On 5/11/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have taken some time to check out the 1.3.4 version today -
upgrading my webapp to this version (was on 1.2.9) and the only other
issue(s) I came up with is that we used to distribute things like the
validator-rules.xml config and taglib t
On 5/1/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/1/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/1/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We also need to send the Wiki diffs to commits@ instead of [EMAIL
PROTECTED] Is
> > that som
On 5/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall, does Monday give you enough time? Calling the vote immediately
> was intended to encourage testing and evaluation, not to lock people
> out of the process by ru
On 5/10/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I missed the discussion where the 1.3 dtd was added - seems like its
actually identical to the 1.1 dtd - which IMO serves no purpose. I
would rather it was removed.
I remember being involved -- it had to do with the version numbers not
mat
On 5/10/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This seems like the smallest of things, but the distribution includes
struts-core-1.3.4.jar and not struts-action-1.3.4.jar.
I thought we'd decided to change that? The upgrade notes wiki page
refers to struts-action:
http://wiki.apache.org/st
declared
in the struts-action-parent pom as an . Each module can
then access the config files on the classpath.
Version 1.0.0 was retired due to an invalid jar manifest. This will
be the first release of struts-build.
Here's my +1.
--
Wendy
th no problems, and I believe we've resolved all of the
packaging issues discovered since converting to Maven 2 and
reorganizing the project.
--
Wendy Smoak
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: mrdon
Date: Sat May 6 19:32:25 2006
New Revision: 400385
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=400385&view=rev
Log:
Starting to synchronizing the Maven 2 build with Struts Action 1,
keeping the Ant build in sync
I think section
On 5/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tonight I'll review the issues and changes since 1.3.3 and deploy
snapshots of 1.3.4. Assuming there are no major issues outstanding,
I'm planning on rolling the 1.3.4 test build on Tuesday evening.
The snapshots are a
Please continue reviewing the 1.3.3 test build and reporting issues:
* http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.3/
Are there any comments on the included website docs?
I've posted a release plan for 1.3.4:
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease134
Tonight I'll review the issu
On 5/7/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts Action Framework 1.3.3 Test Build is available to evaluate
for release quality.
The release plan is available on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease133
+1 Beta -- The struts-tiles jar is missing t
On 5/8/06, David Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On this page:
http://struts.apache.org/announce.html
In the bulleted section of the first announcement, "23 March 2006 ..."
the following statement is open-ended:
A new "mailreader" demo application that duplicates the
functional
On 5/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The "Specification-Title" entry in the manifest for many (all?) of the
generated JAR files is corrupted.
Maven is picking up the from the struts-parent pom.
Adding a single line to struts/current/action/pom.xml
should override it. (Bu
On 5/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I notice that, when a release manager is cutting a new release, she or he
has to update the element of all the dependent pom.xml files (in
the recent case, from 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.3, and then from 1.3.3 to
1.3.4-SNAPSHOT). Since these po
On 5/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* The missing DTD files in struts-tiles-xxx.jar that Jurgen Zimmerman
reported.
* The fact that META-INF/tld/struts-tiles.tld is *also* missing from this
jar file. It looks like Maven's resource copying process is not
recursive by de
On 5/8/06, Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
struts-tiles-1.3.3.jar is missing the dtd files
tiles-config_1_1.dtd and tiles-config_1_3.dtd
Thanks once again! (And Craig, for noticing the missing tld.)
I opened http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2866 for it.
--
Wendy
-
ve had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
of Struts PMC members are binding.
I organized action2 into the usual branches/tags/trunk structure, and
added it to the 'current' external.
Then I noticed a few jar files as things scrolled by during an update.
Can any of these be removed?
~/svn/struts/current/action2
$ find . -name *.jar
./apps/portlet/src/main/etc/gridsphere/g
On 5/7/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd prefer site, since it keeps the focus on the deliverables.
I agree. After thinking about it for a while I couldn't really come
up with a justification for 'all'. If it's important enough to have
issues, it can have its own JIRA project.
-
On 5/7/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Don worked on these already (after that snapshot). Does this
> look better?
> http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/milestones.html
Actually, I removed this page, merging its content into the roadmap
page. Check the live website for
On 5/7/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#1) The Development milestones haven't been updated since 1.2.6.
If you don't care about documenting anything else in 1.2.x, at least
split off 1.3.x into 1.3.3 and 1.3.x, so that the notes are official.
There's a couple of "TODO" items still l
As part of his review of the 1.3.3 snapshot, Paul suggested changing
the downloads page. This is actually part of the top-level site.
We currently don't have anywhere to record issues for the
struts.apache.org site, or for things that affect more than one of the
sub-projects.
What do you think
On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We need to release version 2 of the struts-parent pom:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/trunk/pom/pom.xml
RESULT
+1 - 6 (binding)
I'm publishing it now...
Th
Our JIRA instance is showing a stack trace on the dashboard.
I opened a ticket for it: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-789
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 5/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I still need to provide detailed instructions (ya, it's on my todo list :) ),
but basically, just do this:
- build and deploy the struts-blank.war sample app
~/svn/struts/current/action/apps/blank
$ mvn package cargo:start
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Strike that. JIRA search works fine.
Before or after I changed the summary text on your issue? :)
There's a new snapshot available if you want to get a head start on
issues for 1.3.3 this weekend:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/struts/ma
We need to release version 2 of the struts-parent pom:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/trunk/pom/pom.xml
This is the parent pom from which struts-action-parent inherits, and
it needs to be released prior to the Struts Action 1.3.3 test build.
Changes since v1 include:
- Addition
The Subversion plugin for JIRA seems to be installed, but it's not
working. For example:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398085&view=rev
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2852?page=all
This page says there is a properties file to edit, and I wonder if
that was done for our instal
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. The struts-cookbook-1.3.2 application allows to take a look at the
Java source code of examples. The links refer to
source.jsp?src=/WEB-INF/src/java/examples/simple/xxx.java, while the
actual source code is located under /WEB-INF/src/exa
On 4/28/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are things like references to Bugzilla.
Do you remember where? I searched across struts-action and only found
bugzilla links on the old release notes pages. The Struts Faces index
page had a typo and wasn't building, so the old version
Sorry for the delay. I finally got 1.3.2 into test today.
+1 Beta
--
Wendy
On 4/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
The release plan is available
On 4/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My bad - fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience.
I have also subscribed all committers to the 'allow' list for commits
to save the moderators some time.
Thanks, Brett!
We also need to send the Wiki diffs to commits@ instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/1/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done. It's not much to speak of, but it's a start. I checked it
into sandbox/tiles-test. The lib directory is empty. It will need
the following jars to run:
Thanks. Which build are you using? I'd like to arrange Standalone
Tiles into modu
On 4/28/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having met
the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
Status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/webwork2.html
[ ] +1 L
On 4/30/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not long after this, the moderation emails came in.
For issues@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I received a couple of moderation emails for
issues, (and I see someone already let them through,) but my commit
message from yesterday bounced with:
Hi
On 4/29/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's because this was *not* a vote. It was a proposal. The +1's, +0s, etc.
do not count as votes but as expressions of agreement or otherwise. That
there were no -1 or -0 comments indicates that there was general concensus
to go ahead.
In g
Commit messages are bouncing from the new list. I re-opened INFRA-780.
--
Wendy
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 30 Apr 2006 01:06:28 -
Subject: failure notice
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
On 4/29/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Feel free to add me as moderator for all lists, I'm already one for
user and dev.
Thanks. And thanks to Brett Porter for what must have been the
fastest response on an INFRA ticket in the history of the ASF! The
lists are done:
http://
ke sure that
commits@ will be archived before we unsub it from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I assume a
moderator for dev@ can do that part.)
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Thanks,
Wendy
On 4/25/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To make it easier to filter and sort m
Build
Reporter: Wendy Smoak
Assigned to: Wendy Smoak
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.3.3
Move the Cactus tests for Struts EL and Struts Taglib to the sandbox.
Also move the Struts Faces sysclient-app and systest1-webapp directories.
(This is a webapp and HtmlUnit tests for it
[
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2850?page=comments#action_37247 ]
Wendy Smoak commented on STR-2850:
--
See also:
http://www.nabble.com/-action1-Improving-our-testslong-was-Re%3A-Standalone-Tiles%3A-Status-and-Call-for-Help--p4150894.html
On 3/21/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for the test cases, I'm not very familiar with Cactus or some
other web app testing packages. So to save time, I've been testing
using a simple web application and clicking through.
...
I can also check my test app into the sandbox if it
w
James, shouldn't this be src/main/resource_s_ ?
Thanks,
Wendy
On 4/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu Apr 27 19:12:59 2006
New Revision: 397735
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397735&view=rev
Log:
making action1 src consistent
Added:
str
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2850?page=all ]
Wendy Smoak reopened STR-2850:
--
The integration/apps-it module needs to be added to the assembly.
> Add tests to confirm that example apps w
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2851?page=all ]
Wendy Smoak resolved STR-2851:
--
Resolution: Fixed
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397772&view=rev
> The Struts Tiles jar is missing from the 1.3.2 distr
Smoak
Assigned to: Wendy Smoak
Fix For: 1.3.3
Reported by Jürgen Zimmermann
1.3.2: JAR file for tiles is missing in the distribution
There is no jar file for tiles in the lib subdirectory.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2850?page=all ]
Wendy Smoak resolved STR-2850:
--
Fix Version: 1.3.3
Resolution: Fixed
> Add tests to confirm that example apps work
> ---
>
>
On 4/27/06, Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no jar file for tiles in the lib subdirectory.
Thanks for reporting this! I'll fix the build files, meanwhile you
can grab the Tiles jar here:
http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/struts/action/struts-tile
: Wendy Smoak
Assigned to: Wendy Smoak
Priority: Minor
Simple automated tests using HtmlUnit and Cargo, to confirm that each example
app deploys, starts, and displays its default page.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of
On 4/27/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the move to Maven, the taglib tests were pretty much broken and
> neglected. They were not neglected due to a lack of interest, but
> more for technical reasons (translated -- I didn't know how to force
> Maven to do what I wanted).
>
>
On 4/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the build work out of the way, it is time to get on the fast track to a
> GA release
> of Struts Action 1.3. Here is my plan:
...
> I'm willing to be the release manager for these release if no one else steps
> up to the plate. If we have
[moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/26/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot currently reopen or edit JIRA issues. My profile does say I
> am in the struts-developers group but that does not appear to be
> enough.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sean
---
On 4/26/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am +0 for creating [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd prefer that we subscribe JIRA, Moin
> Moin, and Confluence to commits@, and keep all the automatic mail in
> one place. If it helps to rename commits@ to notifications@ or alerts@
> or logs@, then that w
On 4/25/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance that as you discuss this there would be a move to make dev@ not
> receive all commit@ messages? Some of us (me) prefer to use RSS and forcing
> the emails seems a bit heavy handed.
I remember this request from the last time t
To make it easier to filter and sort messages, and to facilitate
presenting the lists through alternate interfaces such as forums and
RSS feeds, I propose that we do the following:
* establish [EMAIL PROTECTED] and direct JIRA emails to it
* unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] (svn commit messages an
On 4/25/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, there are three public lists.
>
> * user@ for helping people use the product
> * dev@ for discussing changes to the product
> * commit@ for logging changes to the product
>
> Right now, we have the issue trackers and wiki posting to dev
Is it easy to rename components? Under Struts Action 1, the component
'Action' should be 'Core'.
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should we move to Commons Validator 1.3.0 for Struts Action?
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/23/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Get Standalone Tiles really standalone, so that there are no dependencies
> on other Struts code. Maybe that's happened already - I've kinda lost track.
This seems to be done -- sandbox/tiles/pom.xml has no struts
dependencies listed.
Spe
On 4/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't that conflict with the idea of making Tiles a stand-alone TLP?
No. This is Struts Tiles, not Standalone Tiles.
Standalone Tiles is in the sandbox, and will have a life of its own.
Struts Tiles is what most of us are using. Eve
On 4/23/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in the same camp on this one. I think we (SAF1) should be
> providing a plugin that provides Tiles integration.
In that case, should Struts Tiles be put back under Struts Action?
--
Wendy
--
On 4/23/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. Would it be possible to do this by JavaOne? Moving Tiles isn't
> a huge deal, but it would make the new directions of Struts easier to
> explain to users.
What happens to Struts Tiles, then? I'm not sure I understand why
we're holding S
On 4/20/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we require these snapshot plugins in our POM somehow?
> I'm fine with working with snapshots, but their download and
> use should be automatic.
When the Javadoc plugin gets fixed, yes. For now, the released
versions are working (you just don'
On 4/18/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We definitely need an action/src/site directory to contain
> the root site.xml that others inherit, and if you can get
> over the aforementioned issue, then collecting all docs
> there would work for me.
I moved action/core/src/site up to src/sit
On 4/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... to get the Javadoc generated for the
> site, add this to action/pom.xml:
>
>
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-javadoc-plugin
On 4/15/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig wrote
> > I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of
> > these artifacts (although probably two sets ...
>
> Can we do this with custom assemblies?
Without trying it, I don't think so, because it's more than just
On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Separately, I'm ready (gulp!) to start moving Shale towards Maven2, and it's
> recommended soure directory organizations ... as long as you
> have-a-clue-about-Maven gurus promise to stand by my side and help :-).
Of course. :)
> I
> had
On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should
> also definitely include the 2.4 DTD, as that is now a popular platform. To
> make the inclusion effective, though, we'll also want to make sure it gets
> registered with the Digester that processes config files -- otherwise,
>
Do we need to include webapp-2_2.dtd in struts-core.jar? I deleted it
as part of the reorganization [1], so only the webapp 2.3 dtd remains.
Should we include the one for 2.4 as well?
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394264&view=rev
Thanks,
--
Wendy
---
Another one from the chat log... to get the Javadoc generated for the
site, add this to action/pom.xml:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-javadoc-plugin
...
(and repeat for other reporting plugins. Checkstyle? PMD?)
Don mentioned wanting to get the docs in
On 4/14/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I spent some time yesterday looking at what's left wrt the sample apps.
Thanks. :)
> struts-mailreader
> - good to go
>
> (Does the web tests work for this yet?)
They're done with Canoo Webtest, right? I didn't find a m2 plugin for
it,
On 4/12/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So can we say we have an assembly building and can restart the nightlies?
All 25MB of it. :) Example:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/nightly/struts-action/
The procedure here should work the same for nightlies as releases.
Yo
On 4/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: wsmoak
> Date: Wed Apr 12 09:39:38 2006
> New Revision: 393500
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=393500&view=rev
> Log:
> Reorganize Struts Site for Maven 2.
There seems to be something wrong with the .fml files (in
site/s
On 4/11/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it still do the tagging and version changing for you? I'm not sure if
> I'm trust maven enough to do SVN commands quite yet.
Yes. I wasn't sure yet, either. :) That's why I was the test repo
finding out *exactly* what it planned to do. W
On 4/10/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's just about ready for 1.3.2. Since I haven't ever
> released with Maven 2, I wasn't quite ready to try it against the
> Struts repo without seeing it once through somewhere else.
I got the the 'm
On 4/9/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, is this a temporary thing? Maven 2 likes to find resources under
> 'resources', rather than in the source tree (meaning that's the default).
> That happens to be my preference too. ;-)
Right now we have some things in the source tree, som
Every time I run mvn install, I get a file called 'test-database.xml'
created in the current directory. Usually current/struts/action,
assuming I'm installing from the top.
$ grep -r "test-database" .
./mailreader-dao/src/test/org/apache/struts/apps/mailreader/dao/impl/memory/Memo
ryUserDatabaseT
On 4/6/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'll get out a unified Action 1 release yet :)
I think it's just about ready for 1.3.2. Since I haven't ever
released with Maven 2, I wasn't quite ready to try it against the
Struts repo without seeing it once through somewhere else.
I'm practi
On 4/9/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does that actually work? I figured Maven wouldn't look in the
> snapshot repo for non-snapshot artifacts. If this works you have
> found a useful hack ...
Yes, it works. Maven doesn't know it's a snapshot repository. (Maybe
you're thinkin
On 4/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need to release version 1 of the struts-parent pom:
>
> * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/pom/pom.xml
After Martin's addition of the missing committers, and my changing
once more, the struts-parent pom has b
FYI: I'm working in Struts EL now, moving the
'strutsel-exercise-taglib' webapp to the apps module.
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, it worked with m2 version 2.0.3.
Good, but there were some regressions in 2.0.3. If you have any
problems with it, here's the 2.0.4 release candidate:
* http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-vote-%282%29-Maven-2.0.4-Release-p3786986.html
> So
On 4/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: wsmoak
> Date: Sat Apr 8 22:40:48 2006
> New Revision: 392681
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392681&view=rev
> Log:
> Wrap the assembly creation in the 'generate-assembly' profile, and link to it
> from the struts-actio
On 4/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenanceMaven
>
>
> I'm trying to follow the instructions here with the latest bits (including
> y
On 4/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maven's release process doesn't really fit without test build phase,
s/without/with our
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addition
:::sigh::: I realized that I couldn't deploy the snapshot without
, so I just made a change. Please review and
change your vote if necessary.
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/pom/pom.xml
Maven's release process doesn't really fit without test build phase,
so Brett suggested "releasing"
We need to release version 1 of the struts-parent pom:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/pom/pom.xml
This is the parent pom from which struts-action-parent inherits, and
it needs to be released prior to the Struts Action 1.3.2 test build.
Because this is largely uncontroversial, I would
On 4/8/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On MyFaces we took a vote on version 1.0 of our master pom.
...
> I think for something as trivial as a pom (which doesn't actually
> require signing btw) ...
They're not being terribly strict about it yet, but the README in
dist/maven-reposi
The struts-parent pom (version 1) needs to be released:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/pom/pom.xml
Do we need to have a vote? Seems like overkill, but then again this
is a release artifact that will have to be signed and deployed under
www.apache.org/dist, so maybe not.
Meanwhile, (u
On 4/8/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There has been a semi-working build for maven 2 included with WebWork
> for a few months, but I'd like to make that build the default build for
> action 2.
Great news. :) Several of us are working on converting Action 1 to m2 as well.
I
On 4/6/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wendy and I have converted the artifacts and webapps over to Maven 2.
> They are all building with tests passing. The
> assembly build works correctly, running all the builds then creating a
> tarball and zip file.
I have the Cactus tests for Ta
On 4/6/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, is it 1.3.1 or 1.3.2?
>
> The versions are correct. Struts Tiles has a separate build and is at
> 1.3.1-SNAPSHOT, having had a 1.3.0 test build. T
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, is it 1.3.1 or 1.3.2?
The versions are correct. Struts Tiles has a separate build and is at
1.3.1-SNAPSHOT, having had a 1.3.0 test build. The Struts Action jars
(core, el, extras, taglib...) will be versioned together and should be
at
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was pleasantly surprised (after making my changes to the 4 or 5
> tests in core) to run 'mvn install' in struts/action/build/ and see
> the reactor kick off and fully build/test/install all/some of SAF.
> Same for compile, test, and a few ot
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why 2.0.4? Building from source?!? Jeez! At least I'm not _that_
> bad ;)
Because 2.0.3 had some serious regressions, and it was just as easy to
grab the 2.0.4 release candidate as to go back to 2.0.2. It's the
plugins I'm building from so
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Notice the console outputs "FAILURE !!", which make it pretty easy to
> spot ;)
I notice it, I'm just not seeing it here. FWIW, I'm using a snapshot
of Maven 2.0.4 and quite a few plugins built from source. Maven 2 is
still a work in progre
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I'm about to start another thread related to our build...it is
> (more or less) notes as I go through the various project.xml,
> pom.xml, etc, etc for each of the pieces of the action1 puzzle.
What do you think about moving the build fi
On 4/5/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Weird, so your Maven thinks that the tests fail? The tests pass for me, for
> the core module anyways.
The tests don't fail for me, either. They're just noisy with stack traces.
Don, 'maven nightly' continues to work fine here. I deleted
org.
On 4/3/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 'actual' shell script that gets run nightly via cron is not under
> svn. Since we run nightlies on our zone, it is merely a copy of the
> one under svn and as changes come in, I review and then update my
> copy. It's probably an unnecessa
On 4/3/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I'm hoping the nightly build scripts will be unaffected, although
> I'd kinda be surprised. Let me know any way I can help fix them, if
> they are indeed broken.
It looks like Craig's are okay, but not the Maven-built ones. I made
a change
701 - 800 of 1224 matches
Mail list logo