pretty cool!
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Awesome! Thanks Gurkan!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
To: dev
...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 1:36 AM
Hi;
It has remained some issues in M4 release. After closing
those issues, release will be more fine and developer
OWB without having to compile it
theirselfs!
:-) +1 on that!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Date: Sunday, January 31
AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Otherwise
OWB is really usable already (using it in a production project since a month
now).
But I'm not sure if we really need this for the M4 release (would be fine
though). I'd
Awesome! Thanks Gurkan!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 3:14 PM
The biggest missing part
Hallo guys,
is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)?
Thanks!
Matthias
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi folks,
It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I
want to release M4 version, because
: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Sent: Sat, January 30, 2010 12:22:53 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
Hallo guys,
is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)?
Thanks!
Matthias
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo
I agree with you.
+1 on a new release.
Minor things:
-after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number
Do you agree ?
-Matthias
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi folks,
It has been lots of corrections
I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number
Do you agree ?
* In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4.
* After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. After
releasing 1.0.0, I
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com:
I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number
Do you agree ?
* In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4.
* After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 1/21/10, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 11:46 AM
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com:
I
what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ?
That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current
direction is, IMO
Yes, it is so reasonable. Actually M5 contains 2 bullets that we can move
them to 1.0.0 release. But as a common pattern with old releases, I want to
releas e artifacts as 1.0.0-M5
] Releasing M4
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 11:46 AM
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com:
I feel we should not continue to use the
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number
Do you agree ?
* In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4.
* After
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com:
what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ?
That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current
direction is, IMO
Yes, it is so reasonable. Actually M5 contains 2 bullets that we can move
them to 1.0.0 release.
nice, sounds good.
But as a
on and quarterly release 1.0.1, 1.0.2 as bugfix versions.
So I'd say we should stick to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 1/21/10, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
To: dev
Hi folks,
It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I
want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and
covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that
we can do until weekend and create M4 release
16 matches
Mail list logo
