On Fri, 16 Apr 2021, 17:34 Jaroslav Tulach,
wrote:
>
> Let's vote about Apache VSNetBeans 12.4 Beta 2 complementary binary
> (again),
> but this time with `nb-javac` included!
>
> This PMC vote is a follow up requested when issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LEGAL/issues/LEGAL-563
>
Creating delivery branch now, will sync it with release124, wait for
everything to go green, merge into release124, take the hash which will be
on release124, and then create rc1.
Gj
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:27 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> I merged quite a few items that were marked with
Hi all,
There's a recent dscussion (Apr 7) in the "builds.apache.org" mailing
list [1] entitled "Increase the number of parallel jobs in GitHub
Actions at ASF organization level" that may be of interest to us.
What Greg Stein (ASF Infra, I think) says is that we should be grateful
for the
Hi,
I moved all PHP tests from Travis to Github Actions because tests for
PHP Editor were running too long. Travis always timed out.
It was easier to setup Windows build for PHP Editor in Github Actions.
Some tests were OK under Linux but broken when run on Windows, some
tests were broken
Dne pátek 16. dubna 2021 11:33:52 CEST, Atrament Black napsal(a):
> Since nobody reacted, I checked the source code myself and it seems that it
> doesn't use any maven archetype at all, it just creates the folders and the
> pom.xml file itself. Is that right?
> May I ask what's the reason, and why
Dear community,
vote for [Apache VSNetBeans 12.4 Beta 2](https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
r94a2caf8ada7c4ed023348c7581015b554eb86dd2192fe99f9ac%40%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E)
has successfully finished and I believe it is time for one more vote:
Let's vote about Apache VSNetBeans 12.4
Hi all,
JEP 411: Deprecate the Security Manager for Removal:
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2021-April/025486.html
Here's the impact this will have on Apache NetBeans:
https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/jep-411-deprecate-the-security
Comments welcome.
Gj
> Where is the configuration for these build checks setup? Is there a
> specific yaml or part of a build script someplace?
Did more poking here and see
- .github/workflows/main.xml file
- Assume this drives the initial "check" jobs.
- This has the "Test" job with limited
Because the others have less tests.
Gj
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 2:59 PM Eric Bresie wrote:
> Let me change the question a little...Why are all the others quicker
> compared to the php side?
> Do the other clusters / jobs / checks not get tested in the same way (i.e.
> only a subset of tests
Let me change the question a little...Why are all the others quicker
compared to the php side?
Do the other clusters / jobs / checks not get tested in the same way (i.e.
only a subset of tests compare to all tests in php test if so why)? Are
there fewer tests (I would assume not as I've run some
I merged quite a few items that were marked with Milestone 12.4 into master
(in preparation for the delivery branch and sync with release124 later
today).
And then I built master, with all those merges included, which succeeded:
Hi Vladimir,
Don't forget that in Apache NetBeans when creating a Maven-based project
you also have the option there to specify which archetype to use, so users
could just use that, as opposed to Apache NetBeans making that choice for
them.
Regards
John
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 11:14, Geertjan
Two days is not bad at all. If you know how GitHub works, then you know how
to provide pull requests for Apache NetBeans too.
Gj
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:09 PM Vladimír Machat wrote:
> The org.apache.maven.archetypes:maven-archetype-quickstart seems to be the
> obvious choice, as it is the
The org.apache.maven.archetypes:maven-archetype-quickstart seems to be the
obvious choice, as it is the preselected archetype when creating the project
using mvn archetype:generate and it creates the most basic java application
project with hello world example in App.java.
I am not sure
Which Maven archetype should it be using, you're free to provide a pull
request that replaces the way it is done right now with a Maven archetype.
That might be the right approach indeed.
Gj
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:35 AM Atrament Black
wrote:
> Since nobody reacted, I checked the source
Since nobody reacted, I checked the source code myself and it seems that it
doesn't use any maven archetype at all, it just creates the folders and the
pom.xml file itself. Is that right?
May I ask what's the reason, and why it doesn't create the project by
calling maven like any other template
16 matches
Mail list logo
