaces.apache.orgSubject: current12 shared_core classpath issueHi,I'm working on some
the rest to you ;)Dennis Byrne-Original Message-
From: Cagatay Civici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:25 AMTo: 'MyFaces Development'Subject: Re: current12 shared_core classpath issue
Hi Dennis,It is in the shared, the impl is fine.Pretty fresh, I've checked out
Hi,I'm about to finish my work on the client validation and have faced with a design dilemma here.There are two method getJsFunction() and getParams() that must be implemented by extended validators so which design seem more convenient?
* Using an IClientSideValidator which will be implemented by
Hi,Yes, using the validatorbase seems a better way in this case. Also as you said, it would be better to remove the abstract signature since it'll break other validators like in sandbox.One more discussion topic, the client validation is turned on/off via a context parameter,
: Dennis Byrne Assignee: Dennis ByrneAttachments: diff.txt -Original Message- From: Cagatay Civici [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 06:41 PM To: dev@myfaces.apache.org Subject: current12 shared_core classpath issue
Hi, I'm working on some of unassigned 1.2 jira issues
Hi,After brainstorming on the issue more, I think Adam's suggestion looks like the optimal one. ValidatorBase will implement ClientValidator interface and third party validators should also join the client validation mechanism by using the interface.
So the answer seems to be using them both for
Hi,I am also not a fan of static methods, reuse can be done with a good renderer design.CagatayOn 7/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hey,I introduced three helper methods to shared's HtmlRenderer
(renderId(), getClientId(), shouldRender()). These methods are takenCoreRenderer
, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you talking about thishttp://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/htdocs/partners/addins/exchange/jsf/doc/apidocs/oracle/adf/view/faces/validator/ClientValidator.html
-MatthiasOn 7/12/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, After
Hi,A hot discussion we are having here,I think there is no new API here. Only thing
needed is just a single interface. As I mentioned before most of the
validators do not need any conversion before validating the input at
all. We could embed converters like number and date to the client
validation
Mario,Yes, this example explains a alot. Seems I've just needed an example to figure out the problem :)
Maybe I can have a look at the ClientConverter stuff?Sure, that would be great Mario.BTW The extended validators with no conversion requirement is almost ready:), I'll present another demo next
Hi,I was browsing through the JIRA and see the following;http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-151Instead of a new component, the same thing could also be done with a custom resolver like,
f:selectItems value=select.SomeBean.branches.branchLabel.branchCd.items /Which one looks more
, but I think a generic interface is better.
Nick
From: Cagatay Civici
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 1:15
AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Client Validation
Design Discussion
Hi,
No actually, I was talking about the ClientValidator interface I've
such a thing would work.:) Exactly On 7/13/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Hi, I was browsing through the JIRA and see the following; http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-151
Instead of a new component, the same thing could also be done with a custom resolver like
Mario,Yes, I use addResource for the scriptlet, when I was working on the sandbox.Since there is not an extended form renderer in tomahawk(for now), I am using my own custom renderer for testing purposes in my workspace.
I've packed the current unrefactored code at my
Hi,I'm not familiar with the compatibility issues but I wonder Martin's response to this discussion since he is the originator.Today me and Martin talked about moving the s:form to the tomahawk because of the client validation requirement.
Since not the form component itself but mainly the
Hi,Mario: My whole idea is to reduce the necessary effort of myfaces users in order to enable client side validation. My aim was to avoid additional tags and use a context param to turn on/off client validation. Also with an extended form renderer, decorate the onsubmit event and render scripts.
Hi, I took thetime to do our homework and made tomahawk and the RI fully compatible
in all link/button/form related issues. I also added an example -form.jsf in the sandbox root which demonstrates this.Great news! Also now I see why Martin has delayed his response to the thread:)
* add the
Hi,I've been thinking of a new component series related to the browser embedded media players.Like s:mediaPlayer /, s:quickTimePlayer /, s:flashPlayer /, s:realPlayer / with customization attributes and etc.
WDYT?Cagatay,
Hello,This is why I always prefer Cagatay :)The pronunciation is something like Chagatai.Also the g in the middle is actually have a tiny dash on it but nevermind :)Cheers,
Cagatay
I got an email from a user asking how to use selenium for stuff like jscook menu, tree2. I wonder the results also.
The test has some daylight problems, failure/success changes during the day.Mario has made some changes but seems the problem continues.I'm working on to fix it now.Cagatay
On 8/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
continuum test to a special time,when this test passes.try tomorrow
Done, test should pass at any time now.On 8/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
coolOn 8/8/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The test has some daylight problems, failure/success changes during the day. Mario has made some changes but seems the problem continues.
I'm
Hi,I've wanted to written a documentation for a sandbox component but could not figure out where to begin. Building the site module only brings the main site, not the sites of submodules likes api, impl, tomahawk, sandbox and etc.
Where to look?Cagatay
I missed that, thanks LanceOn 8/9/06, L Frohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is:
tomahawk/sandbox/core/src/site/xdoc/{component_name}.xml
De: Cagatay Civici
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé: mercredi 9 août 2006
15:39À: MyFaces DevelopmentObjet: Site of
Other Modules
Hi,I've
awhile.Iwould also think you do do a mvn site in a subproject (like sandbox)to only build documentation for that part, but maybe that doesn't
work.On 8/9/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I missed that, thanks Lance On 8/9/06, L Frohman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is: tomahawk
I don't see a big problem about the change for us but of course the change and side effects should also be announced to the other users of the test library as well.On 8/12/06,
Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And it's only failing for one of the Tomahawk tests, so it's notreally a
already written or you want to implement it
?
Can you be more clear on what s:secure does
?
Girish
From: Cagatay Civici
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006
10:08 AMTo: MyFaces DevelopmentSubject: Re:
s:secure
Hi Mike,
h:panelGroup
rendered=#{securityBean.isManager
or securityBean.isAdmin}On 8/16/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Hi Mike, h:panelGroup rendered=#{securityBean.isManager or securityBean.isAdmin } //components to be secured goes here
/h:panelGroup Yes that would do the same job but my point is the user must create the securityBean class
I think the real question is where to draw the line. Should wereally be maintaining a component that only works for a subset of the
cases and only saves a few characters of typing? I'd recommend thatsomeone who strongly feels the need for such a component start usingFacelets and implement
Hi,There's no new functionality here, and it's not reducing any effort inmy opinion. This assumes that we go forward and created a resolver
or a bean. A resolver or a bean makes perfect sense, but a componentdoesn't.So we say goodbye to s:secure :)Ok a bean is a lot more simpler to implement than
I've thought more on this and read the entire discussion again. Since resolver seems more flexible than the bean, I'd say resolver now.http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-607
I've assigned it to myself.Cheers,CagatayOn 8/17/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Ok, as long as
I totaly agree.RegardsCagatayOn 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Now that JIRA supports bulk operations, I'd like to propose that we use the resolve status to identify things that are fixed, but not yet available in a
I don't see that we're likely to have someone surfing the jira issuetracker looking for things to do.
Well, I'm doing that and assign the issues that I find reasonable to myself.On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:+1On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I
for a wish ?Yes, I do it if only I believe the demand seems important.
But no problem for me, I'd not oppose getting rid of wish type issues.On 8/18/06, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I'm doing that and assign the issues that I find reasonable to myself.
for a wish ?I look at
Hi Danimal,First you should checkout maven module and build it. Also shared is necessary too.Try checking out current and building it instead so you get everything you need.Cagatay
On 8/22/06, Danimal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What branch/tag should I be grabbing if I want to grab the tomahawk
Hi,
Yes it's not easy at the beginning and will take time since it'll download all the dependencies.
The jars are created at the target folder of each maven project and then installed to your local maven repository by default
For example for tomahawk core trunk, the jar is at;
Hi,I've created a new feature for the datatable that allows exporting presented data to the excel format.Simply an excel button is placed on the datatable header and clicking on it makes an ajax request, a popup is displayed and excel file is presented.
Following are the two
Hi,Well, sandbox or not. I missed the discussion. Remember client sidevalidation stuff?
That was a good thread. Or the s:secureTag thread? These two weremuch more open development than here, I guess. Maybe that's all Imissed here. But to me this particular commit *smells*. Sorry, but
that's my
wrote:Hmm... My problem with our extended data-table is that it is much
t overweight already. Couldn't we work with an extra componenthere, which has a for-attribute referencing a dataTable-component, anddisplays the button and on click the excel data for the dataTable?
regards,MartinOn 8/23/0
In my case, JIRA helps me to keep track of things I'm working on. For example I've created issues for stuff like security resolver, excel exporter, client side validation and assigned these to myself. Of course this seems unnecessary for minor commits.
On 8/23/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL
. If that works, I'd fancy it a lot more! regards, Martin
On 8/23/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Martin, Yes that seems like a better idea, so something like this one right?
t:datatable id=tableId ... ... ... /t:datatable s:excelExporter for="" /
This wo
Yes I agree with you Jurgen.
But It seems we don't know how far this exporting business will go. My
plan is to work at sandbox for now, when the time comes to do the
promotion, I guess we'll have a better understanding of the situation.
CagatayOn 8/24/06, Jurgen Lust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Hi Martin, Yes that seems like a better idea, so something like this one right? t:datatable id=tableId
........./t:datatable s:excelExporter for="" /
This would render a button and onclick exports the data
+1On 9/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1On 9/11/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On 9/11/06, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: +1On 9/11/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bug has been fixed - thanks Mike.
+1 from me. regards,
Since eclipse has a similiar feature too, I'll do the one for eclipse once Mario is done with the IDEA one.CagatayOn 9/19/06, Mario Ivankovits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi!Mike, I am with you, though, (another question about this topic) do you
know, do we have a wiki page which defines which
Hi,As far as I know all of the issues are in JIRA.I've also checked through the open jira issues as well and see some of them are already implemented. This causes a bit confusion.Cagatay
On 10/4/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I am going this days through the open JIRAs for JSR-252
I'm thinking of s:selectItems, also satisfies all the requirements in http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/promotion.
Hi,I'd like to discuss the latest issues about the savestate component.In order to use the component with a value of type StateHolder, restoreAttachedState-saveAttachedState is used. But using them fails with list implementations other than arraylists.
See this one;See this one;
] wrote: Hi catagay, javax.faces.component._AttachedStateWrapper is pretty much myfaces_api isn't it? so shouldn't be used inside the savastate custom comp.
can you explain why it is failing? Thanks! On 10/14/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,
I'd like to discuss the latest issues
Yes sure, I'll apply the same to 1.1.4.CagatayOn 10/15/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: cagatay Date: Sun Oct 15 03:36:01 2006 New Revision: 464151 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=464151
Log: Fix for
couldn't see why it breaks, an example should help.On 10/16/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Sean, I see that Serializable is already supported in saveAttachedState.
I couldn't get why it's failing in your case, can you give more details?CagatayOn 10/16/06,
Sean Schofield [EMAIL
Last time I've used, ibm was using RI as the implementation and ibm-jsf is just a collection of extended components and renderers.In order to make websphere work with myfaces I remember deleting some jars under server's lib directory and changing the classloading strategy to PARENT_LAST
On
Me tooOn 11/3/06, Zubin Wadia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, I got it too...On 11/3/06, Dennis Byrne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I the only one getting these after I send a message to either the dev or users list?Dennis Byrne-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL
Hi,
Inputsuggestajax doesn't seem to be working with client side saving anymore.
Does anyone know why?
Regards,
Cagatay
Yes, having separate commons packages sounds good.
Cagatay
On 11/24/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for starting off with commons
+1 for your first naming suggestion
regards,
Martin
On 11/24/06, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Important hint, thanks!
My feeling
Hi,
I'm planning to promote s:selectItems to tomahawk. Component satisfies all
of the requirements needed for promotion.
Regards,
Cagatay
http://myfaces.apache.org/sandbox/selectItems.html
Hi,
I see a scriptaculous license in sandbox, do we have anything that uses this
js lib?
Cagatay
Hi!
I'm working on the 1.2 implementation and got confused with something.
At api under javax\faces\component, I don't see any UIInput and similar
stuff, they seem to be under core\api\src\main\java-templates as templates,
what's the thing here?
Regards,
Cagatay
Coast Guard
Hi,
Dojo 0.4.1 is out with new features and lots of bug fixes. I'm planning to
use the new charting engine, svg stuff and etc.
Are there any known issues that prevent us from upgrading?
Cheers,
Cagatay
Coast Guard
AFAIK last dojo upgrade is done by Sylvain and it's 0.4.0 since then.
Version in tomahawk repo also shows 0.4.0.
0.4.1 is a bugfix release.
On 1/9/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hasn't Tomahawk been upgraded to dojo 0.4.1. a while ago?
Is there a bugfix-release for 0.4.1
] wrote:
ok, all clear - then go ahead and do the update!
regards,
Martin
On 1/9/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK last dojo upgrade is done by Sylvain and it's 0.4.0 since then.
Version in tomahawk repo also shows 0.4.0.
0.4.1 is a bugfix release.
On 1/9/07, Martin
Hi Catagai, I am still testing it, wait until tomorrow for my comments
on it.
We can probably go ahead with the update at the end of this week.
Ok Werner, that's good.
Cagatay
+1 for sure
Cagatay
On 1/10/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just opened an official vote thread since this is an upgrade
on the Tomahawk core.
I ran some tests to test dojo 0.4.1, and I think we can move
the codebase from 0.4.0. to 0.4.1
Since this is a major upgrade on the
Hi,
What do you think of a custom property resolver that converts sets to lists
in order to make use of sets with UIData easier.
The usage will be like;
h:datatable value=#{myBean.mySet.asList} /
Regards,
Cagatay
://www.nabble.com/Can-dataTable%27s-value-be-a-HashSet--tf2982099.html#a8329377
Regards,
Volker
2007/1/14, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
t:dataTable already works with Sets. It is your time however :)
Dennis Byrne
On 1/14/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What
Congrats to all,
regards,
Cagatay
On 1/17/07, Gerald Müllan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks for the upgrade to PMC status.
I am very glad to be aboard.
cheers,
Gerald
On 1/17/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please welcome our new MyFaces PMC members Bernd Bohmann,
Hi,
Does anybody know if there are plans to amend the tomahawk selectitems tag
so that it will call the 'tostring' method on items that are not strings
in
the itemValue field?
No, because itemValue must stay as an object so that a converter can be
used. Making it a string will disable this.
Hi,
Basically now there seems to be some issue with the tld, as the startup
listener is not automatically started when started the app
As far as I know this is an issue introduced with tomcat 5.5.20, previous
versions get the listener config from tld fine.
Cagatay
On 2/1/07, Bruno Aranda
Congrats Wendy,
On 2/2/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy,
welcome aboard!
-M
On 2/2/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Wendy Smoak!
Wendy has been a well known MyFaces contributor and committer for some
time and
+1
Cagatay
On 2/2/07, Gerald Müllan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
let`s get the release out!
cheers,
Gerald
On 2/2/07, Jeff Bischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manfred Geiler wrote:
Please vote for the release of MyFaces artifact maven-project
version
1.0.5!
You can find the release
Which ASs do this BTW?
I'm not sure but it may be weblogic.
Cagatay
On 2/7/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You want to have a test to that would fail for non String class TLD
attributes? It may be a good idea for us in terms of interoperability.
Which ASs do this BTW?
Dennis
Thanks Dennis:)
On 2/8/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice job Cagatay!
Dennis Byrne
On 2/7/07, Cagatay Civici (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
with the documenting and
testing.
Cagatay
On 2/9/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cagatay,
When will variable-property resolver be promoted out of the sandbox?
Paul Spencer
Cagatay Civici (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-885?page
I don't vote since only pmc votes count but I'd want to thank everyone
involved especially Manfred.
Cagatay
members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
to make it more transparent
On 2/14/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't vote since only pmc
Hi,
Great job Mario, I'm also interested in conversation stuff with spring and
jsf, personally I was sick of getting lazyinitexception when doing wizards
with jsf-spring-hibernate before.
I'd really really like to help if you need:)
Regards,
Cagatay
On 2/22/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL
Hi,
+1 for throwing away 1.1.4, creating a new branch using current trunk and
releasing 1.1.4.
Cagatay
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok folks, I will try to start the release process for tomahawk next week.
Well, regarding the branch there are various possibilities:
-
Hi Mario,
In the meantime I'll start digging the codebase and hopefully reach a level
where I can start to contribute soon:)
Cheers,
Cagatay
On 2/23/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Cagatay!
I'd really really like to help if you need:)
There is plenty of room to help :-)
+1 non-binding
On 2/27/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 2/27/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 2/26/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright. Here's my +1 binding. Let's put the nail in this coffin.
