I've started playing with JSR286 portlet support in Struts 2. Is the
sandbox an appropriate place to put this code (probably a new plugin),
or is the sandbox reserved for other purposes?
Nils-H
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
2008/1/16, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've started playing with JSR286 portlet support in Struts 2. Is the
sandbox an appropriate place to put this code (probably a new plugin),
or is the sandbox reserved for other purposes?
AFAIK the sandbox is made for playing :-)
On 1/16/08, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/16, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've started playing with JSR286 portlet support in Struts 2. Is the
sandbox an appropriate place to put this code (probably a new plugin),
or is the sandbox reserved for other
On Jan 16, 2008 5:25 AM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/16, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've started playing with JSR286 portlet support in Struts 2. Is the
sandbox an appropriate place to put this code (probably a new plugin),
or is the sandbox reserved
Just a note Nils,
If you are working in Sandbox, please open JIRA issues under the SB project:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB
with the appropriate component (probably you have to create one).
This does not include the issue that you have already created, that is
generic enough to stay
Thanks for the notice. I'll remember that.
Nils-H
On Jan 16, 2008 3:05 PM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a note Nils,
If you are working in Sandbox, please open JIRA issues under the SB project:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB
with the appropriate component
For whatever reason, I can succesfully buid the head ocally.
I'll apply some patches elsewhere in the codebase to my working copy,
but hold off on any commit until Bamboo is a happy camper.
On Jan 16, 2008 5:20 AM, Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration
Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
On Jan 16, 2008 9:38 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For whatever reason, I can succesfully buid the head ocally.
This wasn't some kind of a joke. I was typing with one hand
unsuccessfully while eating an apple. :)
-
To
On Jan 16, 2008 6:24 AM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
That's a fair question, but I have an answer for it.
Of course you do. If you didn't, I'd think you'd gone on vacation or
something. ;-)
:)
So you're saying that if a non-committer thinks a
I'm not sure what caused the error. The commit shouldn't have caused
any problems. Is it Bamboo hiccups?
Nils-H
On Jan 16, 2008 3:39 PM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 9:38 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For whatever reason, I can succesfully buid the head
Dunno. It builds for me. I have some POM changes to commit. I'll go
ahead and commit those, so that we can see what happens.
On Jan 16, 2008 10:07 AM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what caused the error. The commit shouldn't have caused
any problems. Is it Bamboo
I have needed them to use the StrutsTestCase as a parent class and not
that it was so bad, but my application doesn't have any dependencies on
Spring and I had to go add them to unit test my application. It seems
rather silly to pull in dependencies for a class or two. I would assume
we could
On Jan 16, 2008 6:28 AM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 6:24 AM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
That's a fair question, but I have an answer for it.
Of course you do. If you didn't, I'd think you'd gone on vacation or
Niall Pemberton wrote:
For the record I agree with Martin and in my book votes-are-votes
whoever they come from.
Well, I'm reading the bylaws right now:
http://struts.apache.org/dev/bylaws.html
...and a couple of things stand out to me:
(1) It is specifically stated that the act of voting
On Jan 16, 2008 12:23 AM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a fair question, but I have an answer for it. Put simply, I feel
that anyone officially made a member of a project team has accepted a
greater level of responsibility than someone in the larger user community.
A
Ted, I am guilty as charged of going heads down for a while.
However, I am back for at least the next year. Though I won't be able
to participate in user and dev discussions due to time. I'm on the
lists, but not reading everything unless it stands out. If you want
my input, please holla at
On Jan 16, 2008 10:47 AM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) If as you say Niall votes are votes, then that SHOULD mean that
non-binding voters can veto a release, but the bylaws say differently:
3 binding +1 votes and no binding vetos is the benchmark to whether
a action passes or
It's passing now, so I guess it was just a hiccup.
On Jan 16, 2008 10:16 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno. It builds for me. I have some POM changes to commit. I'll go
ahead and commit those, so that we can see what happens.
