OK you are both right (though I don't think this one does not put any harms on
performance or ressources).
Then we need a mean to pass parameters through ant start target :
http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/property.html
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
From my perspective, this is the same concept as the port settings -
provide some basic defaults and let users change them with patches. If I
want to enable memory dumps on my local copy, then I can apply a patch
that turns them on.
Indeed, I have a patch called local-dev that configures a
Today I have created the new release branch 12.04
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release12.04
this is the feature freeze release with latest features from trunk; from now on
we will backport fixes only.
The tentative release schedule for this branch is described in:
Thanks Jacopo!
-Adrian
On 4/30/2012 9:14 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Today I have created the new release branch 12.04
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release12.04
this is the feature freeze release with latest features from trunk; from now on
we will backport fixes only.
I reverted the -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError just after the release was created (actualy almost in the same time, no luck).
I will revert it from there also
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
Today I have created the new release branch 12.04
I am sorry... but happy in the same time because we have now tested the scripts
:-)
Jacopo
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I reverted the -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError just after the release was
created (actualy almost in the same time, no luck). I will revert it from
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I tried experimenting with the sleep timing and I also replaced the
Thread.sleep call with a safer version, but the tests still failed.
interesting... but if you change the Thread.sleep timeout from 200 to 2000 it
works, right?
Jacopo
Hi Jacques,
Quick question - does this setting mean that now if you uncomment
framework/config/ofbiz-containers.xml cluster settings it wont cluster and that
you should also add a distributable/ tag to all the web.xml files?
Thanks
Sam
On 14 Apr 2012, at 15:30, jler...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264863#comment-13264863
]
yashwant dhakad commented on OFBIZ-4813:
Jacques,
I think this should be
On 4/30/2012 10:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I tried experimenting with the sleep timing and I also replaced the
Thread.sleep call with a safer version, but the tests still failed.
interesting... but if you change the Thread.sleep timeout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264877#comment-13264877
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4813:
Hi Yashwant,
See my comment above:
Hi Sam,
Yes: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/cluster-howto.html#Cluster_Basics
http://wiki.metawerx.net/Wiki.jsp?page=web.xml.Distributable
Also consider
property name=apps-cross-context value=true/
property name=apps-context-reloadable value=true/
(false by default)
If you use sticky
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264878#comment-13264878
]
Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-4813:
-
Jqcques,
This is related to
If, as Adam mentioned, it is an issue caused by the time-slice in your box,
then setting a greater timeout may fix the issue... if you will be able to make
it work with, let's say 600 ms (or even 1s) then I would like to commit the
change to make the test a bit more robust (even if it will be
I will give it a try, but it will have to wait until tomorrow.
-Adrian
On 4/30/2012 12:42 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
If, as Adam mentioned, it is an issue caused by the time-slice in your box,
then setting a greater timeout may fix the issue... if you will be able to make
it work with,
This issue seems to be a same kind of problem as the change of test ports
in trunk.
Why are we so adament that end users should and must apply patches in their
own test environment regarding test ports, while we - on the other hand -
are trying to fix something in trunk that is along the same
The two are vastly different. Configuring ports is something the end
user is responsible for. Cache unit tests that are failing need to be
fixed. Configuration != failed unit tests.
-Adrian
On 4/30/2012 12:58 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
This issue seems to be a same kind of problem as the change
Thank you Adrian, and of course there is no rush at all.
Jacopo
On Apr 30, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I will give it a try, but it will have to wait until tomorrow.
-Adrian
On 4/30/2012 12:42 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
If, as Adam mentioned, it is an issue caused by the
sir,
when i create an user as employee of company x and give him permission
to access and create organization GL like chart of account or
transaction the employee of company x can make it not from only
company x but also from others company.eg. though he is an employee of
company x he can manage
Thanks Jacopo !!
Is there a list of new features (over and above 11.04) that have been
included in this release ?
-
Rgds
Sanjeev
www.sanjeevg.com
@sanjeevgcom
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Release-branch-12-04-is-now-available-tp4597647p4597810.html
Jacques,
If I have this tag in the web.xml, but the change is tested in an
unclustered environment what do you thing the result would be? Is it of no
effect, would it fail?
Regards,
Pierre
2012/4/30 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Hi Sam,
Yes:
Adrian,
I accept that there is a difference, but using vastly is an exaggeration.
Are we going to provide a fix for this issue, whereby end-users can tweak
this in there own environment (by e.g. a configuration setting), or are we
just trying to find an optimal number so that these test don't
This is NOT a configuration issue. Please stop trying to turn it into one.
-Adrian
On 4/30/2012 1:23 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Adrian,
I accept that there is a difference, but using vastly is an exaggeration.
Are we going to provide a fix for this issue, whereby end-users can tweak
this in
Is it so difficult to answer the questions?
I did not state that it should be a configuration setting. I was just
asking a few civilized questions in order to understand it more.
