Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/11/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have taken some time to check out the 1.3.4 version today - upgrading my webapp to this version (was on 1.2.9) and the only other issue(s) I came up with is that we used to distribute things like the validator-rules.xml config and taglib t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-05-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/1/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/1/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/1/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We also need to send the Wiki diffs to commits@ instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is > > that som

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/10/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall, does Monday give you enough time? Calling the vote immediately > was intended to encourage testing and evaluation, not to lock people > out of the process by ru

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/10/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I missed the discussion where the 1.3 dtd was added - seems like its actually identical to the 1.1 dtd - which IMO serves no purpose. I would rather it was removed. I remember being involved -- it had to do with the version numbers not mat

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/10/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This seems like the smallest of things, but the distribution includes struts-core-1.3.4.jar and not struts-action-1.3.4.jar. I thought we'd decided to change that? The upgrade notes wiki page refers to struts-action: http://wiki.apache.org/st

[VOTE] Release Struts Build v1.0.1

2006-05-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
declared in the struts-action-parent pom as an . Each module can then access the config files on the classpath. Version 1.0.0 was retired due to an invalid jar manifest. This will be the first release of struts-build. Here's my +1. -- Wendy

[VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
th no problems, and I believe we've resolved all of the packaging issues discovered since converting to Maven 2 and reorganizing the project. -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r400385 - in /incubator/webwork2: ./ action/ core/ core/src/test/java/org/apache/struts/action2/views/jsp/ src/site/ thirdparty/ thirdparty/jasperreports/ thirdparty/jfreechart/ thirdp

2006-05-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Author: mrdon Date: Sat May 6 19:32:25 2006 New Revision: 400385 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=400385&view=rev Log: Starting to synchronizing the Maven 2 build with Struts Action 1, keeping the Ant build in sync I think section

Re: Struts Action 1.3.4 Release Plan

2006-05-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tonight I'll review the issues and changes since 1.3.3 and deploy snapshots of 1.3.4. Assuming there are no major issues outstanding, I'm planning on rolling the 1.3.4 test build on Tuesday evening. The snapshots are a

Struts Action 1.3.4 Release Plan

2006-05-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
Please continue reviewing the 1.3.3 test build and reporting issues: * http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.3/ Are there any comments on the included website docs? I've posted a release plan for 1.3.4: * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease134 Tonight I'll review the issu

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.3 Quality

2006-05-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/7/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Struts Action Framework 1.3.3 Test Build is available to evaluate for release quality. The release plan is available on the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease133 +1 Beta -- The struts-tiles jar is missing t

Re: small error on announcements page

2006-05-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/8/06, David Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On this page: http://struts.apache.org/announce.html In the bulleted section of the first announcement, "23 March 2006 ..." the following statement is open-ended: A new "mailreader" demo application that duplicates the functional

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.3 Quality

2006-05-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The "Specification-Title" entry in the manifest for many (all?) of the generated JAR files is corrupted. Maven is picking up the from the struts-parent pom. Adding a single line to struts/current/action/pom.xml should override it. (Bu

Re: Stupid Maven Question

2006-05-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I notice that, when a release manager is cutting a new release, she or he has to update the element of all the dependent pom.xml files (in the recent case, from 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.3, and then from 1.3.3 to 1.3.4-SNAPSHOT). Since these po

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.3 Quality

2006-05-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * The missing DTD files in struts-tiles-xxx.jar that Jurgen Zimmerman reported. * The fact that META-INF/tld/struts-tiles.tld is *also* missing from this jar file. It looks like Maven's resource copying process is not recursive by de

Re: struts-tiles-1.3.3.jar is missing dtd files

2006-05-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/8/06, Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: struts-tiles-1.3.3.jar is missing the dtd files tiles-config_1_1.dtd and tiles-config_1_3.dtd Thanks once again! (And Craig, for noticing the missing tld.) I opened http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2866 for it. -- Wendy -

[VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.3 Quality

2006-05-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
ve had a chance to review this test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes of Struts PMC members are binding.

Re: svn commit: r404856 - /struts/action2/

2006-05-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
I organized action2 into the usual branches/tags/trunk structure, and added it to the 'current' external. Then I noticed a few jar files as things scrolled by during an update. Can any of these be removed? ~/svn/struts/current/action2 $ find . -name *.jar ./apps/portlet/src/main/etc/gridsphere/g

Re: Struts JIRA -- top level 'ALL' and/or 'SITE' project?

