Is it possible that one of those vectors is mutable and the other is immutable?
Robby
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote:
I'm seeing the following error deep within Whalesong when I'm running
its test suite:
. .
Would it make sense to have drdr get whalesong directly from planet?
Robby
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
We haven't done it before yet.
The simplest way is to commit something to the core, but that's not
good in the long run.
One thing that we
, Oct 21, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Harry Spier vasishtha.sp...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Robby,
I just lowered the resolution on the larger monitor and it works fine now.
Cheers,
Harry
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I realize this sounds like I'm
There was a thread I saw on 7/30 that suggested we leave things where
they are (and that's what I also think we should do).
Robby
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Wasn't there a decision to keep `racket/package' where it is instead
of moving it to
Do you get a message saying that it has crashed from the OS, or does
it just disappear? I can't recall the details now but when I get such
messages, I get an option to go into some kind of a debugger and get
stack traces. Are you seeing that?
Robby
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Kathi Fisler
Oh-- and do you have the 64 bit or the 32 bit version of Racket? (I
see you have the 64 bit OS, but that doesn't preclude the 32 bit
version of drracket.)
Robby
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Do you get a message saying that it has crashed from
. Only option I get is to close the program.
Kathi
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Do you get a message saying that it has crashed from the OS, or does
it just disappear? I can't recall the details now but when I get such
messages, I get
What is 'p' in this example?
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Stephen Bloch
bl...@adelphi.edujavascript:;
wrote:
Another data point: If define/match expands to a define of a
procedure
that dispatches to a set of implementations
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
* Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
- DrRacket Tests
- Framework Tests
- Contracts Tests
- Games Tests
- Teachpacks Tests: image tests
- PLaneT Tests
- Redex Tests
Updates:
- DrRacket
For the record, I find having two things that combine match and define
in different ways where the name difference is - vs / and swapping the
order of the words to be quite unfortunate.
Plus, we should just have match built into all of the binding forms.
Robby
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:48 PM,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Dan Liebgold dan.liebg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Is there any chance that the .zo file timestamps became earlier than
the .rkt timestamps on end-users' machines?
Yes that is possible... we're
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Oct 5, 2012 9
Thanks for spotting that leak!!
On Friday, October 5, 2012, wrote:
eli has updated `master' from cb42b7ed6a to e7db0bdac4.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/cb42b7ed6a..e7db0bdac4
=[ 3 Commits ]==
Directory summary:
6.5%
Why does TR depend on FV?
Robby
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Three hours ago, sa...@racket-lang.org wrote:
samth has updated `master' from fcfff27c31 to b6b5043ff9.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/fcfff27c31..b6b5043ff9
=[ One Commit
Oh, right. Duh.
And even better, IMO, if it were futures-visualizer/typed/* were a
place you could put this information. But I'm not sure that the trust
is there for that.
Robby
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
20 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
Why does
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
Oh, right. Duh.
And even better, IMO, if it were futures-visualizer/typed/* were a
place you could put this information.
Yeah -- that would make distribution much easier, since
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Oct 5, 2012 9:16 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
Oh, right. Duh.
And even better, IMO, if it were futures-visualizer
IIRC, we even experimented with this one briefly and quickly gave up
as we got overwhelmed.
Robby
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I think this a great change for a future `racket2' (someone should be
keeping a list of these), but it's too incompatible a
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I'm about a week away from having the math library's initial commit
ready. It just needs some more docs and test cases.
Here are the high-level issues, for which I'm soliciting comments,
suggestions, questions,
that they are good for not breaking old
programs, so probably best to leave well enough alone.
Thanks again,
Robby
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
At Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:45:43 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
The original message in this thread suggests
As far as I can tell, if this pollutes TR programs in any interesting
way, then it would be a cause for concern.
Robby
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:21 PM, John Clements
cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Neil
My $0.02: I find #:while and #:when to be too close, and #:until and
#:unless even closer.
Robby
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
5 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
Has this been brought up before? I can't recall. Does anyone else
run into the same
vectors and not typed f32 vectors.
Jay
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
As far as I can tell, if this pollutes TR programs in any interesting
way, then it would be a cause for concern.
Robby
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:21 PM, John Clements
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Single-precision float support used to be enabled via a configure
option, which meant that some Racket installations would support them,
and some would not.
Since zo files are meant to be portable, they could not
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:31:29 -0600, Neil Toronto wrote:
Why do we have these things?
I'm not sure this reason from 1996 is still relevant, but FWIW:
Originally, there were drawing-related `float' computations in C code
I believe I'm using the 32 bit build in all those cases, tho. Are you
using the 64 bit one?
Yes.
Thanks. I see this too. Here's a shorter program illustrating the difference.
#lang racket
(require profile)
(define (f x)
(if (zero? x)
(continuation-mark-set-context
Would you need a and is not a substruct? predicate to make such things work?
Robby
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
TR's complex number optimizations eliminate repeated boxing and unboxing
in chains of operations that each consume and produce
2012 10:15:04 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
Would you need a and is not a substruct? predicate to make such things
work?
Robby
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Vincent St-Amour
stamo...@ccs.neu.edujavascript:;
wrote:
TR's complex number optimizations eliminate repeated boxing
Thanks.
I've been using it for a little while now and I actually really hate it. :)
I need to move it so it doesn't overlap with the (at least not as often).
Robby
On Monday, August 27, 2012, John Clements wrote:
I see that you've added a tooltip on check-syntax hover that shows how
many
I've moved the tooltips so they are in a less annoying place now. I
think it can still be a bit better, but at least now it isn't as
annoying (I think).
Robby
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Thanks.
I've been using it for a little while now
This is definitely a macro writer bill of rights situation. Too bad
that TR's optimizer cannot take advantage of all these kinds of things
that are already happening in the optimizer one level down.
Robby
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
A lot of
You could do the below, but can you say a little bit more about what
the metafunction and judgment-form you want to combine are?
(Presumably they both are type checking?)
#lang racket
(require redex)
(define-language L
(e integer true false)
(τ bool int))
(define-judgment-form L
#:mode (⊢
Oh, this variation may also be a better fit for what you want,
depending (note changed mode).
Robby
#lang racket
(require redex)
(define-language L
(e integer true false)
(τ bool int))
(define-judgment-form L
#:mode (⊢ I I)
#:contract (⊢ e τ)
[(⊢ integer int)]
[(⊢ true bool)]
[(⊢
This is kind of awkward, tho. Do you plan to typeset this portion of your model?
Robby
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Oh yeah, this first solution should work (I want to keep it as an
output though). Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Robby
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2012-08-12 15:42:09 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
But unlike other information from check syntax, it is activated by the
position of the insertion point, not the mouse position. I'm not sure
if this is the right call
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2012-08-22 19:51:34 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
I had imagined that one would mostly leave it open and use f2 to close
it when it was too big and open it again when there is a question. In
other words, using the mouse
That seems fine to me.
Robby
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any reason that the #:forall, #:∀ clause (dual to #:exists,
#:∃) doesn't exist for contract-out?
If it's just that nobody has written it, I've attached a patch that
One could, concievably, still do that without boxing/unblocking by passing
wide enough arguments. And it does seem like TR could help with that, but
IIUC the untyped portion of the compiler needs significant work to support
that before TR's knowledge of the program would help (But doing a better
to get the computation on floats and the tag for their meaning.
On Aug 18, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
One could, concievably, still do that without boxing/unblocking by passing
wide enough arguments. And it does seem like TR could help with that, but
IIUC the untyped portion
I've pushed a change to the current git version of Racket that removes
the 'planet' binary from plt/bin. (Note that 'raco planet' does all
the same things and avoids the conflict mentioned below.)
Robby
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:46 PM, David Bremner brem...@debian.org wrote:
Hi All;
We're
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to invalidate just one part of a GUI element? I'd have liked
having that recently on a little game I made. All I could find was
`refresh', which doesn't take parameters. I didn't like having to redraw the
It works by looking at the expanded version of the program, so if the
parens aren't matched, it can't do anything. It does try to compensate
for this by keeping around information from previous successful
expansions (when it isn't obviously wrong to do so, but you can fool
this aspect of it).
But
Altho in Neil's case, it maybe that he can positively state the types
allowed in the leaves.
Robby
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
More generally, this is a case where you want some form of negation
(plus bounded polymorphism) in the type system,
That's how it always worked, I'm pretty sure. A simple experiment
seems to confirm:
/Applications/Racket\ v5.2.1/bin/racket -m ~/x.rkt
main: not defined or required into the top-level environment
You probably wanted racket -tm x.rkt.
Robby
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
I always forget too
Robby
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
That's how it always worked, I'm pretty sure. A simple experiment
seems to confirm:
/Applications
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
The following have been deprecated and will be removed in the
August 2013 release:
- the `define-contract-struct' form. Use `struct' with `struct/dc'
contracts instead.
This entry surprises me. Has it been
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012, Robby Findler wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
The following have been deprecated and will be removed in the
August 2013 release
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
The following have been deprecated and will be removed in the
August 2013 release:
- the `define-contract-struct' form. Use `struct' with `struct/dc'
contracts instead.
This entry surprises me. Has it been
FWIW, this is done now.
Robby
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I'll try to do something along these lines. It shouldn't be hard to
make it a tooltip.
Robby
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM, John Clements
cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote
How about this:
* The API for fast floating-point bitmaps (flomaps) supports image
processing operations. It is written in Typed Racket, so Typed
Racket code may use it without the cost of contract checks.
?
Robby
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com
I think the idea is that compatibility means we are keeping this to
be backwards compatible with unknown code that is using it (or at
least, that's one of the meanings).
Robby
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Yesterday, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
At Tue, 31
Thanks, this is very helpful!
Robby
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
DrDr now has green buttons to go between times the file's output has
changed. Hopefully this will help you find problematic commits easier.
Jay
--
Jay McCarthy j...@cs.byu.edu
I think it should be okay to remove it. All of the functionality is
covered by using raco planet.
Robby
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:46 PM, David Bremner brem...@debian.org wrote:
Hi All;
We're currently trying to figure out the right way to handle a name
conflict in Debian between racket and
I believe Ryan fixed this a few hours ago. He may be waiting for a
release build before commenting.
Robby
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
6 hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Looks like a minor compiler/optimizer bug in Friday's 5.2.900.1
pre-release.
I
If we're going to include the contract related bullets below, then we
should probably mention struct/dc, too. But I think this is too many
bullets for this amount of stuff. How about something like this:
- the contract library has better support for interfaces, generics,
prompts,
How about Misc. minor bug fixes or something like that instead?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, cleme...@racket-lang.org wrote:
clements has updated `master' from 2dcf060774 to 8ba976c035.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/2dcf060774..8ba976c035
=[ One Commit
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
* Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
- DrRacket Tests
- Framework Tests
- Contracts Tests
- Games Tests
- Teachpacks Tests: image tests
- PLaneT Tests
- Redex Tests
Updates:
- DrRacket
I don't have any good guesses as to which files trigger the problem,
but you could time 'raco make' to try to hone in specific files. Run
'raco make' once to build all of a file's dependencies (or just have
finished a raco setup run) and then delete compiled/file_rkt.zo if
file.rkt is the file you
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Jon Zeppieri zeppi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I don't have any good guesses as to which files trigger the problem,
but you could time 'raco make' to try to hone in specific files. Run
In this particular case, I would prefer this code not to change, as it
the heart of a subtle and important part of DrRacket's useability (the
syntax colorer). If there are concrete issues with it beyond the
desire for a cleaner interface, that's great and I'd love to see
performance or correctness
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Does anyone know what this means from the props script?
[robby@yanpu] ~/git/plt/collects/meta$ ./props
Root: /Users/robby/git/plt/...
.DS_Store: no responsible
DrRacket.app: no responsible
GRacket.app
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Two hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
Just to clarify: the props script is now useless to as a mechanism
for actually setting properties, since the output is always the
below, no matter of the arguments.
It was an attempt
I looked at this a little bit and it appears to be a bug in
version/utils, specifically the version-integer function is not
working correctly for the release version number.
Robby
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Aleksej Saushev a...@inbox.ru wrote:
Hello,
Racket 5.3 release branch doesn't
Thanks, Eli. (I agree that version-integer's current behavior is the
right one.)
Robby
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Two hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
I looked at this a little bit and it appears to be a bug in
version/utils, specifically the version
Does anyone know what this means from the props script?
[robby@yanpu] ~/git/plt/collects/meta$ ./props
Root: /Users/robby/git/plt/...
.DS_Store: no responsible
DrRacket.app: no responsible
GRacket.app: no responsible
PLT Games.app: no responsible
Racket Documentation.app: no responsible
In addition to making a GUI program, eg:
#lang racket/gui
(send (new frame% [label ][width 100]) show #t)
Into an executable and using raco exe to create an executable, you
could also test doing that inside DrRacket (the Create Executable menu
item when you are in the module language has several
Sounds like they aren't. But it isn't clear when the bug was introduced.
Robby
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
In addition to making a GUI program, eg:
#lang
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Robby, could you share w/ us why you don't like the tool designation for the
Optimization Coach and the Future Visualizer? Or if you can't articulate the
dislike for 'tool', can you say what a better word is?
-
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Robby, could you share w/ us why you don't like the tool designation
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
All I regret is that we have a very shallow structure now, and I think it
would have helped if we had stuck to about a dozen or so categories after all.
I think the modern experience is that a flat hierarchy (or
, Robby Findler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
It is the future visualizer so I thought it belonged with the
visualizer. No?
(You mean ... belonged with the futures, right?)
Right
There are two pieces to the visualizer: one part extracts traces from
a computation and the other part shows them. The trace-extraction part
requires a connection to the runtime system and is, I believe,
currently in racket/future/trace. Should that be moved into
racket/future, or kept as a
the visualizer, in which case `racket/future/trace' seems
better than merging it into `racket/future'. But I still think that
`future-visualizer/trace' is better for now, and it could be moved back
out if there's ever actually another consumer of the library.
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:57:20 -0500, Robby
Better than tools, IMO. How about perf? Ie, perf/future-visualizer
and perf/optimization-coach/ ?
Robby
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
(Performance) tuning?
Vincent
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
tools seems like
, and maybe other less pref-y things...
On Jul 11, 2012 6:39 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
wrote:
Better than tools, IMO. How about perf? Ie, perf/future-visualizer
and perf/optimization-coach/ ?
Robby
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
related to
promise/c)
On 2012-07-10 22:13:58 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
Note that this means the guard on there is now going to be gone (as it
is meaningless since impersonators can arbitrarily change it).
This is something that has confused me about impersonators on struct
type property
Not to be a PITA, but the buttons are huge and if they are now always
there, we should be doing something different with the UI. The view
menu would be my first suggestion for where this should go.
Robby
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
At Wed, 11
doesn't carry the same expectation (to me, at least).
Vincent
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:39:53 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
Better than tools, IMO. How about perf? Ie, perf/future-visualizer
and perf/optimization-coach/ ?
Robby
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo
.
Another option is to split the toolbar into two parts. Or have two dockable
toolbars. I know that's more work for Robby... :D
Neil ⊥
On 07/11/2012 10:03 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
Not to be a PITA, but the buttons are huge and if they are now always
there, we should be doing something
the more substantial question will be how to reflect the information
into the GUI in a way that doesn't fight with the check syntax
information.
Robby
Neil ⊥
On 07/11/2012 10:47 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
Well, how many of the things currently in the View menu are nify
tools? The module browser
Would tuning work?
And can you say more about how the whackers made this distinction? Is
the issues that optimizing things doesn't always improve
performance... maybe?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Keep in mind that we were whacked for using
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Jul 11, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Would tuning work?
They were correct, and you conjectured correctly. We conflated 'optimization'
with 'performance gains.' As everyone knows who has been around
the
collection top-level tree here.
On Jul 11, 2012, at 8:26 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I like coaching for the (formerly known as) performance report tool. A lot!
I was suggesting tuning for the collection that would house the
future visualizer and the performance coach and hopefully eventually
That all makes sense to me (except, of course, that the futures
visualizer has nothing to do with drracket. Were the docs not clear on
this point somehow?)
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Several randomly collected replies:
* Re perf -- I dislike it
Yes, I think that would be great.
Which string constants specifically were you planning to remove? I
should probably check that they aren't used on planet.
Robby
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2012-07-08 15:47:27 +0800, Grecks Grecks wrote:
Hi, I
Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2012-07-10 07:20:59 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
Which string constants specifically were you planning to remove? I
should probably check that they aren't used on planet.
The `slideshow-insert-pict-box` constant doesn't appear to be used.
There are also
-0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
Version 1.2 of cdrswift.plt seems to use the slideshow-insert-pict-box
string constant, but it is up to version 1.5 now.
http://planet.racket-lang.org/display.ss?package=cdrswift.pltowner=dignatof
Probably best to just leave them in for now.
Should we
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:30:33 -0400 (EDT), Asumu Takikawa wrote:
- combinator-parser [...]
- test-box-recovery [...]
- tex2page [...]
These seem fine with me, because I think they have no current users.
We've had
On this front, this-expression-source-directory is, for nearly all
purposes, worse than define-runtime-path.
Robby
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:44:28 -0400,
Neil Van Dyke wrote:
I'm still using some mzlib in *new* code.
Right, of course you're right.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:20:16 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:30:33 -0400 (EDT), Asumu Takikawa
It is the future visualizer so I thought it belonged with the visualizer. No?
Alternative suggestions welcome.
Robby
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
This commit adds a bad dependency from the core to framework. Fixing
it is probably not hard, but it
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
It is the future visualizer so I thought it belonged with the
visualizer. No?
(You mean ... belonged with the futures, right?)
Right. :)
Alternative suggestions welcome.
I think
I'm not sure about the rationale behind the design of stream-map, but
any as a result contract for a function indicates it may return
multiple values (in the range of a function any is a special
keyword). any/c is a contract for a single value.
Robby
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Daniel King
What do you do if you have a function that accepts either promises or
lists? Then, you might want total predicates.
Robby
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I just realized that Racket already suffers from the problem that polymorphic
contracts
it.)
Robby
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I can't think of such a primitive other than force, for which it is okay. Can
you be concrete?
On Jul 6, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
What do you do if you have a function that accepts either
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I think the general rule, if you could call it a rule, has been try
harder when it seems useful for something.
A good one to live by. :)
Robby
_
Racket Developers list:
Is it possible there is another channel that TR could use to
communicate these types? That is, could it not expand
(: f Integer)
(define f 5)
into something that bound 'f' to a macro that knows its type? I guess
it already does that, so something doesn't work about that here, but
I'm not
If you're only going to use in keyword arguments (and optional
arguments), you could make it an error to touch the value, unless it
gets touched by a special predicate that checks for its existence.
That is, in
(define (f #:x [x]) ...)
(where I'm saying that leaving off the default value means
-double-flonum x)))]
...))
On 07/01/2012 04:04 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
3. Can you explain the issue again, using smaller words? (I think I
understand the first example, but then I'm lost.)
Robby
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
1
in that direction.
3
Jay
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Consider me done!
Robby
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com
wrote:
I haven't got a clue what you two are arguing about anymore. If you both
stop
501 - 600 of 1296 matches
Mail list logo
