I have posted our problem in StackOverflow, but haven't got any answer:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13289994/jpa-2-0-junit-openejb-createentitymanager-noinitialcontextexception
Shall I re-post it here, or is this enough?
Regards
Sveinung Rekaa
System developer
EVRY Grenland
--
View
Hi,
Arquillian is definitely something you could try, but after we get that
issue fixed maybe. We have a great integration with OpenEJB of course but
also with TomEE.
Anyway, we have a sample in trunk using Eclipselink with OpenEJB. Could you
give it a try or provide us with a simple example to
Hi Mohammad,
i think TomEE just starts to be a bit known so i don't think we can
(should) change this name even if you are right.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn:
Agree with Romain,
There is some buzz around TomEE and I'm afraid that changing the name
changes this advertising ;)
Regards
JB
On 11/13/2012 11:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi Mohammad,
i think TomEE just starts to be a bit known so i don't think we can
(should) change this name even
I agree with Romain : I work in a major software company, about to release
products with dependency on Tomcat replaced by TomEE.
It would be annoying to change the prerequisite name at the last minute.
If the name changes, then please consider a deprecation period during
which both TomEE and
Hi Mohammed,
Changing the name is not really appropriate for the different reasons that
JB, Romain have discussed. Moreover and even if JavaEE 7 is more focused on
Java Bean development simplification, EE is not only focused on JavaBean
and cover a lot of others Java Specs (not related) -- CDI,
The discussion thread is pretty accurate actually.
Regarding the name, TomEE seems to be definietly the name we wanna keep.
But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP
at Apache?
That's the question I guess, and I'm for it.
JLouis
2012/11/13 Mohammad Nour
Hi :)
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Charles Moulliard ch0...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Mohammed,
Changing the name is not really appropriate for the different reasons that
JB, Romain have discussed. Moreover and even if JavaEE 7 is more focused on
Java Bean development simplification, EE is
[joke not accurate]
i like E3 (or E^3) -- EfficientEE
[/joke]
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
The discussion thread is pretty accurate actually.
Regarding the name, TomEE seems to be definietly the name we wanna keep.
But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP
at Apache?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.comwrote:
I agree with Jean-Louis' proposal to make TLP's name official site naming
consistent with TomEE or *whatevername*.
joke
I dislike BeansEE proposal, because it too easy to joke about it: think
about how Bug BeansEE
I agree. I don't think we should rename TomEE - its well known and renaming
has the potential to cause confusion.
I do think, however, that changing TomEE to be the top level project, with
OpenEJB as the subproject makes sense.
Jon
On Nov 13, 2012 10:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the
discussion on how we want to identify ourselves as a TLP.
There have been concerns raised on how we identify to the public in terms of
our primary identity -- the website says TomEE in letters as big as my hand
was one
On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP
at Apache?
Exactly. That's the ultimate subject I wanted to bring up, but wanted to give
Mohammad the chance to raise his concerns about
+1. I definitely agree with that. TomEE seems to be the main project
project now and identifying it as the top level project makes sense to me.
Jon
On Nov 13, 2012 3:05 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the
+1 on the idea but Romain pointed to a main point which is the technical
implications when it comes to stg like module names and package names, etc
I would say core code should still be openejb and code solely related to
tomee should be renamed
another point that is raised on the other thread of
tveronezi jlmonteiro, rmannibucau: can you guys check if I did it right?
[]s,
Thiago.
-- Forwarded message --
From: tveron...@apache.org
Date: Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:59 PM
Subject: svn commit: r1408860 - in /openejb/trunk/openejb: ./
tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/webapp/
It shouldnt need any commit on trunk for me...
Le 13 nov. 2012 19:12, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org a écrit :
+1 on the idea but Romain pointed to a main point which is the technical
implications when it comes to stg like module names and package names, etc
I would say core code
I don't think any modules need changing as they stand at the moment as the
core code is clearly labelled as openejb, and TomEE specific code sits
within a TomEE module.
I guess the top level svn URL may change, but that should only need an 'svn
switch' if that's the case.
I think renaming the
Yep,
Think the first step is renaming the project then well see for the trunk
(think we should just be under trunk then keep what we have)
Le 13 nov. 2012 19:40, Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
a écrit :
I don't think any modules need changing as they stand at the moment as the
Hi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Yep,
Think the first step is renaming the project then well see for the trunk
(think we should just be under trunk then keep what we have)
Le 13 nov. 2012 19:40, Jonathan Gallimore
Hi folks!
A quick note about getting tomee a bit faster in big real world scenarios.
Tomcat 7.0.23 introduced a parallel start feature.
Please change to the following in your conf/server.xml:
Host name=localhost appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true
What about having 2 TLPs?
Actually OpenEJB is still very valuable as own standalone project.
So I'd rather go for having TomEE AND OpenEJB as TLPs.
It is already pretty much separated from the build structure.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins
Hi Mark,
That's nice! Thanks for the tip!
Jon
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
A quick note about getting tomee a bit faster in big real world scenarios.
Tomcat 7.0.23 introduced a parallel start feature.
Please change to the following in
Hmm,
If people on both projects are the same not sure it makes so much
sense...and tomee code is really really small and doesnt do enough work to
let it be another project IMO (in fact it only does integration so fixes
are mainly in openejb)
Wdyt?
Le 13 nov. 2012 23:45, Mark Struberg
25 matches
Mail list logo