2006-05-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/7/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd prefer site, since it keeps the focus on the deliverables. I agree. After thinking about it for a while I couldn't really come up with a justification for 'all'. If it's important enough to have issues, it can have its own JIRA project. -

Re: Struts Action 1.3.3 release will be going for GA, need feedback now

2006-05-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/7/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Don worked on these already (after that snapshot). Does this > look better? > http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/milestones.html Actually, I removed this page, merging its content into the roadmap page. Check the live website for

Re: Struts Action 1.3.3 release will be going for GA, need feedback now

2006-05-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/7/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: #1) The Development milestones haven't been updated since 1.2.6. If you don't care about documenting anything else in 1.2.x, at least split off 1.3.x into 1.3.3 and 1.3.x, so that the notes are official. There's a couple of "TODO" items still l

Struts JIRA -- top level 'ALL' and/or 'SITE' project?

2006-05-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
As part of his review of the 1.3.3 snapshot, Paul suggested changing the downloads page. This is actually part of the top-level site. We currently don't have anywhere to record issues for the struts.apache.org site, or for things that affect more than one of the sub-projects. What do you think

Re: [VOTE] Release the struts-parent pom v2

2006-05-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We need to release version 2 of the struts-parent pom: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/trunk/pom/pom.xml RESULT +1 - 6 (binding) I'm publishing it now... Th

Struts JIRA problem

2006-05-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
Our JIRA instance is showing a stack trace on the dashboard. I opened a ticket for it: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-789 -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

TestGen4Web (was: Re: svn commit: r399762 - in /struts/action/trunk/integration/tg4w: ...)

2006-05-04 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I still need to provide detailed instructions (ya, it's on my todo list :) ), but basically, just do this: - build and deploy the struts-blank.war sample app ~/svn/struts/current/action/apps/blank $ mvn package cargo:start

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Strike that. JIRA search works fine. Before or after I changed the summary text on your issue? :) There's a new snapshot available if you want to get a head start on issues for 1.3.3 this weekend: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/struts/ma

[VOTE] Release the struts-parent pom v2

2006-05-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
We need to release version 2 of the struts-parent pom: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/trunk/pom/pom.xml This is the parent pom from which struts-action-parent inherits, and it needs to be released prior to the Struts Action 1.3.3 test build. Changes since v1 include: - Addition

JIRA links to Subversion commits

2006-05-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
The Subversion plugin for JIRA seems to be installed, but it's not working. For example: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398085&view=rev http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2852?page=all This page says there is a properties file to edit, and I wonder if that was done for our instal

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2. The struts-cookbook-1.3.2 application allows to take a look at the Java source code of examples. The links refer to source.jsp?src=/WEB-INF/src/java/examples/simple/xxx.java, while the actual source code is located under /WEB-INF/src/exa

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/28/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There are things like references to Bugzilla. Do you remember where? I searched across struts-action and only found bugzilla links on the old release notes pages. The Struts Faces index page had a typo and wasn't building, so the old version

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-01 Thread Wendy Smoak
Sorry for the delay. I finally got 1.3.2 into test today. +1 Beta -- Wendy On 4/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality. The release plan is available

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-05-01 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My bad - fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience. I have also subscribed all committers to the 'allow' list for commits to save the moderators some time. Thanks, Brett! We also need to send the Wiki diffs to commits@ instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Standalone Tiles: Status and Call for Help

2006-05-01 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/1/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Done. It's not much to speak of, but it's a start. I checked it into sandbox/tiles-test. The lib directory is empty. It will need the following jars to run: Thanks. Which build are you using? I'd like to arrange Standalone Tiles into modu

Re: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2 Podling to Struts

2006-05-01 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/28/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having met the incubation requirements and thereby be accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2. Status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/webwork2.html [ ] +1 L

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-04-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/30/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not long after this, the moderation emails came in. For issues@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I received a couple of moderation emails for issues, (and I see someone already let them through,) but my commit message from yesterday bounced with: Hi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-04-29 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/29/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's because this was *not* a vote. It was a proposal. The +1's, +0s, etc. do not count as votes but as expressions of agreement or otherwise. That there were no -1 or -0 comments indicates that there was general concensus to go ahead. In g

svn commit: r398263 - /struts/pom/pom.xml (was: Fwd: failure notice)