On Jan 16, 2008 10:07 AM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
Ted Husted wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 10:47 AM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) If as you say Niall votes are votes, then that SHOULD mean that
non-binding voters can veto a release, but the bylaws say differently:
3 binding +1 votes and no binding vetos is the benchmark to whether
a
--- Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Husted wrote:
Since everyone here is a volunteer, there's no way to enforce an
obligation, and the ASF guidelines remind us of this. A vote is an
opinion, not a commitment.
Didn't you effectively say the opposite just yesterday? :
On Jan 16, 2008 11:42 AM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That may be so in practice Ted, but the bylaws say differently:
An action requiring consensus approval must receive at least 3 binding
+1 votes and no binding vetos.
A release is not an action that requires consensus
On Jan 16, 2008 5:10 PM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 12:23 AM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a fair question, but I have an answer for it. Put simply, I feel
that anyone officially made a member of a project team has accepted a
greater level of
On Jan 16, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 12:23 AM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's a fair question, but I have an answer for it. Put simply,
I feel
that anyone officially made a member of a project team has accepted a
greater level of responsibility
Ted Husted wrote:
A release is not an action that requires consensus approval. It's a
majority action. Look farther down under Release Plan and Release
Grade.
Ah your right! Ok, in that case:
An action requiring majority approval must receive at least 3 binding
+1 votes and more +1 votes
Dave Newton wrote:
--- Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Husted wrote:
Since everyone here is a volunteer, there's no way to enforce an
obligation, and the ASF guidelines remind us of this. A vote is an
opinion, not a commitment.
Didn't you effectively say the opposite just
2008/1/16, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As a group, we really suck at letting each other know
that we won't be around for a while.
Ted,
we are not a group, we are a community. In a group there is a chief,
there is a plan, and so on. Most of us (me included) participate in
the spare time. For
One thing we could do is to use a section of the wiki (is the export for
distribution controlled by... top-level page, or...?) is to provide some info
about expected availability *when such information is available*.
For example, I know that for the next month that I'll be able to work a tiny
bit
Is there an easy way to get the entire struts-user mailing list archive,
potentially broken up by dates? (It's for research.)
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ted,
I think you're mixing a vote on quality with a vote on support. A +1 should
mean only of those things. If you really want to find out who intends to
support the release, hold another vote on that. For me, when I give a +1,
it's to determine software quality -- not my involvement. My vote is
MarkMail baby http://struts.markmail.org/
--
Ian Roughley
From Down Around, Inc.
Consulting * Training / Mentoring * Agile Process * Open Source
web: http://www.fdar.com - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Newton wrote:
Is there an easy way to get the entire struts-user mailing list
--- Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MarkMail baby http://struts.markmail.org/
I didn't see an immediately obvious way to get an archive; is there one? I
really need a large corpus and I'd prefer to get it in some sort of archive
rather than GETting everything.
Thanks,
Dave
On Jan 16, 2008 1:44 PM, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't see an immediately obvious way to get an archive; is there one? I
really need a large corpus and I'd prefer to get it in some sort of archive
rather than GETting everything.
Start here:
On Jan 16, 2008 3:47 PM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
For the record I agree with Martin and in my book votes-are-votes
whoever they come from.
Well, I'm reading the bylaws right now:
Yeah and missing the wood for the trees. Vetos need justification
Perfect; thanks.
d.
--- Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 1:44 PM, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't see an immediately obvious way to get an archive; is there one?
I
really need a large corpus and I'd prefer to get it in some sort of
archive
rather
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 3:47 PM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
For the record I agree with Martin and in my book votes-are-votes
whoever they come from.
Well, I'm reading the bylaws right now:
Yeah and missing the wood for the trees.
Not
On Jan 16, 2008 12:19 AM, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why not start a thread about who's planning / intending / feeling
[morally] obligated / promising to support the product and help apply
patches, and get an answer to you real question?
*
On Jan 16, 2008 4:42 PM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't understand is why there's any hesitation to get the bylaws
inline with reality,
There's no hesitation. Before acting, some of us just like to give
others a chance to express their own opinions.
-Ted.
On Jan 16, 2008 2:14 PM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for being rude.
No offense taken.
Like all ASF projects, Apache Struts is modeled after the original
Apache HTTPD Group. In this sense, it is like a group in an operating
system. Everyone in the group has the same
38 matches
Mail list logo
