[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3745) Missing Buttons on LookUp Search

2010-05-03 Thread Sascha Rodekamp (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3745: --- Attachment: OFBIz-3745_LayoutCal.patch Antoher small Layout Fix for the calender issue in

if purchase shipment received is more then ordered no invoice created.

2010-05-03 Thread Hans Bakker
For the purchase order specialist. When a purchase order is created and approved and the related shipment is sent to the appropriate warehouse there is a problem when the quantities are more than was ordered: no invoice is generated. In the ShipmentServices.java when the quantities are not the

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3446) Allow to open a layer lookup from a layer lookup

2010-05-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863278#action_12863278 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3446: Thanks Ankit, Indeed, I did not notice it

Re: erwan contributions.

2010-05-03 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Le 02/05/2010 18:55, Bruno Busco a écrit : BTW I remembered that also Label Manager was there but I connot find it anymore it's in label management https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/SearchLabels Erwan, what I meat is that the label manager should be available from a menu also

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3446) Allow to open a layer lookup from a layer lookup

2010-05-03 Thread Ankit Jain (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863279#action_12863279 ] Ankit Jain commented on OFBIZ-3446: --- Hi jacques, No problem Thanks :) Allow to open

Re: New branch is now available for upcoming releases of 10.04 series

2010-05-03 Thread Vikas Mayur
Do we need any formal vote procedure to conclude whether we should backport unit test or not? Regards Vikas On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: This looks like a good idea to me and I don't see why we should not allow to backport

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3746) Lookup Layer Search of a Varient Product

2010-05-03 Thread Sascha Rodekamp (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3746: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-3746_VariantButtonsFix.patch Hi Jacques, hi Sam, i think i solved the

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3746) Lookup Layer Search of a Varient Product

2010-05-03 Thread Sascha Rodekamp (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3746: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-3746_VariantButtonsFix.patch ups patch was out dated ;) Lookup Layer

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3745) Missing Buttons on LookUp Search

2010-05-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863292#action_12863292 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3745: Hi Sascha, There is something broken in

Re: New branch is now available for upcoming releases of 10.04 series

2010-05-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I don't think so, tests could be backported IMO. Maybe discussed for each case on dev ML before? Jacques From: Vikas Mayur vikasma...@gmail.com Do we need any formal vote procedure to conclude whether we should backport unit test or not? Regards Vikas On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jacopo

Re: Controller Injection

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
Okay for the naming, how about we add a wrapping element that would contain all of our plug-in information: (we could replace inject with plug-ins or something) inject controller base-location=component://path/to/base/controller.xml

Re: New branch is now available for upcoming releases of 10.04 series

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
I don't think anybody is going to be against adding tests and it shouldn't need to be discussed first. BTW, we still need to ask Infra to get buildbot running the 10.04 tests if anyone wants to volunteer. Regards Scott On 3/05/2010, at 10:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I don't think so,

Re: svn commit: r940249 - in /ofbiz/branches/release10.04: ./ applications/order/script/org/ofbiz/order/customer/ applications/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/ applications/product/script/

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
We don't really need that mergeinfo stuff do we? The actual diff looks like a needle in a haystack. Regards Scott On 3/05/2010, at 3:54 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Sun May 2 15:54:05 2010 New Revision: 940249 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=940249view=rev

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3745) Missing Buttons on LookUp Search

2010-05-03 Thread Sascha Rodekamp (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3745: --- Attachment: OFBIz-3745_LayoutCal.patch Ok Jacques, now the calendar have the right image

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3746) Lookup Layer Search of a Varient Product

2010-05-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3746. -- Fix Version/s: Release Branch 10.04 SVN trunk Resolution: Fixed

Re: New branch is now available for upcoming releases of 10.04 series

2010-05-03 Thread Vikas Mayur
Yeah it looks evident from the discussion that most of the people are in favor of backporting unit tests (Thanks Everyone!) and it is good to assume that one can backport a unit test from now onwards, right? I am sorry but I thought generally changes in policy are concluded through

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3468) No Message for duplicate login name

2010-05-03 Thread Atul Vani (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Atul Vani updated OFBIZ-3468: - Attachment: PartyUserNameInUse.patch Hi Koon, Here's the patch that fixes the issue. The email address

Re: erwan contributions.

2010-05-03 Thread Bruno Busco
Yes, please see here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2104 -Bruno 2010/5/3 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr Le 02/05/2010 18:55, Bruno Busco a écrit : BTW I remembered that also Label Manager was there but I connot find it anymore it's in label

Re: Controller Injection

2010-05-03 Thread Bruno Busco
Hi Scott, could we consider to use the ofbiz-component.xml file to contain all the injections like follows? ofbiz-component name=ExtendingAccounting xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation=

Re: svn commit: r940249 - in /ofbiz/branches/release10.04: ./ applications/order/script/org/ofbiz/order/customer/ applications/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/ applications/product/script/

2010-05-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Yes, I plan to remove them. I have still to read more about svn merge... Jacques Scott Gray wrote: We don't really need that mergeinfo stuff do we? The actual diff looks like a needle in a haystack. Regards Scott On 3/05/2010, at 3:54 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Sun

Re: Controller Injection

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Bruno, Thanks for taking a look, here's a couple of points about your suggestions: - You can't mix and match attributes like that on a single element, you'd need to have a separate element for each attribute set. - I really wanted to avoid putting too much definition in the component file

Re: Lucene is broken

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Erwan, It's funny you should bring this up, I have a local git branch where I've been working on the upgrade off and on as well. I don't have time right now, but have been looking at the API a fair bit and should probably be able to get it done within the next week or two. What did you

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3745) Missing Buttons on LookUp Search

2010-05-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3745. -- Fix Version/s: Release Branch 10.04 SVN trunk Resolution: Fixed

Re: Lucene is broken

2010-05-03 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Le 03/05/2010 14:05, Scott Gray a écrit : Hi Erwan, It's funny you should bring this up, I have a local git branch where I've been working on the upgrade off and on as well. I don't have time right now, but have been looking at the API a fair bit and should probably be able to get it done

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3747) ProductStore missing field title help

2010-05-03 Thread chris snow (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863336#action_12863336 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3747: --- Hi Devs, anyone interested in committing this for

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3747) ProductStore missing field title help

2010-05-03 Thread chris snow (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chris snow updated OFBIZ-3747: -- Attachment: (was: productStoreFieldDescriptions.patch) ProductStore missing field title help

IO Error processing request (java.security.cert.CertificateException: No trusted certificate found)

2010-05-03 Thread Nalin Chandra
Hi All I am working for the HSBC payment processor in my application. I prepared the XML document correctly. But during the posting i got IO Error processing request (java.security.cert.CertificateException: No trusted certificate found). Can any one please help me to sort out this issue.

Re: Survey Response Validation

2010-05-03 Thread Robert Morley
On Apr 30, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Scott Gray wrote: Is there an opportunity to plug-in a server-side validation service on any ModalForm? Has this been discussed before from you knowledge (excuse my lack of search). The theory would be that your dynamically generated ModelForm instance could

dojo and dojox

2010-05-03 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Hi all, I'm planning on update the dojo version included in OFBiz, and also adding dojox. This way, we could easily add charts in OFBiz, like explained on this page : http://www.dojotoolkit.org/reference-guide/dojox/charting.html So, before doing it, I would like to know if everyone is OK

Re: dojo and dojox

2010-05-03 Thread Brett Palmer
Erwan, Are you going to get this update from their 1.4 release? I would suggest sticky with their official releases. We use dojo a lot from their trunk but its pretty unstable for general use. Brett On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr wrote: Hi

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3748) Remove test specific code in the GeneralDelegator

2010-05-03 Thread Bob Morley (JIRA)
Remove test specific code in the GeneralDelegator - Key: OFBIZ-3748 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3748 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3748) Remove test specific code in the GeneralDelegator

2010-05-03 Thread Bob Morley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-3748: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-3748_TestGenericDelegator.patch Remove test specific code in the GeneralDelegator

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3748) Remove test specific code in the GenericDelegator

2010-05-03 Thread Bob Morley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-3748: -- Summary: Remove test specific code in the GenericDelegator (was: Remove test specific code in the

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3490) Create theme build script

2010-05-03 Thread BJ Freeman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3490: -- Attachment: (was: themesbuild.txt) Create theme build script -

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3490) Create theme build script

2010-05-03 Thread BJ Freeman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3490: -- Attachment: 3490-themebutild.patch I added a link to the wiki Create theme build script

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3490) Create theme build script

2010-05-03 Thread BJ Freeman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3490: -- Attachment: (was: themebutildpatch.txt) Create theme build script -

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3490) Create theme build script

2010-05-03 Thread BJ Freeman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863486#action_12863486 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3490: --- I will expand the wiki site

Re: Storing supplier provided account number

2010-05-03 Thread Robert Morley
On May 3, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Robert Morley wrote: That wasn't what I was suggesting, I was describing SupplierRelationship as being an extension to PartyRelationship in the same way that Person or PartyGroup extends Party. Yes I think this is the solution that Adrian has original

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3490) Create theme build script

2010-05-03 Thread BJ Freeman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3490: -- Attachment: 3490-themebutild.patch oops. 45Kb is a little to much. Create theme build script

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3490) Create theme build script

2010-05-03 Thread BJ Freeman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3490: -- Attachment: (was: 3490-themebutild.patch) Create theme build script -

Re: Controller Injection

2010-05-03 Thread Bruno Busco
Hi Scott, 2010/5/3 Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com Hi Bruno, Thanks for taking a look, here's a couple of points about your suggestions: - You can't mix and match attributes like that on a single element, you'd need to have a separate element for each attribute set. OK, I see what

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3490) Create theme build script

2010-05-03 Thread BJ Freeman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863521#action_12863521 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3490: --- I will be dong another iteration of this by the end

Re: Survey Response Validation

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
On 4/05/2010, at 2:21 AM, Robert Morley wrote: On Apr 30, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Scott Gray wrote: Is there an opportunity to plug-in a server-side validation service on any ModalForm? Has this been discussed before from you knowledge (excuse my lack of search). The theory would be that your

Re: Lucene is broken

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
On 4/05/2010, at 12:45 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: Le 03/05/2010 14:05, Scott Gray a écrit : Hi Erwan, It's funny you should bring this up, I have a local git branch where I've been working on the upgrade off and on as well. I don't have time right now, but have been looking at the

Re: Survey Response Validation

2010-05-03 Thread Robert Morley
On May 3, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Scott Gray wrote: What I am getting at here is an ability to model a validation service as part of the ModalForm. How it is implemented (sever- side vs. ajax callback) would really be secondary. I like the ajax approach for the validation that you have

Re: Controller Injection

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
On 4/05/2010, at 8:02 AM, Bruno Busco wrote: Hi Scott, 2010/5/3 Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com Hi Bruno, Thanks for taking a look, here's a couple of points about your suggestions: - You can't mix and match attributes like that on a single element, you'd need to have a separate

Re: Survey Response Validation

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
On 4/05/2010, at 10:09 AM, Robert Morley wrote: On May 3, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Scott Gray wrote: What I am getting at here is an ability to model a validation service as part of the ModalForm. How it is implemented (sever-side vs. ajax callback) would really be secondary. I like the ajax

Re: Survey Response Validation

2010-05-03 Thread Robert Morley
On May 3, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I haven't had a good look in a while but I thought FreeMarker templates were used to render surveys? This is from memory for me too; but I believe what happens is FreeMarker templates are used to create xml that represents a ModelForm.

Re: Survey Response Validation

2010-05-03 Thread Adrian Crum
On 5/3/2010 3:27 PM, Robert Morley wrote: On May 3, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I haven't had a good look in a while but I thought FreeMarker templates were used to render surveys? This is from memory for me too; but I believe what happens is FreeMarker templates are used to create

Re: Storing supplier provided account number

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
On 4/05/2010, at 7:34 AM, Robert Morley wrote: On May 3, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Robert Morley wrote: That wasn't what I was suggesting, I was describing SupplierRelationship as being an extension to PartyRelationship in the same way that Person or PartyGroup extends Party. Yes I

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3748) Remove test specific code in the GenericDelegator

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863559#action_12863559 ] Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3748: --- Is it correct to have two separate Factory

Splitting out single and list into separate form widgets

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
Sometimes I think using the same schema and class for single forms and list forms holds us back from implementing features specific to one or the other and even when we do it results in a messy schema. What if we were to separate the two but have them share a common base? We could start by

Re: Splitting out single and list into separate form widgets

2010-05-03 Thread Adrian Crum
On 5/3/2010 4:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Sometimes I think using the same schema and class for single forms and list forms holds us back from implementing features specific to one or the other and even when we do it results in a messy schema. What if we were to separate the two but have them

Re: Splitting out single and list into separate form widgets

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
On 4/05/2010, at 11:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 5/3/2010 4:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Sometimes I think using the same schema and class for single forms and list forms holds us back from implementing features specific to one or the other and even when we do it results in a messy schema.

Re: dojo and dojox

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
There is flotr for javascript charting which I think uses prototype. But due to the integration with BIRT I would like to see a chart widget schema defined that uses BIRT as the rendering engine. It's also possible that we could integrate BIRT with one of the javascript charting libraries to

Re: dojo and dojox

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
BTW I have never been a fan of having two javascript libraries in the code base, personally I think one of them should be removed altogether. Regards Scott On 4/05/2010, at 11:47 AM, Scott Gray wrote: There is flotr for javascript charting which I think uses prototype. But due to the

Re: Storing supplier provided account number

2010-05-03 Thread Bob Morley
Scott Gray-2 wrote: I think you missed the second half of my earlier email: I'm not sure how I would handle something like a security card but IMO the Employment entity should be an extension to PartyRelationship, I mean it already shares the same primary key fields. Employment already

Re: Splitting out single and list into separate form widgets

2010-05-03 Thread Bob Morley
Scott Gray-2 wrote: On 4/05/2010, at 11:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 5/3/2010 4:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Sometimes I think using the same schema and class for single forms and list forms holds us back from implementing features specific to one or the other and even when we do it results

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3748) Remove test specific code in the GenericDelegator

2010-05-03 Thread Bob Morley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863643#action_12863643 ] Bob Morley commented on OFBIZ-3748: --- I think separate Factory implementations is

Re: Splitting out single and list into separate form widgets

2010-05-03 Thread Adrian Crum
--- On Mon, 5/3/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: On 4/05/2010, at 11:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 5/3/2010 4:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Sometimes I think using the same schema and class for single forms and list forms holds us back from implementing features specific to one

Re: IO Error processing request (java.security.cert.CertificateException: No trusted certificate found)

2010-05-03 Thread Raj Saini
It means their is not trusted SSL certificate in jdk CA store. You may need import the certificate in the JDK CA if your certificate is not signed by well knowns CAs. Thanks, Raj On 03/05/10 14:36, Nalin Chandra wrote: Hi All I am working for the HSBC payment processor in my application. I

Re: Splitting out single and list into separate form widgets

2010-05-03 Thread Adrian Crum
--- On Mon, 5/3/10, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com wrote: --- On Mon, 5/3/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: On 4/05/2010, at 11:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 5/3/2010 4:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Sometimes I think using the same schema and class for single forms

Re: Splitting out single and list into separate form widgets

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
On 4/05/2010, at 4:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: --- On Mon, 5/3/10, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com wrote: --- On Mon, 5/3/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: On 4/05/2010, at 11:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 5/3/2010 4:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Sometimes I think using the same

Re: Splitting out single and list into separate form widgets

2010-05-03 Thread Adrian Crum
--- On Mon, 5/3/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: On 4/05/2010, at 4:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: --- On Mon, 5/3/10, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com wrote: --- On Mon, 5/3/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: On 4/05/2010, at 11:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:

Re: Splitting out single and list into separate form widgets

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
On 4/05/2010, at 2:34 PM, Bob Morley wrote: Scott Gray-2 wrote: On 4/05/2010, at 11:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 5/3/2010 4:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Sometimes I think using the same schema and class for single forms and list forms holds us back from implementing features specific to one

Re: Storing supplier provided account number

2010-05-03 Thread Scott Gray
On 4/05/2010, at 2:22 PM, Bob Morley wrote: Scott Gray-2 wrote: I think you missed the second half of my earlier email: I'm not sure how I would handle something like a security card but IMO the Employment entity should be an extension to PartyRelationship, I mean it already shares the

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-2104) Support for sub-menu is not completely implemented in the menu widget

2010-05-03 Thread Bruno Busco (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863665#action_12863665 ] Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-2104: Hi Erwan, what is needed at first is a menu widget