2006-04-29 Thread Wendy Smoak
Commit messages are bouncing from the new list. I re-opened INFRA-780. -- Wendy -- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 30 Apr 2006 01:06:28 - Subject: failure notice To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-04-29 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/29/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Feel free to add me as moderator for all lists, I'm already one for user and dev. Thanks. And thanks to Brett Porter for what must have been the fastest response on an INFRA ticket in the history of the ASF! The lists are done: http://

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-04-29 Thread Wendy Smoak
ke sure that commits@ will be archived before we unsub it from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I assume a moderator for dev@ can do that part.) [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Thanks, Wendy On 4/25/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To make it easier to filter and sort m

[jira] Created: (STR-2852) Move the non-working integration tests to the sandbox for review.

2006-04-28 Thread Wendy Smoak (JIRA)
Build Reporter: Wendy Smoak Assigned to: Wendy Smoak Priority: Minor Fix For: 1.3.3 Move the Cactus tests for Struts EL and Struts Taglib to the sandbox. Also move the Struts Faces sysclient-app and systest1-webapp directories. (This is a webapp and HtmlUnit tests for it

[jira] Commented: (STR-2850) Add tests to confirm that example apps work

2006-04-28 Thread Wendy Smoak (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2850?page=comments#action_37247 ] Wendy Smoak commented on STR-2850: -- See also: http://www.nabble.com/-action1-Improving-our-testslong-was-Re%3A-Standalone-Tiles%3A-Status-and-Call-for-Help--p4150894.html

Re: Standalone Tiles: Status and Call for Help

2006-04-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/21/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As for the test cases, I'm not very familiar with Cactus or some other web app testing packages. So to save time, I've been testing using a simple web application and clicking through. ... I can also check my test app into the sandbox if it w

Re: svn commit: r397735 - in /struts/action/trunk/tiles/src: main/resource/META-INF/tld/ tld/

2006-04-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
James, shouldn't this be src/main/resource_s_ ? Thanks, Wendy On 4/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Author: jmitchell Date: Thu Apr 27 19:12:59 2006 New Revision: 397735 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397735&view=rev Log: making action1 src consistent Added: str

[jira] Reopened: (STR-2850) Add tests to confirm that example apps work

2006-04-28 Thread Wendy Smoak (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2850?page=all ] Wendy Smoak reopened STR-2850: -- The integration/apps-it module needs to be added to the assembly. > Add tests to confirm that example apps w

[jira] Resolved: (STR-2851) The Struts Tiles jar is missing from the 1.3.2 distribution

2006-04-27 Thread Wendy Smoak (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2851?page=all ] Wendy Smoak resolved STR-2851: -- Resolution: Fixed http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397772&view=rev > The Struts Tiles jar is missing from the 1.3.2 distr

[jira] Created: (STR-2851) The Struts Tiles jar is missing from the 1.3.2 distribution

2006-04-27 Thread Wendy Smoak (JIRA)
Smoak Assigned to: Wendy Smoak Fix For: 1.3.3 Reported by Jürgen Zimmermann 1.3.2: JAR file for tiles is missing in the distribution There is no jar file for tiles in the lib subdirectory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly

[jira] Resolved: (STR-2850) Add tests to confirm that example apps work

2006-04-27 Thread Wendy Smoak (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2850?page=all ] Wendy Smoak resolved STR-2850: -- Fix Version: 1.3.3 Resolution: Fixed > Add tests to confirm that example apps work > --- > >

Re: 1.3.2: JAR file for tiles is missing in the distribution

2006-04-27 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/27/06, Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is no jar file for tiles in the lib subdirectory. Thanks for reporting this! I'll fix the build files, meanwhile you can grab the Tiles jar here: http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/struts/action/struts-tile

[jira] Created: (STR-2850) Add tests to confirm that example apps work

2006-04-27 Thread Wendy Smoak (JIRA)
: Wendy Smoak Assigned to: Wendy Smoak Priority: Minor Simple automated tests using HtmlUnit and Cargo, to confirm that each example app deploys, starts, and displays its default page. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of

Re: tablib tests [was Re: closing and reopening jira issues]

2006-04-27 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/27/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With the move to Maven, the taglib tests were pretty much broken and > neglected. They were not neglected due to a lack of interest, but > more for technical reasons (translated -- I didn't know how to force > Maven to do what I wanted). > >

Re: Struts Action 1 Roadmap

2006-04-26 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With the build work out of the way, it is time to get on the fast track to a > GA release > of Struts Action 1.3. Here is my plan: ... > I'm willing to be the release manager for these release if no one else steps > up to the plate. If we have

Re: Pleae change JIRA permissions

2006-04-26 Thread Wendy Smoak
[moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 4/26/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I cannot currently reopen or edit JIRA issues. My profile does say I > am in the struts-developers group but that does not appear to be > enough. > > Regards, > > Sean ---

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-04-26 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/26/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am +0 for creating [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd prefer that we subscribe JIRA, Moin > Moin, and Confluence to commits@, and keep all the automatic mail in > one place. If it helps to rename commits@ to notifications@ or alerts@ > or logs@, then that w

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/25/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any chance that as you discuss this there would be a move to make dev@ not > receive all commit@ messages? Some of us (me) prefer to use RSS and forcing > the emails seems a bit heavy handed. I remember this request from the last time t

[PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-04-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
To make it easier to filter and sort messages, and to facilitate presenting the lists through alternate interfaces such as forums and RSS feeds, I propose that we do the following: * establish [EMAIL PROTECTED] and direct JIRA emails to it * unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] (svn commit messages an

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/25/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, there are three public lists. > > * user@ for helping people use the product > * dev@ for discussing changes to the product > * commit@ for logging changes to the product > > Right now, we have the issue trackers and wiki posting to dev

Re: JIRA cleanup

2006-04-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
Is it easy to rename components? Under Struts Action 1, the component 'Action' should be 'Core'. -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[action1] Commons Validator version?

2006-04-24 Thread Wendy Smoak
Should we move to Commons Validator 1.3.0 for Struts Action? -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/23/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Get Standalone Tiles really standalone, so that there are no dependencies > on other Struts code. Maybe that's happened already - I've kinda lost track. This seems to be done -- sandbox/tiles/pom.xml has no struts dependencies listed. Spe

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doesn't that conflict with the idea of making Tiles a stand-alone TLP? No. This is Struts Tiles, not Standalone Tiles. Standalone Tiles is in the sandbox, and will have a life of its own. Struts Tiles is what most of us are using. Eve

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/23/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm in the same camp on this one. I think we (SAF1) should be > providing a plugin that provides Tiles integration. In that case, should Struts Tiles be put back under Struts Action? -- Wendy --

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/23/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Agreed. Would it be possible to do this by JavaOne? Moving Tiles isn't > a huge deal, but it would make the new directions of Struts easier to > explain to users. What happens to Struts Tiles, then? I'm not sure I understand why we're holding S

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-20 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/20/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we require these snapshot plugins in our POM somehow? > I'm fine with working with snapshots, but their download and > use should be automatic. When the Javadoc plugin gets fixed, yes. For now, the released versions are working (you just don'

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/18/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We definitely need an action/src/site directory to contain > the root site.xml that others inherit, and if you can get > over the aforementioned issue, then collecting all docs > there would work for me. I moved action/core/src/site up to src/sit

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... to get the Javadoc generated for the > site, add this to action/pom.xml: > > > > > org.apache.maven.plugins > maven-javadoc-plugin

Re: [shale] Maven 2 build (was Re: [action1] Which webapp dtds to include in struts-core.jar?)

2006-04-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/15/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Craig wrote > > I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of > > these artifacts (although probably two sets ... > > Can we do this with custom assemblies? Without trying it, I don't think so, because it's more than just

[shale] Maven 2 build (was Re: [action1] Which webapp dtds to include in struts-core.jar?)

2006-04-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Separately, I'm ready (gulp!) to start moving Shale towards Maven2, and it's > recommended soure directory organizations ... as long as you > have-a-clue-about-Maven gurus promise to stand by my side and help :-). Of course. :) > I > had

Re: [action1] Which webapp dtds to include in struts-core.jar?

2006-04-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We should > also definitely include the 2.4 DTD, as that is now a popular platform. To > make the inclusion effective, though, we'll also want to make sure it gets > registered with the Digester that processes config files -- otherwise, >

[action1] Which webapp dtds to include in struts-core.jar?

