Thanks for tracking this, Riley. I agree that we are ready to VOTE.
Thomas
Thomas Huang
Group Supervisor, Data Product Generation Software
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
(818) 354-2747
On Dec 12, 2023, at 3:19 PM,
The podling name search has completed and our name was approved![1]
I think that's the final thing we needed to take care of unless there's any
issues with out IP clearance. If so, I think we're ready to move to a VOTE on
graduation.
[1]
Very good, Joe
Thomas
Thomas Huang
Group Supervisor, Data Product Generation Software
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
(818) 354-2747
On Dec 5, 2023, at 1:03 PM, Jacob, Joseph C (US 398H)
wrote:
I'd also be in
I'd also be in favor of leaving the science domain open as well. On the "Unity
SDS" (science data system project) at JPL I have an SDAP deployment and
ingested some planetary data to run time series as an experiment last year.
Unity is mainly focused on Earth for now, but I recall hearing
Some follow up:
I committed the file [1], but now I'm confused as to whether or not
I'm doing the right thing. I would have thought our codebase would
be cleared when we were accepted into the incubator, and the IP
Clearance guide states that "This form is not for new projects"
leading me to
Hey Julian,
So it appears we haven't done the IP clearance/acceptance process, though we do
have an SGA on file for SDAP [1][2]. I have the .xml file filled out, though
the process description states an officer or member is required to do this
process, I could try to check it in myself, or
I think we shouldn't restrict ourselves to Earth science here. We could
definitely point out that it is currently used in Earth science elsewhere,
but we should avoid attaching that label to the project for the extended
future in the (apparently likely) event we will branch out in application to
FYI. We are in discussion with NASA JPL on using SDAP for planetary science.
thanks
Thomas
Thomas Huang
Group Supervisor, Data Product Generation Software
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
(818) 354-2747
On Dec 4,
This might just be me being nitpicky, but I think it should be
analytics with an s and wondering if we should say "integrated data
analytics center for big Earth science problems?" Should we emphasize
Earth here versus science in general? Understandably, there isn't
anything preventing SDAP from
So something like
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
The phrase "focusing on technology integration, advancement and maturity” seems
to be a little superfluous. It is not description, but more of a mission
statement. Could you remove it? I think that
SDAP is… an integrated data analytic center for Big Science problems
is a perfect description
Already done! (Pending PMC choices)
---
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for
Might be worth generating a draft graduation resolution. In that resolution
there are a couple of things to discuss — a description of the project, initial
PMC (are there any committers/PPMC members who do NOT want to join the PMC) and
initial PMC chair.
> On Dec 4, 2023, at 3:59 PM, Riley
Ok, I've cleared all the red flags.
I used today's date for dates I didn't know. I don't know if that's ok.
Still waiting for the name search before we can proceed.
I think once that's done and (hopefully) approved, we can proceed to vote!
On 2023/12/01 22:07:09 Julian Hyde wrote:
> I checked
I created a Jira case [1] with my findings in the name search
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-216
On 2023/12/01 22:07:09 Julian Hyde wrote:
> I checked SDAP’s roster page on Whimsy [1], and there are 4 red items that
> need to be done before graduation. I don’t know
The sites seem to have been rebuilt but the red flags are still there...
@Julian, did I miss something?
On 2023/12/04 22:10:20 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Ok I updated sdap.xml to reflect the project's status as best I could.
>
> - Added releases to the News section
> - Updated table for mailing
On it! Making notes of what I'm finding where, archiving URLs for searches and
entries where possible.
On 2023/12/04 21:39:20 Julian Hyde wrote:
> You should document what you did, and what you discovered, in the Jira case.
> Evidence that you have searched and found nothing will help get this
Ok I updated sdap.xml to reflect the project's status as best I could.
- Added releases to the News section
- Updated table for mailing lists, source repos, mentors, and committers
- Added dates in the Copyright and Verify distribution rights sections.
(Replaced -..-.. with today's date)
You should document what you did, and what you discovered, in the Jira case.
Evidence that you have searched and found nothing will help get this to
approval. SDAP is an unusual name, so it’s no surprise to me that there are few
clashes.
> On Dec 4, 2023, at 9:08 AM, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>
Thomas,
Thanks for looking into it. Sorry it was a false alarm. It’s likely that those
red flags exist because the incubation metadata is out of date.
It’s worthwhile to spend the time updating the metadata. I believe the
following are the important files:
*
Hey Julian,
I'm also starting up with a Podling Name Search, though I'm having difficulties
with the USPTO search. I followed the syntax documented in [1] but was
receiving syntax errors. I instead tried a field tag search for 'CM:SDAP' and
'CM:"Science Data Analytics Platform"' with no
Hi Julian,
I searched my old email archive and found the original Software Grant I
submitted to secret...@apache.org on October 26, 2017. I received the attached
response from Apache conforming receiving the document and has been filed. I
also attached the original signed SGA here. Please let
I think we should be good on the ASF Copyright Headers in our source releases.
I recall taking care of that pre 1.0.0.
Do the Docker images we build count as release binaries? Otherwise, I think
we've taken care of the chardet issue in our current 1.2.0 RC, though I think a
more thorough audit
Hi Julian
Could you send / point me the relevant form(s)? Our Software Release Authority
is ready to sign.
Thanks
Thomas
Thomas Huang
Group Supervisor, Data Product Generation Software
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
Thanks, Julian. I will look into the first item.
Thomas
Thomas Huang
Group Supervisor, Data Product Generation Software
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
(818) 354-2747
On Dec 1, 2023, at 2:08 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
I checked SDAP’s roster page on Whimsy [1], and there are 4 red items that
need to be done before graduation. I don’t know which of you are allowed to see
this page, so I’ve pasted them below. Let’s start working on these.
Licensing
* No Software Grant and No IP Clearance Filed
* No Release
Thanks, Nga and all the Apache SDAP contributors. SDAP has certainly educated
and transformed the Earth Science community on how to manage and analyze
climate data on the cloud and on-prem that is affordable for a decade. It
already has various infusions across the globe, especially within
27 matches
Mail list logo
