Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Gil, I see no problems with that, we can always revert the squashed commit in case of issue. It would be even better for backporting to 23.xx later... BTW, what about the plugins? Thanks Jacques Le 24/01/2023 à 11:17, gil.portenseigne a écrit : Hi, One concern I have is about pushing

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-24 Thread gil.portenseigne
Hi, One concern I have is about pushing codenarc work, should be it part of 23.xx branch ? I think that could be nice WDYT ? Gil On 24/01/23 10:03, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi All, > > How many time do you think we still need before deciding to release 22.01.01 > using JDK 17 and creating

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi All, How many time do you think we still need before deciding to release 22.01.01 using JDK 17 and creating the 23.xx branch? Jacques Le 24/01/2023 à 09:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Michael, It's done, but you can still amend it if you like Jacques Le 24/01/2023 à 09:50, Michael

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Michael, It's done, but you can still amend it if you like Jacques Le 24/01/2023 à 09:50, Michael Brohl a écrit : Hi Jacques, we are using Ubuntu for all our servers and I cannot confirm that. update-alternatives is used to generally set the envoronment to a specific JDK through

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-24 Thread Michael Brohl
Hi Jacques, we are using Ubuntu for all our servers and I cannot confirm that. update-alternatives is used to generally set the envoronment to a  specific JDK through JAVA_HOME. You can still set and thus override this environment variable in the shell session for the demo user. On our

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I just restarted the demos a last time to check all is correct after the commits. About SDKMAN, this link is useful: https://sdkman.io/usage Jacques Le 23/01/2023 à 17:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi, I got it to work, as often this was not as simple as expected, long story as short as

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, I got it to work, as often this was not as simple as expected, long story as short as possible. It was not possible to set java env vars (JAVA_HOME and PATH). Because The VM uses "Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS". Ubuntu by default uses update-java-alternatives to handle Java versions. We had only

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-20 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Michael, I'm sorry, somehow I missed your email. I can't give you access, that's Infra's privilege. We recently had a discussion with Daniel on Slack OFBiz channel about that, here is the relevant part copy

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-14 Thread Michael Brohl
Hi Jacques, I have no access to the server right now so I cannot see where the Java installations reside or which Linux distro we use. Can you give me access, preferably per ssh/public key to the machine? On Ubuntu and Mac, you just install the different JDK's beside each other and point to

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-13 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 13/01/2023 à 14:15, Michael Brohl a écrit : set JAVA_HOME to the right JDK in the OFBiz start/stop scripts Hi Michael, That's a good news, how would you do that? A patch at https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/tree/master/demo-backup would be welcome Thanks Jacques

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-13 Thread Michael Brohl
part to move forward. Thanks for the works ! Nicolas On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
! Nicolas On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen and Daniel are for. Daniel suggests that we can use

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-10 Thread Jacques Le Roux
! Nicolas On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen and Daniel are for. Daniel suggests that we can

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-09 Thread Michael Brohl
about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen and Daniel are for. Daniel suggests that we can use workarounds but need to later update OFBiz to handle strong encapsulation. Michael, I was surprised by your opinion, because

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-03 Thread Michael Brohl
realize any loading test. So no worries from my part to move forward. Thanks for the works ! Nicolas On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-03 Thread gil.portenseigne
ies from my part to move forward. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the works ! > > > > > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > > > > > > > On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > > > Hi Team, > > >

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen and Daniel are for. Daniel suggests that we can use workarounds but need to later update OFBiz to handle strong encapsulation. Michael, I

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux
icolas > > > > > > On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Hi Team, > >> > >> So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about > releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-1

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-03 Thread gil.portenseigne
t; Nicolas > > > > > > On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about > > > releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400)

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-02 Thread Ramesh Pillai
; > > process for ordering and invoicing during manual simulation. > > > > > > However, I didn't realize any loading test. > > > > > > So no worries from my part to move forward. > > > > > > Thanks for the works ! > > > >

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-02 Thread Ernest Hocking
icolas > > > > > > On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Hi Team, > >> > >> So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about > releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). > >> >

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2023-01-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux
19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen and Daniel are for. Daniel suggests that we can use workarounds but need

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-30 Thread Nicolas Malin
part to move forward. Thanks for the works ! Nicolas On 22/12/2022 19:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 25/12/2022 à 08:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Now about the demos and the BuildBot configuration, I'd like to avoid switching and renaming multiple times. What I suggest is to simply not run the next demo until a 23.xx branch is created

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
ons about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen and Daniel are for. Daniel suggests that we can use workarounds but need to later update OFBiz to handle strong encapsulation. Michael, I was surprised by your opinio

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-24 Thread Daniel Watford
ct to work on that next week. Please review and amend if necessary. > > Have a good weekend and, if you do, a merry Christmas. > > Jacques > > Le 22/12/2022 à 19:02, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > Hi Team, > > > > So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
crit : Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen and Daniel are for. Daniel suggests that we can use workarounds but need to later update OFBiz

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-23 Thread Michael Brohl
chael Am 22.12.22 um 19:02 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen and Daniel are for. Daniel suggests that

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
ing before releasing 22.01 with JDK 11. In my opinion, testing defines WHEN we can release 22.01 with JDK 17, not if. Michael Am 22.12.22 um 19:02 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-23 Thread Michael Brohl
, testing defines WHEN we can release 22.01 with JDK 17, not if. Michael Am 22.12.22 um 19:02 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael

Re: [OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 22/12/2022 à 19:02, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Michael, I was surprised by your opinion, because of https://markmail.org/message/fq3fpxeg5yfshjwz where you said 1 year ago:    <> Mmm, this is maybe unclear. It started from this Michael's comment in OFBIZ-12400: https://s.apache.org/25s0q

[OFBIZ-12400] Releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17

2022-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Team, So far, we have only Michael's, Eugen's and Daniel's opinions about releasing the 22.01.01 version under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17 (OFBIZ-12400). To summarize, Michael is against, Eugen and Daniel are for. Daniel suggests that we can use workarounds but need to later update OFBiz