Re: svn commit: r371806 - /struts/sandbox/trunk/archetypes/shale-blank/

On 1/23/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Wendy ... if anything ever turns me into a Mavenite, it will > probably be this feature :-). This one isn't finished yet... but the archetypes *are* nice, I agree. :) > If this is difficult/impossible to arrange with Maven I'm open

Re: svn commit: r371783 - /struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/pom.xml

On 1/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: wsmoak > Date: Mon Jan 23 18:56:45 2006 > New Revision: 371783 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371783&view=rev > Log: > Added Maven 2 build file. To install Standalone Tiles to your local Maven 2 > repository: 'mvn ins

Re: Managing Snapshots in the Maven Repo (was Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long))

We were discussing how to handle Shale's dependency on Standalone Tiles under this subject line, and I don't think it was ever resolved. Maven's snapshots aren't a good fit for Shale, which needs to depend on a reasonably stable "version" of Standalone Tiles. In another thread, Craig wrote: > Of

Re: Checkstyle (was svn commit: r360442 [1/3] )

On 1/19/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you have a chance to peek at the CheckStyle report? For Action > right now, we're seeing a brutal 4733 errors in 281 files. It dropped to 2810 errors in 281files, but I didn't look closely at what it changed. > Did you do anything else bes

Re: Checkstyle (was svn commit: r360442 [1/3] )

On 1/18/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If anyone reading this can get the GUI configurator to spit out a > conventions file (using Jalopy 1.5rc1) and send it to me, I'd appreciate > it greatly! The default settings are actually the Sun coding standards, > which the Checkstyle

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 1/17/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And we also need to remove the example of the cglib enhanced form from > apps/examples. Done in r370014. -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 1/17/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I see by the commit and wiki logs that Wendy has done the deed, > and everything is checked that going to be checked :) The release notes could use a final review; I didn't check it off on the release plan. And we also need to remove the ex

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 1/16/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any new input on #37730? > > If we are not ready to resolve the serialization issue, then we should > table this new feature for a subsequent release. Done in r369764, see comments on Bug# 37730. I resolved the CGLIB-related bugs and updated th

Removing CGLIB enhancement from struts-action

I really don't like doing this. :( I'm happy to hear alternatives. This is a proposal to remove CGLIB enhancement from Struts Action. Bug# 37730 "Enhanced DynaActionForms cannot be correctly deserialized" [0] remains unresolved and is holding up the 1.3.0 release plan. I'd like to remove this i

[shale] Maven build - groupId changed to 'struts'

Shale's Maven 1 build has had 'shale' as the groupId, leading to its artifacts landing in ~/.maven/repository/shale/. I just changed the groupId to 'struts'. If you are using the Maven build and using the artifacts in your own projects, you'll need to adjust your dependencies, for example:

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 1/13/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That CGLib extension always bugged me a bit... might that not be a > perfect candidate for the Extras package, which would serve to resolve > issue #2 as well? The idea of that dependency, even if optional (it > *is* optional, right?!?) do

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 1/12/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We might be talking past each other. > The package I'm talking about is here: > * http://struts.apache.org/struts-extras/apidocs/index.html > org.apache.struts.plugins.resources > > AFAIK, this is the only package with a dependency on Commons > R

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 1/4/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regardless, I'm thinking that we should rename the "acquiring.xml" to > "downloads.xml", since that's the usual name, and the one I should > have used in the first place. Done, so Maven will stop saying we haven't had any releases. The old acqui

download.cgi (was: Re: Redirects and .htaccess)

On 1/6/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/6/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (I also forgot to fix the file permissions on download.cgi, but no one > > reported that!) > > > That's odd. At some point, I deliberately set the

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

On 1/11/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just from my experience, I'd prefer if we didn't use the "2" > anywhere. We used "WebWork2" for a while and it really confused > things and broke up the brand. We've had much better success ever > since we actively eliminated "WebWork2" in

Re: [VOTE] Struts Scripting 1.0.1 Quality

X] General Availability (GA) > --- Better late than never. :) Minor issue: the url for the struts-mailreader jar is wrong in the generated Ant build file. -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 1/10/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As and for an alternative, I suggest we move the classes that depend > on Resources from Extras > > * http://struts.apache.org/struts-extras/apidocs/index.html > > to a sandbox Extras folder until Commons Message Resources is ready. The original

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

On 1/10/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see a point to build fences between two versions of > (presumably) the same framework. This will slow down the adoption of > 2.0/WW/Ti . There has to be _some_ way to separate the questions, otherwise every answer is going to star

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

On 1/10/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the interest of effective filtering, we should agree on a standard > subject tag for the Struts Action framework. For the Struts Shale > framework, we've been using [Shale]. So, for the other, should we use > > * [SAF 2.x] > or > * [Action 2.x

Re: Examples Webapp jars

On 1/8/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure how its happening, but when I build the struts-examples war I'm > getting two copies of the fileupload jar (version 1.0 and version 1.1) and > as well as the struts-action-1.3.0-dev.jar I also seem to have the old > version struts-co

UMLGraph diagrams (was: Re: svn commit: r367111)

On 1/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=367111&view=rev > Log: > Added a class diagram to the package description. > Thanks to Andrea Aime for help with UMLGraph and Graphviz. > > Added: struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/sh

Re: [site][maven] Maven-Generated Javadocs

On 1/2/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The package descriptions are now showing up, for example (the new one > for remoting): > <http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/shale-core/apidocs/org/apache/shale/remoting/package-summary.html#package_description> ..

Re: Redirects and .htaccess

On 1/6/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (I also forgot to fix the file permissions on download.cgi, but no one > > reported that!) > > > That's odd. At some point, I deliberately set the permissions on that file > so that I was the only person able to write to it, so that it never

Redirects and .htaccess

I wondered why some links weren't working. Oops. I had an old copy of .htaccess in my local site/xdocs, and when I published the site on 12/28 I overwrote the correct one. (I also forgot to fix the file permissions on download.cgi, but no one reported that!) I think there used to be more, but h

Re: svn commit: r366067 - in /struts: el/trunk/pom.xml extras/trunk/pom.xml taglib/trunk/pom.xml tiles/trunk/pom.xml

On 1/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: wsmoak > Date: Wed Jan 4 19:23:01 2006 > New Revision: 366067 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=366067&view=rev > Log: > Added experimental Maven 2 build files: struts-el, struts-extras, > struts-taglib, struts-tiles I m

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 1/4/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regardless, I'm thinking that we should rename the "acquiring.xml" to > "downloads.xml", since that's the usual name, and the one I should > have used in the first place. Sounds fine to me. (I think I was the last person to publish struts-site;

Re: [Shale] Maven build stops

On 1/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I ran the default, i.e just maven. I get the following output (never mind the > norwegian): > > E:\Apache\Shale\build>maven > __ __ > | \/ |__ _Apache__ ___ > | |\/| / _` \ V / -_) ' \ ~ intelligent projects ~ > |_| |_\__,_|\_/\___|_

Re: [Shale] Maven build stops

On 1/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The nightly has a reference to maven-javadoc-plugin-1.8-SNAPSHOT.jar in the > dependency. The latest available one from > http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/plugins/javadoc/ is > maven-javadoc-plugin-1.7.jar. This means that the

Re: Maven nightlies site

On 1/3/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is the README file here: > > http://svn.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/ > > in SVN, or do I just edit the live file directly? I see that it still refers > to 'core' instead of 'action', and various other obsolete names. I think you just edit i

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 1/3/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, what do we need to do to get the nightly builds running for the other > Apps? > > Right now, we have blank running, but that's it. /svn/struts/current/build $ maven nightly was failing when it tried to copy struts-mailreader.war from /apps/

Re: [site][maven] Maven-Generated Javadocs

On 1/2/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll check with the Maven team and see if there's a fix. Easier than I thought. :) It was reported and fixed in May (MPJAVADOC-59). The Javadoc plugin has not been released since then, but there's a recent snapshot in

Re: [site][maven] Maven-Generated Javadocs

On a similar topic, Maven is not picking up the 'package.html' files for Shale. It looks like the m1 Javadoc plugin is unable to deal with the relative paths over to the source code. (If I put a project.xml file in shale/core-library, it works fine.) I'll check with the Maven team and see if the

[shale] 'required' validator

The 'required' validation rule looks like it should call the CommonsValidator.isSupplied method, and then use the 'errors.required' message in messages.properties. Instead, when a form with a missing required field is submitted, a breakpoint set in the 'isSupplied' message is never reached, and th

Re: [site][maven] Maven-Generated Javadocs

On 12/30/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/shale-core/apidocs/index.html > > However, the Javadoc generation does not seem to be picking up the " > overview.html" file (containing text for the overview description page). This is done; it inv

Mailreader example app

As Frank mentioned, there seems to be a class missing from MailReader. In r354948 a reference to oas.apps.mailreader.actions.MainMenuAction was added to struts-config.xml, but I don't see the class anywhere. (Ted?) Thanks, -- Wendy ---

Volunteers page

While editing the volunteers page, I noticed that both Steve Raeburn and James Turner appear twice. Was the intent of r280836 to move them to the emeritus section? -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio

Removing Ant build files from Struts Action

Is anyone using any of these files in struts/action/trunk ? build.xml build.legacy.xml build.properties.sample build.properties.sample.lib build.properties.sample.repo build-all-clean.bat.sample The build.xml file was added for Gump [0] which is now using Maven. It'

Re: Action 1.3, Shale 1.0 <-- FileUpload 1.1?

On 12/27/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that FileUpload 1.1 is out, do we want to update Action 1.3 and Shale > 1.0 to use it? > > If so, could someone clue me in on which places I need to update to do that? > I found 16 project.xml files that reference it, +1 -- Half of those

Re: 404 Error for DEV-Documentation

On 12/28/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was moved over to struts-taglib: >http://struts.apache.org/struts-taglib/dev_validator.html ... and that page has some broken links as well. You might want to use the docs from the 1.2 branch for now: http://strut

Re: 404 Error for DEV-Documentation

On 12/28/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I am on *users* doc (e.g. > http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/building_view.html#vali > dator) > and I click on link "see the Developers Guide" > (ref to > http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/dev_val

Re: Missing dependency

On 12/27/05, Andres Paz Sampedro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I saw you added a pom.xml file. Is it now possible to build struts > using maven 2? That would be great, I was really struggling with that > last week and since I had never used maven before I thought it was a > problem on my side. You

Re: Missing dependency

On 12/26/05, Andres Paz Sampedro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to compile struts/action in Eclipse. After getting > dependencies using the "get-deps" target Eventually the word "target" sinks in, and I realize you must be using the Ant build! If so, that build.xml file is generated fro

Re: Missing dependency

On 12/26/05, Andres Paz Sampedro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to compile struts/action in Eclipse. After getting > dependencies using the "get-deps" target I still get errors in 2 > classes: > DynaBeanInterceptor > DynaActionFormClass > Both have dependency on classes from the > ne

Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale 1.0.0 Quality

rary Javadoc generation problem is fixed in the trunk (r358730) -- it was only happening with JDK 1.4. Instructions to help users correct the problem, and a hotfix with the missing documentation, are available here if needed: http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Shale100 --

Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale 1.0.0 Quality

On 12/5/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Once you have had a chance to assess to quality of this build, please > respond with a vote on the quality: The core-library API docs are missing from the 1.0.0 build. Other than that, I don't see anything that hasn't already been reporte

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 12/12/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we think the problem is the tests, rather than the code, then I > don't believe that the issue should affect whether we release. That's what I think. I've had 1.3.0-dev in production since mid-September and the app uses most of the Struts-E

Re: Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction

On 12/18/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're using ChainAction (I'm not a fan of Dispatch* ;) with Struts 1.2.8, > where we don't have the luxury of the parameter mechanism for mapping > actions to commands. While having this available in 1.3.x would slightly > ease migration for

Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction

On bugs 33202 and 33996 there is a proposal to remove ChainAction and DispatchChainAction. If we're going to do it before 1.3, now is the time. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33202 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996 I started a trivial example app to try o

Bugzilla config

I added a comment on Bug 33202, and it looks like the email only went to Joe. (The bug is assigned to him.) Shouldn't the emails always go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For ad

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Scripting 1.0.1 release plan

On 12/12/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure, I'm not against building the example using only Maven (despite my > personal adversion ;), and if this patch does the job, go ahead and commit > it. Done. -- Wendy - To

Re: svn commit: r356434 [1/4] - in /struts/shale/trunk/tiger: ./ nbproject/ nbproject/private/ src/ src/conf/ src/java/ src/java/org/ src/java/org/apache/ src/java/org/apache/shale/ src/java/org/apach

On 12/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: craigmcc > Date: Mon Dec 12 16:46:02 2005 > New Revision: 356434 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=356434&view=rev > Log: > Initial checkin of a JavaSE 5 based layer on top of standard Shale > functionality. ... > + > Add

Unit tests in struts-action failing w/o struts.apache.org

With struts.apache.org offline, I'm getting some test failures from oas.config.TestModuleConfig in struts-action: Testcase: testCustomMappingParse1_1(org.apache.struts.config.TestModuleConfig): FAILED Parsing threw exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect Testcase: test

