On Sep 17, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Andy wrote:
The question is, how happy are you for commiters (I guess I mean me, but also
anyone interested) to try and clean up some of these issues in trunk? - Or
would a pure Java 1.6 branch be the safer option, at least until wide ranging
changes are
On Sep 17, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hi;
I am looking the ManagedBean implementation. I think that currently it does
not
support the injection of managed beans via @Resource? Is it correct or I am
wrong?
I don't think that's in there yet, but referring to them via @EJB
On Aug 22, 2010, at 5:17 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 22, 2010, at 4:29 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 22, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:23 PM, David Blevins
david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
On Aug 22, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
I
On Sep 16, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Andy wrote:
On 16.09.2010 14:20, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi David,
I checked with OpenJPA guys and this feature has been disabled.
Have a look here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-651
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-651
But,
On Sep 2, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
On 09/02/2010 05:08 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Since the little refactoring we did to add AppContext, ModuleContext and
MethodContext I've been dying to rename CoreDeploymentInfo to a simpler
BeanContext. So that would give us a cleaner
On Sep 3, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Perhaps the thing would be to split the CDI TCK into a separate module that
way it could be run using TestNG leaving the other tests as is on JUnit
It's looking like that might be the only option. Very silly as it would be
nice to be able
On Sep 2, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:52 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
Right, a n...@startup bean is a lazy reference that will be initialized on
first use using the same code you have in that block. We can certainly have
an option
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi All,
Just to let you know I spotted a few test failures when running the itests
against Tomcat. I've added a module assembly/itest-runner which uses Groovy
to start the Tomcat bundle and run the itests. It still needs a bit of work,
On Aug 27, 2010, at 2:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 26, 2010, at 10:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Thiago, Andy,
Need you to send me some info for your account request. First and second
choice of user id, name as it appears on your CLA and email address where
your use
Since the little refactoring we did to add AppContext, ModuleContext and
MethodContext I've been dying to rename CoreDeploymentInfo to a simpler
BeanContext. So that would give us a cleaner:
AppContext
\-- ModuleContext
\--BeanContext
\--MethodContext
At the same time
invocation, it is
a bitter annoying.
Thanks !
2010/7/22 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jul 21, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Ivan wrote:
Or maybe we could have a reference in the ThreadContext for the next
ThreadContext in the invocation chain ?
Hmm. Maybe we just go simple and hook
On Aug 31, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi all,
I ran into a problem with @Startup singletons with circular
dependencies. I tried to explain the problem in OPENEJB-1348. I also
attached a proposed patch for this problem that involves splitting
some of the Container.deploy() logic
On Sep 1, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:11 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
Note the 'initializeDependencies' method of the SingletonInstanceManager
shouldn't be necessary. The CheckDependsOn validation code should pick up
that scenario
On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:39 AM, ga...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gawor
Date: Wed Sep 1 18:39:54 2010
New Revision: 991646
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=991646view=rev
Log:
add explicit type on @Key annotations since there is no default value now
Sorry :) Didn't mean to check that
Running into this strange error and wondering if anyone has ever seen anything
like it.
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:31 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hello guys,
Just want to get your opinion about our jcdi branch.
Is it still relevant to keep this branch?
The trunk is now fully Java EE 6 oriented.
I read some discussion
On Aug 28, 2010, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Ideally, we could get some consistently functioning code for method/class
applicable metadata and funnel all these sources through it. The
TransactionAttribute processing code is abstracted to support additional
kinds of metadata
On Aug 3, 2010, at 10:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 3, 2010, at 1:16 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 5:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm taking a look at implementing the ejb 3.1 jndi support for
global/app/module contexts and binding ejbs in at standard names. I think
Heads up to the group that I had to make a backwards incompatible change to the
interface processing.
Specifically some interfaces that were previously treated implicitly as @Local
now will need the @Local annotation. I hope we can add a backwards compatible
flag before we release -- easy
On Aug 29, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Thanks Ivan. This seems really nice.
Does anybody mind if I update our poms to point to geronimo-tomcat ?
Note that the source is modified[1] so it won't help you if you're remote
debugging a standalone tomcat server.
-David
[1]
On Aug 27, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Just wanted to double check that the @AccessTimeout annotations are
supposed to be processed in exactly the same way as the @Lock
annotations. The spec does talk about how the @Lock annotations are
supposed to be processed but doesn't say much
On Aug 26, 2010, at 10:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Thiago, Andy,
Need you to send me some info for your account request. First and second
choice of user id, name as it appears on your CLA and email address where
your use...@apache.org email will be forwarded. You can send me the info
Vote passes with 10 +1s and no other votes.
+1s:
Daniel Haischt
David Blevins
David Jencks
Jarek Gawor
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Jeff Genender
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Malhi
Kevan Miller
Mohammad Nour El-Din
We'll need to get a CLA on file for you before I can request the user account.
If you can
Vote passes with 10 +1s and no other votes.
+1s:
Daniel Haischt
David Blevins
David Jencks
Jarek Gawor
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Jeff Genender
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Malhi
Kevan Miller
Mohammad Nour El-Din
You're already setup as a Geronimo committer, so I should be able to get you
access today
Vote passes with 10 +1s and no other votes.
+1s:
Daniel Haischt
David Blevins
David Jencks
Jarek Gawor
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Jeff Genender
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Malhi
Kevan Miller
Mohammad Nour El-Din
See my note to Thiago, we'll need to get a CLA for you as well so we can get
the account
On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:53 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
+1
It'd be great but I don't know if David got rid of all pending issues.
We're good on the stats and garbage collection features.
Now that I recall there was one tweak I wanted to make to a stat that can show
up as a negative
Tried to update us to the Connector 1.6 API classes. Looks like we need some
MDB related updates.
If anyone has time to take a look, great :)
-David
On Aug 24, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
Hi
If there is no other people volunteer, I'd like to help looking into
this, not that I know connector 1.6 API well. :)
Could you tell me which branch or trunk this work should go into?
Hi Lin!
Right in trunk/openejb3 is good. Hopefully
On Aug 23, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Committed a small fix in revision 988313 that seems to work for me.
Let me know if that seems ok to you too.
That's good enough for now. Tweaked it a bit more so that not supplying
APP_NAME results in the module being counted as a standalone
Vote passes with 8 +1 votes and no other votes:
+1s:
Alan D. Cabrera
Daniel Haischt
David Blevins
David Jencks
Jeff Genender
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Malhi
Mohammad Nour El-Din
-David
Been out there for a while. Going to launch off some vote threads.
-David
On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
We have some wonderful contributors that have been active for a while we
should consider converting into committers.
Andy: You've been a constant source
Subject says it all :)
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
welcome to vote.
Here's my +1
-David
Subject says it all :)
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
welcome to vote.
Here's my +1
-David
On Aug 19, 2010, at 12:28 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Thanks for pointing that.
David did some changes yesterday. May be it's related with that post.
Yep. Checked in a change about an hour ago that switches the threads to
daemons.
Thanks, Gurkan!
-David
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hello guys,
Just want to get your opinion about our jcdi branch.
Is it still relevant to keep this branch?
The trunk is now fully Java EE 6 oriented.
I read some discussion (between David, Jacek, ...) about the next generation
On Jul 29, 2010, at 2:43 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi all,
Holidays are going to start tomorrow for me ;-)
I will go to Portugal (near Porto) during the next 2 weeks.
I plan to meet at least one other Apache member in Porto.
So if someone wants to join us, it'd be great.
Great. I'll start a vote.
On Jul 26, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
kevan wrote:
On Jul 23, 2010, at 10:26 PM, David Blevins wrote:
We've been pretty tight on our last couple votes in terms of legal
coverage. We have some new votes coming up and we'll probably
Per the More oversight discussion:
http://s.apache.org/uc0
Here's the vote for adding Jean-Louis Monteiro to the PMC so he can assist in
providing legal oversight for the project.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENEJB/Management+and+Voting
Vote will be open for at least 72
Per the More oversight discussion:
http://s.apache.org/uc0
Here's the vote for adding Kevan Miller to the PMC so he can assist in
providing legal oversight for the project.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENEJB/Management+and+Voting
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours --
On Jul 14, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi, David:
I am thinking that since the persistent support is not included in the
web profile, maybe I could try to work on those features belong to EJB 3.1
Lite. Not sure how many features have been covered, hope to get some
comments from you.
We have some wonderful contributors that have been active for a while we should
consider converting into committers.
Andy: You've been a constant source of ActiveMQ and resource adapter goodness
since January. It's always great to have users who are willing to give back.
Thiago: You've
On Jul 29, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi David,
Are you happy for me to have a go at sorting this or are you looking at it?
Go for it.
