To me it seems like the topic of having maven compatible binaries has come
up once too many times.
Maybe someone has a good example of a pom/gradle build file showing how to
set everything up so
that it can be compiled from source and installed into the local .m2 repo?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 7:23
Sure thing! ... Lemme do some reading of the mail archives. Will follow up.
Cheers,
Greg Stein
Infrastructure Administrator, ASF
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019, 14:23 David Nalley wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Can you find a time next week to clarify what we can (or can't) do to
> minimize the project's pain point
Greg,
Can you find a time next week to clarify what we can (or can't) do to
minimize the project's pain points?
--David
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:46 AM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, 11:47 Eric Barboni, wrote:
>
> > Would be nice, but I don’t remember the discussion that allow to
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, 11:47 Eric Barboni, wrote:
> Would be nice, but I don’t remember the discussion that allow to do that.
>
It might have been something that came up in a video chat a few of us had
with infra people about transitioning of websites, etc. It was a while ago
now, but at some poin
Would be nice, but I don’t remember the discussion that allow to do that.
Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Neil C Smith
Envoyé : vendredi 13 septembre 2019 11:04
À : dev
Objet : Re: bits.netbeans.org vs netbeans.apache.org
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, 09:31 Jean-Marc Borer,
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, 09:31 Jean-Marc Borer, wrote:
> So Emilian, do you take the token and move, at least, all Maven and Javadoc
> for 8.2 to OSUOSL?
>
Shouldn't we be putting Maven artefacts on Maven Central rather than OSUOSL?
Best wishes,
Neil
>
So Emilian, do you take the token and move, at least, all Maven and Javadoc
for 8.2 to OSUOSL?
Greetings
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 5:50 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Fair enough, whatever works. :-)
>
> Gj
>
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 19:34, Matthias Bläsing
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Geertjan,
> >
> > Am
Fair enough, whatever works. :-)
Gj
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 19:34, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Hi Geertjan,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 12.09.2019, 18:54 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga:
> > Amount of data is a question of downloading the bits you want and then
> > seeing how large that is.
>
> don't t
Hi Geertjan,
Am Donnerstag, den 12.09.2019, 18:54 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga:
> Amount of data is a question of downloading the bits you want and then
> seeing how large that is.
don't take this wrong, but that approach is the worst way to determine
the amount of data. Someone with access to
Amount of data is a question of downloading the bits you want and then
seeing how large that is.
I don’t see anyone asking about anything other than 8.2 so far.
Gj
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 17:19, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 12.09.2019, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielen
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 12.09.2019, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga:
> Sure, everything. But indeed let's start with what we need most, i.e., 8.2
> related artefacts.
>
> You're the one who set up the OSUOSL storage, would be happy to help, but
> if you suggest some kind of structure and a p
Sure, everything. But indeed let's start with what we need most, i.e., 8.2
related artefacts.
You're the one who set up the OSUOSL storage, would be happy to help, but
if you suggest some kind of structure and a process with steps for getting
artefacts up there, I'd be happy to do it or be involve
I would move *everything* public facing that's on bits.netbeans.org.
No need to purge anything if it's under an open-source license and
OSUOSL can redistribute it.
Older builds, older Maven repositories, maybe even Javadocs?
On top of my list would be NetBeans 8.2 and the 8.2 maven repo.
--emi
Sure, let's do it, but for me the question is what precisely we want to
move to OSUOSL storage, if we can have a list or start putting one
together, we'll have a clear starting point.
Gj
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:53 PM Emilian Bold wrote:
> Doesn't sound silly at all. I was also very concerned
Doesn't sound silly at all. I was also very concerned about such
matters. Now that we have the OSUOSL storage we have a place to save
historical artifacts, it's just a matter of somebody (from the PMC, I
guess) doing it.
Besides the bits, you will find that bugzill is quite referenced in
commits,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:46 PM Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> Sure, I understand all those points, but does anyone know how long
> bits.netbeans.org will still be online? Last week, there was an outage
An outage of bits.netbeans.org?
Or do you specifically mean http://bits.netbeans.org/maven2?
Whe
Which artefacts are we talking about?
Gj
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:23 PM Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> Hmm ok.
>
> Does it sound silly that I am concerned about the disappearance of the
> legacy artefacts?
>
> What is you opinion and shall we invest any effort to save those artefacts?
>
> JMB
>
> On
Hmm ok.
Does it sound silly that I am concerned about the disappearance of the
legacy artefacts?
What is you opinion and shall we invest any effort to save those artefacts?
JMB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:59 AM Emilian Bold
wrote:
> I doubt it will be live a few more years. Another year max un
I doubt it will be live a few more years. Another year max under Oracle
IMHO. Under Apache it won't serve those old bits from Apache infra but
could use OSUOSL.
--emi
joi, 12 sept. 2019, 14:46 Jean-Marc Borer a scris:
> Sure, I understand all those points, but does anyone know how long
> bits.n
Sure, I understand all those points, but does anyone know how long
bits.netbeans.org will still be online? Last week, there was an outage and,
of course, exactly when I was testing our new artifactory. That is why I
started wondering.
If the bits.netbeans.org will remain live during a few years, t
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, 09:48 Eric Barboni, wrote:
> We could not move the artefacts to central because of the licence and the
> groupid that are now for Apache NetBeans.
>
I'm not sure this is correct. At least, I remember us getting some advice
about pre-Apache release artefacts that might allow
t;
> Not sure it worth the effort.
>
> Regards
> Eric
>
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jean-Marc Borer
> Envoyé : mercredi 11 septembre 2019 13:34
> À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
> Objet : Re: bits.netbeans.org vs netbeans.apache.org
>
> Wel
cally repopulated by getting old source from mercurial repo
of Oracle NetBeans.
Not sure it worth the effort.
Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Jean-Marc Borer
Envoyé : mercredi 11 septembre 2019 13:34
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
Objet : Re: bits.netbeans.org vs netbeans.apache
Well, I was wondering how long one could rely on legacy NB Maven artifacts
such as NETBEANS72 or such hosted on bits.netbeans.org?
I don't mind directly since we have finally migrated to NBP 11, but during
a long time after the donation, we were still bound to NETBEANS82 and so do
some plugins tha
What is it exactly that you need, as specifically as possible?
Gj
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 13:00, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> And how long will bits.netbeans.org be maintained? Any input here?
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:32 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>
> > Only source code is being donated by
And how long will bits.netbeans.org be maintained? Any input here?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:32 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Only source code is being donated by Oracle to Apache and only the tip of
> the source code it donates.
>
> Gj
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:29 PM Jean-Marc Borer
> wr
Only source code is being donated by Oracle to Apache and only the tip of
the source code it donates.
Gj
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:29 PM Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> Hi list members,
>
> How long is bits.netbeans.org supposed to be maintained and is there any
> plan to migrate the legacy artifacts
Hi list members,
How long is bits.netbeans.org supposed to be maintained and is there any
plan to migrate the legacy artifacts (dependencies up to 6.5!!) to the new
netbeans.apache.org repo?
Cheers,
JMB
28 matches
Mail list logo