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Scripting 1.0.1 release plan

On 12/7/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the plan is to continue using a hybrid build scheme, then I would > have to vote +0. (Since I think I'm the one who added that part as a quick fix...) Don, see if this does what you need it to: http://people.apache.org/~wsmoak/struts-scri

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 12/6/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Cactus tests for EL are still a problem, but I haven't gotten > anywhere with them. I'm planning to try again this weekend. I looked at this again, and I still don't see anything wrong with the tags. Unfortunat

Re: [OT] IDE Haters (Was Re: Logging in MailReader 1.3)

On 12/9/05, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I definitely agree that a lot of Java > users are at a point where they don't know what a class path is, much > less the importance of ClassLoader hierarchies. It's unfortunate that > "using an IDE" gets associated with that. There's "usi

Re: [OT] IDE Haters (Was Re: Logging in MailReader 1.3)

On 12/9/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Cooper wrote: > > My turn to date myself, along with Frank. ;-) > > No wories, we're not women :) (Oh boy, I think I see Wendy getting > ready to fire off a reply - LOL!) (You think I'm _that_ easily offended?!) I'm just enjoying

Re: [OT] IDE Haters (Was Re: Logging in MailReader 1.3)

On 12/9/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bad news though... check this out... > > > The system is out of resources. > Consult the following stack trace for details. > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError > + > | Building nightlies Struts Site > | Memo

Re: how can i use tabs in struts. please give me a reply

On 12/9/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And, do please keep questions like this on the Struts User list. (Sorry! That's twice this week I haven't noticed which list a mesage was posted to. :/ ) -- Wendy - To unsubs

Re: how can i use tabs in struts. please give me a reply

On 12/9/05, Sony Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can I use tabs in jsp pages in my struts application. Is there is > any tab container stuff. Can anyone help me please. I use Struts Menu: http://struts-menu.sourceforge.net/ Struts Layout is another option: http://struts.application

Re: Chain questions

On 12/8/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you talking about dispatching to a chain, instead of > dispatching to a method by reflection? If that's the case, you could > do it using the commons-chain Lookup Command, although it might be > more elegant ... Yes, I was looking for the

Chain questions

I need help with Commons Chain and Struts in combination. I've read the Commons Chain docs, including the cookbook, which uses a CommandAction in the Chain version of mailreader. Then in Extras we have ChainAction and DispatchChainAction. I assume I'm supposed to use one of those instead of incl

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

Coming back around to the pending 1.3 release... It looks like Commons Resources is coming along well, thanks to Niall, Rahul and Christian. Laurie, can we please have an update on Bug 37730 and the Enhanced DynaActionForm addition in general? 37301 is also still open. Thanks! The Cactus tests

Re: bug 7817,please help

On 12/6/05, osama awad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am a struts developer who is working on a struts 1.0 application, I am > having a problem that html:hidden tag not invoking setter on form bean, this > bug is reported on > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-dev

Re: Struts Scripting _test_ build

On 12/3/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since this is my first Struts release, I created a test build [1] for > the Struts Scripting 1.0.0 release that I'd like some feedback, por > favor, from the distribution gods (I'm looking at you Martin, Niall, and > Wendy) :) If no one sees anyth

Re: svn commit: r353807 - in /struts/scripting/trunk: maven.xml project.xml xdocs/README.xsl xdocs/index.xml xdocs/navigation.xml xdocs/source-guide.xml

On 12/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: mrdon > Date: Sat Dec 3 19:51:00 2005 > New Revision: 353807 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353807&view=rev > + Don, before you tag it, can you please add compile to these two? The project.xml file

Re: PDF documentation

On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This looks really good. The only gripe I would have is that it would be nice > if we could adjust the column widths in the tag attribute descriptions. As > it is now, it looks like the space is distributed evenly between the > columns, but it w

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/3/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 11:19 PM -0700 12/2/05, Wendy Smoak wrote: > >tiles-core-0.2-20051203.01.jar 02-Dec-2005 21:56 82K > >tiles-core-0.2-20051203.060733.jar 02-Dec-2005 22:07 82K > >tiles-core-0.2-SNAPSHOT.jar

PDF documentation

Somewhere on the website conversion plan is "PDF version of the site". I've been trying it occasionally, reporting issues and working with Lukas and Arnaud on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to fix the problems. Here's a preview of the Struts Tiles doc that Greg has been working on: http://struts.apache.org

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/2/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In short, it builds a JAR with a timestamped version (like > struts-core-20051106.203359.jar) and then makes a copy of it with the > name struts-core-SNAPSHOT.jar So for my team, if we are depending on > a nightly build, we use the timestamped

Re: svn commit: r351883 - in /struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/webapp/WEB-INF: entities/profile-open.xml entities/subscription-add-page.xml entities/subscription-add.xml webtest.xml

On 12/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351883&view=rev > Log: > WebTest.xml > * Add test against duplicate subscription hosts. > * Include reference to use case step in test descriptions. > * Include remaining tests as TODOs Thanks, Ted!

