Just to clarify: I understand that this feature is useful for the portletWidget
implementation, but it is a *framework* feature that has to be
discussed/approved/committed to trunk before the portletWidget code can use it,
not vice versa.
Jacopo
On Nov 17, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Jacopo Cappellato
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499376#comment-13499376
]
Paul Piper commented on OFBIZ-5042:
---
I missed your point on Apache Extra. With the
Hi Jacopo,
I understand your formal concerns about being mixed with the branch and I agree
with you.
Apart that, I did not find anything against this patch
http://ofbiz.markmail.org/search/?q=OFBIZ-4949
Only Scoot's comment about using fieldName= which is cleary a less dangerous
but also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499377#comment-13499377
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5042:
Sure there is no hurry, but we need to
If you agree with me than let's commit to trunk first (if the objections from
committers are cleared, and I am not sure it is the case with Scott's one, even
if I didn't review this particular one) and remove it from the branch.
But most importantly: are we (and are you) sure that this was the
Before we get to discuss about moving components to Extras
Does someone envision to finish the last tasks
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4833 ?
1.. make sure they are listed properly in LICENSE (and if required NOTICE)
file
2.. make sure we are running stable versions and not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Foxworthy updated OFBIZ-4949:
--
Summary: Add a new attribute for entity-engine-xml tag,
set-other-fields-to-null= true, if it
Hi all,
I have no strong opinion on the change itself, which I suppose means I
haven't had a use case that would need it. But the commit change description
is misleading. In the Jira discussion for OFBIZ-4949 I proposed the name
set-other-fields-to-null instead of put-other-field-to-null, and
Thanks everyone,
I'm looking forward to working with everyone to make a better OFBiz.
Cheers
Paul Foxworthy
Erwan de FERRIERES-2 wrote
Welcome Paul !
2012/11/15 Jacopo Cappellato lt;
jacopo.cappellato@
gt;
Paul Foxworthy has accepted the invitation of the OFBiz PMC to become a
new
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
If you agree with me than let's commit to trunk first (if the objections from
committers are cleared, and I am not sure it is the case with Scott's one,
even if I didn't review this particular one) and remove it from the branch.
Yes, I
Thank you Paul.
After a cursory review I also see (in very few lines of the contribution):
* bad formatting
* a bad variable name (why _setOtherFieldsToNull rather than
setOtherFieldsToNull)
* I am also not sure I like the attribute name set-other-fields-to-null (that
is btw better than
Just reviewed (thought Erwan followed our code formatting convention)
I must say it's a matter to taste for variable names and formatting
But I agree:
* no underscore needed in front of variable name/s,
* Formatting was done to aligne expressions I guess. This is no recommended by
our (aging)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499415#comment-13499415
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4941:
Tom,
I'm still not quite sure what you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499415#comment-13499415
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4941 at 11/17/12 1:13 PM:
Hi All,
How do you interpret the point 2 at
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party ?
2. Do ensure that every third-party work includes its associated license, even
if that requires adding a copy of the license from the third-party download
site into the distribution.
Do you
All the licenses we distribute are actually copied in the LICENSE file.
Jacopo
On Nov 17, 2012, at 2:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi All,
How do you interpret the point 2 at
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party ?
2. Do ensure that every third-party work includes its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499441#comment-13499441
]
Tom Burns commented on OFBIZ-4941:
--
Jacques,
1. Sorry to confuse you with the term
Pfew, I like it's only that :o)
I thought it could be more tedious, it's not very clear there. They should say
it, like
even if that requires adding a copy of the license from the third-party
download site into the distribution (ie in the LICENSE file at root of the
project)
Jacques
From:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499442#comment-13499442
]
Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-4941:
-
Current implementation and proposed help system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499443#comment-13499443
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4941:
OK, no worries, Jacopo clarified: I will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499446#comment-13499446
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4941:
Thanks for feedback Anil,
Current
Anil,
...option of help documents being hosted outside of business application..
Have you looked at the other open source projects using webhelp?
I discussed other deployment options in the OFBiz Help Spec.pdf in the
helppdf.zip file attached to 4941.
Please see the following and let me know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499447#comment-13499447
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4941:
Tom,
I think you 3 points are clarified
Tom,
Please keep your comments inside the Jira
Thanks
Jacques
Tom Burns wrote:
Anil,
...option of help documents being hosted outside of business application..
Have you looked at the other open source projects using webhelp?
I discussed other deployment options in the OFBiz Help Spec.pdf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499451#comment-13499451
]
Tom Burns commented on OFBIZ-4941:
--
Anil,
...option of help documents being hosted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4941:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-4941.patch
Tom,
The last patch only included the catalog_en webapp and it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499536#comment-13499536
]
Tom Burns commented on OFBIZ-4941:
--
Jacques,
Testing using latest trunk -
1. Copied
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499554#comment-13499554
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4941:
Tom,
Saxon.jar and logo.gif missing, yes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499601#comment-13499601
]
Paul Foxworthy commented on OFBIZ-4949:
---
Hi all,
I think there's two fundamental
Hi Jacques and Jacopo,
Maybe set-absent-fields-to-null? Or even nullify-absent-fields?
I think the idea behind the option is that when you are first importing new
data, quite naturally all fields other than those specified in the file will
be null. If, however, you're updating existing data, you
I have downloaded the file from the mirrors and then run the tests again on it
and everything was fine; I am going to announce it at this point.
Thanks,
Jacopo
On Nov 16, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
We discussed it this morning with Christian. I believe it's the same with
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release Apache OFBiz
11.04.01.
Apache OFBiz is an open source enterprise automation software project (ERP,
CRM, E-Business / E-Commerce, MRP, SCM, CMMS/EAM...).
Apache OFBiz 11.04.01 is the first release of the 11.04 series and contains
Hi all,
now that all the steps needed to release the 11.04.01 release are completed, I
am providing a short summary of the OFBiz Release roadmap.
The last two months have been quite busy for the OFBiz project and we have been
able to release 3 (!!!) products:
Apache OFBiz 10.04.03 - bug fix
Try using ofbiz-base.jar instead of ofbiz.jar.
-Adrian
On 11/17/2012 5:05 PM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
Hello all,
I do have issues with this as follows:
After downloading the latest trunk for my monthly merge release I do find
issues with my tenant data sources as the framework complains,
34 matches
Mail list logo
