Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On 01/15/2018 08:25 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 7:14 AM, Markus Kilås > wrote: > >> I was trying to find the KEYS file in order to obtain the public key to >> verify the signature but I am not sure it is there? >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Please do not vote in this thread anymore. This thread is closed. Vote in the rc2 thread instead: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/796200c149232ba2da722c6d4b1310307708e09b2afa77eb90ecaebc@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E Gj On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Neil C Smith

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi, On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 at 14:08 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > That's exactly what we're doing already. See the start of this thread > -- if you like we can add that caveat even more clearly. I.e., the > artifact that the vote is about is the source artifact and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

+1 (binding) Good work, -Jirka Dne 15.1.2018 v 01:05 James Gosling napsal(a): +1 (binding) Everything I tried worked nicely. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I was trying to find the KEYS file in order to obtain the public key to verify the signature but I am not sure it is there? From wiki link below: Also, the KEYS file needed to verify netbeans distributions needs to be uploaded in the root (netbeans) dist folder there as well:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

+1 (binding) Everything I tried worked nicely. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Very nice, thanks very much. Gj On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Ok. The release files for platform are here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-platform/incubating-9.0-beta-rc2/ > and for the Java IDE are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Ok. The release files for platform are here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-platform/incubating-9.0-beta-rc2/ and for the Java IDE are here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-beta-rc2/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I think producing them now or ASAP would be best. They’ll be the same as rc1, except no JARs and ZIPs. Gj On Sunday, January 14, 2018, Jan Lahoda wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > I have notes from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I have notes from Jan Lahoda for producing a release candidate: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ > Apache+NetBeans+Release+README > > See the steps in 'Producing a Release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I have notes from Jan Lahoda for producing a release candidate: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+Release+README See the steps in 'Producing a Release Candidate' above, these are all his notes, very practical and step by step. I'm hoping he'll produce the 9.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > Hi Geertjan, > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 23:14 Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll >> see Apache NetBeans: >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi Geertjan, On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 23:14 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll > see Apache NetBeans: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi, On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 20:59 Jan Lahoda wrote: > Well, we can call them as we like, I guess, but if a zip with a subset of > source is to be released from ASF, then it needs to go through the same > scrutiny as the full zip. That's my understanding at least. So not clear >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

+1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jan 2018, 19:11 Jan Lahoda, wrote: > > > My understanding of the ASF process is that any release (any file > released > > under ASF) is subject of the same scrutiny. I.e. if we would

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Sat, 13 Jan 2018, 20:24 Geertjan Wielenga, < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > OK, the most important thing right now is that we put a source release > together, without the JARs, and name that rc2 and then start a new > vote thread on that. > > Do we agree/disagree? > Yep,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

OK, the most important thing right now is that we put a source release together, without the JARs, and name that rc2 and then start a new vote thread on that. Do we agree/disagree? Thanks, Gj On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jan 2018,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 13:39 Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > I belive we could do convenience binaries for subsets, but not source > > releases for subsets. > > > > I wondered if this was related when I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 13:39 Jan Lahoda wrote: > I belive we could do convenience binaries for subsets, but not source > releases for subsets. > I wondered if this was related when I asked, but I'm confused by this. If the code in the repository is capable of building source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I belive we could do convenience binaries for subsets, but not source releases for subsets. Jan 13. ledna 2018 14:21:23 SEČ, Geertjan Wielenga napsal: >Right, that would be the main objection I think. > >And we need to be able to create distributions from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Right, that would be the main objection I think. And we need to be able to create distributions from subsets of the repository. Gj On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > I am not quite opposed to it (packing all git content), but that would mean > we couldn't

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I am not quite opposed to it (packing all git content), but that would mean we couldn't reasonably source-release a subset of the repository. E.g. just the platform. Jan 13. ledna 2018 12:47:02 SEČ, Antonio napsal: >Aha, so you mean downloading [1]? > >Look ma! No hands!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 12:26 Matthias Bläsing wrote: > I raise the same objection as always when github is moved to the core of a > process. A release should be doable without services outside our control. > :-) So, use the git CLI command you used earlier? All it is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hey, Am 13. Januar 2018 12:58:46 MEZ schrieb Geertjan Wielenga : >Seems great to me too, not sure what the objections could/would be. We >do need to put that here though: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/ i.e., >that's the staging

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 11:58 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Seems great to me too, not sure what the objections could/would be. > I guess it depends on what the ant task is doing?! eg. with the excluded modules, if all the code in the repo is Apache licensed I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Seems great to me too, not sure what the objections could/would be. We do need to put that here though: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/ i.e., that's the staging location for releases. Gj On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Antonio wrote: > Aha, so

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Aha, so you mean downloading [1]? Look ma! No hands! That's clever! [1] curl -o netbeans-9.0-beta-rc1.zip https://codeload.github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/zip/9.0-beta-rc1 On 13/01/18 12:39, Neil C Smith wrote: On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 10:17 Geertjan Wielenga <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 10:17 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I think this is the most urgent task -- we need a new source ZIP > (that's how artifacts are made available for review), > To clarify if the point in brackets was in reply to my question(?), I meant why

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I think this is the most urgent task -- we need a new source ZIP (that's how artifacts are made available for review), without the JARs, and I think we should make that the rc2 release. Once we have that -- and I think right now only Jan Lahoda can create this since he knows what needs to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi, On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, 21:05 Matthias Bläsing, wrote: > However the git tag is not identical with the contents of the source > zip. That there is contents in the repository that is not in the source > zip would be ok from my POV (hibernate support module for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I may allocate some time to fix this, but I don't know which ant task was used to build the source zip file. Is it "ant build-source-config" or "ant build-source-zips", or maybe we want another specific task for creating a release zip file? Thanks, Antonio On 12/01/18 23:52, Geertjan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I see, thanks Matthias for identifying this. Maybe when we fix this, we should provide an rc2 with a new vote thread? Thanks, Gj On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:25 PM, Antonio wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-276 > > > On 12/01/18 23:08, Antonio wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-276 On 12/01/18 23:08, Antonio wrote: I'll open an issue@JIRA with the details. On 12/01/18 23:07, Antonio wrote: What Matthias is saying is that the contents of the zip file do not match github sources in tag 9.0-beta-rc1 You can verify this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi Geertjan, Am Freitag, den 12.01.2018, 22:29 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Can you be very very clear and concise about what is wrong here? What > does 'Nur in' mean and what exactly is the problem? > > Please don't respond with generated texts and so on -- just write down > what it is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

What Matthias is saying is that the contents of the zip file do not match github sources in tag 9.0-beta-rc1 You can verify this yourself like so: # Unzip the sources cd X X$ curl -O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Oops. The task that does the source build downloads (prepares) a handful of the external libraries and these are apparently not excluded when building the source zip :-(. On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Can you be very very clear

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I tested the binary file. I created the following projects: - *a python project*: there were some errors, but the generated files were OK. I could not right-click and delete the python project though (delete menu item was disabled) - *a java project (anagrams)*: no problem - *a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Can you be very very clear and concise about what is wrong here? What does 'Nur in' mean and what exactly is the problem? Please don't respond with generated texts and so on -- just write down what it is that is not what it should be or not be. Thanks, Gj On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:05 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hey, my positive findings: The MD5 and SHA1 sums match the artifacts. The source zip builds cleanly on OpenJDK 8 (the one from Ubuntu artful). The resulting binary is a usable IDE. However the git tag is not identical with the contents of the source zip. That there is contents in the repository

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi all, I tried it out in FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 with "openjdk full version "1.8.0_152-b16"" and everything seems to be fine. I can build & run, install nb-javac, open projects, etc. Checksums are also correct. README, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER are perfect, but I like DEPENDENCIES better. Look at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

> ​ > > >---- Original Message ---- > >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1 > >Local Time: 12 January 2018 2:33 PM > >UTC Time: 12 January 2018 12:33 > >From: lah...@gmail.com > >To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org, E

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

I don't mean showing the nb-javac license before the installer. But the plugins themselves (which right now I assume are in the Plugin Portal) don't have the license included in the NBM. --emi ​ > Original Message >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Thilina Ranathunga > wrote: >> Performed following actions on source download from the link provided by Gj. >> create new window (TopComponent) in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Thilina Ranathunga wrote: > Performed following actions on source download from the link provided by Gj. > create new window (TopComponent) in above created module *PROBLEMATIC* > it displays the design. can work with palette. > In

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Performed following actions on source download from the link provided by Gj. ant *OK* ant tryme *OK* install nb-javac using the prompt on launch *OK* create and run java application containing jframe form *OK* create netbeanse platform application *OK* add module to above created netbeanse

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

. Still to > Oracle? > > --emi > > > >---- Original Message -------- > >Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1 > >Local Time: 11 January 2018 1:14 AM > >UTC Time: 10 January 2018 23:14 > >From: geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 at 07:59 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Please do note we are voting on one very specific artifact here. I.e., do > not git clone anything please. > Sorry. Confirmed that specific artifact does build and run on Windows 10/64-bit, so my original

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

ins to either hardcode / pin some keys > > or > > > buy a certificate. > > > > > > NetBeans Usage Data Tracking is disabled for this build (in Options | > > > General) but I'm not certain where data goes if I enable it. Still to > > > Oracle? > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

t; > > NetBeans Usage Data Tracking is disabled for this build (in Options | > > General) but I'm not certain where data goes if I enable it. Still to > > Oracle? > > > > --emi > > > > > > > Original Message > > >Subject: [VO

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

> NetBeans Usage Data Tracking is disabled for this build (in Options | > General) but I'm not certain where data goes if I enable it. Still to > Oracle? > > --emi > > > >---- Original Message ---- > >Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

for this build (in Options | General) but I'm not certain where data goes if I enable it. Still to Oracle? --emi > Original Message >Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1 >Local Time: 11 January 2018 1:14 AM >UTC Time: 10 January 2018

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

+1 go go go Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Geertjan Wielenga Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018 08:46 An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1 On Thursday, January 11, 2018, cowwoc <cow...@bbs.darktech.org>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Thursday, January 11, 2018, cowwoc wrote: > On 2018-01-10 8:05 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> I want to ensure that the vast majority of regressions are fixed prior to >>> a >>> release. >>> >> >> You are going to need to list the many regressions right here in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

+1 I’ve been building VisualVM plugins and running them with this version. > On Jan 11, 2018, at 4:54 AM, John Brock wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I was able to install, load AnagramGame, build and run on Windows 10. > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:00 PM cowwoc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

+1 (binding) I was able to install, load AnagramGame, build and run on Windows 10. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:00 PM cowwoc wrote: > On 2018-01-10 8:05 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> I want to ensure that the vast majority of regressions are fixed prior > to a > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On 2018-01-10 8:05 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: I want to ensure that the vast majority of regressions are fixed prior to a release. You are going to need to list the many regressions right here in this thread, with a URL to a bug in Issuezilla, otherwise they cannot be taken into

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Thank you! We can download it now. +1 (binding) I've verified the following: - $ md5sum incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-source.zip - $ sha1sum incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-source.zip - $ ant (BUILD SUCCESSFUL) - $ ant tryme Best regards, Junichi 2018-01-11 10:16 GMT+09:00 Geertjan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Junichi Yamamoto wrote: >> At startup you are prompted to install it and then an install procedure is >> provided. > > Yes, I know it. But currently, plugin's status is "PENDING". > So we can get the following message: "nb-javac library"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Thursday, January 11, 2018, Junichi Yamamoto wrote: > Hi Geertjan, > > It seems that we cannot install nb-javac Library[1] via NetBeans > directly. i.e. We have to download it manually. At startup you are prompted to install it and then an install procedure is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Thursday, January 11, 2018, Gili T. wrote: > Who gets to vote? Read the end of my e-mail and you will see the answer. Everyone who wants to vote gets to vote. > What determines when the final release is made? Whether the sources in the artifact to be voted on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi Geertjan, It seems that we cannot install nb-javac Library[1] via NetBeans directly. i.e. We have to download it manually. Could you please verify it? [1] http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/73454/nb-javac-library Thanks, Junichi 2018-01-11 8:14 GMT+09:00 Geertjan Wielenga

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Who gets to vote? What determines when the final release is made? My concern is that I've seen many regressions relative to 8.2 and very few new features (jdk9 support being the major feature that I am aware of). I want to ensure that the vast majority of regressions are fixed prior to a release.

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi all, Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1! If this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release this version. Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) constitutes all the modules