Haven't looked into it, figured you'd want first crack at it :)
-David
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Blevins david.blev
On Jul 15, 2010, at 9:31 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 11, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hello folks;
As of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1197, I have implemented
initial version of the integration between OpenEJB and OpenWebBeans. This
code
in the
RpcContainer which accepts a preconstruct ThreadContext.
Do you have any better idea ? Thanks !
2010/7/16 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi, seems that there are still some work required for the Asynchronous
support.
If no one had
On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:37 AM, jlmonte...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jlmonteiro
Date: Thu Jul 15 09:37:38 2010
New Revision: 964353
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964353view=rev
Log:
OPENEJB-1305: patch from Andy. Hook standalone shutdown process.
Cool patch! Thanks Andy
On Jun 4, 2010, at 1:33 AM, Andy wrote:
On 27.05.2010 18:54, David Blevins wrote:
On a very related note, we've got this ant script that we've been using at
release time to download zips, start the standalone server, deploys and runs
the itests app then shuts it down again.
http
On Jul 11, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hello folks;
As of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1197, I have implemented
initial version of the integration between OpenEJB and OpenWebBeans. This
code
is not perfect but at least we could discuss based on it
nice comments above them,
like fail() or warn(). This gives a good idea to the test author whether to
test for a warning or failure. Please try and make sure if you add keys to
this file, also supplement the keys with the little comment.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, David Blevins
. Once those changes are completed I would like to move onto
being able to specifying the threading for the container, as it is
currently
hard-coded (min=1,max=20).
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:50 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
wrote:
Matthew,
Finally got a chance to get OPENEJB
for it if possible. Fine to comment it out with a TODO in the meantime.
-David
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:23 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 5:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I think that particular one's xml element/jee tree class got renamed
features. About the
persistent support, as you mentioned, it is not of high priority, I will
check whether we could take advantage of Quartz.
Thanks !
2010/7/8 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jul 7, 2010, at 6:18 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi, David:
Thanks for the info. Currently
On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
We really should have 100% coverage. If there is a message key for it in
../config/rules/Messages.properties, than there really should be a test for
that scenario.
Basically, we need to go through this list and make sure there are tests
On Jul 10, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Jacek,
Thank you and I promise to be as nice as I can possibly be :)
You're gonna have to do a lot better than that. [sorry, couldn't resist ;-P]
-David
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Jacek Laskowski
ja...@laskowski.net.plwrote:
On
On Jul 8, 2010, at 6:20 PM, David Blevins wrote:
The only way to fix that issue is to make the sorting done in References
stable, so it only makes changes in order necessary to enforce the references.
Tricky bit of work indeed. I added a couple test cases to ReferencesTest
On Jul 2, 2010, at 3:01 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 25, 2010, at 2:14 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok. Think I'm totally done with all our new fancy stateless pooling options.
Not quite :)
# [...] Pool shrinking is achived through SoftReferences
# and natural vm garbage collection
On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:18 AM, viola.lu wrote:
For accessTimeouts test, there will be an accesstimeout exception if
invocation against a full pool:
javax.ejb.ConcurrentAccessTimeoutException: No instances available in
Stateless Session Bean pool. Waited 1 MILLISECONDS.
For idletimouts test, i
] at
org.apache.openejb.core.singleton.SingletonInstanceManager.createInstance(SingletonInstanceManager.java:171)
[exec] ... 30 more
.
.
.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:34 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
On Jun 24, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
Hi, devs!
Im still alive... Im
Hi Viola,
On Jul 5, 2010, at 6:00 PM, viola.lu wrote:
I already provided a patch for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1303, seems feed won't catch
thi update, can you help review it?
Looks like a great start! Went ahead and applied it. Thank you!
And there is a problem here,
On Jul 6, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
IIRC, last time I looked there was a minor (I hope) TCK issue which was going
to need to be resolved. I hadn't looked in any detail...
I know there was a override failure which Shawn just fixed (thanks again,
Shawn!).
Not sure if there is
On Jun 24, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
Hi, devs!
Im still alive... Im just having a good rush at work these days. Anyways, I
just found an opportunity to contribute for both projects. :O)
:)
I've opened and fixed the following issue:
Mostly directed at David Jencks.
So if I had to upgrade a 1.0 ra.xml to a 1.5 or 1.6 ra.xml, what is required?
Is it possible to simply translate the xml to the newer style or is there no
real lineup?
-David
of JAXB
limitation that requires us to override that one method?
-David
On Jul 6, 2010, at 2:43 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Mostly directed at David Jencks.
So if I had to upgrade a 1.0 ra.xml to a 1.5 or 1.6 ra.xml, what is
required? Is it possible to simply translate the xml to the newer
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Openejb trunk now reads both 1.0 and 1/5/1.6 ra.xml's so I'm not sure why
you would need to upgrade.
However, if you do. you can
On Jul 6, 2010, at 4:59 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 4:33 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Openejb trunk now reads both 1.0
On Mar 25, 2010, at 2:14 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok. Think I'm totally done with all our new fancy stateless pooling options.
Not quite :)
# [...] Pool shrinking is achived through SoftReferences
# and natural vm garbage collection. All but the minimum are allowed
# to be garbage
Picking this back up (see the question on the user list as to when 3.1.3 will
be released).
Here's what I would like to get in before shipping 3.1.3 (post your list, if
any):
- The garbage collection related pooling features
- JMX/Stats test coverage
And of course a clean TCK run.
On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
I gave a wrong ejb class name in the ejb-class element, was hoping to get
a ValidationFailedException. However, Validation was never even invoked and
the AppModulePreProcessor (which is higher up in the chain) threw an
OpenEJBException.
*Here
Hi Viola!
On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:09 PM, viola.lu wrote:
Hi, david:
i have some questions about attributes usage: PoolVersion, Flushed, Sweeps,
and GarbageCollected, these attributes are used under what kinds of
condition?Thanks in advance!
GarbageCollected is untestable as it will basically
On Jun 25, 2010, at 8:00 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Thanks! fixed in rev 958001
sorry
Just did the same yesterday
Once again I ask myself why-oh-why does svn not have an svn-aware patch
command! I guess that's why people like Git.
-David
On Jun 25, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Thiago
Hi Andy,
Hope your vacation was good :)
On May 28, 2010, at 1:01 AM, Andy wrote:
A 'temp' directory issue patch is here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1285
The patch code (v2) has been tested over this week and has definitely
resolved the issue - only the contents of 'temp'
Hi Shawn!
Missed this patch in JIRA. Feel free to post anytime you have a patch for
review.
On Jun 13, 2010, at 12:22 AM, Shawn Jiang (JIRA) wrote:
callback method search is not considering the overriding rule.
--
One thing that's become clear in digging around in @Inject (330) and CDI(299)
lands is that it that our CoreDeploymentInfo object is just too large and
unwieldy.
This is not really a surprise, but looking at it with fresh eyes I can see how
refactoring it a bit is going to make a few things
:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/EJB-3-1-Schedule-support-td988002.html
This was all before the EJB 3.1 spec closed and things did change somewhat in
the final version, so be on the lookout for old code :)
On Oct 31, 2008, at 12:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Anyway, I wrapped up
On Jun 23, 2010, at 7:58 PM, viola.lu (JIRA) wrote:
Hi, david: i have one question about this test case: currently, it just
listed all mbean attributes/operations information.
But i should get its all attributes value, so i have to connect to a jmx
connector server which has a jmxurl(such
On Jun 23, 2010, at 8:33 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jun 23, 2010, at 7:58 PM, viola.lu (JIRA) wrote:
Hi, david: i have one question about this test case: currently, it just
listed all mbean attributes/operations information.
But i should get its all attributes value, so i have
As mentioned in the JCDI Sandbox discussion, one of the things that is part
of EJB that is not necessarily configurable is if a bean should be discarded if
a system exception is thrown. As of EJB 3.0 the @ApplicationException can flag
certain exceptions as not causing the bean to be discarded
On Jun 17, 2010, at 4:14 PM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
Author: djencks
Date: Thu Jun 17 23:14:34 2010
New Revision: 955781
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=955781view=rev
Log:
OPENEJB-1298 half of some more case-change renames
Added:
On Jun 13, 2010, at 12:47 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:15 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
A much larger vision is that I'd really love to take EJB and break it up
into tiny little pieces. It's difficult to describe without writing a big
manifesto
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:03 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
While working with AroundTimeout implementation, I found that OpenEJB
treats it as a normal business method, and in EJBTimerServiceImpl, I can see
some codes like :
---
try {
RpcContainer container = (RpcContainer)
On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:43 PM, David Blevins wrote:
If I understand correctly, then right on all points.
To recap for possible doc benefit, sounds like this is the setup.
client - server1 - server2 - server3
That should definitely
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:51 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jun 11, 2010, at 3:22 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:44 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
wrote:
I'd like to experiment with integrating JCDI much deeper into the core code.
Would you share what
On Jun 10, 2010, at 2:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Ivan Xu wrote:
Do OpenEJB 3.1.* has the minium JRE version of 1.6 ? If not, I guess we
could not use TimeUnit.MINUTES, it only exists in JDK 1.6.
Thanks !
Absolutely!
3.1.x -- Java EE 5
3.2.x -- Java EE 6
Can you fill a JIRA
On Jun 9, 2010, at 10:29 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
mvn clean install -DskipTests
is shorter to type
Cool, I didn't even know that was an option. Thanks!
-David
In case you missed this one:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=953196
See the commit message for the motivation of expanding the @DependsOn usage.
Tempted to start a page for documenting OpenEJB EJB enhancements to track
this stuff.
-David
On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
Thanks, David!
I'm pretty excited: My first apache code has been committed! :O)
I updated my code for the OPENEJB-1099 using your changes. A new Patch is
available...
It's basically as simple as this:
http://markmail.org/message/amwz73mzqvdtzzjx
More or less just:
- add the property to the service-jar.xml
- add setter to factory class listed in service-jar.xml
- ensure there is a java.beans.PropertyEditor for the injected type
- add property to the
On Jun 9, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi, David :
Seems that we could do the samething for AroundTimeout, if no one has
begun the work, could you assign the JIRA OpenEJB-1172 to me ? I could like
to work on it.
Excellent, will assign that one to you!
Thanks for the validation patch!
On Jun 5, 2010, at 4:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I just did some work in the validation area and it occurs to me how much
work has yet to be done. It is definitely one of our most critical features
that users go ooh and ahh over
On Jun 6, 2010, at 7:42 PM, viola.lu wrote:
Thanks so much. Got it.
You're welcome! Mailing list questions are the primary source of
documentation. So it's actually very helpful.
Thanks!
-David
On Jun 7, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Ivan wrote:
JndiNameTest unit test seems to fail, the configured
SystemInstance.get().setProperty(openejb.geronimo,true); prevents the
JaccPermission building work.
Thanks! Not sure why this property didn't prevent the test from passing
before. Went a head and
On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Ivan wrote:
Thanks for the comment, I attach another patch to the JIRA, if any problem,
please let me know :-)
Wow. Wonderful patch, Ivan! Doesn't really get any better than that :) Very
thorough test case as well.
I closed these JIRAs and marked them
On Jun 7, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Ivan wrote:
I have finished most of the codes, but after I modeled all the session
synchronization callbacks in the interceptor datas, even the methods from
the bean class itself, some new questions are coming :-(
That frowny-face should be a smiley-face, I love
On Jun 6, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Could anyone help push a new snapshot to the repo ?Geronimo 2.2 branch
can't start without the new open ejb snapshot including this jira.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Will you push a new
setup
;-)
-David
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:35 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
On Jun 6, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Will you try writing the ICFB in Geronimo ? This problem is still a
blocker
for geronimo 221 release.
Or can we revert this change until
On Jun 6, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Will you try writing the ICFB in Geronimo ? This problem is still a blocker
for geronimo 221 release.
Or can we revert this change until geronimo 221 is released ?
Hi Shawn!
That change was reverted Friday, so we should be good. Note,
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:16 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Cool. Might see if I can rework it to a smaller change (primarily for
patching and for merging to 3.1.x ease). With the AbstractFinder
abstraction, seems like we don't need to abstract
On Jun 4, 2010, at 1:33 AM, Andy wrote:
On 27.05.2010 18:54, David Blevins wrote:
On a very related note, we've got this ant script that we've been using at
release time to download zips, start the standalone server, deploys and runs
the itests app then shuts it down again.
http
On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I just did some work in the validation area and it occurs to me how much work
has yet to be done. It is definitely one of our most critical features that
users go ooh and ahh over.
Code wise, its's one of those areas where the hardest
with a running server, that bootstrap list becomes unused.
Essentially the art of using a statically maintained list to bootstrap getting
the more valuable dynamically maintained list.
Hope this helps!
-David
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:23 PM, David Blevins [via OpenEJB]
ml-node+2239675
On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi Jean-Louis,
You have to add something to your Maven settings.xml to add your ASF login
details - I don't have this to hand at the moment, but I'll forward an
example on later.
Here's what I have in my settings.xml
settings
801 - 900 of 1653 matches
Mail list logo