2006-04-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
Do we need to include webapp-2_2.dtd in struts-core.jar? I deleted it as part of the reorganization [1], so only the webapp 2.3 dtd remains. Should we include the one for 2.4 as well? [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394264&view=rev Thanks, -- Wendy ---

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
Another one from the chat log... to get the Javadoc generated for the site, add this to action/pom.xml: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-javadoc-plugin ... (and repeat for other reporting plugins. Checkstyle? PMD?) Don mentioned wanting to get the docs in

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/14/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I spent some time yesterday looking at what's left wrt the sample apps. Thanks. :) > struts-mailreader > - good to go > > (Does the web tests work for this yet?) They're done with Canoo Webtest, right? I didn't find a m2 plugin for it,

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-12 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/12/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So can we say we have an assembly building and can restart the nightlies? All 25MB of it. :) Example: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/nightly/struts-action/ The procedure here should work the same for nightlies as releases. Yo

Re: svn commit: r393500 - in /struts/site: ./ legacy/ legacy/struts-doc-1.0.2/ legacy/struts-doc-1.1/ src/ src/site/ src/site/fml/ src/site/resources/ src/site/resources/images/ src/site/resources/pro

2006-04-12 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: wsmoak > Date: Wed Apr 12 09:39:38 2006 > New Revision: 393500 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=393500&view=rev > Log: > Reorganize Struts Site for Maven 2. There seems to be something wrong with the .fml files (in site/s

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/11/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it still do the tagging and version changing for you? I'm not sure if > I'm trust maven enough to do SVN commands quite yet. Yes. I wasn't sure yet, either. :) That's why I was the test repo finding out *exactly* what it planned to do. W

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/10/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's just about ready for 1.3.2. Since I haven't ever > released with Maven 2, I wasn't quite ready to try it against the > Struts repo without seeing it once through somewhere else. I got the the 'm

Re: svn commit: r392870 - /struts/action/trunk/apps/mailreader/src/main/resources/

2006-04-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/9/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, is this a temporary thing? Maven 2 likes to find resources under > 'resources', rather than in the source tree (meaning that's the default). > That happens to be my preference too. ;-) Right now we have some things in the source tree, som

[action1] Mailreader DAO test creating a file where it shouldn't

2006-04-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
Every time I run mvn install, I get a file called 'test-database.xml' created in the current directory. Usually current/struts/action, assuming I'm installing from the top. $ grep -r "test-database" . ./mailreader-dao/src/test/org/apache/struts/apps/mailreader/dao/impl/memory/Memo ryUserDatabaseT

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/6/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We'll get out a unified Action 1 release yet :) I think it's just about ready for 1.3.2. Since I haven't ever released with Maven 2, I wasn't quite ready to try it against the Struts repo without seeing it once through somewhere else. I'm practi

Re: [VOTE] Release the struts-parent pom v1

2006-04-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/9/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does that actually work? I figured Maven wouldn't look in the > snapshot repo for non-snapshot artifacts. If this works you have > found a useful hack ... Yes, it works. Maven doesn't know it's a snapshot repository. (Maybe you're thinkin

Re: [VOTE] Release the struts-parent pom v1

2006-04-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We need to release version 1 of the struts-parent pom: > > * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/pom/pom.xml After Martin's addition of the missing committers, and my changing once more, the struts-parent pom has b

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
FYI: I'm working in Struts EL now, moving the 'strutsel-exercise-taglib' webapp to the apps module. -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, it worked with m2 version 2.0.3. Good, but there were some regressions in 2.0.3. If you have any problems with it, here's the 2.0.4 release candidate: * http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-vote-%282%29-Maven-2.0.4-Release-p3786986.html > So

Re: svn commit: r392681 - in /struts/action/trunk: assembly/pom.xml pom.xml

2006-04-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: wsmoak > Date: Sat Apr 8 22:40:48 2006 > New Revision: 392681 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392681&view=rev > Log: > Wrap the assembly creation in the 'generate-assembly' profile, and link to it > from the struts-actio

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenanceMaven > > > I'm trying to follow the instructions here with the latest bits (including > y

Re: [VOTE] Release the struts-parent pom v1

2006-04-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maven's release process doesn't really fit without test build phase, s/without/with our -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addition

Re: [VOTE] Release the struts-parent pom v1

2006-04-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
:::sigh::: I realized that I couldn't deploy the snapshot without , so I just made a change. Please review and change your vote if necessary. * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/pom/pom.xml Maven's release process doesn't really fit without test build phase, so Brett suggested "releasing"

[VOTE] Release the struts-parent pom v1

2006-04-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
We need to release version 1 of the struts-parent pom: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/pom/pom.xml This is the parent pom from which struts-action-parent inherits, and it needs to be released prior to the Struts Action 1.3.2 test build. Because this is largely uncontroversial, I would

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/8/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On MyFaces we took a vote on version 1.0 of our master pom. ... > I think for something as trivial as a pom (which doesn't actually > require signing btw) ... They're not being terribly strict about it yet, but the README in dist/maven-reposi

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
The struts-parent pom (version 1) needs to be released: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/pom/pom.xml Do we need to have a vote? Seems like overkill, but then again this is a release artifact that will have to be signed and deployed under www.apache.org/dist, so maybe not. Meanwhile, (u

Re: [action2] Maven 2 migration

2006-04-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/8/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There has been a semi-working build for maven 2 included with WebWork > for a few months, but I'd like to make that build the default build for > action 2. Great news. :) Several of us are working on converting Action 1 to m2 as well. I

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/6/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wendy and I have converted the artifacts and webapps over to Maven 2. > They are all building with tests passing. The > assembly build works correctly, running all the builds then creating a > tarball and zip file. I have the Cactus tests for Ta

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/6/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, is it 1.3.1 or 1.3.2? > > The versions are correct. Struts Tiles has a separate build and is at > 1.3.1-SNAPSHOT, having had a 1.3.0 test build. T

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, is it 1.3.1 or 1.3.2? The versions are correct. Struts Tiles has a separate build and is at 1.3.1-SNAPSHOT, having had a 1.3.0 test build. The Struts Action jars (core, el, extras, taglib...) will be versioned together and should be at

Re: Action 1 consolidation testing (was Towards a stable 1.3 release)

2006-04-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was pleasantly surprised (after making my changes to the 4 or 5 > tests in core) to run 'mvn install' in struts/action/build/ and see > the reactor kick off and fully build/test/install all/some of SAF. > Same for compile, test, and a few ot

Re: Action 1 consolidation testing (was Towards a stable 1.3 release)

2006-04-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why 2.0.4? Building from source?!? Jeez! At least I'm not _that_ > bad ;) Because 2.0.3 had some serious regressions, and it was just as easy to grab the 2.0.4 release candidate as to go back to 2.0.2. It's the plugins I'm building from so

Re: Action 1 consolidation testing (was Towards a stable 1.3 release)

2006-04-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Notice the console outputs "FAILURE !!", which make it pretty easy to > spot ;) I notice it, I'm just not seeing it here. FWIW, I'm using a snapshot of Maven 2.0.4 and quite a few plugins built from source. Maven 2 is still a work in progre

Re: Action 1 consolidation testing (was Towards a stable 1.3 release)

2006-04-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, I'm about to start another thread related to our build...it is > (more or less) notes as I go through the various project.xml, > pom.xml, etc, etc for each of the pieces of the action1 puzzle. What do you think about moving the build fi

Re: Action 1 consolidation testing (was Towards a stable 1.3 release)

2006-04-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/5/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Weird, so your Maven thinks that the tests fail? The tests pass for me, for > the core module anyways. The tests don't fail for me, either. They're just noisy with stack traces. Don, 'maven nightly' continues to work fine here. I deleted org.

Re: Action 1 consolidation testing (was Towards a stable 1.3 release)

2006-04-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/3/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 'actual' shell script that gets run nightly via cron is not under > svn. Since we run nightlies on our zone, it is merely a copy of the > one under svn and as changes come in, I review and then update my > copy. It's probably an unnecessa

Re: Action 1 consolidation testing (was Towards a stable 1.3 release)

2006-04-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/3/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, I'm hoping the nightly build scripts will be unaffected, although > I'd kinda be surprised. Let me know any way I can help fix them, if > they are indeed broken. It looks like Craig's are okay, but not the Maven-built ones. I made a change

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >