Re: Remove of Useless Maven Projects

; project to do this light integration today - and we have a few alternative > at apache. > It is also highly consistent with meecrowave to have @owb. While we > maintain meecrowave we maintain this module sounds like a very fair > assumption. > > @Gurkan Erdogdu can you clarify why you

Re: Remove of Useless Maven Projects

ive in the main build in tomcat we can > discuss this again. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 01.07.2020 um 12:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Le mer. 1 juil. 2020 à 11:52, Gurkan Erdogdu > a > > écrit : > > > >> CDI is the core

Re: Remove of Useless Maven Projects

com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le mer. 1 juil. 2020 à 11:27, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > Thanks Remy. > > Is it possible to merge these 2 efforts to single on

Re: Remove of Useless Maven Projects

Thanks Remy. Is it possible to merge these 2 efforts to single one under Tomcat coebase? I dont see any reason to maintain two different implementation with the same aim On 1 Jul 2020 Wed at 11:14 Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:35 AM Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: >

Re: Remove of Useless Maven Projects

in.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mar. 30 juin 2020 à 09:29, Mark Struberg > > > a > > > écrit : > > > > &

Re: Remove of Useless Maven Projects

t; | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le lun.

Remove of Useless Maven Projects

Hi folks I would like to discuss to remove the following modules from the OWB code base. - webbeans-jms : We introduced this module years ago for JMS but frankly never see any usage. Also, it was not completed. - webbeans-tomcat7 : We introduced this modules for Tomcat7 integration

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: OWB-1328 NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory

t, Jun 13, 2020 at 12:39 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le sam. 13 juin 2020 à 10:54, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > If you want to revert , you can... > > But Xbean method returns null and throwing NPE is not a good way to go... > > > > Contract makes it resp

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: OWB-1328 NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory

gt; <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le ven. 12 juin 2

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: OWB-1328 NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory

etaDataFactory > > > To: comm...@openwebbeans.apache.org > > > > > > > > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > > > > > gerdogdu pushed a commit to branch master > > > in repository https://gitbox.

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

wrote: > Le mer. 10 juin 2020 à 09:55, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > This javax to jakarta has already created problems in running for example > > TestNG tests in eclipse :) > > Also, keep in mind that OWB also depends on several Geronimo EE APIs and > > mus

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

; > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > >

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1328) NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17130279#comment-17130279 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-1328: - [~Thihup] What kind of URL you get a NPE? Can you attach

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: OWB-1328 NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory

w b812c6f OWB-1328 NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory > new ff4c809 Merge branch 'master' of > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans > b812c6f <https://github.com/apache/openwebbeansb812c6f> is described below > > commit b812c6ff7db69723d692efa1efd4dca00fd73c2a >

[jira] [Closed] (OWB-1328) NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gurkan Erdogdu closed OWB-1328. --- > NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory > -- > > K

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-1328) NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gurkan Erdogdu resolved OWB-1328. - Fix Version/s: 2.0.18 Resolution: Fixed Fixed. > NPE in AbstractMetaDataFact

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1328) NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17130077#comment-17130077 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-1328: - Thanks for reporting. This issue is now fixed in trunk. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.17

< > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1062/ > > > > > > > > > > commit in our repo is 20d2b83390996007873abb2338a8b1fb61a55ceb > > > > > > The source release can be found in > > &

[jira] [Assigned] (OWB-1328) NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gurkan Erdogdu reassigned OWB-1328: --- Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu > NPE in AbstractMetaDataFact

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

There are some string literals in source code using javax.*. for example, in BeansDeployer, public static final String JAVAX_ENTERPRISE_PACKAGE = "javax.enterprise.";. How is the shading plugin fixes these? Regards. Gurkan On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 10:55 PM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > The

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

it on G, it does not impact OWB - and btw this is not what > had been said ;). > Thanks for the pointer Regards. Gurkan On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 9:50 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 20:39, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > > > > > So to conclude on