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/2/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is, using "maven jar:deploy-snapshot", you can build and deploy > a SNAPSHOT library independent of the in the POM. > Similarly with jar:install-snapshot, dist:deploy-snapshot, etc. > > In short, it builds a JAR with a timestamped version

Re: svn commit: r351781 - in /struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src: java/org/apache/struts/apps/mailreader/resources/ApplicationResources.properties webapp/Registration.jsp webapp/WEB-INF/entities/registe

On 12/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: husted > Date: Fri Dec 2 09:52:55 2005 > New Revision: 351781 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351781&view=rev > Log: > * Registration.jsp - Give submit and reset buttons names so that they can be > invoked by automatic

Re: [VOTE] Confirm Shale 1.0.0 Test Build Release Plan

On 12/2/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also looking at the build.xml, the > dependency download also includes three Commons components not mentioned on > the website or in the release plan (Codec 1.2, Collections 3.0 and > FileUpload 1.0). Those three are for MyFaces: http://

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/1/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we could publish nightly (or intermittent) snapshots to the > Apache repository (http://cvs.apache.org/repository/) I think that > the hope is to avoid people treating it like an ibiblio mirror (i.e. > we would only publish snapshots a

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/1/05, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I forgot about the TLD. I haven't even looked at that yet. As for > the website, there's really not one. I personally don't want to > maintain two versions of the doc right now: the struts-tiles and > Standalone. So I'm doing doc in struts-t

Re: [VOTE] Confirm Shale 1.0.0 Test Build Release Plan

On 12/1/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to > release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the > 1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vote > confirming it: > >

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/1/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing we should probably do is talk a bit about snapshots during the > intermediate time period while the codebase is unstable. It doesn't make > sense to me to publish tiles-core-SNAPSHOT.jar artifacts to ibiblio.org, for > example, s

Re: svn commit: r350142 - /struts/action/trunk/src/java/org/apache/struts/action/DynaActionFormClass.java

On 11/30/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There was a thread somewhere recently (I'm afraid I don't recall where) > about going in the opposite direction, for a good reason that I don't > recall. I'm hoping someone else here saw the same thing and has a better > memory. ;-) IIRC, the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Target tickets to milestones and use as roadmap

On 11/30/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And a big thank you for the +1's :) Any more? +1 (And for automating release notes/change logs as much as possible.) -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts BSF to Struts Scripting

On 11/27/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Wendy - I took care of the rest. Should be ready for the > release, as soon as I can get folks to +1 my release plan... :) ... and I published the site to pick up your changes. If you want to update it: /svn/struts/current/scripting/ $

Re: [shale] mailreader question

[moved from [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 11/25/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll see if I can find it and change the MailReader app, then. > > It'd mean extending either AbstractFacesBean or AbstractViewController on > the backing bean classes. I took the methods out of mailreader

Re: Maven pom for 1.2.8 (was: Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsRelease128" by NiallPemberton)

On 11/24/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I've fixed the 1.2.8 project.xml. Niall, I know you've been busy with Resources. :) Is it okay to upload this to java-repository? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/projec

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36794] - Enhance DynaActionForm and sub-classes to allow normal property access in JSPs

On 11/26/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ted, where do I edit the release notes for 1.3.0? The only likely > candidate looked to be > >action/xdocs/userGuide/release-notes.xml > > but that looks like it's the 1.2.8 release notes... Are 1.3.0 release > notes being aggregated some

Re: home page of struts lists related projects....

On 11/26/05, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Idea is that one would not have to set up a project, that's boring. Exactly. :) It's mvn archetype:create ... mvn idea:idea<-- pick your IDE ... and open the project. > Key is that time be spent that choices be as simple as possib

Re: home page of struts lists related projects....

