Re: [perf] cache observers in NotificationManager#resolveObservers

We can surely clean it up after startup but looks good Le ven. 12 oct. 2018 17:16, Thomas Andraschko a écrit : > Hi, > > as you already may know from the TomEE/BVal mailing list, i'm not happy > with the startup performance since TomEE8. > > TomEE7 OWB startup ~ 4,5seconds > TomEE8 OWB startup ~

Re: [perf] cache observers in NotificationManager#resolveObservers

Think we didnt test that, thanks for catching that and adding a test Thomas! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: 2.0.8 release?

Sounds like it can be the moment to pass another step? ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <

Re: 2.0.8 release?

some sanity check son "known" projects (DS, meecrowave, tomee, your app etc) then jira triage, mvn release:prepare release:perform, dist area creation (don't forget the sha512 ;)) and vote thread Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibuc

Re: 2.0.8 release?

deltaspike$ mvn clean install -POWB2 -Dowb.version=2.0.8-SNAPSHOT Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: 2.0.8 release?

it uses asm beta, final is in vote Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

om my part? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Bo

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

Ok I get it now, so this is not *this* commit you want but one before - likely https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/92f94b68ae125d171ac26e6a3cbf26b6a3f54513 - but it was included in the commit you backported ;). makes sense to include that in 1.7 branch IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: 2.0.8 release?

yep Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

Hello Daniel, it is ok for me Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8

I will review it tomorrow but I want to thank you to have done it and say you congrats for your first release very early! Well done Thomas! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8

+1, works well Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

Re: Release docu

@Mark: hmm the vote should also be on the sources will sync in dist/release with the sha512 now, no? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

> > >> > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 12:28, Thomas Andraschko < > > >> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > >> > > > >> > > I could merge it, too but does it really make sense to apply it > > >> without >

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

+1 Thomas Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

> > >> I think you can keep ASM 7, but leave this: > > >> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13/commits/cb600aada79427ab7eff31e7da92038b6af6ed19#diff-f58069aef7df21dd8d4b0bd3546a747aR104 > > >> > > >> as `return Opco

Re: Release for OWB 1.7.6

+1 Le mar. 4 déc. 2018 22:15, Mark Struberg a écrit : > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 04.12.2018 um 21:24 schrieb Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > > > > Basically +1 > > Should this releases then Java11 compatible? > > > > I'm personally waiting for TomEE-2270 and 227, wh

Re: Release Meecrowave 1.2.5?

Hi Mark Im off this week so can be a bit "off" but i think tomcat is voting so we can surely roll it after them? Le mar. 11 déc. 2018 22:44, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > I'Ve resolved the last tickets for MW-1.2.5. > Wdyt, should I roll a release? > > LieGrue, > strub > >

release 2.0.9

Hi guys, any pending work? I started to work on releasing some geronimo modules and i need the 2.0.9 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: release 2.0.9

oki, will start then Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.9

4) Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-2.0.9/ (rev 1849073) Please VOTE: [+1] go for it! [-1] No, because there this ${issue} is blocking The VOTE is open for 72h. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <ht

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.6

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.9

+1 from me as well Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.9

Which makes 5 +1 (4 bindings) so this vote passes, will continue with the release steps, thank you all guys Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: [DISCUSS] move owb to Apache gitbox?

+1 for OWB +1 for meecrowave if called "meecrowave" - guess we can manage to get it +1 for owb-site (cms) if we can Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordp

jan releases?

Hi guys, anything we want to put it in owb and mw? can try to launch a release today if not? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.10

Hi guys, I'd like to call a vote for OWB 2.0.10. Issues fixed are: [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1273 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1273> Extension wildcard types leak parameterized types <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1273> Romain M

[VOTE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.5

.class) <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-91> Unassigned RESOLVED [image: Major] [image: Improvement] MEECROWAVE-151 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-151> Exclude jacoco agent from default scanning <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-151> R

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.10

and my +1 which makes 6 +1 (5 bindings) and no other vote so this one passes, will continue the release steps ASAP Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.5

and my +1 which makes 4 +1 (bindings) so this vote passes, will continue the release step ASAP Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.10 CDI container

It’s a great pleasure to announce the release of Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.10 Apache OpenWebBeans-2.x is a CDI container (Contexts and Dependency Injection for Java) and targets the CDI-2.0 specification (JavaEE 8). This is a maintenance release targeting the new CDI 2.0 specification! CDI is a Jav

[ANNONCE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.5 released

Apache OpenWebBeans team is happy to announce that Apache Meecrowave just got released in version 1.2.5. Apache Meecrowave is a lighweight server based on Apache Tomcat, OpenWebBeans, CXF and Johnzon to provide a ready to deploy CDI based server. It also provides some nice tools around this stack

[meecrowave] some changes in bundle mojo

ider which supports tomcat/tomee but not (yet?) meecrowave so the instance will have the exact same shape :). Hope it makes sense and the example speaks better than me by itself ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net

[meecrowave] CXF does not require activation/jaxb anymore (and a java11 profile?)

Hi guys, Just to let you know, https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/487 has been merged so we should hopefully be able to remove several of our hacks for java 11 build when next release will pop up. If not we should enhance it again to not need all these conditional imports IMHO. Romain Manni

Re: [meecrowave] PDF generation broken by last download page updates

up? seems we still have this issue Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin

[meecrowave] when do we plan next release?

Hi guys, anything pending for openwebbeans except last cxf vote? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

[VOTE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.5 vote

tps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-174> OAuth2TokenService does not work with JWT access token format <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-174> Romain Manni-Bucau <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau> RESOLVED [image: M

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.5 vote

Which makes 3 +1 bindings and no other votes so this vote passes, will continue the release steps thank you guys! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.5 vote

My own +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: [VOTE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.5 vote

Oops, right, as all links pointed out sorry about that guys and thanks Mark for the heads up Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

[ANNONCE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.6 released

Apache OpenWebBeans team is happy to announce that Apache Meecrowave 1.2.6 just got released in version 1.2.5. Apache Meecrowave is a lighweight server based on Apache Tomcat, OpenWebBeans, CXF and Johnzon to provide a ready to deploy CDI based server. It also provides some nice tools around this

Re: Issue with inherited Scoped-Annotation?

ry().addBeanClasses(Base.class, Child.class).initialize() println instance.beanManager.resolve(instance.beanManager.getBeans(Child.class)).scope // prints RequestScoped instance.close() Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metaw

Re: Discussion on inherited scopes

Hi Frankie, No discussion AFAIK but the rational of annotated mode was to use a marker on classes to discover it. It assumes the reflection model of the single clasd is enough which also means the parent could be used if NOT in another jar - otherwise it requires multiple passes and we dont want t

[meecrowave] release today?

Hi guys, not sure you read jira notifications but a user asked for a release, I'm planning to try to do it this morning, please shout if there is any issue Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>

[VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.7

Hi guys, Here is the vote for Meecrowave 1.2.7. Changelog is: [image: Major] [image: Task] MEECROWAVE-180 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-180> Upgrade to tomcat 9.0.16 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-180> Romain Manni-Bucau <https://issues.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.7

And my +1 which makes our 3 needed +1 bindings, therefore this vote passes, thank you very much guys Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Meecrowave 1.2.7 released

Apache OpenWebBeans team is happy to announce that Apache Meecrowave 1.2.7. Apache Meecrowave is a lighweight server based on Apache Tomcat, OpenWebBeans, CXF and Johnzon to provide a ready to deploy CDI based server. It also provides some nice tools around this stack like an OAuth2 server and a f

New CDI SE main in our owb-se module

a thing is to write batches or CLI apps as standard CDI apps and then just configure the command through an option without having to use anything specific. With MP-Config it makes it trivial to be configurable and runnable which is pretty nice and very low cost IMHO. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibu

What's our java 11 target?

ight tccl - not sure it would affect it much - and maybe some perf issues? Any known opinion or trick to make us better? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> |

SeContainer & Junit 5

Hi guys, For a project based on SeContainer I just wrote this JUnit 5 extension: https://gist.github.com/rmannibucau/f7f07969225b880c8009b0c0f2f21299 Do you think it is worth contributing it? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: SeContainer & Junit 5

ple? > > Am Di., 16. Apr. 2019 um 09:08 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi guys, > > > > For a project based on SeContainer I just wrote this JUnit 5 extension: > > > > https://gist.github.com/rmannibucau/f7f07969225b88

Re: SeContainer & Junit 5

Hi guys, Will try to push it next week - hopefully tomorrow. Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 16:16, Gerhard Petracek a écrit : > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > Am Di., 16. Apr. 2019 um 17:49 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > : > > > > Sure > > > >

Re: SeContainer & Junit 5

@Mark: in my current impl it is per class yes but we can use the same trick we have in tomee and meecrowave to optionally do it once per suite. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: SeContainer & Junit 5

w.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 29 avr. 2019 à 09:36, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > @Mark: in my current impl it is per class yes but we can use the same > trick we have in tomee and meecrowave to optionally do it once per suite. > &

Re: [DISCUSS] move OpenWebBeans core repo to GIT?

-+0, will not change anything IMHO Le ven. 3 mai 2019 à 16:19, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Yess +1 > > Le ven. 3 mai 2019 à 16:19, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 12:31 PM Mark Struberg > > > wrote: > > > > > hi folks!

Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

Hi guys, Quarkus makes @Inject optional for MP qualifiers, can we add a flag to get it? I.e. injection point is defined if inject is there or there is a qualifier (even without inject)? It can probably be extended to delegate too - but less common. Guess it can be on by default but fine if you p

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

uni 2019 > > > > Treffen Sie uns auf weiteren Konferenzen, > > Summits und Events: > > > > Zu unseren weiteren Events > > > > > > > > am fine with that. I even thought of that before, when I wanted to add > @PersistenceContext as qualifier

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

t was just possible via a plugin for resource-injection > >(and it was a bit "tricky"). > >if nothing changed in the meantime, we should take the chance to add a > >more powerful injection-spi (to allow multiple plugins which can > >participate in th

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

> regards, > gerhard > > > > Am Mo., 6. Mai 2019 um 20:43 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > : > > > > Well im happy with the spi option but since it would be in impl not sure > we > > need to slow down the boot instead of hardcoding it. Or did you mean in >

Re: javax vs. jakarta

Personally i would expect a kind of proxy based impl since CDI is mostly interface based so it would always work and enable to switch between models when needed. Now I also dont expect we do it before CDI 3 arrives which can be never - we dont know today. So do we need anything? Probably not. Pr

Re: javax vs. jakarta

Please dont branch - except in sandbox mode - before the sed option is right, in terms of maintenance this is not what we want and we always failed synching branches properly in most ee project but tomcat which does it very right. Le mer. 8 mai 2019 à 18:13, Arne Limburg a écrit : > Oh yes, in J

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

verall > use-case isn't that important to start a long/er discussion. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > Am Mo., 6. Mai 2019 um 23:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > : > > > > Le lun. 6 mai 2019 à 22:51, Gerhard Petracek a > > écrit : > > > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] also move the Meecrowave repo to GITbox?

+1 but maybe after next release - we didnt cut one since last fixes right? What about post tomcat+johnzon upgrades? Le jeu. 9 mai 2019 à 08:52, Mark Struberg a écrit : > hi folks! > > Since we now already moved OWB itself and the meecrowave-examples, should > we also move Meecrowave to GIT? > Th

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

for that test. Not sure how we stand about it and if we care much but this is a small detail which can be surprising when seen. 3. (likely for Mark) I pushed it on svn, is git already ready? Didn't see it. Don't hesitate to give some feedback about it. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibu

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

24. September 2019 > > Nächste Akademie: > > API, Microservices & DDD Summit | München | 17. - 19. Juni 2019 > > Treffen Sie uns auf weiteren Konferenzen, > Summits und Events: > > Zu unseren weiteren Events > > > > Am 09.05.19, 18:55 schrieb "Romain Ma

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

t part of the decisive > factor). -> large/r migration-projects might benefit from such an > option (i still know large projects using ee <= v5). > > @OWB-1287: > i'll have a look at it next week > > regards, > gerhard > > Am Do., 9. Mai 2019 um 18:55 Uhr schr

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

an Extension adding it as a qualifier then for instance if a PersistenceContextInjectionPointService is added). Would be great if it can get some reviews before next release since it is a quite deep change even if simple technically. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu

Re: [DISCUSS] also move the Meecrowave repo to GITbox?

PS: think we are ready to release, tomcat and cxf are upgraded now on trunk. I'll wait a few days for reviews and if noone beats me at releasing I think I will do it next week, this way we can move to git end of the month probably? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rma

Release?

Any blocker to release owb and mv depending on johnzon/owb upcoming votes?

[VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.11

<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1282> Romain Manni-Bucau <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau> RESOLVED [image: Major] [image: Improvement] OWB-1283 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1283> Upgrade xbean to 4.13 <https://issues.apac

[VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.8

ra/browse/MEECROWAVE-166> Romain Manni-Bucau <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau> RESOLVED [image: Major] [image: Improvement] MEECROWAVE-186 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-186> Gradle plugin id uses microwave a

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.11

Hi Jon, org.apache.webbeans.service.DefaultInjectionPointService.implicitSupport = false In WebBeansContext properties - or openwebbeans.properties - should fix that. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.8

And my +1 which makes 4 +1 bindings so this vote passes, thank you all. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.11

and my +1 which makes 5 +1 (bindings) so this vote passes, thank you guys. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

[meecrowave] proxy module?

is functional. I'm planning to enrich it a bit more and in particular add tests later this month but I'd like to get you feeling about that too. Side note for the geeks ;): you can couple it with RewriteValve of our Tomcat backbone ;). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https:

[java 9-11] classloader based proxying?

f we want to be clever we could use both strategies at the same time, i.e. if we can proxy through this classloader then we do, otherwise we keep current impl. Any opinion? i'd really like to have a clean run on java 11 for 2.0.12 or 2.0.13, even if we must add a few limitations like this vis

Re: [java 9-11] classloader based proxying?

Oki, will try to push a service this week. Side note: I agree on JPMS point but there is no link to jigsaw, it is linked to the enforced security more than modules. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

FYI: tomcat & cdi

Hi everyone, Just a quick pointer for the ones not following Tomcat list, there are some discussions about a CDI integration: > http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/CDI-support-improvements-td5086092.html If you are interested don't hesitate to join. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibuca

Re: [java 9-11] classloader based proxying?

Pushed through https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1289 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: [java 9-11] classloader based proxying?

itself. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: Tomcat integration improvements

+1 to merge (replace) it in owb module since tomcat adherance is reduced thanks your refactos. The few weird things I saw - but guess it is inherited from our owb module and cdi 1 times are: 1: dont start cdi if there is no beans.xml in webinf (in cdi 2 it should be anyway) 2: security service is

Re: Tomcat integration improvements

Le mer. 19 juin 2019 à 11:16, Rémy Maucherat a écrit : > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote: > > > +1 to merge (replace) it in owb module since tomcat adherance is reduced > > thanks your refactos. > > > > The few weird things I

Re: Tomcat integration improvements

Le mer. 19 juin 2019 à 20:23, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 10:37, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > Le mer. 19 juin 2019 à 11:16, Rémy Maucherat a écrit : > > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:26

Fwd: [jira] [Created] (OWB-1291) Updated Tomcat integration

Hello everyone, Should we replace tomcat7 module by just a tomcat module? (Importing tests). Also wonder if we shouldnt build a tomcat distro presetup at the same time. Any thoughts? -- Forwarded message - De :Remy Maucherat (JIRA) Date: jeu. 20 juin 2019 à 00:26 Subject: [jira

Re: [jira] [Created] (OWB-1291) Updated Tomcat integration

Le jeu. 20 juin 2019 à 09:07, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Thu 20 Jun 2019 at 05:54, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > Should we replace tomcat7 module by just a tomcat module? (Importing >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenWebBeans repo migrated to GIT

Thanks Mark, great movement for the project. Le jeu. 11 juil. 2019 à 21:52, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Good afternoon! > > The Apache OpenWebBeans main repository successfully got migrated to > gitbox. > > The main repo is > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans.git > > This repo is 2-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenWebBeans repo migrated to GIT

Hi everyone, created meecrowave one at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans-meecrowave.git will try to populate it today as well Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

[meecrowave] drop jolokia module?

Hi everyone, Anyone aware of the jolokia module? We are pretty behind and I never saw it used - guess docker made it deprecated almost as soon as it was added :(. Do we want to drop it? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.met

[meecrowave] preparing next release?

+ Johnzon 1.2.0 will be fully JSON-B compliant so we can probably bump the version to 1.3.0 Except that I think we are good to go and have enough in the release to let it go. wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.ne

Re: [meecrowave] drop jolokia module?

Up? Le sam. 17 août 2019 à 20:40, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Anyone aware of the jolokia module? We are pretty behind and I never saw > it used - guess docker made it deprecated almost as soon as it was added :(. > > Do we want to drop it? >

Re: [meecrowave] drop jolokia module?

oki, will do it today, thank you! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin

Re: [meecrowave] preparing next release?

FYI 2 had been done so we are on SNAPSHOT dep land now ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <

Fwd: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: OWB-1298 ensure we don't duplicate annotated types when possible

a is described below commit eb94a3a27698471b7ebeced33d710b7f7558d131 Author: Romain Manni-Bucau AuthorDate: Tue Sep 17 12:10:06 2019 +0200 OWB-1298 ensure we don't duplicate annotated types when possible --- .../org/apache/webbeans/config/BeansDeployer.java | 26 +- .../

Next releases (2.0.12)?

Hi everyone, Should we release owb and meecrowave? Anything pending for you?

Re: Next releases (2.0.12)?

ng of next week too, but agree we should include johnzon upgrade. Side question: anyone wants to drive one of the two (or both)? (no issue to do it myself but it is an opportunity to do a release if you want) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |

Re: Next releases (2.0.12)?

FYI, I will likely start this morning Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.12

rg/jira/browse/OWB-1289> Romain Manni-Bucau <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau> RESOLVED [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1292 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1292> StackOverflowError in GenericsUtil.satisfiesDependency

[VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.9

t;https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-197> Romain Manni-Bucau <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau> RESOLVED [image: Major] [image: Task] MEECROWAVE-198 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-198> Upgrade to Tomca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.12

dium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > Am Mo., 30. Sept. 2019 um 10:10 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi everyone, > > > >

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >