[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3387) Make AR Payment Groups screens consistent to the best practice.

Make AR Payment Groups screens consistent to the best practice. --- Key: OFBIZ-3387 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3387 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3387) Make AR Payment Groups screens consistent to the best practice.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sumit Pandit updated OFBIZ-3387: Attachment: OFBIZ-3387.patch Hi All, Here is patch attached for UI enhancements. It includes

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3387) Make AR Payment Groups screens consistent to the best practice.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sumit Pandit updated OFBIZ-3387: Attachment: 4.png Make AR Payment Groups screens consistent to the best practice.

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3387) Make AR Payment Groups screens consistent to the best practice.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sumit Pandit updated OFBIZ-3387: Attachment: 3.png 2.png 1.png Attaching screen shot for reference.

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (OFBIZ-3387) Make AR Payment Groups screens consistent to the best practice.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795573#action_12795573 ] Sumit Pandit edited comment on OFBIZ-3387 at 12/31/09 9:30 AM:

Re: Existing Servlet Porject and ofbiz

Still Waiting Best regards -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Existing-Servlet-Porject-and-ofbiz-tp976173p991349.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: getNextSeqId and multiple sequence on entity

Thanks Brett, I understand more your enchancement ;) I finalize a customer emergency and I try to create patch to improve the sequence system. For waiting ... have a happy new year Nicolas Brett Palmer a écrit : Nicolas, Your proposal for a new method like,

Re: Conditional seed data loading

That's true, it would be still a dependence. Anyway, in this case the MyPortal is considered to be dependent from all other components (because it mounts portlets defined by all other components in the default portalPages). It should be possible to use the MyPortal component even if one of the

Re: Conditional seed data loading

MyPortal still needs a lot of work. It should really be just the shell of the portal and include only a very few portlets that are part of the framework. Higher level components, including applications components, can have their own portlets that appear in MyPortal by having data in seed/etc

Re: Discussion: BuildBot component independence check

How could we define new ant targets to deploy partial OFBiz configurations? I mean, an OFBiz configuration I would like to build and get working is the one with the following applications: - application/commonext - application/content - application/party - application/securityext -

Re: Conditional seed data loading

David, I totally agree with you and will work to get this. So, the portalPages that are actually defined in MyPortal should be defined in a different seed or a different component that is at the highest level. A solution could also be to define those portlaPages in the setup (even if I do not

Re: Existing Servlet Porject and ofbiz

You will wait much more if you don't ask here it should be asked on user ML See why here http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Mailing+Lists#MailingLists-DesignanddevelopmentList:dev@ofbiz.apache.org Jacques From: zafaralikhan14 raa...@gmail.com Still Waiting Best regards --

Re: Existing Servlet Porject and ofbiz

From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com You will wait much more if you don't ask here it should be asked on user ML Arf typos, should be You will wait much more if you don't ask where it should be: on user ML Jacques See why here

Re: Conditional seed data loading

Hi David: IMO the term portlet should only be applied to JSR 168/268 compliant code. Regards, Ruth David E Jones wrote: MyPortal still needs a lot of work. It should really be just the shell of the portal and include only a very few portlets that are part of the framework. Higher level

Re: Conditional seed data loading

I agree with Ruth, this will (and has already) certainly bring some confusion in future. Jacques From: Ruth Hoffman rhoff...@aesolves.com Hi David: IMO the term portlet should only be applied to JSR 168/268 compliant code. Regards, Ruth David E Jones wrote: MyPortal still needs a lot of

Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

David E Jones wrote: On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: The security-aware artifacts implementation is nearly complete. The branch is out of date and I can't get it synchronized with the trunk because there are too many conflicts. I would like to create a new branch and port the

Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

I am interested in reviewing this work. I think there may be some overlap on how we decided to apply security in our ofbiz based system. In brief, what we did was put security checks at the service definition and then at presentment artifact load time, we triggered a security application

Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts

The branch implements the design specified in this document: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign -Adrian Bob Morley wrote: I am interested in reviewing this work. I think there may be some overlap on how we decided to apply security in our ofbiz based

Re: Discussion: BuildBot component independence check

Bruno Busco wrote: How could we define new ant targets to deploy partial OFBiz configurations? I mean, an OFBiz configuration I would like to build and get working is the one with the following applications: - application/commonext - application/content - application/party -

Re: Conditional seed data loading

The terms portal and portlet existed, and were used in a software user interface context, a LONG time before JSR 168 was a twinkle in the eye of the fans of ineffective design and standardization for marketing purposes that created the spec. I have no intention of granting them ownership of

Re: Conditional seed data loading

Bring confusion in the future? That's like saying you shouldn't use the term object-relational mapping unless you're talking about JPA. Just like object-relational mapping is a general term with many variations and implementations, and supporting the JPA interfaces is simply a feature of some

Re: Conditional seed data loading

From: David E Jones d...@me.com Bring confusion in the future? That's like saying you shouldn't use the term object-relational mapping unless you're talking about JPA. Just like object-relational mapping is a general term with many variations and implementations, and supporting the JPA

Re: Conditional seed data loading

Hi David: David E Jones wrote: Bring confusion in the future? That's like saying you shouldn't use the term object-relational mapping unless you're talking about JPA. I beg to differ. Portlets and Portals have clear definitions recognized in the Java community: JSR 168/268. Regardless of

Re: Conditional seed data loading

Hi Jacques: IMO, it is a big deal. When someone is looking at OFBiz for an enterprise solution and the competition is Jetspeed, Liferay, Websphere etc., we should be clear that when the OFBiz project says Portal it does not mean what everyone else thinks it means. It is misleading. Just to

Re: Conditional seed data loading

David E Jones wrote: Bring confusion in the future? That's like saying you shouldn't use the term object-relational mapping unless you're talking about JPA. Just like object-relational mapping is a general term with many variations and implementations, and supporting the JPA interfaces is

Re: Conditional seed data loading

probably all replaced with opensocial: http://www.opensocial.org/? On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 12:17 -0600, Adam Heath wrote: David E Jones wrote: Bring confusion in the future? That's like saying you shouldn't use the term object-relational mapping unless you're talking about JPA. Just like

Re: Conditional seed data loading

BTW there is also the WSRP standard (I did not know about it) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Services_for_Remote_Portlets Jacques From: Ruth Hoffman rhoff...@aesolves.com Hi David: IMO the term portlet should only be applied to JSR 168/268 compliant code. Regards, Ruth David E Jones

Re: Conditional seed data loading

Actually we would just have to change the name at the surface, from a marketing POV if you prefer. No need to change underneath. But sincerely I have not much time for that... Where is it used in documentation which could induce new users in error? Jacques From: Ruth Hoffman

AcctgTransEntry population of related entities (partyId, roleTypeId, etc)

We are trying to understand the proper usage for the accounting transaction / entries as they relate to the related entities such as partyId, invoiceId, shipmentId, etc. What I do not understand is when the related entities should be populated on the acctgTransEntry entity. The specific example

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2234 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894956

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

Is there any way to get more details about this? Evidently I'm to blame for a compile failure... but my last commit that involves something to be compiled was on Dec 27 in rev 894047. Or does the blame list just look at the most recent commit even though the test may have included various

Re: Conditional seed data loading

Maybe we can take a look at mashup, which is not that heavy as portlets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mashup_(web_application_hybrid) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mashup_(web_application_hybrid) -- Regards, Michael Xu (xudong) www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86)