On 14-07-2022 17:57, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 14-07-2022 15:34, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
Maybe this can help as well to start searching at the right place:
https://netbeans.apache.org/wiki/DevFaqFindLocationInSourcesFromUi.asciidoc
Thanks!
BTW:
I've researched further into class
On 14-07-2022 15:34, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
Maybe this can help as well to start searching at the right place:
https://netbeans.apache.org/wiki/DevFaqFindLocationInSourcesFromUi.asciidoc
Thanks!
BTW:
I've researched further into class hierachy behaviour, and i've found
another class
+ 1
Tested on Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS
Petr
Od: Jan Horvath
Odesláno: středa 13. července 2022 16:03
Komu: dev@netbeans.apache.org
Předmět: [External] : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans VSCode extension
14.0.301
+1
Tested on MacOS 12.4, SHA check is OK.
Jan
>
On 7/14/22 6:02 AM, Jiří Kovalský wrote:
Dne 14. 07. 22 v 13:15 Michael Bien napsal(a):
On 14.07.22 12:44, Neil C Smith wrote:
So we can .. use
the NB15 baseline as initial set for NB16+ as suggested by Matthias.
just an idea,
Yes. Using the previous release as the baseline set is far from
On 14.07.22 15:51, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
Is there a possibility to preview the changed asciidoctor page without
saving (committing) it?
you commit to your clone of the website. Then you can create a PR to the
actual website. You can preview the markup on github which looks
similar. Don't
On 14.07.22 15:42, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
Hi there,
I started reviewing some asciidoctor pages of the netbeans apache
site. I read the instructions on
https://netbeans.apache.org/kb/docs/contributing.html to understand
how to proceed.
However, it doesn't tell what to do when the review is
Once I get all the required instructions, I will update the contributing
page accordingly.
I the meantime I guess that:
1) one shall add :reviewed: -mm-dd metadata tag
2) remove the footer text: "*NOTE:* This document was automatically
converted... "
3) remove the needsreview tag
Correct?
Hi there,
I started reviewing some asciidoctor pages of the netbeans apache site. I
read the instructions on
https://netbeans.apache.org/kb/docs/contributing.html to understand how to
proceed.
However, it doesn't tell what to do when the review is finished: shall we
remove the footer that say it
Maybe this can help as well to start searching at the right place:
https://netbeans.apache.org/wiki/DevFaqFindLocationInSourcesFromUi.asciidoc
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 7:58 PM Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
> filed a bug report
>
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/4366
>
>
>
After searching I found it again:
https://netbeans.apache.org/wiki/DevFaqFindLocationInSourcesFromUi.asciidoc
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 12:05 PM Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone remember the command line switch that allows to debug the
> labels in the IDE and therefore source
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 14:02, Jiří Kovalský wrote:
> Anyway, I very much like the idea of notification button which would
> give owners of plugins supporting already released version 14 a chance
> to quickly double check that their plugins work in version 15 and then
> request official
Dne 14. 07. 22 v 13:15 Michael Bien napsal(a):
On 14.07.22 12:44, Neil C Smith wrote:
So we can .. use
the NB15 baseline as initial set for NB16+ as suggested by Matthias.
just an idea,
Yes. Using the previous release as the baseline set is far from a new
suggestion though,
well this was
Hello,
Does anyone remember the command line switch that allows to debug the
labels in the IDE and therefore source bundles they come from? I remember
it exists, but I am not able to find this information again.
Cheers,
JM
On 14.07.22 12:44, Neil C Smith wrote:
So we can .. use
the NB15 baseline as initial set for NB16+ as suggested by Matthias.
just an idea,
Yes. Using the previous release as the baseline set is far from a new
suggestion though,
well this was only a part what i was suggesting, it was
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 11:05, Michael Bien wrote:
> as already mentioned in other threads about the same topic, I have the
> suspicion that many plugin maintainers don't know that they have to
> press verify after every NB release. (I do know but i forgot at least
> twice so far but thats me)
Hi,
as already mentioned in other threads about the same topic, I have the
suspicion that many plugin maintainers don't know that they have to
press verify after every NB release. (I do know but i forgot at least
twice so far but thats me)
I believe a temporary solution would be to send a
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:17, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> from my perspective all "Verification" can do is to check a plugin
> looks normal and does not immediately destroys your data. Everything
> else will not scale (and yes not doing verification at all is IMHO an
> option).
>
> What we could do
17 matches
Mail list logo