Hi,
In the ongoing discussion concerning printing a matrix (at
https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/120), I noticed that
castAsScalar was introduced to the language as a mistake. It has been
replaced by as.scalar but castAsScalar has been kept around until now for
historical reasons.
gards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---04/21/2016 05:33:56
> PM---Hi, In the ongoing discussion concerning printing a matrix]Deron
> Eriksson ---04/21/2016 05:33:56 PM---Hi, In the ongoing discussion
> concerning printing a matrix (at
>
>
Hi,
I created a draft for the May 2016 SystemML podling report that is due this
Wednesday. Please provide feedback if you'd like anything updated. For PMC
members, if the issue is private related to the project, please use the
private mailing list for discussion.
Thanks!
Deron
Sy
I submitted the May SystemML podling report to
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2016. If any further changes are
needed today, please let Mike Dusenberry, Luciano Resende, or myself know,
since we have write access to the Apache wiki.
Deron
Hi,
Here is a list of Justin Mclean's findings from our last incubator release.
We need to verify that all potential issues have been addressed before our
next release.
I will go over the list and figure out which have been fixed already.
Deron
-- Forwarded message --
From: Just
Hi,
I believe the js and css issues have been addressed (see
src/assembly/source/LICENSE) for the src packages. The standalone license
also features the js/css licenses but I believe this is not necessary
because the documentation is currently not packaged into any artifact
except the src distribu
Welcome and congratulations Glenn Weidner and Faraz Makari!
Thank you for all your great contributions to the project! It has been
great working with both of you on SystemML.
Deron
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> I would like to welcome both Glenn Weidner and Faraz M
Here are Justin Mcclean's finding from our last release (0.9.0):
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00482.html
I think most issues raised by Justin have now been resolved.
Could someone look at [4] and [8] to see if we need to cite anything in the
LICENSE or NOTICE
ng source code / libraries into their
> LICENSE/NOTICE files.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---05/12/2016 04:34:03
> PM---Here are Justin Mcclean's finding from our last release (0]Deron
> Eriksson ---05/12/2016 04:34:03 PM---
Hi,
I'm wondering what would be a good way to handle JCuda in terms of the
build release packages. Currently we have 11 artifacts that we are building:
systemml-0.10.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-inmemory.jar
systemml-0.10.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar
systemml-0.10.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sour
ks,
>
> Niketan Pansare
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---05/18/2016 10:51:17
> AM---Hi, I'm wondering what would
Hi,
Currently the DML algorithm scripts are written to the base directory of
the following artifacts:
systemml-0.10.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
systemml-0.10.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-inmemory.jar
systemml-0.10.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar
systemml-0.10.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-standalone.jar
t; IBM Almaden Research Center
> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar*
> <http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar>
>
> Deron Eriksson ---05/18/2016 01:15:36 PM---Hi, Currently the D
Hi,
I've looked over all the release packages and the NOTICE and LICENSES are
looking much better. I believe we have addressed all of the issues brought
up during the 0.9 release and have fixed many additional issues.
Are we about ready for our next release, 0.10? I believe it would be nice
for P
Thank you!
Deron
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've looked over all the release packages and the NOTICE and LICENSES are
> > looking much better.
un our full performance
> testsuite (at least up to 80GB) but this could be done on the RC too.
> Thanks guys for taking care of the release again.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Luciano Resende ---05/18/2016 06:06:46
> PM---On Wed, May 18, 20
int('hello world');"
-exec hybrid_spark
will generate the following error rather than executing:
Error: No main class set in JAR; please specify one with --class
Deron
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PR162 and PR167 have been merged. Thank
BTW, I am investigating. I believe the issue is caused because of my update
to add an assembly (for the proper LICENSE and NOTICE) for the main jar.
Deron
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Luciano, before starting the RC, I think I found an issue. Th
20, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > BTW, I am investigating. I believe the issue is caused because of my
> update
> > to add an assembly (for the proper LICENSE and NOTICE) for the main jar.
> >
> > Deron
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May
Hi Luciano,
The fix is tested and merged. I believe we should be good to go now to cut
an RC.
Deron
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Thank you Luciano. I have a fix. I will test with your latest update to
> the Apache parent pom and then merge.
>
> Deron
Hi,
We have a test suite of 5000+ tests but I don't think we have a standard
way of testing the distribution artifacts once they are built. I just did
some 'hello world' tests of the various distribution artifacts to be sure
that I could run a 'hello world' DML script using the various
distributio
0.10.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar and SystemML.jar identical,
> and we should drop one of these artifacts.
>
> Regards,
> Berthold Reinwald
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com
>
>
> -Deron Eriksson wrote
Hi,
It might be nice to formalize what needs to be done when reviewing a
release candidate. I don't mean this as something that would add
bureaucracy that would slow us down. Rather, it would be nice to have
something as simple as a basic checklist of items that we could volunteer
to check. That w
Should there be a branch-0.10 on GitHub? The current pom.xml on master is
referring to the 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT.
Deron
gt;
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Should there be a branch-0.10 on GitHub? The current pom.xml on master is
> > referring to the 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT.
> >
> > Deron
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
10:38 AM, Frederick R Reiss
wrote:
> I'd say wait until we have a final 0.1.0 release candidate, then branch. I
> don't believe anyone has any open PRs that need to go into the trunk right
> away.
>
> Fred
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---05/23/
candidate, and another session
> would be thse items below with a bit more info on how ro execute them...
> And then people could claim these or respond to the vote with the things
> they have tested.
>
> Btw, for the build ones, we should recommend building with an empty maven
> repo
Hi,
Is there a way to make sure that print statements are synchronized while
developing a DML script? By this, I mean is there currently a way to ensure
that the order of print statements in a DML script are the order in which
they are displayed to standard output?
Deron
tter to just ensure consistency natively.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On May 23, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm wrote:
> >
> > a simple worka
Hi,
The release candidate validation checklist needs to be easy to modify by
SystemML committers/contributors. As a result, it should probably take a
'Wiki' form. This raises the question of where it should go? Seems like the
options are:
1) md file in the project itself (not a wiki, not easy to
Hi,
I noticed that not all the artifacts at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
have md5 checksums.
Also, the previous release (see
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/systemml/systemml/0.9.0-incubating/)
featured sha1 checksums but the current r
In my opinion, I don't think restarting the vote is needed for this.
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that not all the artifacts at
> >
> &
asy as possible for people to
update it.
Deron
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The release candidate validation checklist needs to be easy to modify by
> > S
Hi,
Checklist on a jira sounds good to me. Sorry if I misunderstood the
previous comment.
Deron
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, wrote:
>
> > Another possibility would be to create a new JIRA issue for each release
> > (candidate) an
and maybe:
? systemml-0.10.0-incubating.pom.md5
Also, the previous release had sha1 checksums. Do we need those too or is
that overkill?
Deron
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> &g
Hi,
I created a release checklist JIRA for the release candidate.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-708
Please feel free to add items, remove items, modify items, or post
validation results.
Thanks!
Deron
May 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Checklist on a jira sounds good to me. Sorry if I misunderstood the
> > previous comment.
> >
> > Deron
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Lucia
I may have found an issue with the standalone (uber) jar LICENSE and
NOTICE. Investigating.
Deron
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:47 PM, wrote:
> +1
>
> I ran scripts in Jupyter and Zeppelin using both the Scala and Python
> MLContext APIs in order to test our notebook integration.
>
> One thing to
Hi Luciano,
10 of the 11 artifacts look good to me for LICENSE and NOTICE (as far as I
can tell they reflect the artifact contents). However the standalone
uberjar (systemml-0.10.0-incubating-standalone.jar) does not have the
correct LICENSE and NOTICE (one of my commits in the last week must have
That sounds good to me.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Luciano,
> >
> > 10 of the 11 artifacts look good to me for LICENSE and NOTICE (as far as
> I
> > can tel
+1
Deron
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM, wrote:
> Great, I created SYSTEMML-710 to track this. Would be good as a simple
> starter task as well.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On May 25,
==
> > > == Apache Incubator release policy ==
> > > =
> > > Please find below the guide to release management during incubation:
> > > *http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html*
> >
Hi,
On OS X during development, I usually run SystemML using an Eclipse debug
configuration that uses DMLScript as the main class.
I tried doing the same thing on Windows, and when I do this, I see the
following winutils.exe exception:
16/05/27 12:01:54 ERROR util.Shell: Failed to locate the winu
.path=\src\test\config\hadoop_bin_windows\bin
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---05/27/2016 12:14:34
> PM---Hi, On OS X during development, I usually run SystemML usi]Deron
> Eriksson ---05/27/2016 12:14:34 PM---Hi, On OS X during develop
+1, but please note following findings:
1. Is the *source-release.zip artifact unnecessary, since we have
src.tar.gz and src.zip artifacts? Also, it contains the Hadoop binaries.
So, it can't be used as the "source release" artifact.
2. No standalone uberjar is present (I am happy with this since
+1
>
> Tested the main JAR with a PySpark Jupyter notebook.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:16 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
Hi,
We need to put together a page of release notes for the 0.10.0 release
(similar to http://systemml.apache.org/0.9.0-incubating/release_notes.html).
Could SystemML committers and contributors please respond to this thread
with what they feel are the major updates/improvements in this release?
* Random data generator for ALS
>
> i) Various fixes
> - Dozens of fixes for diverse issues, fix pack for 0.9 release
>
> j) Build, documentation, examples
> * [SYSTEMML-551] Enhanced jmlc javadoc
> * [SYSTEMML-484] Build javadoc jar
> * [SYSTEMML-468] Contributing to Syste
I would like it if we move towards having a version of the complete
documentation for each release. The documentation for each release can be
published on the main website, similar to what Apache Spark does:
http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html
By the way, this will mean that when we do a re
It might be nice to create a new Jenkins job that we can manually modify
and start to test specific test failures like this in the Jenkins
environment. We could go into 'configure' and set the test to execute (mvn
clean test -Dtest=MyTest, or something like that).
Deron
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1
How do I print a value in a frame?
Suppose I have the following 2x2 csv file:
one,two
three,four
I read it in with:
M = read($Min, data_type='frame', format='csv');
(1)
If I try:
print(M[1,1]);
I get:
ERROR: null -- line 1, column 0 -- print statement can only print scalars
(2)
If I try:
ix toString().
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---06/29/2016 01:23:41
> PM---How do I print a value in a frame? Suppose I have the foll]Deron
> Eriksson ---06/29/2016 01:23:41 PM---How do I print a value in a frame?
> Suppose I have t
Hi Luciano and others,
How do we update the "SystemML Project Incubation Status" page at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/systemml.html?
I noticed at http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html that we are listed as
having not elected any new committers to the project since its
establishment as a
Hello Garvit,
You might also find "Contributing to SystemML" to be useful:
http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/contributing-to-systemml.html
Deron
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Nakul Jindal wrote:
> Hi Garvit,
>
> A good place to get started is to look at the SystemML JIRA site:
> ht
PM, Matthias Boehm wrote:
> quick correction: I meant to say, option 2 because you have a frame of
> strings (option 3 is only possible if you have numeric/boolean data). Btw,
> it's fixed now - so please go ahead and give it a try. Thanks.
>
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [ima
+1 for quick release cycle
+1 for 2.0 support
+1 for simplified release artifacts
Simplifying the release artifacts could potentially halve the time it
requires for me to validate a release, so I am definitely in favor of that.
I really like the idea of having essentially one or two artifacts that
3/changes>
>
> Changes:
>
> [Deron Eriksson] [SYSTEMML-832] Upgrade Scala version and prune
> dependencies
>
> --
> Started by timer
> [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
> [EnvInject] - Preparing an environment for
I would definitely be in favor of moving to Spark 2.0 as early as possible.
This will allow SystemML to be current with cutting edge Spark. It would be
nice to focus our efforts on the latest Spark.
Deron
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:05 PM, wrote:
> I'm in favor of moving to Spark 2.0 now, meanin
Here is a draft I created for the August monthly report. Feedback welcome.