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

4J to add features to support OWB-OSGI or other ASF projects? Could you explain in detail? Regards. Gurkan On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 9:39 PM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > So to conclude on this point not belonging to OWB, we still need our fork >> and eclipse always answered saying "yes we

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

Why do I need to maintain for example Geronimo EL? Regards. Gurkan On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 9:25 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 20:20, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > Hi David > > > > I’m not sure exactly how it impacts this decision, but IIUC t

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

sn’t. > > Personally I’m afraid I’m totally on Romain’s side so far, AFAICT Gurkan’s > proposal will only add difficulty for developers and probably users. > Although I haven’t been active here for years I might even vote. > > thanks > David Jencks > > >

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

; < > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 16:42, Thomas Andraschko < > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > > a écrit : > &

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

t=webmail > > > > > Virenfrei. > > www.avast.com > > < > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > > Am So., 7. Jun

Re: Jakarta EE 9 Support

//rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performan

Jakarta EE 9 Support

Hi After the 2.x release, can we get the master to 3.0.0 to support upcoming Jakarta EE 9 release with jakarta.* namespace? I also favor to use the Jakarta EE CDI API instead of using the Apache based api. Regards Gurkan -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: Will start with the release tomorrow

to setup tck in the build > > Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 10:13, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > Hi Mark > > After the release, can we make master 3.0.0 for > > Jakarta EE 9 and adapting the Jakarta Cdi API? > > Regards > > Gurkan > > > > On 6

Re: Will start with the release tomorrow

> > LieGrue, > strub > > -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Re: Adding Comments To Source Code

with CDI SE/notEE 2.0 > certification already but were only tested against javax TCK AFAIK. > > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:40, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > OK I agree. > > Lets focus on improving the OWB. > > What is the latest status of TCK covering regarding l

Re: Adding Comments To Source Code

lt; > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:30, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > I

Re: Adding Comments To Source Code

er/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/config/BeansDeployer.java#L1424 > . > > Hope it explains a bit where I'm coming from and what I'm hoping we target. > > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:21, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > Also, for how to write comments, ple

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: adding a test for testing the Typed annotation with wrong value

always start to contribute with test cases. This is really useful practice which I learn in my 20 years of software engineering experience. Warm Regards. Gurkan On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:20 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:02, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > &

Re: Adding Comments To Source Code

Also, for how to write comments, please look at Spring or SpringBoot code base. Just an example file : https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/master/spring-beans/src/main/java/org/springframework/beans/BeanUtils.java On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:09 PM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > L

Re: Adding Comments To Source Code

and HOW we do it is highly welcome! > > Back in the early 2000 there have been metrics for code which misses > JavaDocs. This mantra is refuted since a long time. > I'm sure there are plenty of other tasks which make perfect sense. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 05.06.202

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: adding comments and cosmetic changes

I have removed these @inheritdoc updates. On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:02 PM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > OK fine to remove @InherticDocs > Regards. > Gurkan > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:55 PM Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> BIG

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: adding a test for testing the Typed annotation with wrong value

better named tag). This > sounds a > > > better welcoming path to me, like "contribute something real" and "make > > the > > > project move forward". > > > > > > wdyt? > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rm

Adding Comments To Source Code

Hi folks I am reviewing the source code, but there are codes without comments in many places. Please can you review the codes and write comments?I know this is boring, but commenting is very important. Otherwise, it is not possible to understand what is going on in your code. Regards. Gurkan

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: adding a test for testing the Typed annotation with wrong value

One more thing: All new incomers to the project are invited to start with adding a simple test like this. On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:34 AM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hey Romain > In fact, this is our internal test suite not the TCK. So, it is a good > idea to have internal tests to c

