From: "Shi Yusen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jacques,
I think keeping Shark will let the users upgrade from some old version
safely and easily. Besides, workflow is a key point for some users to
consider OFBiz.
Yes sure.
On the LDAP component with SSO, I think it'll be better to wait more
feedbacks
Jacques,
I think keeping Shark will let the users upgrade from some old version
safely and easily. Besides, workflow is a key point for some users to
consider OFBiz.
On the LDAP component with SSO, I think it'll be better to wait more
feedbacks on it especially the author(s) of check509CertLogin
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sep 6, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, do not remove the shark component. That isn't a commit-then-
review sort of thing, and in fact I'd say we should have a vote in
order to decide to remo
On Sep 6, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, do not remove the shark component. That isn't a commit-then-
review sort of thing, and in fact I'd say we should have a vote in
order to decide to remove it or not.
OK, I personnlly don't nee
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, do not remove the shark component. That isn't a commit-then-review
sort of thing, and in fact I'd say we should have a vote in order to
decide to remove it or not.
OK, I personnlly don't need a vote. If you think we should keep it, it's fine
wit
No, do not remove the shark component. That isn't a commit-then-review
sort of thing, and in fact I'd say we should have a vote in order to
decide to remove it or not.
As for the LDAP component... could you be more specific? I'm not aware
of any separate component for LDAP, and really it
From: "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You will know as soon as you create a Jira :P
I think seeing work flow in graphics is a good task
I saw your query on ULM and was wonder if you were going to try to map
it to do what shark does.
Being LGPL license dose make make it hard if it is not gong to
You will know as soon as you create a Jira :P
I think seeing work flow in graphics is a good task
I saw your query on ULM and was wonder if you were going to try to map
it to do what shark does.
Being LGPL license dose make make it hard if it is not gong to be
supported.
Jacques Le Roux sent the
Nobody interested of does this mean that I can go ahead ?
Ahead : remove Shark, install LDAP as a framework component
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Despite of the efforts I put in it 2 years ago, I'm wondering if we should not throw away Shark. It's not supported anymore an
Despite of the efforts I put in it 2 years ago, I'm wondering if we should not throw away Shark. It's not supported anymore and
there are any real use of it in OFBiz since ECA are used instead. It looks really like a dead end.
LDAP is proposed as a specialpurpose applications in https://issues.apa
10 matches
Mail list logo
