Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-22 Thread Rich Feit
Ted Husted wrote: On 8/22/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: p.s. In some ways, JSF is a direct competitor to ASPX in ASP.NET, which is still figuring out the whole navigational-controller thing. In the rare event that I imagine myself to be on a "side", in a "battle", I consider my

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-22 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/22/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > p.s. In some ways, JSF is a direct competitor to ASPX in ASP.NET, which > is still figuring out the whole navigational-controller thing. In the > rare event that I imagine myself to be on a "side", in a "battle", I > consider myself to be on the s

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-22 Thread Rich Feit
I consider the "JSF-is-hopeless" megaphone to be hype also. :) I really do think JSF has great potential, especially as tools vendors latch onto it. What I object to is the "JSF-is-here-Struts-is-dead" hype. My personal belief is that JSF itself -- the technology that was described in David

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-22 Thread Dakota Jack
There is nothing new about JSF. In net terms it is old news On 8/21/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/15/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In general, I agree with the sentiment that there's a lot of hype in > > this arena, and not all of it is easily backed up. But the

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-21 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/15/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In general, I agree with the sentiment that there's a lot of hype in > this arena, and not all of it is easily backed up. But the Struts > community has always been a bit hype-adverse, no? Once upon a time, people were saying the same sort of thi

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-21 Thread netsql
Ted Husted wrote: Once upon a time, people were saying the same sort of things about custom tags that people now say about JSF. It's too new, it's too fat, scriplets are faster. I've started coming arround, due to Faclets and some other minor improvments (if I was ever to do an HTML site aga

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-20 Thread Dakota Jack
rote: > > >FYI > > > >http://jroller.com/page/dgeary > > > > > > > > > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:44 AM > >>To: Stru

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-15 Thread Rich Feit
st 11, 2005 8:44 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: JSF vs. Struts I personally think all this exploration is a Very Good Thing(tm). There are a vast number of different ideas out there as to how a modern application framework should be built. Mistakes have been made over the years,

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-11 Thread Dakota Jack
framework, and if it meets your needs, give it a shot. > >>Just as not every web application is the same, neither is their needs > >>for a framework. > >> > >>Don > >> > >>On 8/10/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>

RE: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-11 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
FYI http://jroller.com/page/dgeary > -Original Message- > From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:44 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: JSF vs. Struts > > > I personally think all this exploration is

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-10 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
? -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance EdgeTech, Inc. http://www.edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-10 Thread Dakota Jack
jmitchtx > > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Skype: jmitchtx > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 200

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-10 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
I figured it was something like that :) Would have been a bit of a bombshell to drop matter-of-factly otherwise :) I'm reminded of a scene from Babylon 5 where Londo and Vir are conspiring to kill the emperor and they are talking about after they poison him, depending on how fast the poison a

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-10 Thread Don Brown
Haha, no I meant "undergo", darn it :) Don Frank W. Zammetti wrote: Don Brown wrote: Of course, there will be Struts classic still for a long time to come which will continue to forego active development. Is that actually what you meant to say Don? Isn't that saying that Struts Classic

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-10 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Don Brown wrote: Of course, there will be Struts classic still for a long time to come which will continue to forego active development. Is that actually what you meant to say Don? Isn't that saying that Struts Classic is in maintenance mode only from here on out? I understand people are ex

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-10 Thread Don Brown
; > - Original Message - > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MyFaces Discussion" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 7:29 AM > Subject: Re: JSF vs. Struts > > > currently the are *forking* :) >

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-10 Thread James Mitchell
- Original Message - From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MyFaces Discussion" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 7:29 AM Subject: Re: JSF vs. Struts currently the are *forking* :) Struts Ti see here: http://ww

RE: JSF vs Struts

2004-07-21 Thread Amanpreet Singh
ing List Subject: Re: JSF vs Struts On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:25:13 -0400, Rick Reumann wrote: > > We're thinking about using Flash forms for some things. Will they plugin > nicely to JSF? > Hooking up the output side of that should be a piece of cake ... write some components th

Re: JSF vs Struts

2004-07-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
; To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: JSF vs Struts > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:25:13 -0400, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > We're thinking about using Flash forms for some things. Will they plugin > > nicely to JSF? > > &

RE: JSF vs Struts

2004-07-21 Thread Hookom, Jacob
way they've tackled the same problems. Thanks, Jacob Hookom -Original Message- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:28 AM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: JSF vs Struts The MyFaces open source project is currently becoming

RE: JSF vs Struts

2004-07-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
L PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 5:28 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: RE: JSF vs Struts > > > The MyFaces open source project is currently becoming an > official Apache project through the Apache Incubator. > MyFaces has some custom com

RE: JSF vs Struts

2004-07-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
al Message- > From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:13 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: JSF vs Struts > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:25:13 -0400, Rick Reumann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >

RE: JSF vs Struts

2004-07-21 Thread James Holmes
/ -Original Message- From: Hookom, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:27 AM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: JSF vs Struts Would there be any interest in starting an Apache JSF implementation with a component repository for the open source

RE: JSF vs Struts

2004-07-21 Thread Hookom, Jacob
12:13 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: JSF vs Struts On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:25:13 -0400, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We're thinking about using Flash forms for some things. Will they plugin > nicely to JSF? > Hooking up the output side of th