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: adding a test for testing the Typed annotation with wrong value

dded to refs/heads/master by this push: > new 6de6f20 adding a test for testing the Typed annotation with wrong > value > 6de6f20 is described below > > commit 6de6f200f0817fc8028017800e5fdcf490496a9a > Author: Gurkan Erdogdu > AuthorDate: Thu Jun 4 23:57:26 2020 +0300 > >

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1326) Bean#isNullable is ignored since CDI-1.1.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17125911#comment-17125911 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-1326: - Yup, he did not remove the method in API :) I added

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1326) Bean#isNullable is ignored since CDI-1.1.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17125894#comment-17125894 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-1326: - [~romain.manni-bucau] But he says he will remove and I

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1326) Bean#isNullable is ignored since CDI-1.1.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17125880#comment-17125880 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-1326: - [~romain.manni-bucau] OK lets explain this way :) How are you

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1326) Bean#isNullable is ignored since CDI-1.1.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17125866#comment-17125866 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-1326: - [~romain.manni-bucau]This is an internal API but application

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: adding comments and cosmetic changes

ication-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le jeu. 4 juin 2020 à 13:19, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > I don't see any problem,it compiles perfectly :) > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:32 PM Mark Struberg > > wrote: > > &g

Re: [openwebbeans] branch master updated: adding comments and cosmetic changes

s and cosmetic changes > > new b6c1310 Merge branch 'master' of > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans > > 91dcbf2 is described below > > > > commit 91dcbf2484c7da9aeba9a90712a4a16f8438c84f > > Author: Gurkan Erdogdu > > AuthorDate: Thu Jun 4 01:25:55 2020 +03

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1326) Bean#isNullable is ignored since CDI-1.1.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17125836#comment-17125836 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-1326: - We need to support previous users of API (2.x) but I think

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1326) Bean#isNullable is ignored since CDI-1.1.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17125791#comment-17125791 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-1326: - Please don't remove the code, Deprecate it > Bean#isNulla

Re: Release 2.0.17?

;https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Regarding Provide a spy flavor of ClassDefiningService

Hi folks I have put more time and energy to contribute back to OWB. @Romain, I did see your JIRA issue as the mail subject but I don't see any discussion regarding this in mailing list. I think first is to discuss these experimental features in the list before creating jira and committing the

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5

Thanks Mark +1 Gurkan On Sunday, April 29, 2018, 1:39:57 PM GMT+3, Daniel Cunha wrote: +1 2018-04-29 5:18 GMT-03:00 Mark Struberg : > My own +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 29.04.2018 um 09:47 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau

Adding Original Project Proposal to Community Page

Hi folksI have added the original project proposal (OpenWebBeansProposal - Incubator Wiki) to Community Page in openwebbeans-cms-site/content/community.mdtext | | | | OpenWebBeansProposal - Incubator Wiki | | | How this is synched?Regards.Gurkan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.0

Hi Mark Thanks for the release. Does this current release pass CDI Web Profile TCK? Regards. Gurkan On Monday, July 10, 2017, 2:28:39 PM GMT+3, Mark Struberg wrote: Good afternoon! We are proud to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.0 This is an

Re: Regarding Meecrowave Subproject

| JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2017-01-09 9:11 GMT+01:00 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com.invalid>: > Hi all > First of all happy new year! > As I am a founder and keen observer of the project (hope to commit much > more time this

Regarding Meecrowave Subproject

Hi all First of all happy new year! As I am a founder and keen observer of the project (hope to commit much more time this year), I would like to ask a question regarding the new subproject Meecrowave. Why would we create such a sub-project under OpenWebBeans? From my perspective, OpenWebBeans

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.1

+1 Great work thanks Mark! I still remember the first M1 release, 2009-02-16.  On Monday, January 2, 2017 3:03 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi folks! Please VOTE for the release of Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.1. Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] take 1: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.1

+1 Gurkan On Saturday, November 9, 2013 7:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: +1 -David On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:12 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, As discuss in another thread, I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.1