On 11/26/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (I also thing an IDEA HOWTO would be a great addition for > the IDE section.) I started a page on the Wiki when I noticed how out of date the IDE guides were (last summer.) I think they've seen some updates since then, but the Wiki page is sti

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts BSF to Struts Scripting

On 11/25/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure, go ahead and do that, as I think we got a good enough response. > Thanks for the help! The site is now at http://struts.apache.org/struts-scripting (with redirects from /bsf and /struts-bsf). I moved struts/bsf/trunk to struts/scripting/t

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT][shale] Struts Shale 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1 Available

On 11/25/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll focus on the use-cases app. ... and now I'm wondering whether I should have touched it, given that you've already done all the testing! Let me know if you want me to rever

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts BSF to Struts Scripting

On 11/25/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Struts Scripting/BSF project seems to be called different names in > different places. I propose we change the project to Struts Scripting > before we release 1.0. BSF, although more accurate, is obscure and > might be obsolesced when the sc

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT][shale] Struts Shale 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1 Available

On 11/25/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In preparation for the initial milestone release of Struts Shale 1.0.0, a > release candidate has been made available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~craigmcc/struts-shale-1.0.0-rc1/

Re: svn commit: r348065 - in /struts/shale/trunk/build: README.txt project.xml

On 11/22/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 100 character messages seem to be coming from the [tar] task. Can the > plugin be told to use the Maven equivalent of Ant's longfile="gnu" > attribute? site:sshdeploy: [tar] Building tar: E:\svn\struts\current\shale\build\target\s

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "ShaleRelease100" by CraigMcClanahan

On 11/25/05, Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following page has been changed by CraigMcClanahan: > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease100 You might want an 'A3.5' to upload the artifacts to the Apache internal Maven repository. That will allow Maven users to easily test the r

Re: Reminder: 'core' will be renamed 'action' on Wednesday evening

On 11/25/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had this problem before the rename but forgot to mention it. > When I run > maven build-all > from struts-current/build/ > > I doesn't complete unles I add "LICENSE.CheckStyle" and > "struts_checks.xml" to the bsf/build folder in my working co

Re: Reminder: 'core' will be renamed 'action' on Wednesday evening

On 11/25/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had this problem before the rename but forgot to mention it. > > When I run > > maven build-all > > from struts-current/build/ > > I doesn't complete unles I add "LICENSE.CheckStyle" and > "struts_checks.xml" to the bsf/build folder in my worki

Re: Maven pom for 1.2.8 (was: Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsRelease128" by NiallPemberton)

On 11/24/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Part of the problem is that the Struts 1.2.x uses ant for the build - not > sure if the maven one works properly or not. > > The ant build doesn't have xalan at all - just the xerces (xml-apis) > dependency. I believe the xml-apis is an inh

Re: Maven pom for 1.2.8 (was: Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsRelease128" by NiallPemberton)

On 11/24/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following url is to check out the 1.2 branch: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH I see what happened... I had it checked out with 'core' in the URL, and didn't realize until now that it was th

Re: Maven pom for 1.2.8 (was: Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsRelease128" by NiallPemberton)

On 11/24/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the best option would be to fix whatever maven 2 issues there are > with 1.2 Branch project.xml and use that for the pom. > What's the URL for the 1.2 branch? (And where should I have been able to find it without asking?) Thanks

Re: Reminder: 'core' will be renamed 'action' on Wednesday evening

On 11/23/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - rename core to action > - modify svn:externals on 'current' Would help to change all the dependencies, wouldn't it? I've checked that in, and 'maven build-all' works. I also created the dire

Re: svn commit: r348644 - in /struts/shale/trunk/mailreader/src: java/org/apache/shale/examples/mailreader/ApplicationResources.properties web/mainMenu.jsp web/registration.jsp

On 11/23/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steps to recreate: > Login > Edit Registration > Add Subscription<-- looks good > Edit Subscription <-- screen is wrong > Delete Subscription <-- screen is wrong I click Edit, I get the expected edit screen, I click Save... Back

Re: svn commit: r348644 - in /struts/shale/trunk/mailreader/src: java/org/apache/shale/examples/mailreader/ApplicationResources.properties web/mainMenu.jsp web/registration.jsp

On 11/23/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you run the mailreader app, do you see the same issue with edit > subscription as I do (mentioned on a previous commit)? No problems here... maybe the move to MyFaces 1.1.1 fixed it? -- Wendy --

Re: Reminder: 'core' will be renamed 'action' on Wednesday evening

On 11/23/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/23/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No objections to the renaming of 'core' to 'action' were raised in > > the vote thread, so I'm still planning to do it this even

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >