Re:
concurrent, parallel loading stuff
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 25, 2010, 4:27 PM
BJ Freeman wrote:
thanks have updated the thread on user ML
I'm debating whether to roll back my change; granted, that is what
caused this ofbiz bug. However, there's nothing that says we
I've got a change to ofbiz startup to make loading of the webapps run
in parallel. Unfortunately, it's been taking me longer than I'd like
to get working completely.
Catalina itself is single-threaded when loading the webapps attached
to a particular host. That fix required me initializing the
I am sure you know why but would you enlighten us as to why this is
necessary.
Does it break using ofbiz with external tomcat?
Adam Heath sent the following on 6/25/2010 11:20 AM:
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
BJ Freeman wrote:
I am sure you know why but would you enlighten us as to why this is
necessary.
Does it break using ofbiz with external tomcat?
Because it makes startup faster.
I did no changes to tomcat, and can't say whether the stuff I've done
will work with anything other than the
what is your target for start up.
I am less than one minute on mine.
Not sure breaking an established convention without discussion is a good
idea.
are you willing to go through all the test and change documentation?
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic
, parallel loading stuff
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 25, 2010, 11:51 AM
BJ Freeman wrote:
I am sure you know why but would you enlighten
us as to why this is
necessary.
Does it break using ofbiz with external tomcat?
Because it makes startup faster.
I did no changes
BJ Freeman wrote:
what is your target for start up.
I am less than one minute on mine.
Not sure breaking an established convention without discussion is a good
idea.
are you willing to go through all the test and change documentation?
documentation change - none. It just works
Adrian Crum wrote:
2010-06-25 12:32:26,939 (main) [ContainerLoader.java:50 :INFO ] [Startup]
Loading containers...
...
2010-06-25 12:32:54,251 (main) [ BeanShellContainer.java:102:INFO ] NOTICE:
BeanShell service ports are not secure. Please protect the ports
2010-06-25
Understood. Thanks.
-Adrian
--- On Fri, 6/25/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
Subject: Re: concurrent, parallel loading stuff
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 25, 2010, 12:50 PM
Adrian Crum wrote:
2010-06-25 12:32:26,939 (main
not saying it is you but currently the svn is broken.
it looks like library
how did this get through the testing that buildbot does.
if your code does not break the ability to use external tomcat. then I
agree no documentation.
how ever if your testing shows it does then the documentation that
BJ Freeman wrote:
not saying it is you but currently the svn is broken.
it looks like library
how did this get through the testing that buildbot does.
if your code does not break the ability to use external tomcat. then I
agree no documentation.
how ever if your testing shows it does then
as i said don't believe it is you.
however from my email on the user ML
LimitedSubContentCacheTransform.java has not been touched since the 4th.
here is the log from the site
--
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
BJ Freeman wrote:
as i said don't believe it is you.
however from my email on the user ML
LimitedSubContentCacheTransform.java has not been touched since the 4th.
here is the log from the site
--
http://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/
:ERROR MESSAGE:
org.ofbiz.widget.screen.ScreenRenderException: Error rendering
screen [component://ecommerce/widget/ContentScreens.xml#factoids]:
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException (null)
as reported on the user ML
BJ Freeman wrote:
I check the ofbiz code files for any changes since last week and now. I
did not see any.
I have a trunk version that does not have this error from last week.
I've got it isolated, but not fixed. FastList is not functioning the
same as ArrayList, and it's got me purplexed.
Adam Heath wrote:
BJ Freeman wrote:
I check the ofbiz code files for any changes since last week and now. I
did not see any.
I have a trunk version that does not have this error from last week.
I've got it isolated, but not fixed. FastList is not functioning the
same as ArrayList, and
that is about what I expected
thanks for finding it.
what caused it though.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com
Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
BJ Freeman wrote:
I check the ofbiz code files for any changes since last week and now. I
did not see any.
I have a trunk version that does not have this error from last week.
I've got it isolated, but not fixed. FastList is not functioning the
same as
BJ Freeman wrote:
that is about what I expected
thanks for finding it.
what caused it though.
956470, which is something I did. But I wouldn't expect that FastList
would not obey the List.subList contract, specifically that the
returned list supports the same set of optional methods as the
thanks have updated the thread on user ML
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator--
Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
BJ Freeman wrote:
I check the ofbiz code files for any changes since last week and now. I
did not see any.
I have a trunk version that does not have this error from last week.
I've got it isolated, but not fixed. FastList is not
BJ Freeman wrote:
thanks have updated the thread on user ML
I'm debating whether to roll back my change; granted, that is what
caused this ofbiz bug. However, there's nothing that says we couldn't
have the same problem occur with other uses of FastList.subList.add().
highest priority is ofbiz is stable.
second priority is consistency in code.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com
23 matches
Mail list logo
