DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35956] - Updated CheckStyle rules file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35969] - Patches to resolve CheckStyle issues, batch #1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35969] - Patches to resolve CheckStyle issues, batch #1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35956] - Updated CheckStyle rules file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Proposal] Struts Ti

I'm kind of surprised with all the replies indicating the willingness to think much more revolutionary rather than evolutionary... I can't say I expected that, but I'm really quite happy about being wrong :) I really think web applications to this point, on the whole, have been rather lousy.

Re: [Proposal] Struts Ti

This looks really good, and fits well with my belief that the way to get to Struts 2.0 is to start by building a new core first, and then adding a compatibility layer on top of that to help people migrate. From my own perspective, it shouldn't be a surprise to most on this list that I have a p

[OT] My O'Reilly Open Source Conference Talk

I just uploaded the slides from my OSCON talk this afternoon, comparing several web frameworks on how they implement six major architectural features. Several people have asked for them, so here's a link: http://people.apache.org/~craigmcc/oscon_2005_web_architectures.pdf They are also on the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35488] - BeanValidatorForm cannot be saved in session

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsShale" by DavidThielen

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by DavidThielen: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsShale -- * [h

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13" by JoeGermuska

On Wed, August 3, 2005 10:41 am, Joe Germuska said: > At 10:05 AM -0400 8/3/05, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: >>Well, at least I was talking about Struts, huh Joe :) > > Hey, I wasn't trying to make a crack or anything -- No Joe, I know, I was just being a wise-guy. No offense was taken in any way, sh

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13" by JoeGermuska

At 10:05 AM -0400 8/3/05, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: Well, at least I was talking about Struts, huh Joe :) Hey, I wasn't trying to make a crack or anything -- it was a good question and it also reminded me that I feel like the bootstrapping of the chains deserves some more design consideration;

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13" by JoeGermuska

Well, at least I was talking about Struts, huh Joe :) -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Wed, August 3, 2005 8:55 am, Apache Wiki said: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki"

[Struts Wiki] Update of "ComposableRequestProcessor" by JoeGermuska

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JoeGermuska: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ComposableRequestProcessor The comment on the change is: Brief introduction to CRP, plus mention a few

Re: Session tracking with URL rewriting does not work with higher versions of struts.

On further analysis this is what we have found out. There is no "RequestProcessor.java" in struts 1.0.2 . This class is been introduced from struts1.1. Enabling struts trace i could see that struts ActionServlet is calling "sendError 400 Invalid path ;jsessionid=gE0mwjqt37IqNxCy0s2UO15:-1 was

[Struts Wiki] Trivial Update of "RequestProcessor/Composable" by JoeGermuska

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JoeGermuska: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RequestProcessor/Composable The comment on the change is: Make clear that Struts has officially adopted

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13" by JoeGermuska

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JoeGermuska: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13 The comment on the change is: Adapted Frank's comment in an attempt to answer

svn commit: r227211 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/ti: ./ src/example/WEB-INF/src/java/ src/example/WEB-INF/src/java/ttt/ src/java/org/apache/ti/config/mapper/

Author: husted Date: Wed Aug 3 05:35:00 2005 New Revision: 227211 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=227211&view=rev Log: Add LICENSE.txt and friends, and a couple license statements. No code changes. Added: struts/sandbox/trunk/ti/LICENSE.txt struts/sandbox/trunk/ti/NOTICE.txt

Session tracking with URL rewriting does not work with higher versions of struts.

Our application is built on struts frame work.. Moving from a previous version of struts (1.0.2) to struts 1.1 we have seen that Session management using URL rewriting is not working properly. Our logs shows that the class RequestProcessor from struts is throwing the below error [4/7/05 15:26

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31501] - html:form focus generates non-XHTML

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu