Actually I did not check, 3.5.2 is available
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
I really do not like this one
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=282581
But not enough to run all issues with building my own Eclipse (did not try
though), I will wait 3.5.2 :/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3440.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Hi Geir,
Your (slightly modified) patch is
Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Hans,
I would recommend using the custRequestItem for the story, the implementation
can be simple enough by using a service to create the header and item in a
single call and a view entity could could them back to you as a single record.
Conceptually what you really
Mmm... weird this is not by default, yoy may even automatically update
using http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/3.5 (though I did to 3.5.2
and it did no fix the bug below :/)
see also http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse_Project_Update_Sites
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux
Anyway a sole -1 is enough for reverting code without explanations
Needs 3 +1 (and more + than -) for a release.
These are Apache rules (inherited from HTTPD project) as it's well explained in
the release management document Bruno gave a link)
Jacques
From: Bilgin Ibryam bibr...@gmail.com
I think it makes sense to have a story/text for the header (for all
items), but why not using CustRequestNote for this?
Christian
Scott Gray schrieb:
Hi Hans,
I would recommend using the custRequestItem for the story, the implementation
can be simple enough by using a service to create the
Jacques Le Roux schrieb:
Anyway a sole -1 is enough for reverting code without explanations
Wrong, a veto on code modification without an explanation is invalid!
See http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
But this shouldn't really be used all the time, it makes a lot more
sense to
Hello Scott,
Following the previous condition;
((this.attributes != null attributes != null)
((this.attributes.size() != attributes.size()) ||
!(this.attributes.equals(attributes
and the information added by Adam, we can see the why these changes needed.
The
From: Christian Geisert christian.geis...@isu-gmbh.de
Jacques Le Roux schrieb:
Anyway a sole -1 is enough for reverting code without explanations
Wrong, a veto on code modification without an explanation is invalid!
See http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Yes indeed, thanks for the
Why would you even bring this up here? No one is talking about commits and
definitely no one is talking about reverts.
Regards
Scott
On 12/03/2010, at 2:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Anyway a sole -1 is enough for reverting code without explanations
Needs 3 +1 (and more + than -) for a
Hi Bruno
yes that was my first intention to integrate it completely with the
project manager, look at the 'requests' button there.
However i had to change my mind There are two areas:
1. ticket(request) management and the communicationEvents around it
2.
Hi Christian,
nice to have you back!
Sure we can use that too, but the note is meant for some extra info?
The main story should be as close to the request as possible.
Initially the request was meant to have information at some kind of
product list therefore the items so it could be easy
Simply because I read that in the document Bruno sent us and I was not aware
of all details.
So I though maybe some other commitets were not and a summary (on this subject)
could not hurt.
Jacques
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Why would you even bring this up here? No one is
Send Email link from /humanres/control/EmployeeProfile does not work
Key: OFBIZ-3553
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3553
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
It just seems rude to me, Hans comes to the list with a discussion, which is a
good thing, and people start talking about reverts?
Regards
Scott
On 12/03/2010, at 7:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Simply because I read that in the document Bruno sent us and I was not
aware of all details.
So
jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Fri Mar 12 08:27:42 2010
New Revision: 922177
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=922177view=rev
Log:
A slightly modified patch from Geir Ove Grønmo Calculation of promotions and
price rules should support multi-level GROUP_ROLLUP
Ha It was not directed to Hans at all. Just that I thought it could be
interesting for everyone.
To be clear, I have anything against Hans. He is here for a longer time than me, knows certainly more things than me on OFBiz and
his contributions, past and future, are very important.
I would
Le 12/03/2010 15:28, Hans Bakker a écrit :
Hi Bruno
yes that was my first intention to integrate it completely with the
Hi Hans,
we are planning on doing such thing, and merging our forces may create a
nice piece of OFBiz contribution !
On the entity part, what have you planned ? using
Delegator removeByXXX do not trigger remove ECA
---
Key: OFBIZ-3554
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3554
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects
Hello Tim,
I have already sent my comments before few days: (Sending here once
again for your reference)
-
Hello Hans | Tim,
Here are major points for your ready reference that are supported/
present in the eBay component before the introduction of ebaystore
component:
Hello Tim,
I have already sent my comments before few days: (Sending here once
again for your reference)
-
Hello Hans | Tim,
Here are major points for your ready reference that are supported/
present in the eBay component before the introduction of ebaystore
component:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844643#action_12844643
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3026:
---
to be able to patch I can only provide to release
Search for synchronized in ShoppingCart. You'll fine a couple of
spots that lock on cartLines, a few that lock in the class instance
itself. But then no other hits.
However, tons of internal variables all need to be kept
self-consistent with each other, so locking against just one or the
other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844718#action_12844718
]
Bob Morley commented on OFBIZ-1222:
---
I know this one is pretty old - but we ran into this
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Search for synchronized in
ShoppingCart. You'll fine a couple of
spots that lock on cartLines, a few that lock in the class
instance
itself. But then no other hits.
However, tons of internal variables all need to be kept
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Search for synchronized in
ShoppingCart. You'll fine a couple of
spots that lock on cartLines, a few that lock in the class
instance
itself. But then no other hits.
However, tons of internal variables all need
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Search for synchronized in
ShoppingCart. You'll fine a couple of
spots that lock on cartLines, a few that lock in
the class
instance
itself.
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Search for synchronized in
ShoppingCart. You'll fine a couple of
spots that lock on cartLines, a few that lock in
the class
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Search for synchronized in
ShoppingCart. You'll fine a couple
of
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Search for synchronized in
ShoppingCart. You'll fine a couple of
spots that lock on cartLines, a few that lock in
the class
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Search for synchronized in
ShoppingCart. You'll fine a couple
of
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com wrote:
Consistent random foreign key violations. Two records would
get the same sequence number. Random in that different
entities would be affected each time, and consistent in that
it happens nearly every time.
Try running five or
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com wrote:
Consistent random foreign key violations. Two records would
get the same sequence number. Random in that different
entities would be affected each time, and consistent in that
it happens nearly every time.
Try
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right now? In the US?
The above test fails, because the start date is now, but the end date
is in the future *past* when daylight savings time takes place. So
the interval is off by one hour, and the assertion fails.
Does
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right now? In
the US?
The above test fails, because the start date is now, but
the end date
is in the future *past* when daylight savings time takes
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right now? In
the US?
The above test fails, because the start date is now, but
the end date
is in the future *past* when daylight
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right
now? In
the US?
The above test fails, because the start date
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right
now? In
the US?
The above test fails, because the
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right
now? In
the US?
The above test
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844819#action_12844819
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3026:
Yes, we can try that... I don't expect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3026:
Datafile does not catch lack of delimiter if at end of line.
44 matches
Mail list logo