Deron
-
SystemML
SystemML provides declarative large-scale machine learning (ML) that aims at
flexible specification of ML algorithms and automatic generation of hybrid
runtime plans ranging from single node, in-memor
t;
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---08/02/2016 05:39:53
> PM---Here is a draft I created for the August monthly report. F]Deron
> Eriksson ---08/02/2016 05:39:53 PM---Here is a draft I created for the
> August monthly report. Feedback we
l features since 0.10 (specifically frames, the prototype
> Python
> > DSL, and the new MLContext) and it would be good to have a Spark 1.6
> branch
> > of our version tree where we can backport the debugged versions of these
> > features if needed.
> >
> > I would reco
etailed code comments and suggestions to try out can be made in the
> branch commit instead of this mail thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Glenn
>
> Deron Eriksson ---08/05/2016 02:02:10 PM---I am open to the idea of
> supporting Spark 2 and Spark<2 concurrently if someone shows th
Hi Sourav,
Great question. Work is currently being performed by Alok Singh (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-860) regarding this topic.
Deron
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Sourav Mazumder <
sourav.mazumde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any work going on to call Sy
+1
Continuing to support Spark 1.4/1.6 for now while setting a cutover date
for 2.0 sounds like a great idea. This allows for the creation of a really
solid release for 1.x, which greatly benefits SystemML users using Spark
1.x. It also gives these users a general date that they can use to plan
mig
sounds like a good plan to allow us to continue supporting the Spark
> 1.x line in the short term, with a plan for moving to Spark 2.x support
> soon.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberr
Luciano,
Yes, I like the idea of the next release being SystemML 1.0. Given the
significance of the version, it would be a good idea to not rush the
release so that we can make this a truly great release.
Deron
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at
+1
Deron
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Luciano,
> >
> > Yes, I like the idea of the next release being SystemML 1.0. Given the
> > significance of the version, it wou
Wow, these updates really look incredible! Thank you Jeremy Anderson for
this amazing contribution!
Deron
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> Jeremy Anderson has been so kind to spend few days on a new design for the
> Apache SystemML website, and this is now attached to
eremy. The website looks awesome !!
>
> Deron/Luciano: Do you think we should change the 'Get Started' link to
> point to one of the beginner's guide rather than point to the Download
> page ? Alternatively we can add a link in Download page instructing what
> the u
ception. I've made a change and I'll run the test suite and verify the
tests work and then commit a hotfix if that fixes it.
Deron
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:01 PM, wrote:
> See <https://sparktc.ibmcloud.com/jenkins/job/SystemML-
> DailyTest/495/changes>
>
> Chan
Feel free to not expose MatrixObject and FrameObject. I am fine with that.
The only reason MatrixObject and FrameObject are exposed is that I felt if
the new MLContext API did not expose them, there would be complaints from
existing committers that these objects were not available. I can't see
anyo
ixObject/FrameObject and
> other internal structures from API level, remove the
> BinaryBlockMatrix/BinaryBlockFrame
> types, and try to consolidate the various Matrix/Frame objects as well as
> replicated compilation chains.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hid
+1
Deron
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Niketan Pansare wrote:
> +1 for 0.11 release
>
> Thanks
>
> Niketan
>
> > On Sep 19, 2016, at 10:39 PM, Acs S wrote:
> >
> > I would agree to most of the part except that there would be need to
> have SystemML support on Spark 2.0 for "Spark As A Serv
+1
Great idea, Berthold. Adding a roadmap to the project will be a very
welcome addition to the project, both for users and developers.
Deron
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Berthold Reinwald
wrote:
> In the spirit of other Apache projects, we should publish a Roadmap page.
> The page shoul
Hello Luciano,
I would prefer doing fixes on master for the website. However, I do not
feel strongly about this issue.
Anyone else any thoughts?
Deron
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> I have created a PR [1] porting the Jekyll based website to use the new
> design co
-1, SYSTEMML-963 and SYSTEMML-967 are potential needed license fixes. Glenn
and I should have these issues addressed by tomorrow.
Deron
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Matthias Boehm wrote:
>
> > -1, unfortunately, SYSTEMML-964 and SY
s been tagged as v0.1.
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Luciano,
> >
> > I would prefer doing fixes on master for the website. However, I do not
> > feel strongly about this issue.
> >
> > Anyone else any thought
The SYSTEMML-963 and SYSTEMML-967/-971 issues have been resolved and are no
longer blocking the release.
Deron
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> -1, SYSTEMML-963 and SYSTEMML-967 are potential needed license fixes.
> Glenn and I should have these issues addres
Hi Luciano,
I am definitely in favor of fixing these javadocs. I created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-842 two months ago to
address this issue.
However, there are so many problems with the javadocs that I think
addressing this should probably be broken down into separate java pa
uld prefer to leave the empty (automatically generated)
> javadoc comments - at least in eclipse, this provides a better overview of
> parameters and exceptions.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---09/30/2016 12:35:30
> PM---Hi Lucian
I believe that for an Apache release, our test suite is supposed to pass
(although I'm pretty sure random test fails can be ignored).
See 2.1 of Release Check List here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
"2.1 Build is successful including automated tests.
The ex
be ok, but it's a community decision.
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > I believe that for an Apache release, our test suite is supposed to pass
> > (although I'm pretty sure random test fails can be ignored).
> >
&
The 0.11.0 rc3 artifacts are located at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.11.0-incubating-rc3/
I see the following artifact:
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip
I do not recognize this artifact. Can anyone tell me what this artifact is?
Can it be removed?
Der
I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of 3
and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I have
no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such as
scalability.
I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of th
Hi Nakul,
+1
I think having some clear characteristic to distinguish operations that
only operate locally is a great idea. Otherwise, how would a user know that
these operations are only local and not distributed? Adding this naming
convention for local operations sounds reasonable to me so that w
x27;t expecting
> > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> >
> > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> >
> >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of
>
Hi James,
Thank you for the great questions! I think some of the issues that you are
experiencing are usage issues from a failure on our part to convey this
information clearly. The good news is that a tremendous amount of effort
and focus is currently being directed towards fixing our website and
Would it be acceptable for a user to receive a log warning if the user uses
an operation that is currently only implemented for single node? My concern
is that there is an expectation for operations to be distributed with
SystemML, and if an operation is not currently distributed, the user needs
to
+1 sounds great to me too.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, wrote:
> +1 that sounds great to me.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers
> wrote:
> >
>
+1. Great idea!
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Renee Mascarinas
wrote:
> +1 This is a great idea! It would be nice to invite the community to write
> about their experiences with SystemML as well. Maybe we can start with
> Medium and in the future, do a youtube vlog :]
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 20
Hi Luciano,
Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
Deron
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares
wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> Initial page:
> > - What's the intention of the section just abov
Hi Luciano,
Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone ahead
and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
Deron
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
>
Hi,
I mentioned here that the "source-release.zip" is not something I
recognize:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00960.html
Is this mystery artifact created by the script to deploy release candidates?
It should definitely be removed in my opinion.
Deron
On S
2016, at 10:55 PM, Glenn Weidner
> wrote:
> > >
> > > In my opinion it can be removed.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Glenn
> > >
> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/20/2016 01:36:04 PM---The 0.11.0 rc3 artifacts are
> > located at: https://di
If there are no other volunteers to help with the report, I will help. If
anyone else is interested in writing the monthly report, I would also be
very happy to provide any assistance and guidance. Contributing to the
project monthly report is a great way to become familiar with ASF
procedures and
Hi Jeremy,
I think moving forward with visualization and design is a great idea,
especially since I feel there is currently momentum after the great design
refactoring of the project website. Mike and Jeremy, please let me know if
there's any way in which I can help.
Deron
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016
Thank you Felix! I really appreciate it!
Deron
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:01 PM, wrote:
> I will help you, Deron!
>
> Felix
>
>
> Am 31.10.2016 20:26 schrieb Deron Eriksson:
>
>> If there are no other volunteers to help with the report, I will help. If
>> any
t reduce this confusion by dropping our
number of released artifacts, as addressed by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926.
Deron
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I mentioned here that the "source-release.zip" is not something
Hello,
Here is a draft of the November monthly report due tomorrow that Felix and
I put together. Feedback is welcome.
Deron
SystemML
SystemML provides declarative large-scale machine learning (ML) that aims at
flexible specification of ML algorithms and automatic generati
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here is a draft of the November monthly
101 - 200 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