Dennis Byrne
On 2/26/07,
Hi Tara,
Could you please file a jira issue for the points you mentioned and link it
to the nabble link below;
http://www.nabble.com/ExcelExport-column-headers-in-Excel-file-tf3302286.html#a9185916
Also next time we'd appreciate if you post these kind of stuff to the users
mail instead.
Thanks
I'd suggest Maestro since it focuses on different aspects like orm, view
and etc.
My other suggestion will be Lamborghini but unfortunately it's taken by a
company some time ago:)
Cheers,
Cagatay
On 2/27/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache MyFaces Orchestra?
--Manfred
On
Kleber
On 2/28/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like a lot of the names, but Apache MyFaces Kleber is doing exactly
what the word means in German ;)
regards,
Martin
On 2/28/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Now I know what it is.
Paul Spencer
Mario
Hi Martin,
I just tried the scenario but couldn't reproduce it.
Shouldn't the second step be;
2) conversion and validation phase: -- setValue(); isLocalValueSet =
true; setSubmittedValue(null);
An empty string instead of null is set by setValue(), so the local value
becomes , preventing the
I think using a converter can cause this issue, here's the code from UIInput
public void validate(FacesContext context)
{
if (context == null) throw new NullPointerException(context);
Object submittedValue = getSubmittedValue();
if (submittedValue == null) return;
Yeah, exactly. Did you read my mail from before? Plus my new
issue-evaluation?
No, I read your mail after sending a reply about the converter, anyway
you're right about the bug Martin.
In this case, I'd strongly recommend that you run this by the spec
folks. If nothing else, we should get
Martin, Matthias, Bruno.
On 3/2/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not really heavily involved at this time. I'd be a poor choice.
On 3/2/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kito D. Mann schrieb:
Hello everyone,
I'd like to conduct a new e-mail interview with one
Hi Mario,
Good catch, I was thinking about localization before but I left it for later
for now. Because it seems like the server side converters like
javax.faces.FloatConverter or javax.faces.DoubleConverter do not handle i18n
too. I'm trying to make the client side validation be %100 compatible
Just a quick typo fix:)
as an example Float.valueOf(10,2) everytime even in French locale
as an example Float.valueOf(10,2) fails everytime even in French locale
Cagatay
On 3/11/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mario,
Good catch, I was thinking about localization before
own
org.apache.AnnotationProcessor class which is loaded by a different
classloader than the AnnotationProcessor in tomcat.
2007/3/13, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm trying to run the 1.2's test-webapp with tomcat 6.0.10 but keep
getting
this error;
org.apache.jasper.JasperException
://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/loader.html
When using new code from trunk, it needs quite a lot changes to make it
work in Tomcat (i can provide patch if wanted).
Regards,
Zdenek
Cagatay Civici napsal(a):
Yes,
Already tried with removing the duplicate class but that time faced
with a NPE
Hi,
I also want to be involved.
Cagatay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/14/07, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
This is a proposal to donate a rich component library for JSF to the
Apache Software Foundation. The live version of the proposal
Hi,
I've updated the new javax.faces.messages resource bundle for the english
locale according to the spec.
But for other languages we need to add the translated bundles.
Cagatay
Hello Matthias,
As far as I know, there's no jsr-252 issue related to the new prependId
feature in jira,
Since you fixed it, I'm planning to create one and mark as resolved then.
Cagatay
On 3/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mbr
Date: Fri Mar 16 02:48:49 2007
New
A cool example from Matthias's FacesGoodies project;
http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf?entry=web_2_0_building_mashup
http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/
On 3/17/07, Marcus Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 16.03.2007 um 18:37 schrieb Barbalace, Richard:
(Wouldn't it be nice to have a
+1 (non-binding)
Cagatay
On 3/19/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
+1 for MyFaces being the sponsoring entity for RCF
+1
Ciao,
Mario
Hi,
MYFACES-1235 is done for English locale.
Cagatay
On 3/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin,
please do a comment on each of them
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1269
That isn't complete, I added it only to abstract UIComponent, not UIData
yet
thx,
M
Tomahawk core just failed as;
[INFO] Setting property: classpath.resource.loader.class = '
org.codehaus.plexus.velocity.ContextClassLoaderResourceLoader'.
[INFO] Setting property: velocimacro.messages.on = 'false'.
[INFO] Setting property: resource.loader = 'classpath'.
[INFO] Setting property:
1 - 100 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