Re: [E-Book Version] Apache TomEE Cookbook

Hello Yann You can buy PDF version of the book from http://payhip.com/b/bsva Best. Gurkan From: Yann Blazart yann.blaz...@bycode.fr To: us...@tomee.apache.org; Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Cc: u...@openwebbeans.apache.org u

June 2013 Board Report

Hi Time to report.  I have written June2013 at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OWB/June2013 Please have a look and add/update/delete? Thanks, Gurkan

Re: [VOTE] take 3: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0

+1 Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 8:49 AM Subject: [VOTE] take 3: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 I'd like to call a 3rd take to VOTE on releasing Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans build-tools 1.3

+1 From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 9:45 AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans build-tools 1.3 Hi! This is now a split VOTE for owb-build-tools-1.3 The stating repo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Romain Manni-Buccau as new OWB PMC member

welcome a board! Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: openwebbeans-user u...@openwebbeans.apache.org; openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 10:31 PM Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Romain Manni-Buccau as new OWB PMC

Yan: CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies

: 9 Nis 2013 21:47 Salı Konu: Re: CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies because it's broken! It's broken in the CDI-1.0 spec and we clarified the correct behaviour in CDI-1.1. Btw, which branch do you speak of? LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gurkan

CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies

Hi In AbstractProducerBean below method is commented out but TCK 1.0 still checks ProducerMethod's Serializable return type and fields.     public void validatePassivationDependencies()     {     // don't call super.validatePassivationDependencies()!     // the injection points of

Re: [VOTE] (take2) Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.8

+1 Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 17 Mart 2013 19:01 Pazar Konu: [VOTE] (take2) Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.8 Hi! 2nd try ;) I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache

March 2013 Board Report

Hi Time to report.  I have written March2013 at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OWB/March2013 Please have a look and add/update/delete? Thanks, Gurkan

December 2012 Board Report

Hi Time to report.  I have written December 2012 at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OWB/December2012 Please have a look and add/update/delete? Thanks, Gurkan

Re: [VOTE] release OpenWebBeans-1.1.6

+1 Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 5 Aralık 2012 23:24 Çarşamba Konu: [VOTE] release OpenWebBeans-1.1.6 Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.7. This is

Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?

AFAIK some fix in trunk were not ported to 1.1.7 branch. Before releasing, we must fix these bugs. Kimden: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Kasım 2012 0:52 Salı Konu: Thoughts on

Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?

; Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Kasım 2012 12:27 Salı Konu: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ? Hi Gurkan, which fixes are you thinking about? thought it was mainly cleanup which were not ported (and these cleanup can generate issue if badly used but no issue intrinsically

Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?

and to be able to get a clean release report. wdyt? Please tell us your preferences for doing a 1.2.0 release. So far we are still on CDI-1.0, releasing 1.2.0 with CDI-1.0 and later moving to 1.1 sounds a bit weird imo. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gurkan Erdogdu

Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?

r1409751, r1409721 not ported to 1.1.x branch.  Mark, are you able to port this? Kimden: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Kopya: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Gönderildiği

Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?

OK, I will merge these commits to 1.1.x branch from trunk. Then, no need to release 1.2.0 Thanks Gurkan Kimden: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Kopya: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de

Re: svn commit: r1409751 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/proxy: ProxyFactory.java javassist/JavassistFactory.java

://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2012/11/15 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Where is the location of this code in TomEE? (ProxyFactory # getEjbBeanProxyClass

Re: svn commit: r1409751 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/proxy: ProxyFactory.java javassist/JavassistFactory.java

javassist? In that case we should adopt our plans and add unit/integration tests for both. probably via a maven profile? LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Thursday

Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

+1 for 1.2.0 Gurkan Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 10 Kasım 2012 17:21 Cumartesi Konu: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ? Hi folks! Removing functionality from webbeans-impl into an own module +

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-717) Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13494864#comment-13494864 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-717: Yes we can activate it. Remove

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-717) Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13494910#comment-13494910 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-717: I will do, no problem Remove