Regards,
Pierre
2012/4/30 Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
This is NOT a configuration issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264896#comment-13264896
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4813:
Thanks Deepak,
I will have a closer
whereby end-users can tweak this in there own environment (by e.g. a
configuration setting)
There has been plenty of discussion on this already. Please read the
previous replies, and the Jira issue mentioned in the replies.
-Adrian
On 4/30/2012 1:33 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Is it so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-4753:
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux (was: Ashish Vijaywargiya)
After session timeout, ajax
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4753:
---
Description:
This is related to OFBIZ-4256. Need to port the same for release 11.04.
If the
Pierre,
please also consider that the dev list should be used by OFBiz committers to
discuss about development and project related tasks; we are happy if non
committers follow the discussions and participate to votes (non binding votes)
but they should limit the number of posts in the dev list
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
yashwant dhakad updated OFBIZ-4813:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-4813-R11.04.patch
Here is the path for release 11.04 branch,
I have also updated the svn page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access
As a side note, I have removed from the page a couple of sections:
1) the old svn repos as it was no more working
2) the instructions about svn export rather than svn co; I
Hi Sanjeev,
please consider that 12.04 is not a release yet; you can use the information in
this page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features
(and children pages to get an idea of the new features).
Jacopo
On Apr 30, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
Help yourself
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features
Jacques
From: Sanjeev Gupta subscr...@sanjeevg.com
Thanks Jacopo !!
Is there a list of new features (over and above 11.04) that have been
included in this release ?
-
Rgds
Sanjeev
www.sanjeevg.com
Pierre,
I did not test, but I believe it's only used in a clustered environment and
should have any impacts in other cases.
It makes only a webapp distributable. Before we added this, all were distributable by default, which could annoying in certain
circumstances.
So adding it in web.xml
This is not a good implementation, simply searching the web.xml file for a
string containing distributable/ is not good enough. It'll find the tag
even if commented out and and won't find the tag distributable / (space
before closing, perfectly valid). I'm surprised this got past you Jacques.
Looking for 'distributable' I found no reference in any web.xml. However I
found in *-containers.xml the reference:
property name=apps-distributable value=false/!-- you must also set
all the webapps you want distributable, by adding distributable/ in their
web.xml file --
If I understand it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264947#comment-13264947
]
Tom Burns commented on OFBIZ-4838:
--
OFBIZ-4838 Party Group Status Change.patch has been
Hi all,
At present, credit note is managed by Customer Return Invoice
(CUST_RTN_INVOICE) and generated by an order return process.
if I am not mistaken, I didn't found how to generate a Credit Note from
an existing invoice. Is Credit Note different than Customer Return or is
same notion (My
Nicolas,
The credit note is different to the Customer Return as it goes beyond just
the return of goods or the order return process. A credit note can also be
issued due to stating wrong prices on an invoice (as opposed to what has
been agreed upon in contracts). It might the result of a
You are right Scott, this can be improved...
Jacques
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
This is not a good implementation, simply searching the web.xml file for a string containing
distributable/ is not good
enough. It'll find the tag even if commented out and and won't find the tag
Ha yes, I already put a comment there and it's actually clear: you need to set
both to have a webapp distributable
ie
property name=apps-distributable value=true/
in ofbiz-container.catalina-container
AND
distributable/
in each webapp you want to distribute
Jacques
From: Pierre Smits
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-4813:
Mmm, there are conflicts, will see later...
ajax autocomplete and dialog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13265122#comment-13265122
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4813:
Ha sorry Yashwant, missed your patch
Thanks Jacopo!
--
Ashish
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
Today I have created the new release branch 12.04
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release12.04
this is the feature freeze release with latest features from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4813.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Release Branch 11.04
Thanks Yashwant,
Your A modified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13265152#comment-13265152
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4813 at 4/30/12 7:52 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4753.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of OFBIZ-4813
After session timeout, ajax
Nicolas Malin created OFBIZ-4848:
Summary: Create return invoice from invoice
Key: OFBIZ-4848
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4848
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-4848:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4848.patch
To test, search a sales or purchase invoice with a status differant
Le 30/04/2012 18:40, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Nicolas,
The credit note is different to the Customer Return as it goes beyond just
the return of goods or the order return process. A credit note can also be
issued due to stating wrong prices on an invoice (as opposed to what has
been agreed upon in
That's an understatement and could actually be said of every patch in jira,
shall we just go ahead and commit them all? We can improve them later right?
Reading an xml file character by character to find something is like driving in
a nail with the claw side of a hammer. It sort of works,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13265625#comment-13265625
]
yashwant dhakad commented on OFBIZ-4813:
Thanks Jacques.
ajax
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13265628#comment-13265628
]
yashwant dhakad commented on OFBIZ-4829:
Thanks Erwan.
Missing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13265632#comment-13265632
]
Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-4753:
-
Thanks Jacques. :)
After
54 matches
Mail list logo
