Adrian,
the vote passed a few days ago and you should now have commit privileges
to the Webtools and Example components.
Jacopo
Adrian Crum wrote:
Now that this thread has made the rounds for a few weeks, can we get
back to the original subject? I need commit access to framework/webtools
? I need commit access to
framework/webtools and framework/example. Please.
:D
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
Ean Schuessler wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2007 07:23:36 pm David E Jones wrote:
As a committer, I would like to do more to get the patches in Jira
fed
into the project
I may be overstating matters and its certainly a matter of perception. I
suppose I may just be grumpy because no one paid any attention to my
ProductRole patch (OFBIZ-1177).
We have rolled out our own similar implementation and think it is common
requirement for products such as books
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Ean,
I agree that the branch-explore-prune strategy is wickedly rapid, for
quick prototyping and cultivation of best of breed directions.
With multiple official/public OFBiz branches, each branch can be more
specialized to cater more tightly to particular user
David E Jones wrote:
Then David or Undersun could oversee all the official branches, and
pick up best of breed ideas to be merged back into main OFBiz SVN.
Yes, they'll need more hires for this, possibly. And they are busy
enough already. Note that without this step, each fork will simply do
Now that this thread has made the rounds for a few weeks, can we get back to the original subject? I
need commit access to framework/webtools and framework/example. Please.
:D
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
Ean Schuessler wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2007 07:23:36 pm David E Jones wrote
The PMC vote for this is underway...
-David
Adrian Crum wrote:
Now that this thread has made the rounds for a few weeks, can we get
back to the original subject? I need commit access to framework/webtools
and framework/example. Please.
:D
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
Ean Schuessler
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 03:22:24 am David E Jones wrote:
Ummm... not sure where this idea came from...
Neither David nor Undersun (now part of Hotwax Media) nor any other
person or organization are some central source of resources or driving
force for the project. OFBiz is overseen by a
Ean Schuessler wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 03:22:24 am David E Jones wrote:
Ummm... not sure where this idea came from...
Neither David nor Undersun (now part of Hotwax Media) nor any other
person or organization are some central source of resources or driving
force for the project.
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 06:23:36 pm David E Jones wrote:
Now who's being defensive? ;) And what I wrote wasn't even a reply to your
email...
Whatever the case, I stated the lie and then said it was such, I wasn't
quoting from anyone, though I think the reply was to Jonathon and we have a
Ean Schuessler wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 06:23:36 pm David E Jones wrote:
Now who's being defensive? ;) And what I wrote wasn't even a reply to your
email...
Whatever the case, I stated the lie and then said it was such, I wasn't
quoting from anyone, though I think the reply was to
Whatever the case, I stated the lie and then said it was such, I wasn't
quoting from anyone, though I think the reply was to Jonathon and we
have a nice long history and being harsh with each other (again ;) ).
Discussions! Those were discussions! We need brutally honest discussions. That, or
On Friday 31 August 2007 09:56:19 am Adrian Crum wrote:
No I haven't.
Define rouge committless forks please.
I mean forks in the tradition of the Linux kernel. GIT was designed around a
development model where there are many paths of simultaneous development
going on, each with their own
Ean,
Thank you for the explanation.
Where I work there would be no need to create/maintain a separate fork. I have a few enhancements to
OFBiz that I maintain for my employer - I'm not the type of developer who would create a cottage
business based on OFBiz.
I was given commit priviledge to
On Monday 10 September 2007 03:40:59 pm David E Jones wrote:
This seems different from what you described above with the Linux kernel...
but I'm interested to hear more of how you think that would work
independent of what is going on with OFBiz and OFBiz derivatives right now.
The way I look
Ean Schuessler wrote:
I may be overstating matters and its certainly a matter of perception. I
suppose I may just be grumpy because no one paid any attention to my
ProductRole patch (OFBIZ-1177).
I hadn't noticed that Jira issue before, but it's something I would very much like to take a look
Adrian Crum wrote:
Ean Schuessler wrote:
I may be overstating matters and its certainly a matter of perception.
I suppose I may just be grumpy because no one paid any attention to my
ProductRole patch (OFBIZ-1177).
I hadn't noticed that Jira issue before, but it's something I would very
to be
patient.
Be patient... or do something about it!
Like Adrian did...
I believe Adam had commit access at one time but no longer does. Do something
about it!
:-D
touché.
It would be great to have Adam involved again, and his contributions from
before really made a difference
Hi Ean,
De : Ean Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 10 September 2007 03:40:59 pm David E Jones wrote:
This seems different from what you described above with the Linux kernel...
but I'm interested to hear more of how you think that would work
independent of what is going on with
On Monday 27 August 2007 10:28:39 am Adrian Crum wrote:
Could I be given commit access to framework/webtools please? I'd like to
continue working on the UI in that component.
We were playing with SVK to manage rouge committless forks of OFBiz but are
starting to lean towards GIT because
No I haven't.
Define rouge committless forks please.
Ean Schuessler wrote:
On Monday 27 August 2007 10:28:39 am Adrian Crum wrote:
Could I be given commit access to framework/webtools please? I'd like to
continue working on the UI in that component.
We were playing with SVK to manage
21 matches
Mail list logo