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-717) Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13494913#comment-13494913 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-717: Done. Remove Failover

Re: Method in OpenWebBeansEjbPlugin

validly be called   from methods on the interface but not the method from the concrete   class (unless it is a NIV EJB).   svn blame seems to hint that David changed these lines most recently,   so I would defer to him on this.   Sincerely,   Joe   On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Gurkan

[jira] [Created] (OWB-715) Remove EL22 implementation from Core to Own Project

Gurkan Erdogdu created OWB-715: -- Summary: Remove EL22 implementation from Core to Own Project Key: OWB-715 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-715 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-715) Remove EL22 implementation from Core to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gurkan Erdogdu resolved OWB-715. Resolution: Fixed Fixed. Remove EL22 implementation from Core to Own Project

[jira] [Deleted] (OWB-716) Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gurkan Erdogdu deleted OWB-716: --- Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project

[jira] [Created] (OWB-716) Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project

Gurkan Erdogdu created OWB-716: -- Summary: Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project Key: OWB-716 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-716 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue

[jira] [Assigned] (OWB-717) Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gurkan Erdogdu reassigned OWB-717: -- Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans build tools 1.2

+1 Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 16 Eylül 2012 23:58 Pazar Konu: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans build tools 1.2 Hi!  I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache

September 2012 Board Report

Hi Time to report.  I have written September 2012 at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OWB/September2012 Please have a look and add/update/delete? Thanks, Gurkan

Yan: September 2012 Board Report

. txs and LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 3:35 PM Subject: September  2012 Board Report Hi Time to report.  I have written September

Yan: javassist removal

Hello David I favor that we can implement a common SPI like other integrations and refactor code to use SPI (Pluggable way of using javassist or ASM). Thanks. Gurkan Kimden: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org

Yan: ApacheCon Germany

-Louis and me will be there. Most probably also a few others.Would be great to meet you there as well! LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 2:40 PM Subject

June 2012 Board Report

Hi Time to report.  I have written March 2012 at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OWB/June2012 Please have a look and add/update/delete? Thanks, Gurkan

Re : [VOTE] take2 Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.4

+1 Gurkan Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 5 Nis 2012 13:23 Perşembe Konu: [VOTE] take2 Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.4 Hi! I'd like to call a second VOTE on releasing Apache

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Romain Manni-Bucau as new Committer!

Welcome on board Romain! Gurkan Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; u...@openwebbeans.apache.org u...@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 12 Mart 2012 9:23 Pazartesi Konu: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome

Re: OpenWebBeans meets Eclipse RCP

Cool project :) Thanks. Gurkan. Kimden: Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 9 Mart 2012 15:25 Cuma Konu: OpenWebBeans meets Eclipse RCP Hi guys, Last year I had to do a project at university using

Yan: Which JAX-WS/RS implementation with OWB?

Hi Thomas OWB does not implement/provide any WS functionality. You can look at Apache Wink for JAX-RS from http://incubator.apache.org/wink/ Thanks Gurkan Kimden: Thomas Andraschko zoi...@googlemail.com Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği

Yan: [VOTE] drop outdated (and unused) openwebbeans-openejb plugin

+1. I implemented it for experimental OpenEJB + CDI usage. It has done its job well. We can drop it! Thks. Gurkan Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Aralık 2011 21:08 Salı

Yan: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.3

+1 PS: It is unnecessary to send vote to user@... group Gurkan Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; u...@openwebbeans.apache.org u...@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 3 Aralık 2011 15:07

Yan: Yan: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.3

Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.3 I don't think so. The more the merrier ^^ Actually I got the feedback that even people from distantly associated projects like MyFaces, OpenEJB and Geronimo are interested in a VOTE being in progress. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gurkan Erdogdu

Yan: 1.2 Branch

into owb-1.1.x Actually owb already contains a hell lot of that stuff! Also there is atm not really much I desperately miss in 1.0 from the 1.1 spec. Most of the work currently done have been clarifications! LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >